iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Marilyn Sewell

GET UPDATES FROM Marilyn Sewell
 

Rush Limbaugh and the Legacy of Margaret Sanger

Posted: 03/ 6/2012 11:36 am

2012-03-06-472pxMargaretSangerUnderwood.LOC.jpg

For three days Rush Limbaugh verbally attacked a young Georgetown University law student who testified in support of the Obama administration's requirement that health insurance plans cover contraceptives for women. Among other pejorative terms, Limbaugh called the young woman a "slut" and a "prostitute." For this behavior, he has lost many advertisers, and is in danger of losing his credibility as a radio personality.

We need to remember that just a few short years ago, historically speaking, Limbaugh would have been speaking for the majority. More than any other single person, a diminutive woman named Margaret Sanger changed all that.

Working as a nurse among the poor of New York City, Sanger was entreated by poor women, over and over again, "Please, Miss, tell me what should I do, not to have another baby right away?" She was at a loss to answer this question, and when she asked doctors, they were of no help. Women from families of wealth and education learned how to plan their pregnancies, but poor women were vulnerable. Sanger saw these women having baby after baby, falling deeper into poverty. Desperate, they sometimes took the risk of aborting a pregnancy themselves.

Then one incident pushed Sanger over the line, giving her clarity about her life's work. This is how she tells the story in her autobiography. She had been called to the home of a Mr. and Mrs. Sachs, as she refers to them. When the husband, a truck driver with little income, came home, he had found their three young children crying and his wife unconscious from the effects of a self-induced abortion. Sanger and the doctor worked hard to save the woman, and Jake, the husband was at hand, doing what he could. Three weeks later, Sanger was preparing to leave the home after her final visit, and Mrs. Sachs said to her, "Another baby will finish me, I suppose?"

Sanger told the doctor that Mrs. Sachs was terribly worried about having another baby. The doctor was a kindly man who had heard this sort of thing so often that he just laughed and as he went out the door, he said, "You can't have your cake and eat it, too. Tell Jake to sleep on the roof." Sanger looked at Mrs. Sachs and saw on her face a look of absolute despair. "He can't understand," Mrs. Sachs said, "but you do, don't you? Please tell me the secret, and I'll never breathe it to a soul. Please!"

Sanger didn't know what to tell her, but she promised to come back. Night after night, the wistful image of Mrs. Sachs appeared before her, but she made all sorts of excuses to herself for not going back -- she really felt helpless in the face of this woman's need. Then the telephone rang one evening three months later -- it was Jake Sachs, and he was begging her to come, in an agitated voice. She hurried into her uniform, grabbed her bag and started out, dreading to enter that home again. When she turned into the dingy doorway, she saw the three little children, and then she went to the bedside of their mother. Mrs. Sachs was in a coma and died within 10 minutes. Sanger folded her still hands across her breast, remembering how this woman had begged so humbly for the knowledge that was her right to have. Mr. Sachs was pulling out his hair like an insane person and wailing, "My God! My God! My God!"

Sanger walked and walked and walked for hours through the hushed streets of New York. The sun was just coming up, as she arrived at her home. It was the dawn of a new day for her, too. She had been irrevocably changed by this experience. She ends this chapter of her book by saying, "I went to bed, knowing that no matter what it might cost, I was finished with palliatives and superficial cures; I was resolved to seek out the root of evil, to do something to change the destiny of mothers whose miseries were vast as the sky."

Margaret Sanger eventually became the founder of Planned Parenthood International. But it was a long, hard slog getting there. She began doing research on contraception, and in 1916 opened the first birth control clinic. Nine days later she was arrested. She was convicted, with the judge stating that a woman did not have "the right to copulate with a feeling of security that there will be no resulting conception."

She went all over the country with her message of contraception, violating the Comstock law against sending "obscene" reading matter through the mail, and was thrown in jail eight times, once in my hometown of Portland, Ore., now a progressive enclave. She was invited by a Portland church to address their congregation, and she was the honored guest at a lovely dinner. But then when she began to distribute her pamphlet Family Limitation, she and others were arrested. Undaunted, she writes, "I was tremendously gratified by seeing women for the first time come out openly with courage; over a hundred followed us through the streets to the jail asking, 'Let us in too. We also have broken the law.'"

