More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Marian Wright Edelman

Marian Wright Edelman

GET UPDATES FROM Marian Wright Edelman

From the Children's Congress to the Corporations' Congress

Posted: 04/ 6/11 02:07 PM ET

Four years ago, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gaveled the House of Representatives into session saying, "For all America's children, the House will come to order.'' The House budget proposal released Tuesday by House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan would transform the legislative body from the Children's Congress to the Corporations' Congress, robbing poor children of their futures while rewarding the richest Americans and corporations.


This is radical and reckless, and it's built on rhetoric, not real solutions. This is less a budget proposal than an ideological assault on the foundation of a fair society, with the least among us poised to become the principal victims. Instead of protecting and investing in our most precious asset, our children, certain members of Congress are putting corporations first. This policy is wrong-headed and will dramatically increase the already massive gap between the rich and the poor. Poor children and their families will suffer most.


The House Budget proposal is an assault on children and low income families cutting lifelines and dismantling protections for the Medicaid program that serves more than 30 million children. From cradle to college, poor children would lose crucial supports from Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to Pell grants. Under this budget plan the federal government would forsake its role as the engine of equality, and truly become the locomotive for inequality by cutting taxes on corporations rather than closing the loophole that allows them to dodge taxes by shifting profits overseas; further cutting taxes for the richest Americans; and repealing the estate tax increasing the deficit.


To offset all these financial gifts to the rich, this House proposal would cut health care funding by more than $2 trillion over 10 years—at a time when there are 50 million uninsured Americans including more than 8 million uninsured children. This proposal would not only threaten the uninsured by repealing health reform, it also threatens the health and future of millions of children, more than half children of color, currently being served by Medicaid. The intersection of poverty and race in America today means children of color would suffer disproportionately from these cuts. Instead of leaving no child behind, the House budget proposal would leave no corporation behind.


If enacted this budget proposal would increase hunger, homelessness, and misery for the most vulnerable in America who are already suffering from deep cuts at the state level and are still facing devastating federal cuts in the FY2011 budget battle that could lead to a government shutdown this week.


All of us must do what's morally right and stand together for children to fight back these cruel and immoral assaults on our children. The future and soul of our country is at stake.

 

Follow Marian Wright Edelman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ChildDefender

 
 
  • Comments
  • 262
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
02:06 AM on 04/08/2011
RAISE TAXES ON THE MOST FORTUNATE!
09:12 PM on 04/07/2011
Really? And exactly what would you do to fix the problem that our bloated government spends $1.6B a YEAR more than it takes in? Was our government in 2008 an immoral mess? How about in 2006 and 2004. How about in 2000? Why can't government be cut back to where it was. Was it really so horrible back then?

And where do you get off equating government spending with morality? Since when is taking money from people who earned it, or borrowing money from your children moral?

How about this. Fire 33% of all non-defense government employees. Cut the pay of the rest by 30%. Eliminate Medicaid, and block grant the money to the States. Turn Medicare into a program like Ryan says. Dedicate FICA to Social Security and demand that SS cannot spend more than it take in (like a family or a business - radical concept I know).

Grow up. Anything whose costs expand at a great rate than the incomes of the people who have to pay for it is toast. We simply refuse to pay. Get it?
07:33 PM on 04/08/2011
How about just firing 33% of al defense government workers and bring the rest home from foreign expeditions,
photo
chaya
Another proud veteran
08:31 PM on 04/07/2011
It's still "The Children's Congress," Ms. Edelman. It is in fact being run by them right now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
APMOTRBC
Urban Warrior Princess of The Table!
05:48 PM on 04/07/2011
I'm tired of the wealthy not paying their fair share. The poor do not need roads and airports. They do not need educated workforces. They do not benefit from having their houses be worth more because they sit beside beautiful public goods (my house is worth about $150,000 more because it sits near lake of the isles). The rich benefit from such investments as the internet.

One of my best friends sold a company for a billion dollars and he with a straight face says that the government has "never done anything for him." Yes, he is bright, yes he worked hard, but he also got a full scholarship to a public university in the 80s and the business he sold? A company that was all internet based.

Could those of us who have benefited from the common weal at least recognize how we benefit? When I was in a white out blizzard driving between Vail and Minneapolis I was really glad for the real-time road updates, but the poor don't need those.

