More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Marie Griffith

GET UPDATES FROM Marie Griffith
 

What We Should Be Talking About in The Wake of Anthony Weiner's Morality Tale

Posted: 06/08/11 04:11 PM ET

What Anthony Weiner did online is not really surprising. Not in the least. Thousands, if not millions, of people engage in sexual banter by phone, text, and the internet every day. There's no way to tell how many of these people are married, but researchers have long known that online sex sites are well populated by people who say they are in serious relationships, including marriage.

Obviously, the pervasiveness of cyber-cheating does not make it right. But it should make us think. And it should stop us from indulging yet again in the righteously indignant finger-wagging that is possibly our most self-defeating national pastime. For once, when a salacious scandal like this one erupts, let's stop licking our chops long enough to ask what it means, not simply about him but about us.

I don't know Anthony Weiner and, like pretty much everyone else, can only speculate about why he did what he did, even after marrying a highly desirable woman. But I do know the rush of getting a text, or an instantaneous email response, or a "like" on Facebook, and realizing that someone is thinking happy thoughts about me. This feels good. Sometimes, depending on the sender, it feels really good. And however chemical-driven this reaction may be, it is easy to imagine wanting to feel that way again. And again. And ...

Therapists and religious leaders sometimes call this addiction, and I'm not qualified to say if they're right or wrong. I'm more interested in why so many perfectly decent, happily married people nonetheless engage, even fleetingly, in what we'd all like to tell ourselves is uncharacteristic, bawdy behavior. Perhaps cyber-flirting briefly eases the tedium of sitting at one's desk, day after day, trying to achieve something of value and wondering what's the point of it all. Maybe it promises comfort that someone has time for you or finds you attractive, when your spouse no longer seems to. No doubt it is, for some, a fantasy that helps one escape something -- a job, a marriage, the endless changing of diapers, that stressful commute -- that feels deadening. It helps one feel, let's face it, less lonely and afraid, more powerful and captivating. Or, in Megan Broussard's fateful word, hotttt!

Of course, besides being ephemeral, all of this soothing is utterly counterfeit, just like any other form of escapism. Visit the websites for women ensnared in electronic affairs and you'll see that they know they're being conned. Anthony Weiner surely knew this too; we all do. But loneliness, boredom, and fear persist in our everyday lives, and the old habits resurface. "Sexting is a lot less harmful than hard drinking or drug abuse," one might think. "Really, it hurts no one." But this belief too, I suspect, is false.

I have been married for 15 years. I deeply love my husband, and I have kept my marriage vows. But I have been, at times, sorely tempted to play around in cyberspace. I'm certain he has too. Haven't you? Surely, I am not the only person willing to admit that focusing erotically on a singular, lifelong partner does not always feel, well, erotic; in fact, it's very, very difficult. And while friendliness can morph rapidly into flirtatiousness anywhere, it is especially easy online. As an academic scholar, I spend hours and hours of my working life alone, with only my computer and iPhone to keep me company. Since friends and colleagues no longer call (instead, they email or text), I often go entire days without hearing the sound of a live human voice, until I'm reunited with my spouse and three children at suppertime.

Fidelity demands self-discipline and integrity, first and foremost; that's obvious, and Weiner seems to be lacking in both. But faithfulness in marriage could surely be aided by better ways of structuring our public and private lives. What we badly need, in the wake of the Congressman's sad story, is a national conversation about our work environments and the technologies that make us feel isolated, anxious, and bored, despite all their promises of social connection. Some of us need to figure out why we're spending more time googling old high school crushes than dropping in on friends, volunteering our time to help others, checking in on our parents, or having sex with our spouses. Others just need to stop wasting time at the office and get back to work. Many of us need to confront the disappointment we feel in our careers or our marriages and make clear decisions about what to do. And those of us with children urgently need to show them that we care more about being with people than trolling for fake gratification online.

