My inaugural piece for The Huffington Post, published this past Friday, discussed the political calculus and shrewdness of President Obama's endorsement of an incumbent Senator and 2010 candidate from my home state of Colorado.
In my accompanying bio (which you can still view as it stood then by clicking my photo at the top of any of my pieces), I disclosed what I considered to be pertinent aspects of why I was writing about issues relevant to my state. Namely, the fact that I spent my formative years there, I covered national politics extensively in the capital city a year ago, and my broader experience in journalism gives me insight into tackling both the policy and political considerations of the burgeoning and increasingly relevant Western political region.
I also acknowledged my political leanings, in the form of my disclosure that I am currently employed by a Democratic-leaning polling/strategic consulting firm. In that I am a registered Democrat is the only way in which such information is relevant.
Four days after my piece was published, David Sirota, a self-proclaimed journalist himself, questioned my motives for writing about a candidate for public office considering my affiliations with a private organization that, among other things, helps elect candidates to public office.
As a former president of a daily college newspaper, let me be abundantly clear about one thing: I understand conflicts of interest for journalists better than most, I recognize where the lines between honest commentary and propagandizing lie. I have come nowhere near crossing those lines.
Let me say that again: any and all opinions you read under my byline are solely mine, and in no way reflect the opinions or views of the company by which I am employed.
Furthermore, never have I -- nor will I -- write about any candidate that the organization I work for calls a client. I will not write about the opponents of clients, either, as to avoid even as much as approaching a potential conflict of interest.
During my college years, I was privileged enough to lead a newspaper institution for a year, presiding over an institution encapsulating nearly 137 years of history. While I wrote and edited, my primary duty was to uphold the traditions, reputations, and integrity of that organization. I did not take that task lightly then, and as I apply my words to new pages, I continue to respect the tenants and ethics of journalism to the greatest degree.
Of Mr. Sirota's swipes, the only one that carried with it any shred of validity was the one calling my piece "overwrought and almost laughably clichéd." As a reader, he, like everyone else, is entitled to that viewpoint.
But to suggest anything otherwise -- especially that I have in any way written with the intention of promoting any interests of any clients or potential clients -- fails to recognize the seriousness with which I take this profession that he himself calls himself a part of, as well as the flimsiness of his attack.
The crux of my piece considered the standing of a decision made by the President of the United States, and tangential -- at best -- was the connection to any other organization. That I, an admitted Democrat, would share views with like-minded men and institutions is no surprise. In fact, it's to be expected, and I think most readers understood that. Mr. Sirota was not one of them.
It was my intention in crafting my biography to, again, highlight insights I have into the issues I will discuss, not to confusingly conflate my own views with those of the organization where I work. Unfortunately for everyone, Mr. Sirota has tried, and failed, to do that here.
Perhaps next time, he will better consider that with my well-disclosed shared ideology with more than one of the piece's subjects, I, as a writer who shares many of the principles discussed in his piece will, naturally, support those principles in the wider world. Not always -- and certainly never in an entry that bears my name -- is any conflicted interest involved.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.