More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Marian Wright Edelman

GET UPDATES FROM Marian Wright Edelman
 

The Pledge

Posted: 07/01/11 05:15 PM ET

Over this long holiday weekend, children will be gathering in towns and cities around the country ooh-ing and aah-ing over fireworks, marching in parades, proud of their heritage and proudly waving the American flag. Most of them still believe in the promise of America—a promise reflected in so many of the values and ideals that underlie the founding documents of our nation and the Pledge of Allegiance so many of us learned as children and repeated each morning in school.


But today the promise of America’s Pledge of Allegiance is in jeopardy for millions of our nation’s children, and right now many of our elected officials are letting another pledge take precedence. Americans for Tax Reform, the organization headed by Grover Norquist, created the “Taxpayer Protection Pledge” twenty-five years ago and now “asks every candidate for elected office on the state and federal level to make a written commitment to their constituents to ‘oppose and vote against tax increases.’” Many of our current Congressional leaders have signed onto this pledge and now seem to believe it is the only pledge they need to honor. They are so determined and dug in they are willing to default on our country’s obligations in order to stick to it—and their loyalty to this no-new-taxes pledge is putting millions of our children and entire nation at risk.


But what about those elected leaders’ Pledge of Allegiance to the flag, and to the republic for which it stands, and to the promise of liberty and justice for all? Does that pledge still matter? And if so, how can there be liberty for all our children when our public education system is condemning so many of them to failure—unable to read and do math proficiently at grade level in this globalizing competitive world? How can there be justice for our nation’s youngest citizens when they are the poorest age group in rich America and have gotten poorer—15.5 million in 2009? How could some Congressional leaders consider dismantling the health care program so many of our poor children rely on and propose cuts in federal nutrition programs at a time when hunger and food insecurity are rampant and growing? And how can there be justice for our children if the millionaires and billionaires and the richest corporations don’t pay anywhere near their fair share and have reaped hugely disparate benefits from Bush-era tax cuts while the nation is mired in debt contributing to the widest gap between rich and poor ever recorded? How can any member of Congress even consider balancing the budget on the backs of our babies and children who are losing their homes and all sense of security about tomorrow?


President Obama made some of the choices very plain in his recent press conference. As he put it: “If we choose to keep those tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires, if we choose to keep a tax break for corporate jet owners, if we choose to keep tax breaks for oil and gas companies that are making hundreds of billions of dollars, then that means we have to cut some kids off from getting a college scholarship… Before we ask our seniors to pay more for health care, before we cut our children’s education, before we sacrifice our commitment to the research and innovation that will help create more jobs in the economy, I think it’s only fair to ask an oil company or a corporate jet owner that has done so well to give up a tax break that no other business enjoys.”


Our nation does have a huge deficit problem—but Congress has tunnel vision on the wrong one. Our most dangerous deficits are our values deficit and narrow self interest which pose the biggest threat to our future and our children’s future and the very idea of America. Our failure to invest in our children has already led to a deficit in human capital and companies are troubled by an undereducated workforce that can barely keep up with business today. If we don’t fix our education system and prepare all of our children to thrive in the global economy, America’s promise may die forever.


As we celebrate our strong nation’s independence, let us all pledge to ensure all our children a more—not less—just land. Let us demand that all our political leaders pledge not to ask children to sacrifice their hopes and health and food and education while asking for no sacrifice from powerful billionaires and corporations who have gained far more than their fair share.

 

Follow Marian Wright Edelman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ChildDefender

 
 
  • Comments
  • 380
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
Karma2U
Blessed are the Peacemakers
12:22 PM on 07/07/2011
This pledge sound about as legal as the Iraq war.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vic22
"I write to make it right, don't like what I see"
10:48 AM on 07/04/2011
You cannot serve two masters.