This delinking from the "other" or "those" people. The belief that we can just do it all on our own is very immature . . . I'm sure very self-gratifying if true but not real.
photo
chaya
Another proud veteran
08:37 PM on 04/07/2011
Thank you for this. It was well-stated.

Fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
APMOTRBC
Urban Warrior Princess of The Table!
05:18 PM on 04/07/2011
If you only remember one this: These deficits were intentional. They were caused by the conservatives to force this outcome. That's why they have perpetually insisted on cutting all manner of taxes on the wealthy, at each stage promising that this would increase tax receipts and improve job outlooks and the economy and it hasn't delivered that result, but just the opposite.

When a community has a society in which 50% actually no longer holds any resources or wealth and 20% hold over 87% you no longer have a functioning community. When you see that top 20% actually increase their wealth by 2.2% in 18 months will all other quadrants lost ground stop blaming the poor and start blaming those who have gamed the system to ensure high rates of inequality.

This was CAUSED INTENTIONALLY BY THE CONSERVATIVES. They hate government. Conservatives have hidden behind some kind of family values but they are non-existent. When conservatives don't believe that workers should have fair pay or worker safety. When they don't believe that the financial giants that caused this mess should be let off and Ryan included in his bill a rollback of all financial regulation.

it also includes tax cuts of 4.2 trillion for the top 1% while cutting 4.3 trillion in aid to the poor and middle class. This isn't about DEFICITS. It is simply a war on the middle class by the wealthy and they are winning because of conservatives in the middle class!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stephen feldman
06:27 PM on 04/07/2011
You believe that raising rates would balance the budget? OMG. What a sap.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
APMOTRBC
Urban Warrior Princess of The Table!
06:59 PM on 04/07/2011
I really see it as letting a tax holiday that was billed as job creation and economic growth opportunities to be rescinded. It did not work. We are borrowing money to give that tax holiday to people who are CURRENTLY sitting on 2.2 trillion in profits, etc. that they refuse to put into the economy. Even donor ship at that end of the economic scale is down according to the chronicle on philanthropy, although funding for buildings with their names on them and think tanks that hire people to justify their wealth (AEI, Cato, Heritage). At what time did that 2.2 trillion flow from our pockets into theirs? by what mechanisms?

I'll like the two wars that were started and were just gonna cost a $1 or so to end. I'd like us to stop cavalierly getting into wars. And I'd also like for people to stop calling Obama a hardcore leftist. He is a centrist, moderate.
photo
chaya
Another proud veteran
08:38 PM on 04/07/2011
You really aren't able to think, are you? It's amazing to me to watch right-wingers struggle to hold up their end in a discussion. They just can't do it.
05:05 PM on 04/07/2011
This is so patently ridiculous it defies belief. Essentially Ryan's proposal takes us allllll the way back to 2008 spending levels...when, apparently Ms. Edelmen believes "the least among us" were starving and dying in the streets by the thousands.

Yes corporations get a tax break as do wealthy Americans. But their tax deductions go away...so GE will no longer be able to pay no taxes just because they're good buds with the Pres and John Kerry will finally be paying his fair share (aside from those pesky yacht taxes).

What it additionally does is let people take the money currently spent by the gov't thru Medicare and gives it to individuals to shop for their own private insurance. Libs will scream that then the decisions on health care will be decided by those horrible insurance companies. What libs either don't know or are unwilling to share, is that Medicare denies claims at twice the rate of any private insurer. Ouch. I bet that hurt. Don't believe me, check out the numbers yourself.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2009/10/06/deny-guess-who-has-highest-medical-claim-rejection-rate
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
APMOTRBC
Urban Warrior Princess of The Table!
05:28 PM on 04/07/2011
DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS NO PRIVATE INSURANCE? I'm an entrepreneur/small business owner and it is impossible at almost any price to find insurance. I'm under 50 and I've never let my insurance lapse, yet in addition to paying almost $8,000 per year for insurance when I needed cataract surgery three years ago my insurer made me wait three years even though I had a $7,000 deductible. They wouldn't cover the lenses at $4,000 above that and then refused to pay for the eye drops at $125 a bottle. My husband needs lipitor, the second month of his prescription they took that off his plan. I went out and looked at 9 other insurance plans for the family. The lowest cost one I could find was $18,000.

