More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Margarita Alarcon

Margarita Alarcon

Posted: April 7, 2010 11:29 AM

Ladies in White

What's Your Reaction:

People, in general, have to be entitled to protest, disagree, and feel at liberty to complain. Whether these individuals, with something to complain about, wear one particular form of garb or another, and whether they carry daisies, signs, or gladiolas is of no difference. This said, it is my humble opinion that the self proclaimed Ladies in White, of the Cuban counter revolution, should be allowed a space where they may complain about whatever and whomever they deem appropriate. Just as long as they, and the people they encounter along the way abide by rules of civility.

Protests have been common place for ages. All over the world, groups of people and organizations go through a standard process before staging any kind of march, protest or manifestation. Usually, the process includes applying for permits or licenses by which city or town governments, or the police, issue authorization. After authorization, these groups or individuals are allotted a date, a timetable, and a space where in they may do all the protesting they desire.

In the early 1990s I recall ultra right wing Cuban Americans from the New Jersey area protesting my father's presence in New York City, Cuba's role at the Security Council in the UN, and our nation's rational view (pretty much unique in those days), regarding President Bush Sr.'s invasion of Kuwait. Those protestors organized themselves and marched from one end of Lexington Avenue, starting a little below 38th street, all the way up towards East Harlem. They stopped short of reaching the upper upper East Side because it is a known fact in NYC that the Cuban American community of NJ takes the Dominican community of Washington Heights, the Boricuas of Spanish Harlem, and the African Americans of Harlem very seriously. Those social groups would always organize a counter march in favor of the Cubans.

In a previous post I mentioned that Cuba has more than enough to protest about and more than enough to get out in the media. The husbands of these Ladies in White have been accused of being sponsored by a foreign government by using the funds allotted to Cubans on the island. These funds are intended to create a "social opposition" within the so called "independent civil society," and to "identify the adequate means in order to put a quick end to the Cuban regime and organize the transition."

Funds during the Bush Jr. administration rose from 3.5 million yearly to 20 million and continue at that level today. These ladies, whose husbands have been sentenced to prison terms for being accused of acting on behalf of the interests of a foreign government logically have as much right as the next person to be annoyed. They will of course want to make their feelings known, even when members of their families were caught red handed. They have the same right to protest as the Cuban government does. They have the right to take punitive action against nationals working at the bequest of the United States- which coincidently is gravely punished and prohibited by the US itself.

So, let the protests begin. Let the Cuban government allow for them to take place, by granting these ladies a permit to do so. Of course, with proper police security to warn off any onlookers who deem it appropriate to heckle, push, shove, or whatever aggressive lime lighting attitude may play about.

I then would request that the foreign press, Amnesty International, and the rest of the political and non political organizations out there, cover the much less publicized protests of the thousands of Cubans on the island who want an end to 50 years of economic, political, cultural and scientific punishment. Or end the acts of sabotage and terrorism that the island and all of the people outside of the island have been subject to for the past 50 years. This is including but not exclusive to acts such as the murder of Carlos Muñíz Varela, a 26 year old Cuban American shot and killed in San Juan Puerto Rico. Or multiple bombings in the city of Miami, against the places of work of individual's hoping to reconcile with the government on the island. Or acts of sabotage, like the downing of a Cuban civilian aircraft with 73 passengers on board.

More to the point, these Ladies in White protest their husband's incarceration and they want them home. There is a lesser known group of ladies in Cuba, not because they have less reason or passion, but simply because they get less coverage and demand less attention.

This other group of ladies is smaller in size and they too have reason to protest. They do not wear white and they do not carry flowers. They carry the conviction of their truths and the truths of their husbands. More importantly, the truth of an entire nation - including that of the infamous Ladies in White.

These are the wives, mothers, and daughters of the Cuban Five. Five men imprisoned for the past decade in the United States for fighting the same acts of hatred which the Cuban nation has been dealing with for the past 50 years. They did not act on behalf of a foreign government. They were not in the United States to topple the government there, or "take steps directed at training, developing and strengthening of the opposition and civil society." They were there to help protect both the people of Cuba and the people in the US who believe that a better reality across the straights is possible.

