iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Marcia D. Greenberger

GET UPDATES FROM Marcia D. Greenberger
 

Senate Minority Block Equal Pay for Women

Posted: 06/05/2012 6:24 pm

Today the Senate had a chance to stand up for the American value of an honest day's pay for an honest day's work by voting "yes" on the Paycheck Fairness Act. Despite widespread public support for this common-sense bill and a majority of the Senate in support, it fell short of the votes needed to defeat a filibuster.

I have been working to combat wage discrimination for many decades, and have seen first-hand the injustices caused by the loopholes in the nearly 50-year old Equal Pay Act. Since 1963, when the Equal Pay Act became law, the wage gap has narrowed by only 18 cents. American women who work full time, year-round are paid, on average, only 77 cents for every dollar paid to their male counterparts. Although the difference in pay between men and women has not changed much in the last half-century, what has changed is that women are fast becoming breadwinners in a majority of American families. Even when controlling for factors like time out of the workforce to care for children, years of work, hours worked and job tenure, women are still paid significantly less. That's why, now more than ever, we need the Paycheck Fairness Act.

The Paycheck Fairness Act would help combat wage discrimination by strengthening the Equal Pay Act in critical ways, including by providing incentives to employers to pay women fairly and by preventing employers from retaliating against women and men for discussing their pay with each other.

Paying women fairly is crucial to achieving economic security for women and families -- hardly a distraction from the pressing economic issues facing our nation, as opponents claim.

Paying women less hurts moms, dads and their children. In the toughest economic climate in recent history, working moms are trying to put dinner on the table for their families with one hand tied behind their backs. In these hard times, a median wage gap of $10,784 per year means families have less to spend on basic necessities.

Here's what closing that gap would mean for families this year:

• Four months' supply of groceries = $2,447
• Five months' child care = $2,958
• Three months' rent and utilities = $2,424
• Five months' health insurance premiums = $1,550
• Four months' student loan payments = $1,117
• Five tanks of gas = $287

Almost fifty years after the Equal Pay Act was signed into law, there ought to be universal agreement that paying women less -- simply because they are women -- is unacceptable. Equal pay for equal work is no longer up for debate, and making the equal pay laws truly work should not be up for debate either. Every woman in the country should expect -- and demand -- no less.

 

Follow Marcia D. Greenberger on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@nwlc

FOLLOW WOMEN
Today the Senate had a chance to stand up for the American value of an honest day's pay for an honest day's work by voting "yes" on the Paycheck Fairness Act. Despite widespread public support for thi...
Today the Senate had a chance to stand up for the American value of an honest day's pay for an honest day's work by voting "yes" on the Paycheck Fairness Act. Despite widespread public support for thi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:50 PM on 07/23/2012
While I generally agree with the sentiment, I object to the abuse of statistics in this article:

"The pay gap has narrrowed 'only' 18 cents" - deliberately phrased to make it sound pitifully small, until you realise you're talking about cents in the dollar - The other numbers in your article imply the pay gap started at 41 cents; so the pay gap has narrowed by 43%, representing a 30% increase relative to men. Misleading at the very least.

Your article also implies that the pay gap is entirely explained by differences in like-for-like jobs - "Even when controlling for factors like....women are still paid significantly less" is conspicuously absent of hard numbers. While the other factor differences are not okay, they will not be tackled by this bill.