We need to stop having our healthcare run through insurance companies. Because there are no people who will not need healthcare, it is uninsurable. You can't insure against what everyone needs. You can ensure against unlikely things, but not likely things . . . So we need to come to grips with that reality on medical care, that it isn't like anything else in the marketplace. Also by having this weird employment insurance situation, many older people refuse to leave jobs (which would open up work for younger workers because of fear of losing their care and people are afraid to innovate and start businesses. Americans waste .30 of every healthcare dollar in the insurance market.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
APMOTRBC
Urban Warrior Princess of The Table!
05:39 PM on 04/07/2011
Ryan's plan guts financial reform to the level it was at before the crash. It cuts 4.3 trillion in services that benefit the poor/middle class and then delivers 4.2 trillion in tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations.

So at least can we dispense with the idea that this has anything to do with deficits? I am not decreasing my revenue at the same time I'm trying to get spending for some needed outlays in control. The idea that the conservatives never come up with a plan that doesn't include massive tax cuts for the wealthy at the same time decrying the giveaways to the poor.

Well the poor aren't getting richer, the rich are the only people who've increased their wealth in the past 30 years and they've done it by a lot. and they've mostly done it by the financial sector applying "rents" on the community . . since 1980 when the financial sectors profits were 7% of GDP, now they are over 27% and they haven't invented or produced anything but a giant financial meltdown. But that sectors profits and wages are up and there isn't a true reason for it, except they can do it to all of us and you will support them instead of standing up and realizing that something is radically wrong when 50% of the population holds less than 1% of the wealth of the country.

That's not a country that provides opportunity.
04:53 PM on 04/07/2011
Robbery refers to taking people's property (what they have earned and own) by force. What the author is talking about is withholding of charity. If you can't define your terms honestly, even to yourself, how are you ever going to have a serious conversation?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
APMOTRBC
Urban Warrior Princess of The Table!
05:44 PM on 04/07/2011
I don't consider government programs "charity." I consider them common needs/common goods that we have collectively determined are easier to pay jointly.
03:57 PM on 04/07/2011
Is this the Huffington Post? Based on the comments to this article I would think that I'm at the Heritage Foundation's website.

Comment after comment repeating the lie that we are broke and we're bankrupting the country and the only way to fix the situation is on the backs of the working middle class. People, we waste over a half billion dollars a day...EVERY DAY...In Iraq and Afghanistan and we've been there spending like drunken sailors for ten years. Hundreds of billions of dollars just since the beginning of this year. Since when is killing people in a dusty hell-hole on the other side of the planet more important than our own children?

End the wars and bring the troops home.

Raise taxes on millionaires and billionaires to 2000 levels.

Allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices.

Raise the cap on Social Security taxes from $107 thousand to $250 thousand.

Place a fee on Wall Street financial transactions to help pay for the damage to the economy that they caused.

Do these things before demanding regular people to tighten OUR belts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
APMOTRBC
Urban Warrior Princess of The Table!
05:12 PM on 04/07/2011
Yes . .they have been brainwashed very well by the conservative controlled media of this land for over 30 years.

They have been convinced up is down and black is white. They have been convinced that our salvation is to return to a feudal aristocracy is in our best interest and no amount of facts and direct causation will deter them from wanting to ensure an aristocratic rule in our country.
11:56 PM on 04/07/2011
You can argue that we should find a way to continue our entitlement spending if you want. I'd disagree with you of course, but you could honestly make the argument. Claiming that we aren't broke just shows that you have your head stuck in the sand. We have to face facts if we want to solve our problems.

http://www.rationalpublicradio.com/fiscal-crisis-us-gov-spends-8x-revenues.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
APMOTRBC
Urban Warrior Princess of The Table!
03:56 PM on 04/07/2011
This is an excellent article in Vanity Fair about why income inequality matters and what it costs us all as a community. It isn't good for anyone. I'm only in the top 5% and you don't need to tell me I was born at the front of the buffet line and need to share. I was just taught that you were supposed to add value at all times and not just extract it.

http://www.vanityfair.com/society/features/2011/05/top-one-percent-201105?currentPage=1

Read, weep, ruminate!
05:00 PM on 04/07/2011
LOL, you might try finding a neutral source to back up your arguments. I'd have to surmise that you are correct in one sense though--anyone who holds your views on economics and can still count themselves in the top 5% of earners probably achieved their position through being "born at the fron to the buffet line", rather than hard work.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
APMOTRBC
Urban Warrior Princess of The Table!
06:14 PM on 04/07/2011
You know until conservatives that facts had a liberal bias Paul Krugman and Joe Stiglietz were just highly respected experts in their fields . . .but then the conservatives didn't like the things they had to say . . so now you get to say they aren't neutral. Go read the article. It doesn't say anything that isn't true. That if you have studied history or read the book Collapse it always turns out badly for everyone when you allow a ruling class that has no respect or no concern or consideration. And truly no awareness that there isn't any social mobility in this country. It has been closed off for all but a very, very, very few super special people (I actually am one of those people and I feel really fortunate to have had just the right confluence of events line up to put me where I am).