Once again, almost 100 years later, women seeking information about contraception are called "obscene," and poor women are threatened with the loss of protection from unwanted pregnancies. But as Susan G. Komen learned last month, and Russ Limbaugh is learning now, great numbers of us will rise up in protest if women are denied access to contraception. Those days are over in this country. It's about time. Would that we could say the same for the whole world.

Marilyn Sewell hosts an on-line radio show on religion and public life: www.rawfaithradio.com

 

Follow Marilyn Sewell on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MarilynSewell

 
 
  • Comments
  • 73
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edwardandersons
The Lord is my Shepard
01:51 AM on 03/08/2012
If only Sangers mother did not also believe in abortion the world would be a much better place!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patriot86
Compassion is the basis of all morality.
06:45 AM on 03/09/2012
A woman should have choices...and in modern America I almost met the same fate as the woman in the story as my right to life or so he called himself...he sure did not care about my life-doctor waited to make sure the baby was gone...hey doc...babies do not survivie life threatening hemorrage...his political ideology interfered with his ability to treat me responsibly...this will happen over and over again with the insane personhood laws and all...but women are now understanding what the GOP are up to and we won't go back...I was left almost dead and infertile thanks to this doctor...never again. WE Will bury you GOP in the 2012 elections.
01:15 AM on 03/08/2012
What happened to the whole "Pro-Choice" thing!?! Catholic institutions "Choose" not to cover B/C for women (or men) .....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patriot86
Compassion is the basis of all morality.
06:47 AM on 03/09/2012
Sure and maybe other employers claim one should pray away cancer ...or diabetes ...where does it end? Catholics should not have this right any more than Muslims to impose Sharia law...or engage in female circumcision.
11:36 PM on 03/07/2012
Much of Sanger's passion for making abortion available stemed from her deep interest in and desire for bringing about racial purity. She was a firm believer in white superiority and was a widely admired figure in Nazi Germany. She was hardly the compassionate human being that this blog attempts to portray her as.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edwardandersons
The Lord is my Shepard
12:25 AM on 03/08/2012
She was a miserable human being..here is some bio info about her:Margaret Sanger was born the 6th of 11 children. She grew up in poverty and despair with a sickly mother and an overbearing atheist father. When her Catholic mother died, Margaret forever rejected the church and set out on her own. Prior to her marriage to William Sanger, Margaret had dropped out of high school, quit teaching kindergarten after two terms, and dropped out of a nursing program almost before it began. William Sanger, a young and successful architect was Margaret's ticket out of poverty. But after ten years of marriage and three children, Margaret was still discontent. She convinced her husband to move into the city, a move that gave Margaret a bustling new Manhattan social life and reunited William with some of the Socialist connections of his youth. Though Margaret initially ridiculed the radical politics of William and his friends, something eventually clicked. She became consumed with the notion that social subversion offered the only hope for a happier existence. Her living room "became a gathering place where liberals, anarachists, Socialists, and IWW's could meet".1 Though they lamented the evils of capitalism and postured themselves as advocates of the poor, they seemed to much enjoy their own personal wealth and isolation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edwardandersons
The Lord is my Shepard
12:27 AM on 03/08/2012
(con't)
It was in this environment that Margaret's devotion to cause quickly outdid that of her husband, to the demise of their family life. Meetings and rallies began to define her, and William was unable to pull her back. Her friendship with renowned anarchist Emma Goldman would be her marriage's undoing. After concluding that she must be unrestrained by the unnatural constraints of the marriage bed, Margaret demanded the freedom to pursue her sexual pleasure with whomever she wished. William's final attempt at pulling her away from such ideology came when he moved the family to Paris. There was peace for a time, but when Margaret demanded a return to New York, William refused. Margaret took the children and left him for good.
leaving her husband and returning to New York, Margaret began publishing a new 8-page periodical, The Woman Rebel. On the masthead read "No Gods and No Masters", and the first issue "denounced marriage as 'a degenerate institution,' capitalism as 'indecent exploitation,' and sexual modesty as 'obscene prudery.'" Issue number two asserted that "Rebel women claim the following rights: the right to be lazy, the right to be an unmarried mother, the right to destroy . . . and the right to love." In later issues she defended both the necessity of social revolution and political assassinations.
photo
averagezoe
Don't breed or buy while homeless animals die!
10:27 PM on 03/07/2012
The mission of this courageous woman and the ridicule and persecution she faced is a sad reminder that things in this country haven't changed all that much. To this day, the puritans and religous zealots still display attitudes similar to the ones faced by Margaret Sanger almost 100 years ago. That is a rather grim commentary on America.
01:00 AM on 03/08/2012
I hope and pray that Sanger and her racial eugenist cohort's are constantly exposed for what they were!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patriot86
Compassion is the basis of all morality.
06:49 AM on 03/09/2012
I hope the GOP are exposed for what they are...now today...mostly men who want to control a womans sexual and reproductive life.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
COPESTIR3
09:42 PM on 03/07/2012
Margaret Sanger is one of my heroes. She unlike Rush, had empathy for the suffering of others and dedicated her life to ease that suffering. She did not humiliate, embarrass or call names to women who simply want to plan for their families.
01:16 AM on 03/08/2012
You have clearly never read any of Sanger's writings. Get back to us when you have!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
COPESTIR3
09:29 AM on 03/08/2012
You clearly did not read my posting. She did not make disdainful remarks to those that took birthcontrol, but to those that did not. She was rahter racists it is true. But she did bring birth control to the masses.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
COPESTIR3
05:29 PM on 03/08/2012
Actually i have. While shee relected racial attitudes of that period, she empowered, through education and accessablity, women with birth control. You may want to take it back, but there are enough of us to inform and educate. By the way, get back to us once you understand the importance of birth control, for women. Not for men to tell us, but for womanto make their own decisions.
12:28 PM on 03/07/2012
Keeping women from contraception is just plain VILE. On a planet of 7 BILLION it is also immoral.