Bending the truth is not acceptable just because your cause is just.
02:13 PM on 06/07/2012
What exactly does this law do that the laws do not already cover?
02:11 PM on 06/07/2012
Firstly, we already have an equal pay law. This just opens the door for more lawsuits. Plain and simple. Here's the thing... If a woman does a better job than a man, I'm going to pay her more. I want to keep employees who are good. If she doesn't, why should I not be able to pay the male more? If you want equal pay, go work for a union where it doesn't matter, and there is no opportunity for merit. Sorry.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:28 AM on 06/07/2012
The Wage Gap Myth is still being peddled?
11:23 AM on 06/06/2012
Men and women should be paid the same for the same job - no brainer. If you disagree I don't know what year or world you should be living in, but it's not mine and not here and not now.
10:27 AM on 06/06/2012
What right does the government have to interfere with what employers pay their workers? If I think that Jim or Jill is the best salesman/woman on the planet why can't I pay them like it? Under these news laws wouldn't I have to prove that the reason wasn't because they were a man/woman. It has been illegal for 50 years to pay more because of gender anyway. Do more laws make it more likely or less likely for employers to hire people? Unemployment is the biggest problem we face right now. Anyone who proposes more laws governing employment right now should be kicked out of office.
09:26 AM on 06/07/2012
Read the article. they're not talking about merit pay or paying some people more than others based on their job performance. It's about equal pay for equal work performance. As it is now, women don't get equal pay for equal work performance a lot of the time. The 50 year old law you speak of is full of loopholes which is why women still only average 77% of what men do for equal job /perfomance. Of course, senate minority leader Mitch Mconnell complained it would only reward plaintiff lawyers, and cost business more money. According to his twisted logic, we shouldn't have any civil rights laws or laws at all because it creates litigation costs to prosecute and defend people when crimes are committed . So let's make everything legal right Mitch? But I bet he would run to the most expensive lawyer he could find if the people decided to drop his pay to $5.00/hr. (which is still more than he is worth), and pay other congressman what they get now. As for the cost to his business buddies. They don't have to spend more on payroll, they just have to divide it equally, meaning the men would have to make a little less, and women a little more so that everyone is equal. The employer would pay the same total for payroll. Who elects people like this time after time ? I can't believe any intelligent, informed woman would vote for him.
07:49 AM on 06/06/2012
Instead of equal pay for women, why not equal pay for men: $.77 on the $1.00
03:02 AM on 06/06/2012
I love how the people that sponsor the bill don't post the actual bill online. (does anyone have a link to the actual bill? Really I see people talking about the bill, I see info-graphic links but I cant find a copy of the actual bill?) FAIL, it doesn't exist, you all have no idea whats in it so stop talking.

Its a dumb idea anyways. Only a moron (or pandering crooked politician) would vote for something like this.
11:35 AM on 06/06/2012
actual link to the act to read and it's details. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.3220:
11:39 AM on 06/06/2012
Annd printer friendly version;
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/C?c112%3A.%2Ftemp%2F~c112y3ZxAX
10:04 PM on 06/05/2012
If men with equal qualifiations and equal responsibilities were paid less than a woman in the same position, do you think the men should be entitled to equal pay? Of course you do. Mr McConnell's response that this law would result in more lawsuits is utterly idiotic. Of course an employee should be entitled to file a lawsuit if he or she is performing an identical job and is being paid less. That's the foundation of our country! Equal pay for equal work. DUH? Those Repubicans who voted NAY on the Equal Pay bill should be ashamed!
03:06 AM on 06/06/2012
No one is entitled to anything, pay is determined by your employer and if you have a problem with it then get a new job.

If you don't want an employer then go start your own business.

If you want to collect welfare then move to California.

Shameful that you would want the government to basically negotiate a pay raise in a private contract for you.

Shame on you for basically throwing every idea about how the American economy works out the window with such a "Appeal to the people" and "Name calling" argument.

Clime back into your hole. Prostitution is legal in Vegas if you need money too.
07:31 AM on 06/06/2012
Nice misogyny and a red herring all in one. The question is stopping discrimination in pay by gender, not the government negotiating your pay. The same job should expect the same pay range landing somewhere based on education, training and skillset rather than race, gender, sexual orientation or even something you choose like religion.
09:11 PM on 06/05/2012
The GOP has made it's Agenda clear for all willing to see: keep Women barefoot (by limiting educational opportunities, pregnant (by limiting access to family planning) and dependant on a man (by making it acceptable to pay women pennies on the dollar).
10:21 AM on 06/06/2012
You think this because they don't want even more laws making wage discrimination illegal when it has been illegal for over 50 years? Do you reach these conclusions yourself or just think exactly what you are told to think?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:31 AM on 06/07/2012
You wrote, "The GOP has made it's Agenda clear for all willing to see: keep Women barefoot (by limiting educational opportunities".

There are more women than men in college, conclusively verifying discrimination against men in college admissions.
06:57 PM on 06/05/2012
why on earth would anyone oppose this...
10:23 AM on 06/06/2012
Lets see gender based wage discrimination has already been illegal for 50 years. Our current economic problem is unemployment and you don't really encourage employment by passing more laws that let the government look over the shoulder of employers. I could go on from there, but figured that was enough to get you started.
09:16 PM on 06/11/2012
...and most of this act is just amending the fair labor and standards act because it is insufficient, which is why women are still ILLEGALLY getting paid less purely based on gender (not education, experience or merit). Funny how everyone is talking about how bad the economy is and ignoring that all these women getting paid less negatively effects the economy. Seems to me republicans are more interested in taking away rights and freedoms than improving the economy.