Republican women may have flirted with Rick Santorum, but they're now less interested in going all the way. In the early contests, Santorum did better with women than with men. And he did better relative to Romney with women than with men. As Republican leaders have become increasingly extreme on women's issues, Santorum's chief backer made an outrageously offensive comment, and Santorum's own extreme social views came under close scrutiny, Santorum's standing with women worsened. Now, his early strength with women has become a weakness.
The table below shows the gender gap in Santorum's vote share in each contest, according to exit polls. The third column is the difference between Santorum's vote share among men and women. A positive number means women voted in larger numbers for Santorum than did men. The last column shows the gender difference in Romney's advantage over Santorum. A positive number means Romney did better against Santorum with women than with men, but it doesn't necessarily mean Romney beat Santorum with women in that state. States without exit polls (CO, MN, MO, ME, WA, ID, AK) and without a real contest (VA) are omitted. Everything below the line took place after Santorum began to falter on women's issues.
In the first three states, Santorum did better with women than men (a +4, +3, +6 gender gap), and the Romney-Santorum gap was larger with men than women (-2, -2, -3).
But Super Tuesday these two patterns reversed. Yesterday Santorum only did better with women than men in two states, Georgia and Oklahoma, not coincidentally the two states where Gingrich fared best. (Gingrich, for obvious reasons, does less well with women than men, and has in just about every state so far with available exit polling.) And in all the Super Tuesday exit polling (again, aside from Georgia and Oklahoma), the Romney minus Santorum gap was larger with women than with men.
This woman problem is not just Santorum's burden, though. While women make up a majority of the general electorate, they have only been the majority of Republican primary voters in two states so far -- Oklahoma and Arizona. Santorum may be losing ground with women, but the Republican Party as a whole isn't doing much better.
Follow Margie Omero on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MargieOmero
Chris Kelly: Mitt Romney of Mars
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Obama | Romney | |
|---|---|---|
| Electoral Votes (270 to win) |
332 | 206 |
| Obama | Romney | |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 65,899,660 | 60,932,152 |
| Percent | 51.1% | 47.2% |
| Democrats* | Republicans | |
|---|---|---|
| Current Senate | 53 | 47 |
| Seats gained or lost | +2 | -2 |
| New Total | 55 | 45 |
| Democrats | Republicans | |
|---|---|---|
| Seats won | 201 | 234 |
The media reflect the society, not vice versa. There's no money to be made by steering the society one way or the other. There is money to be made, addressing topics that concern the most viewers. The media pander to that, not the other way around.
"But the reality is that the Bible is right."
Depends upon how you define that statement. The Bible is demonstrably self-contradictory. In that sense, it cannot be 'right'. On the other hand, I happen to believe that the crucial message that is left by the Bible is correct; we must learn to live with each other and treat each other with love, kindness, and respect, or our species won't survive. That message assumed a new urgency in 1945 with the development of nuclear weapons. If we don't grow up soon, we won't be here...
"Ask most women and they will tell you they were disappointed with giving away their virginity to someone it really didn't matter to."
That may well be true. None of us feel good about our mistakes. But we have to grow up sometime, and we never learn much about our world until we interact with it. As soon as we do that, we are guaranteed to make mistakes.
A government for the people by the people to be self governable means just that. Individually we have to learn to govern our own house, our own lives, and raise our young to do the same. Not, I repeat not, become shameless in lusts of our hearts and wants and let someone else pay the consequences as it appears to be the case now. And not to surrender our inaliable rights and freedom to the Government to choose for us because we percieve we are to inept to rule our own passions.
How lucky you were to have had the parents you did!! F & F
YOU are the majority.
USE IT.
Woman Young and Old should be watching. There are many young 21st century women that are educated. They have to vote. They have to go to the poles. There are many older women. they should be watching. If they cut your Social Security and medicare and your husband passes. Where are you going to find the money to make ends meet? "The Job Creators" at what age do the "Job Creators" stop hiring because of the bottom line? Do you want to work endless hours for minimum wage? Senior woman know that they need hormones. They should be paying close attention to what is at stake and not read so deep into the social arguments but what those arguments are masking. What are they actually trying to remove? promiscuity? or the real reason is to remove an expense, the hormones, birth control pills, estrogen... the bottom line at the expense of the less fortunate.
the drama is for distraction. The politics supports the stage
VOTE LIKE YOUR IN THE 21st CENTURY, PARTY IN NOVEMBER.