Pundits, please stop fixating on the survival chances of Weiner's post-sexting career. Quit gloating over his Icarian fall, and presenting him as one more narcissistic scoundrel whose pathetic double life is uproariously entertaining to the rest of us. Call in smart people who think hard about social networks (David Brooks would be a start) and are developing good ideas about how we can work to develop more sustaining work and home environments, filled with friends in the flesh rather than online. Let's work on being more civil and less smug, remembering that we flourish as a society only when we are as committed to empathy as to criticism.

Anthony Weiner's online dalliances are not astonishing. What's astonishing is his -- and our -- relentless self-delusion. Make no mistake: his moral failings may mirror our own.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 114
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HopeWFaith
We the People
11:49 PM on 06/11/2011
We also need a national discussion and push to teach young women of self-care, self-love, self-respect, decency, honor and true healthy active living. The kind of lives our young people lead nowadays is sorely lacking of any rich, fulfilling desire to fight for a just cause, to heal the people of the nation who are in suffering and hardship daily. How can our young take over the nation and run it well, if they are not taught by example now how to help others, care for others, and while doing so, build a very strong self-esteem for their own long-term futures? Texting is just not going to do it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terramartom
People for the people. Revolution.
09:37 AM on 06/10/2011
When greed, intolerance, arrogance, selfishness, racism, bigotry permeates the culture of the USA today, why would we think that this type of behavior is not typical?
WE live in a culture that has learned that as long as you can get away with anything, that it must be both good, and that it shows your individual power over others.
We have Presidents who lie, Clinton and Bush, and from there all Hell breaks lose on the morality stage, and forget religion because it is the worst offender of morality and ethics.
It too is simply about power and greed!
Each of us has choices, those choices have consequences, and we alone are responsible for the consequences of those choices, and until we are taught and practice this daily, society continues to crumble around us each and every single day.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Diagoras
01:46 AM on 06/10/2011
Refreshingly honest! Love it! It's easy to react with righteous indignation but harder to talk about the fact that lifelong monogamy is a challenge and to discuss ways to make less challenging (such as spending more time with your spouse, working on improving your marriage, being more honest with your spouse and avoiding getting yourself into stupid situations that you know will make you feel tempted.)

About the isolating effect of online communications - There is one online institution that encourages people to meet in person, though - Meetup.com. Not only do you make friends and have in-person conversations but it's always in groups. And potentially you could use it to increase time with your spouse if you pick a Meetup group you'd both be interested in.
06:10 PM on 06/09/2011
They do mirror our own.

Hence the intensity of the outrage. Keeps us from having to look to closely in the mirror.

Bravo.
05:21 PM on 06/09/2011
Let me correct myself I meant other universes
05:19 PM on 06/09/2011
No there isn't an absolute proof of G_D,but as I have delved into quantum theory. I have learned of the forces of Nature. Space time. and other worlds look into this world yours self. Start first with the history of physics.
photo
blarneydude
I can handle the truth. Now let's talk about you.
04:59 PM on 06/09/2011
Everything I read in most of the posts below shows me that no one making those posts read the article. Or could be bothered to understand it if they did.

YOU ARE MAKING THE LADY'S POINT, PEOPLE.

Weiner's not the one with the sex-obsession disease. America is.
04:59 PM on 06/09/2011
Of course it is much easier to talk about sex. This title wave of jibber jabber drowns out the horror of what is truly happening
04:53 PM on 06/09/2011
Sorry for my comments on what I saw in Vietnam. Some times it's is good for the American public to see what war is truly like. Now in these days wars are fought by someone else. Usually not by the majority of people's sons and daughters in this country. Just the people in the lower rungs of this society. The poor, Latinos,Blacks etc.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Lee Morris
04:15 PM on 06/09/2011
Weiner's moral failings may mirror our own. IMHO, the social sites, and endless blogs provide anonymity but no "physical contact." Thus most interactions are considered to be harmless "flirtations." The web is fairly young in the technology world, so naturally folks want to experiment with the moral boundaries.

For my parents generation, there were social "clubs" in the form of Kiwanis, Eagles and Elks. Folks paid dues, and attended "face" events. Imagine that!