Signing pledges to special interest groups is anti american when you are supposed to be governing everyone, regardless of political affiliation
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MeinNH
Ooooo Silly Me
09:28 AM on 07/04/2011
The only taxpayers that they are pledging to help is those who can afford to pay more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kevinbr38
Forward
09:27 AM on 07/04/2011
Ms. Wright Edelman writes eloquently and accurately as usual.
I don't recall the stakes ever having been so high, and the rancor so bitter as right now. It seems as if the elected GOPers have indeed taken a pledge to devastate all of America accept the wealthy elite, which so many of them happen to be.
The notion that propping up those that need it the very least at the cost of those who need it most as a means to a vibrant economy has been proven a fallacy time and time again.
I cringe, and am deeply ashamed at the state of our education system, how it has back-slid just since I graduated from high school in 1974. Even in Detroit we had some of the finest public schools in the country.
It's too simple to just say the GOP is greedy, heartless, and only out for the wealthy. We have to examine what there is in our society that keeps voting them into power in the first place.
I hope people realize just how important the 2012 election(s) are going to be. They will chart the course of this country for at least another generation.
What are we going to allow to happen, or better yet, what are we going to do?
While I've no doubt President Oba,a will secure reelection, and we will make gains in The House and Sensate, I remain deepl concerned and afraid for America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigmadd
Retired Teamster & Vet USN
09:20 AM on 07/04/2011
The only Pledge those in Congress should make is to uphold and defend the Constitution and obey the laws of America they were sent to Congress to represent the people no just Grover Norquist. So which Pledge are the top of a republicans list?
07:36 AM on 07/04/2011
Exactly. A truly progressive society needs a strong centralized government to ensure that no one group of people rises above the rest.

We must have strong laws, strong law enforcers, and strong cell bars.

The rich aren't going to give back our money if we just ask - it's time we take it back - we, the MAJORITY with the power of OUR GOVERNMENT behind us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigmadd
Retired Teamster & Vet USN
09:00 AM on 07/04/2011
Reagan started this fear of the government is why most teabaggers are scared of "big government" a turn a blind eye to the common good it does. I have a ralative who get's SSI, Medicaid, She's low income and has a handicap daughter to boot but still is a one issue voter and votes republican.......fan and fav
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cclaker
Save democracy. Campaign finance reform now.
06:48 AM on 07/04/2011
Ms. Edelman is exactly right. The Republicans in the U.S. Congress owe their allegiance to this country and the people who elected them, not a demagogue like Grover Norquist. It's outrageous that he could dictate policy in the Congress. There have been 19 polls that confirm that Americans, working people unlike Norquist who was born wealthy, believe taxes should be raised on the wealthy and on corporations. We're at a crossroads in our history. Either we fight to keep democracy for the people, or we capitulate to the rich and let them further entrench the plutocracy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Damon
Do or do not, there is no try.
06:44 AM on 07/04/2011
Madame they are trying to save our economy. How anyone can be so naĂ¯ve to not understand that the class warfare the Dems are pursing has nothing to do with the economy and everything to do just winning in 2012. What accepted economic principle supports raising taxes on the key components of an economy during and economic down turn? The US economy enjoyed decades of scant competition and wild profit margins for many decades after WWII. That’s where the money came from that allowed all these subsidies to get so large and developed generations of people who expect a check from government. But now the global economy has changed and the US will never again make the kind of profits required to support the pseudo socialist nanny state the Dems are promising their base. Even if you take all the money from the evil rich people and corporations it is still not enough to pay off our debt or fund the nanny state.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigmadd
Retired Teamster & Vet USN
09:15 AM on 07/04/2011
So your solution is give all the nation's wealth to the wealthy and destroy Social Security and Medicare ( which we paid for) so the top 1% get's more tax breaks. Eisenhower had a tax rate on millionaires of 91% and if those Millionairs wanted lower taxes the had to create American jobs, More American jobs the lower the tax rate.Bill Clinton raised taxes and balanced the budget Bush lowered the taxes and sent the economy into a tail spin, We paid for Social programs before and we can do it again we need to go after those who got those Bush tax breaks and work for the common good of all Americans not just the rich who have created jobs for China while outsourcing our jobs. And get totally out of Bushs two wars. By the way the more Americans working with better incomes the more taxes are created. History proves tax cuts for the wealthy doesn't create jobs. To bad we have Americans that hate their fellow Americans so much that the can't look back to history.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Damon
Do or do not, there is no try.
10:19 AM on 07/04/2011
Why is it so hard for people to understand that you can't make businesses and corporations do anything? They don’t exist to pitch in for the common good, they exist to make a profit. The cost of regulations and taxes are passed to the consumer until a profit can no longer be made in the market place, and then business (jobs) leave for a place that is more profitable. The only alternative is to nationalize the market place (socialism) which we know is not viable in a global free market. It’s not hate, it’s simple economics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kevinbr38
Forward
10:24 AM on 07/04/2011
You havestudied your GOP hand book, and learned your sound-byte talking points well Alfred.
The reality hoever is the fact that the only class warfare being waged is that of the wealthy GOPers against what is left of the middle class, and bty extension the growing lower class. Let's not even bring our seniors into the discussion.
Since you wnt to talk about the state of how our economy has played out since WWII you would be well advised to take not of the fact that all of the prosperity that we [had] enjoyed, and indeed shared globally was created by democratic initiatives. Heard of The Marshall Plan?
Caring for one another, seeing to it that our childrenreceive an education that will enable them to compete globally, as well as here at home, and seeing to it that our seniors don't have to cut their pills in half to stretch out their prescriptions isn't a granny state.
it's called a modern enlightened society.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
I'm actually a radical leftist
01:55 AM on 07/04/2011
Blame the US voters for rewarding Bush Sr.'s "Read my lips, no new taxes!" promise back in 1988.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheGreatRenewal
Naming the next paradigm
12:25 AM on 07/04/2011
Remember ... 'promote the general Welfare' is also part of the Constitution.
11:36 PM on 07/03/2011
Imagine if you will, that your significant other is having surgery. During the course of a "normal" surgery the situation gets out of hand requiring the surgeon to initiate a blood transfusion. Little known to anyone in the surgical suite, the surgeon, in spite of many years of training does not believe in the procedure due to some ideology s/he was previously exposed to. Nevertheless, the surgeon tries several other strategies to mitigate the situation. In the end the patient expires on the operating table.