Also the way we feel about one another really has an impact on how well the entire community does. I'm seeing here a complete lack of any empathy or understanding about living in bone crushing poverty in a community where everyone has so much.

Disparities matter because with disparities come fracturing. We used to believe that providing access to education was a value. But that's gone for our young. We used to believe a social safety net was worthwhile but now that's too expensive.The only thing not too expensive is to borrow money for tax cuts for the rich.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
APMOTRBC
Urban Warrior Princess of The Table!
06:23 PM on 04/07/2011
I am actually one of the hardest workers you will ever meet and I also came out of the foster care system. I'm a woman of color who has not had one bit of help from anyone since age 16. I was an emancipated minor.
I have never been on public assistance (other than the money my foster families received, which I didn't get any of). I would have been ashamed. I worked two jobs to pay my own way through college carrying a 3.95 GPA while working 12 hour days.

I'm the actual proverbial self-made girl. AND GUESS WHAT I know I didn't make myself. Only those who overvalue themselves and undervalue their communities think they've done everything on their own.

But many of my friends were born in the front of the buffet line. And they laugh and laugh and laugh when anyone suggests that they've earned their money or worked hard for it . . .

I have two friends who have each sold their businesses for a billion dollars in the past five years (both investors in my social entrepreneurship). Both in the past two months have told the republican party to remove them from their lists as they don't believe that conservative policies deliver as promised and that they are tired of being lied too. One I fought with over Christmas break in Vail two years ago. He sent me a text that just said. "You can gloat, you were right."
05:14 PM on 04/07/2011
First of all, there are no good articles in Vanity Fair.

Second, I'm in the top 2% and I resent the hell out of some incompetent in government telling me he knows how to spend MY money better than I do. My wife and I give a lot of money to charities and causes which WE support because we know that we are indeed, blessed. I'd give more but it goes to an inept gov't who spends it on a great many things which I don't support.

Income inequality. I grew up eating Spam and wearing hand me down clothes. Never had a car until I bought it myself. Largely paid my own way thru college with the aid of a football scholarship, summer jobs, and part time work during school. then worked my butt off to get where I am today. Doesn't seem all that unequal to me.

You don't like where you are in life? Get off your ass and change it. Don't expect me to pay your way.
03:23 PM on 04/07/2011
So the foundation of a fair society is taking by force from one group and giving it without earning to another?
03:30 PM on 04/07/2011
Yes, haven't you heard?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:51 PM on 04/07/2011
Know the difference between equity of outcome and equality of outcome to know your error. Understand that existence is about relieving one's ignorance and you discover how little wealth is required for true achievement. At the same time you'll understand that largess and disparity do not serve this obligation for either the rich or poor. Equity demands minimums, below which people cannot self develop beyond subsistence modes. That destroys the intellectual capital of any human arrangement and thus is the source of most problems. Greed can thus be defined as an unexamined desire to possess more wealth than is required to self develop beyond specialization and a hobby.
08:22 PM on 04/07/2011
AA, I certainly defend your right to 'understand what existence is about' for you, but I do not support any such right for you foist your definition of such by means of the police power of the state. Equity may demand minimums, but no person has a right to anything simply because that 'something' exists. Do those in other countries have the right to demand their entitlement to 'equity' from people in this country? If not, then why does such a 'right to equity' only exist within the borders of countries?
02:30 PM on 04/07/2011
Edelman says the cuts are "radical and reckless." Yet Peter Ferrera points out "President Obama has actually already increased federal spending by 28% compared to 2008, to $3.819 trillion this year from $2.983 trillion in 2008, after promising repeatedly in the 2008 election that he would adopt a "net spending cut." He then proposes in his 2012 budget to increase federal spending by another 57% to $5.756 trillion by 2021 according to CBO. That's not radical, irresponsible and extreme?" Remember, if businesses were run like the Gov't - there would be no Gov't. (Bankrupt companies can't pay taxes)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
APMOTRBC
Urban Warrior Princess of The Table!
04:04 PM on 04/07/2011
Did Obama actually "increase spending," or did he just put things on the books that previous administrations pretended weren't part of the budget like Iraq and Afghanistan?
05:23 PM on 04/07/2011
He actually increased spending. In fact, so much so that by the end of his administration, he will have doubled the debt. If we are so unfortunate that he is reelected, his budgets will TRIPLE the debt in 10 years according to CBO. Of course well before then we'll be Greece or Portugal.