I read Sanger's autobio as a young woman. One of the lines I remember best is her writing that she could not remember her mother other than being pregnant or nursing. Her mother died relatively young after many pregnancies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
momoluvsu
We live in a parallel universe
03:11 PM on 03/07/2012
I think her mom was pregnant 2o times.
02:42 PM on 03/08/2012
OMG.
12:58 AM on 03/08/2012
How about keeping men from contraception??
02:35 PM on 03/08/2012
?
11:55 AM on 03/07/2012
The reality should be made clearer by adding descriptions of Anthony Comstock and the Comstock Laws. Limbaugh appointed himself a new Comstock during these hearings, and the response to him has made it quite clear that society no longer approves of Comstockery, no matter how they feel on the specific issue on which this young woman was testifying.
11:21 AM on 03/07/2012
MARGARET SANGER IN HER OWN WORDS:
On blacks, immigrants and indigents:
"...human weeds,' 'reckless breeders,' 'spawning... human beings who never should have been born." Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, referring to immigrants and poor people

On sterilization & racial purification:
Sanger believed that, for the purpose of racial "purification," couples should be rewarded who chose sterilization. Birth Control in America, The Career of Margaret Sanger, by David Kennedy, p. 117, quoting a 1923 Sanger speech.

On the right of married couples to bear children:
Couples should be required to submit applications to have a child, she wrote in her "Plan for Peace." Birth Control Review, April 1932

On the purpose of birth control:
The purpose in promoting birth control was "to create a race of thoroughbreds," she wrote in the Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2)

On the rights of the handicapped and mentally ill, and racial minorities:
"More children from the fit, less from the unfit -- that is the chief aim of birth control." Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12

YOU GUYS PAINT A ROSY PICTURE OF SANGER WHEN SHE WAS A VILE HUMAN BEING.
11:52 AM on 03/07/2012
You have a rosy picture of parenting, incidentally. As a lawyer, I find that the more custody cases I handle, and the more juvenile cases I have had to work on, the more I wish that there were indeed a way to determine that everyone simply should not be allowed to have children.
12:57 AM on 03/08/2012
Time for you to find another proffession!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xenubarb
Nebulon V
02:40 PM on 03/07/2012
Come back and say that when there are over 10 billion of us in a few years.