Fast Forward; The family initiates a medical malpractice suit for obvious reasons. Only to find out that they live in a state which has medical malpractice lawsuit caps on the damages.

Having a professional who claims to have your best interest in mind, but is unwilling to use the complete cadre of tools and strategies available to them when it comes to life and death situations will at sometime create an indefensible position one where the outcome has lead to a death of a live person regardless of their status in life.

Should this professional be allowed to continue to practice a profession that deals in the very real potential situations of life and death of their clients in view of their refusal to use all of the strategies available to them?

IMHO it would appear to me that their credentials should be revoked and they should be run out of town. But that is just me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MeinNH
Ooooo Silly Me
09:29 AM on 07/04/2011
Fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mario59
So many books and so little time...
11:12 PM on 07/03/2011
Grover Norquist has no skin in this game. The Republican lawmakers have handed power over to this nobody and I for one demand an explanation. The whole country is owed an explanation. This makes the republicans truly look gullible.
04:03 PM on 07/03/2011
Marian Wright Edelman's Children's Defense Fund has done good work for a long time, advocating for equal rights and striving to rescue the tens of millions of American children who live in poverty.

Back in the Sixties about 20 percent of children lived in poverty, as Michael Harrington’s book, The Other America reported. That percentage rose when the Reaganites came to power claiming America was a "welfare state," scapegoating "welfare cheats" and cutting human services.

Then the 1996 "Welfare Reform" enacted by a Republican Congress (and expediently approved by Clinton) made things even worse .. and then along came Bush and made things even more terrible for the working poor and the poor.

While the rich have gotten incredibly richer, the working poor and the poor have gotten very much poorer, and the middle class has shrunk and more and more people have fallen into the working poor population, and into poverty.

Most people don't know it, but even before 2008 usually between 73 and 79 percent of the tens of millions of children in poverty lived in families with at least one parent working full time! And now it's probably more.

Now read Poverty: America's Hidden Shame, at http://messenger2.cjcmp.org/poverty.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:03 PM on 07/03/2011
Conservatives having more and more imprisoned themselves in a steel box of inflexible dogma, and having adopted an adamant no-budge certainty regarding their distorted perspective of reality, are severely injuring our nation.

We are stuck in a quagmire, unable to do anything to deal with our problems, much less continue as a leading progressive nation. Our creativity and ingenuity are stymied because those require flexibility, adaptability and out of the box thinking. It brings to mind one of those dreams where you are trying to escape from danger and are unable to move. We are in great danger of not escaping.

It truly is a travesty. Our founders were creative, inventive people. Surely this is not what they would ever have envisioned.
11:46 AM on 07/03/2011
the problem with new taxes is it will still be only 50% of the population paying for the free ride by the other 50%. and the dems will try to find new ways to spend the newly aquired wealth instead of decreasing the defecit. those paying taxes are getting tired of the other half sitting on their duffs riding the government gravy train.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
I'm actually a radical leftist
01:56 AM on 07/04/2011
Only banks and corporations are supposed to get a free ride (at bailout time).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stewartm0205
02:35 AM on 07/04/2011
Every one pays taxes. Sick and tired of the bullshit. Since Reagan social security and medicare taxes account for more than 50% of the federal revenue. This meant that the poor and middle class were paying a majority of the taxes paid. Hedge fund managers many of whom made more than $1 billions a year over the past 6 years pay less than 15% on their income while there are middle class people paying 40% of their income in taxes. Is that fair?