 

Follow Margarita Alarcon on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Maggichu

 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:43 AM on 04/09/2010
And please do not blame others for the poor economy that you have, for the inneficient goverment, that can barely covered the neccesity of its people. Don't tell me now that the US embargo is what has brought you all these problems, it's your system that encourages fraud, laziness, inefficiency and stagnation.
You are a joke. I am positive that if you'd have been just a "regular citizen" and not Alarcon's daughter, you wouldn't have the right to post your opinion in any newspapers, not even the Gramma or Juventud Rebelde. So yes, go back to your palace little princess. And stay there, but believe me, it will not be for long.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Margaritta Alarcon
Havana based media analyst
03:24 PM on 04/12/2010
Interesting. But you see, I dont post in Granma or Juventud Rebelde. I post here, on Huffington. which as far as i am aware is published in the United States and although it is possible that in spite of me being the "joke" that you consider, my family ties may have played a role in that, but i tend to think that my views and my command of the English language play a stronger role in HP publishing my work.
Sorry if i have offended you, I wasnt talking economics but dont forget ENRON; the Stock Market crash and Bernie Madoff when reffereing to, how did you put it? Ah yes, "fraud, laziness, inefficiency and stagnation."
10:14 PM on 04/08/2010
Margarita,
I actually get delighted when I read things like this, it makes me realize that there is actual democracy in the country in which I live right now. I wonder whether I (or anyone else in the Island) could write a column like this and see it published in a Cuban newspaper like Granma or Juventud Rebelde, pointing out the problems with the Cuban Revolution and its policies. We both know the answer: absolutely not. There is only one acceptable line of thought in Cuba which can be printed, and anybody who goes against the dogma, suffers stigmatization. There is absolute censorship in the Island, and if there is any hope for the Cuban people to be free from the dictatorship of the Castros, those who live outside who are Cubans as well, have a duty to support them moraly and with the necessary printed material for them to carry their civic duties.
10:07 PM on 04/08/2010
One weak point in your argument is that you are equating Cuban political prisoners with those men that actually came to the United States to spy here. You could try to stretch it and equate the 5 Cuban here with Allan Gross (the American that is being held in Cuba for distributing 'sophisticated equipment') and say that the guy down there trying to help the Jewish community get connected to the Internet, was actually spying on the Cuban government, and therefore, the Cuban authorities have a right to put him in prison. But you are not comparing these "5 Heroes" to someone like Allan Gross, you are comparing them to actual prisoners of conscience that are Cuban nationals, that according to you are willing to go to jail for more than 30 years because they are receiving funds from the United States. First, this is a completely preposterous idea: not even if those 20 million dollars were going to one person, would they go to prison their entire lives to get the money.

I do support money going to support pro-democracy groups in Cuba, because I think it is important for them to have access to information the Cuban government denies them; and because since they are unable to be employed in the Island (most jobs are only for 'revolutionaries') I don't want them to starve because they decide to think differently.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Margaritta Alarcon
Havana based media analyst
05:49 PM on 04/09/2010
Marianeli, first of all, i dont compare the Cuban Five to the other prisoners in Cuba, if that is what you understood then Im sorry to have misinformed you. What i do do is compare the RIGHTS that both the Ladies in White and the relatives of the Cuban Five have to protest.

Disstoriting information is not by any means a useful tool in any battle.