But these days, you can "flirt" endlessly using digital devices. But that is not the same as using your fingers to reach out and touch someone...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Diagoras
01:59 AM on 06/10/2011
True...it's definitely not the same, not nearly as bad. I wouldn't say it was completely harmless for two reasons 1-I think a lot of people doing that will at least be tempted to meet in person for a physical affair. People often underestimate their own self-control. 2-The time, energy and attention spent on online relationships means that same time, energy, attention is not being spent on your spouse (for married people). I think this even more true in the event that there is a particular person you have an online crush for.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chaotician101
03:14 PM on 06/09/2011
Your thoughts are a good; but probably we need to go much deeper to get a good start! The notion of morality, especially sexual morality, is one with anecdotal precedence based on lower class concepts of 17th,18th, and 19th century Europe confused by Puritan and other religious extremists suppression of anything smacking of enlightenment or personal freedom; misused and abused by Evangelical political actions in their serial revivals of ignorance and superstition! So-called moralists generally try to twist the Christian Old testament which approximates the Jewish Bible as being some moral standard imposed by the Creator no less! However, Christians, especially the Evangelicals, conveniently overlook the relatively liberal, enlightened acts and words of their God, Jesus, in his treatment of sexual offenders and his focus on damning effects of wealth and abusive financial activities! In any case, adding in the vicarious nature of modern technology, sexual morality faces some stiff questions! For example, is there something uniquely different about seeing a video or picture of Wiener's privates on your computer versus having the same opportunity in person, on the street or in his or your room? Is flirting over the web with various subterfuges obviously available, better or worse, the same or different than doing the same actions live, over a phone, in a club, or in your home? Is any sexual morality necessary or desirable in a modern society; and if so why? How and who gets to determine such morality; and how is any such morality enforced?
photo
Indigo1941
Time Traveler
02:39 PM on 06/09/2011
The whole episode is a healthy reminder to watch what we say on the email and the internet and the twitter machines. Dante said it best when he read the sign over the entrance to Hell (Inferno): "Abandon all hope ye who enter" (Lasciate ogni speranza voi chi entrate). Now we need to say, Abandon privacy ye who enter the internet.

Put a sticky note at the top of your screen: "There is no privacy here."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Lee Morris
04:18 PM on 06/09/2011
in years past, we all would say, "what I do in my bedroom, is er, private." But alas, "what we do in cyber=space is very public."
photo
Indigo1941
Time Traveler
10:14 PM on 06/09/2011
True. But even in the old days, a phone number scribbled on a public restroom wall was public. And that, imho, is what these sextexters-tweeeters-poseurs are doing. Maybe they don't realize that yet but hopefully, a few more episodes like Rep. Weiner's and they'll catch on. Hopefully.
02:27 PM on 06/09/2011
I hope that my comments show that the sexual urge is not so strong there are many more important things in this life that come crashing down on us. Strip us of our sanity momentarily, I hope.
02:13 PM on 06/09/2011
I have seen men under very difficult and dangerous conditions (Vietnam)and I certainly didn't see any sexual urges and even talk, they just wanted to survive. Some prayed to live another day and see their family's
I sure didn't have urges and think about sex,just survival.
photo
darquelourd
You Get What You Play For
12:54 PM on 06/09/2011
I think in a sick way he wants attention. The weird thing is no one seems concerned that he obviously needs mental health counseling. He's an Exhibitionist - at least that's my amateur psychological diagnosis.

More important than the hoopla and the entertainment value of his bizarre behavior is the fact he needs Mental and Emotional Therapy. He's got a REAL problem that need addressing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Lee Morris
04:24 PM on 06/09/2011
i am not a trained mental health practitioner, but Weiner may have NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER.

Persons with this disorder present severely overly-inflated feelings of self-worth, grandiosity, and superiority over others. Persons with narcissistic personality disorder often exploit others who fail to admire them, and are overly sensitive to criticism, judgment, and defeat.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Diagoras
02:00 AM on 06/10/2011
Oh nonsense. Everyone likes attention and likes confirmation that they are sexually desirable (or at least sexually desirable to someone who is desirable to you). If he was a single man, this wouldn't even be an issue. The only person he needs to talk to is his wife.