iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Marge Baker

Marge Baker

GET UPDATES FROM Marge Baker

Issa Meets His Match on the Oversight Committee

Posted: 06/ 7/11 05:07 PM ET

Rep. Darrell Issa took the reins of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee with one apparent goal in mind: to reward the big corporations that have loyally funded his congressional campaigns. He set off on a seek-and-destroy mission, scouring the law books for rules, regulations, consumer protections and environmental safeguards that might slightly hamper the profits of his favored industries -- no matter the economic, environmental or health costs to ordinary Americans.

Even before the gavel was passed in January, Issa sent a letter to over 150 corporations, asking them which inconvenient rules they wanted scrubbed from the books. The corporations and special interests didn't hesitate to respond to Issa's request, and since that time we have witnessed a steady string of disappointing behavior from the Oversight Committee -- including hearings orchestrated to blast the EPA, shroud corporate donors in secrecy and amplify the Wisconsin Governor's assault on public workers. Issa's faithful deputies have added their own tantrums to the campaign, including Rep. Patrick McHenry's embarrassing attempt to call Elizabeth Warren a liar just this past week.

Fortunately, on the Oversight Committee, Issa has met his match. Ranking Member Rep. Elijah Cummings has been relentless and effective in pushing back against Issa's extreme agenda, and his efforts have gone a long way to preserving whatever shreds of credibility the committee has left.

When Rep. Issa orchestrated an endless parade of energy industry executives and lobbyists to implore the committee to slash environmental safeguards, expand drilling permits and preserve gaping loopholes for controversial hydrofracking loopholes -- all while preserving their $4 billion taxpayer subsidies -- Rep. Cummings produced a damning report exposing the role of speculation in driving up gas prices. Operating by careful economic analysis instead of by political axe-grinding, Cummings proposed an investigation that has the potential to truly benefit Americans -- both in terms of short-term prices at the pump and our long-term energy future.

When Rep. Issa changed Committee policy to treat Obama Administration officials as witnesses sponsored by the Democrats on the committee -- even if they hadn't been requested by them -- and by requiring Issa's personal approval of all minority witness requests, Rep. Cummings challenged this "dangerous policy," and admonished Issa for his arrogant disregard for the minority's right to call witnesses of their choosing. And he joined Rep. Gerry Connolly's call for the Administration to refuse to send any more witnesses until this offensive policy is rescinded.

When Rep. Issa decided to reinstate the practice of issuing unilateral subpoenas in order to embark on witch hunts against the Obama administration, Rep. Cummings condemned that abuse of power, along with many of Issa's predecessors. These subpoenas, he pointed out, were last used during "an era of the committee's history when it was criticized for abusive practices," and Rep. Cummings fought to keep the committee focused on the pressing needs of the American people. While Issa, the co-chair of the Congressional Transparency Caucus, tries to shroud his campaign donors in secrecy, Cummings reiterated his support for stricter transparency requirements for government contractors' political spending in an effort to help Americans understand where their tax dollars really end up.

When Rep. Issa's henchmen have made unfair and politically motivated attacks against committee witnesses, as did Rep. Patrick McHenry during his dishonest attacks aimed at Professor Warren, Rep. Cummings quickly intervened and established himself as the adult behind the dais.

It's unfortunate that the Oversight and Government Reform committee, under Issa's leadership, has functioned thus far as a soapbox for corporate special interests and partisans interested in attacking the Obama Administration. Yet there remain good people who are committed to restoring that body to its role as an important guarantor of governmental transparency and responsibility that is truly accountable to the American people. Ranking Member Cummings is leading the charge.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kyleewonder
04:48 PM on 06/08/2011
I hope they are planning on continuing the space program because by the time these people are done, we are going to need a new planet
whochi
Liberals think 2 + 2 = Bush
04:15 PM on 06/08/2011
Issa and Cummings deserve one another; the American public deserves neither of them.
Both are just doing the usual dog and pony show for their respective contributors and special interests and there is nothing new under the Sun here.
If the democrats take back the House, the only thing Cummings and Issa will do is swap seats - nothing of substance will change.
04:15 PM on 06/08/2011
This article omits the fact that Issa's Committee has received testimony from scores of groups (not just Big Corporations) concerning the host of hobbling regulations that in many cases have virtually forced small businesses to close, while providing dubious benefit to the public. And of course, major examples of regulatory high handedness have cropped recently in which the EPA unilaterally decided to label Carbon Dioxide a pollutant, after the Democrats had been unable to accomplish this in Congress; and the NLRB's unprecedented lawsuit alleging that Boeing has no right to choose in which state to build a new facility.
12:00 PM on 06/08/2011
Democrats do an admirable job of keeping up the appearence of an opposition party. Sadly, they are, in fact, being sponsored by the same corporate interests as the Republicans. Why else would they do nothing, NOTHING, to stop the runaway special interest agenda enacted by the Republican House?
01:29 PM on 06/08/2011
When the American People want to have a voice in Washington, they will find a way to pay for political campaigns. Unitl then, only those who pay for the campaigns will have a seat at the table. Reform campaign financing is the only way to change the "Special Interests" control over Congress.
ByAndForThePeople
and corporations aren't people!
11:19 PM on 06/08/2011
I believe that there is literally no hope of this happening short of a bottoms-up revolution. Why am I so pessimistic? Well, the so-called "Supremes" have ruled (narrowly, but ruled nonetheless) that money = speech and secret money is perfectly OK in our political system -- it's constitutional. )For those of you who get confused by long sentences, here's the short version: Bribing politicians: constitutional.) The only way to change that is with a Constitutional Amendment, which is a very high bar, indeed. First, the amendment has to be initiated in Congress. Hmmm...lemme see...which 227 Representatives in the House will vote to kill their campaign donations? Which 60 Senators will do the same? Then, of course, it has to be approved by 3/4 of the States (that is, by their legislatures).