And I personally know more non revolutionaries than i care to admit who hold perfectly good jobs in Cuba, they may not be Party members, -and that no longer is an impediment to getting a decent and at times more than decent job - but they definitly have very good jobs.
12:36 AM on 04/16/2010
Non revolutionaries are most (at least most of the ppl my own age in Cuba), and yes, most of them have a job. However, none of them act on their beliefs, none of them are willing to say anything out loud. They know the repercussions all too well. I was obligated to go to Elian's demonstrations if I wanted to stay in La Lenin, because as the director said, our school was 'only for revolutionaries.' Now, I was not a revolutionary, but still didn't act on my beliefs cause I wanted to get an education. That's the price we have to pay to get an education in Cuba. We don't pay with money there, we pay with our complete devotion to the system.
10:58 PM on 04/07/2010
Margarita and I agree on one point only, that the Cuban 5 are political prisoners. We differ in that I believe that the Ladies in White are not any different from the families of the Cuban 5. Adriana and Olga and the mothers of the 5 as well and the ladies in white are totally within their right to fight for the release of their loved ones. The Cuban 5 have solid support from many people within the United States and the committee is not shy about collecting money for their support within the US. So please, no double standards. All political prisoners deserve their freedom to disagree, assemble without fear of reprisal and to live and to prosper. I believe that the more we are able to perceive our similarities rather than our differences we will have a chance to be all Cubans once again. At this point we are all bitching aimlessly and without a course. I think that you should encourage your dad to aim for a more pluralistic society that allows for individual differences and dissent. I am fighting very hard within my means to free the Cuban 5. I wish that you would do your part as well within the island to free others who are unjustly imprisoned as well.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laurenc
10:20 AM on 04/08/2010
One crucial difference I believe: at last count, the U.S. is spending $20 million a YEAR to undermine the Cuban government (at a time when we are desperate for teachers and police and parks here at home--shameful waste of taxpayer funds!) and to publicize Cuban dissidents.

Second difference; the "ladies in white" have husbands incarcerated in their own country not in a foreign country. We have millions of similar Americanwives mourning the incarceration of their men in U.S. jails and nobody hear gives a ---about them.

Finally, this babble about a "pluralistic society" is code for neoliberal return to barbarism, such as we see all over the world when "the market" is king; check out Haiti or any of hundreds of countries where the elites own and run everything.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laurenc
05:21 PM on 04/07/2010
I am thrilled to hear from a blogger who is a patriotic supporter of her country.
Americans desperately need to hear from you, Margaritta. Welcome!! Please ignore the nasty types who will post attacks. They are simply ignorant because there is no education about your country here. I look forward to further discussions of the many areas where we can learn from you!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Margaritta Alarcon
Havana based media analyst
05:29 PM on 04/07/2010
Thank you. DOnt worry i dont frighten easily, its been a long and winding road and there is a lot more to trek!
10:59 PM on 04/08/2010
Margarita, I am glad that you are writing. It will be enjoyable to read your posts as well as Yoanis. The beauty of blogging in the US is that you have nothing to be frightened about. We do not have Actos de Repudio to worry about. It would also be nice if the population in Cuba would have access to blogs like Huffpost and Progreso Weekly, but they don't. Perhaps you can also suggest to your dad that it would be nice for the population in Cuba to have free access to the internet.
Best wishes,
06:33 PM on 04/07/2010
Laurenc, if you refer to me, you should know that I am Cuban; born and raised there; probably more educated about the Cuban reality than you. Patriotism does not relate to government in any way. Although I do agree with the main point of this post about the right of these ladies and anyone to protest, I have to disagree about other aspects because I think they misinform people like you that don't know much about my country.
02:03 PM on 04/07/2010
Everything you mention about the Cuban Government having the right to take punitive action against nationals working at the bequest of the United States would be understandable if Cubans had another way to fund their civil discontent; and you live in Cuba and know that Cubans can only work for the government for pennies; anything else is illegal. So, who are you kidding here?? When Fidel organized his revolution where did he get the money for it?? This is post is pure misinformation.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Margaritta Alarcon
Havana based media analyst
02:57 PM on 04/07/2010
When Fidel was funding his revolution he was funded by others on the island, by his own funds (he comes from a well off family) and from the work of individuals outside of Cuba who were on his side. Neither he nor the other members of the 26th of July Movement received funding from another government. If the Ladies in White or any one else for that matter gets money, placards, what ever from private individuals that is another story entirely, but it is know adn documented well that there is a specific groups of funds allotted by the US governement through specific agencies to disrupt the situation in Cuba. the question you should be asking yourself is "Why?" and "For whos benefit?"
05:00 PM on 04/07/2010
What alternative do they have?? Where else to get funds if Cuban can not travel, can not own enterprises/business, can not even effectively communicate to the outside world?? Besides, it is yet to be proved the funds the American Government puts aside for this kind of activities come with any chains.
05:13 PM on 04/07/2010
Also, no one knows where the money for the revolution came from.