And are you really so clueless that you think someone could "pretend" we didn't spend money on Iraq and Afghanistan? Spending is spending...it all counts.
01:59 PM on 04/07/2011
Let me be sure I've got this right. You spend a dollar on a child, out of that dollar .40 cents is borrowed, you hope that the child grows up to be productive and pay that back, the child gets .20 cents of that dollar, and administration cost take .80 cents. Now who is it that is depriving a child?
It would seem to me that someone is using a child as an excuse for theft!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:02 PM on 04/07/2011
You stopped too early in the causal chain. The concentration of wealth is a measure of how much less labor has been paid than the value of its work. That starts the cascade of exploitation that ultimately shows up as an inability to fund the commons.

Thus government is merely unable to deliver the necessities for a functional social contract, because the middle class and poor do not receive enough economic value to fund society with the taxes they pay. Concentrated wealth escapes this tax obligation while the true costs of running a society remain. Its so bad now that we have to borrow to pull it off. So the ultimate source of such dysfunction is extreme and structural inequity required to support a small minority underdeveloped people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
APMOTRBC
Urban Warrior Princess of The Table!
05:13 PM on 04/07/2011
Antro . . .I'd fan you again if I could . .You and I are fighting a lonely battle out here is seems. We have lost our collective souls in this country. It's been a slow train wreck since Ronald Reagan.
01:54 PM on 04/07/2011
Your argument panders to the easiest target and avoids any responsibility for financial management. Do you really, really think that children are going to die, starving in the street full of horrible disease?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
APMOTRBC
Urban Warrior Princess of The Table!
06:28 PM on 04/07/2011
Yes. Our life expectancy has already dropped as a country. We expect the lives of our serfs to get worse and worse. That's what ALWAYS happens in highly unequal societies. They are also rampant with corruption and cronyism and tribalism too.
'That's a reason you want to attempt to deliver some modicum of equality of opportunity.
01:32 PM on 04/07/2011
How will children hold up when deficits lead to the collaps of the US dollar, hyperinflation, disintegration of federal, state, and local governments, and a new order in which our society is run by warlords hosting underlings with automatic weapons manning the streets of our cities and gunning down people for sport?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
APMOTRBC
Urban Warrior Princess of The Table!
03:59 PM on 04/07/2011
That's exactly where underfunding and refusing to take in enough revenue will lead to. The conservatives have been wanting and positioning for just such an outcome since 1980. This is all been the path. When the tea party says they want their country back, they do, they want it right back to the conditions of 1928 . . . but that didn't turn out well for anyone and neither will these new conservative policies that are just old conservatives policies that have already proven to be horrible for everyone in the long haul.
01:13 PM on 04/07/2011
What about the debt, deficit, bankruptcy of Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, and dead economic environment we are leaving to our children? We should destroy tomorrow so we can give more to poor children today? What's her plan to ensure our great grandchildren are cared for, God forbid they should be disabled or live in poverty?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
APMOTRBC
Urban Warrior Princess of The Table!
04:08 PM on 04/07/2011
Listen. This was always the plan by conservatives. They have been lopping off the tax rates of the top 1% for 30 years . . . WE DON'T HAVE A FUTURE right now . .let alone our kids and grandkids .. if things continue we will all eventually be indentured due to medical bills/interest payments to the aristocracy who are so wealthy that the top 400 INDIVIDUALS (97% of whom were born super wealthy and 2% were born in the upper middle class and 1% came from the lower class) hold the same amount of wealth as 280 million people combined. Now that happened because we have been cutting estate taxes and capital gains taxes for the wealthy for years. We were promised if we did this, it would make silver and gold rain from the skies . but it didn't. Instead it just made the wealthy come up with more ways to get/acquire and hoard wealth. It also disconnected them from the community as well . . . .

Go read this:

http://www.vanityfair.com/society/features/2011/05/top-one-percent-201105?currentPage=1