Really? Anybody actually see a snowball's chance of this happening?

It's not like we citizens get to have a say, except by voting for one politician versus another one. And with all the spin and outright lies (from both parties), and the hundreds of millions of dollars spent on ads to convince us that we're better off allowing corporations to bribe our law-makers, what are the chances?
09:37 AM on 06/08/2011
God Bless Rep. Cummings. Still think we should be investigating Issa.
07:13 AM on 06/08/2011
Issa will stay under attack from people who are fighting for government control. Obama has intruded to many regulations and need to be curved so this economy can grow again. People fighting a government take over are the enemy to people who want a more socialist government. We had regulations, just the people inforcing them were not doing thier jobs. Because some one does not do thier jobs does not mean you need government take over. This atricle seem to leave out a lot of the investagation that Issa has put forward. But to report all the new would not help the Obama brand.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
debblack
Rn Case Manager-mother-grandmother-daughter
08:40 AM on 06/08/2011
I see you are living in the fantasy alternative universe, where big business is always concerned about what is best for the American Economy, safe water, clean air, and earth safe to grow food on. Gee, we don't need Government at all, big business will look out for us all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Schalaine
We are women. We vote.
08:54 AM on 06/08/2011
Oh please. Just how ig.nor.ant are you? As vast as the ocean is wide, would be my guess?
05:56 AM on 06/08/2011
"Rep. Darrell Issa took the reins of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee with one apparent goal in mind: to reward the big corporations that have loyally funded his congressional campaigns. He set off on a seek-and-destroy mission, scouring the law books for rules, regulations, consumer protections and environmental safeguards that might slightly hamper the profits of his favored industries -- no matter the economic, environmental or health costs to ordinary Americans."
Worth repeating. And may God bless Rep. Elijah Cummings. That's what statesmanship looks like, people. It's so very refreshing to read this article, particularly since so much of the media is maintaining its focus on another Congressional Representative from New York.
I hope there is growing buyer's remorse from Republicans and independents. To them I would ask:
is this what you signed on for? Dirtier water and air, more mining accidents, more oil spills, all in the service of short-term profits? Because that will be the result of less government regulation.
Maybe some serious cost/benefit analysis is in order.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Schalaine
We are women. We vote.
08:59 AM on 06/08/2011
Thank you. Republicans would risk the lives of all of us, if it means more profit for their corporate sponsors. It has taken years and years to get the protections in place that ensure food is safe, drinking water is safe, medication is safe, etc. etc. The weird thing is they have convinced their supporters these regulations are not necessary. Corporations will police themselves. How did that work for "too big to fail" and wall street? How quickly some people forget the chaos caused when Republicans de-regulated...well everything.
photo
essbird
IOKIYANO
01:10 PM on 06/08/2011
Yeah, how did it work for Erin Brakovitch? Love Canal? The Detroit River? I guess we need to have a few corporate ecological disasters each generation so that voters who don't know history can learn first hand. It's also happened to the labor movement. Very few understand what it accomplished and what it had to fight, and how many gave their loves so that others could have a decent life.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
RButler
I've always wanted to have everything I wanted
03:17 AM on 06/08/2011
I can imagine that the right thinks Issa is a 'hard hitting' whatever and 'that's what we need' or some such BS.
01:45 AM on 06/08/2011
issa is dangerous. He's a spokesman for corporate wrong doing, his job is to serve the people, not the corporations.
photo
Democrat in the South
Empathy, the most important word
10:47 AM on 06/08/2011
"He begs to differ"?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sjcarl
12:31 AM on 06/08/2011
Thank you, Rep. Cummings.
12:31 AM on 06/08/2011
Most of them (politicians) are bought and paid for.

And we the people pay the price.

Personally, I consider much of what they do economic treason.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kyleewonder
04:47 PM on 06/08/2011
I agree, there should be no lobbyist on the hill, and every one running for office should have a set amount of money to run on and it that runs out, oh well.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
noaxe397
11:55 PM on 06/07/2011
Elijah Cummings and Jim Clyburn; two public servants that make me proud to be a Democrat.
photo
William Diaz
Passive-Aggressive word salad tossed here!
06:35 AM on 06/08/2011
George Mitchell, Paul Wellstone, Hillary Clinton, Shirley Chisholm, FDR, Jimmy Carter (yes, him too), Jim Webb, Al Franken, the list goes on for me. There are many Democrats whose service and ideals make me proud to support them. Put Elizabeth Warren on that list and Obama for putting her there.

If it werent for the whole dic-pic thing, Weiner would be there too, how sad.

Have a great day!
photo
unfoxworthy
We:ScottOlsens,the misfits,out to change the world
10:46 PM on 06/07/2011
I truly love watching Elijah Cummings in subcommittee and committee hearings.
What a great voice for the people of this country!
Elijah, any chance of you running for President? (I'll start a campaign office TODAY!)
Bernie Sanders, Colin Powell, Liz Warren, and Ron Paul would make great running mates and cabinet members - by the way.
10:45 PM on 06/07/2011
Great article. Issa might have been able to stay below the radar and do his dirty work for personal corporate donors but then he got cocky and went after Professor Warren (with the help of McHenry) in a shameless attack that made headlines. Now he is exposed for the rat that he is.
wendy scott
never believe generalizations
10:41 PM on 06/07/2011
Rep.Cummings is a good man. I love his quite confidence and how doesn't let the petulant children on the committee get away with anything. I've watched a few hearings where the Republicans interrupt as soon as someone tries to give an indepth answer or one that they don't like.They are incapable of actual governing or doing anything other than furthering their corporate masters.