Reality isn't pretty. Pragmatism is often harsh. But you brought it on yourselves by breeding like rats, until nature decides you're done.

When you're in the middle of the first wave of a lethal pandemic, just remember this. You could have avoided it with contraceptive planning. You chose not to. ("you" as a species, not you personally)

My folks had one and adopted two. It's a shame the majority of humanity doesn't follow suit.
Enjoy your apocalypse! I hope you learn from this, so future generations take better care.

Of course there'll be future generations! We're too big to fail and go extinct, right?
10:27 AM on 03/07/2012
The woman Limbaugh spoke of was a political operative who enrolled in a Jesuit university for the purpose of forcing it to act contrary to its religious beliefs and support contraception. Limbaugh was absolutely correct in opposing her attack on religious freedom, but probably wrong in using insulting language. After all, in America at present only Leftists are permitted to use personal insults. Limbaugh stands for individual choice and freedom from governmental control. He opposed, as all right thinking persons should, this attack on religious freedom. Catholics and Non Catholics alike should oppose the kind of government mandates supported by Ms. Fluke, since if the government can come now to control the Catholic Church, soooner or later, it will come to control other churches. Christians should remember that Jesus sought always to teach and persuade, never to force,either individually or by means of the government.
09:11 PM on 03/07/2012
That is pure myth. Good luck with your story telling on this thread. All you are doing is reinforcing the negative stereotypes of the right wing conservatives. Most people believe they are irrational and make up myths. It sure looks like that here. That you support Limbaugh's horrific three day rant is astonishing from any viewpoint. That says enough there.
07:26 PM on 03/08/2012
If you listened to all that Limbaugh said against this political operative,you should realized that most of his remarks were directed to ridiculing her attempt to force a religious institution to act contrary to its religious principles by providing free or below market cost benefits. I agree that people should not be insulted, but by far the most personaly insults, such as those directed against Sarah Palin and Michele Bachman, come from the controller-regulator leftists. They invariably launch ad hominem attacks;since they cannot win in the forum of ideas. Every sane person wants prosperity, absence of racial prejudice, and peace, but history has proven over and over again that these cannot be achieved by leftist command-control policies. Economic Freedom, not command and control, produces prosperty. Equality before the law, not racial favoritism and set asides, reduces racial tensions. And peace comes from strength, not appeasement. And yet the Left continues to demand curtailment of economic freedom, affirmative action in favor ot its chosen groups, and appeasement of the world's tyrants and dictators.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
COPESTIR3
09:46 PM on 03/07/2012
No matter if you are conservative or liberal, no one should be subjected to sexual harassment and slander, period. He did that for three days.
12:55 AM on 03/08/2012
No one should be subjected to slander!?! ever browse any HuffPo article regarding Rush, George W.. Sarah Palin?? ................
09:02 PM on 03/06/2012
I certainly have no problem with contraception and family planning, and firmly believe making a baby ought to be an intentional act that one can back up with the financial, educational and emotional support needed for years after making him or her. But Margaret Sanger was not all light and sunshine. Her ideas about eugenics, race and ethnicity assumed that lighter-skinned races were superior to darker-skinned races, and she took a low view of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe reproducing in America, deeming them "feeble." If it were up to her, I just might not be here today, given that those are my roots.
photo
goatini
We are two-legged wombs, that’s all
05:24 PM on 03/07/2012
You are incorrect as regards Margaret Sanger. Every word you wrote is an intentionally false piece of propaganda.

http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/index.html
09:16 PM on 03/07/2012
IF you read about Margaret Sanger's life in total you will find that she spoke out against the eugenics efforts later in her life. Eugenics was a rage of social darwinists who were not real scientists in terms of this topic. The entire country was in a rage for eugenics, and she did get caught up in it a bit. And it was just a very, very little bit. She disassociated herself legally and by organizations, as well as recanted her support. Furthermore, it does not erase her grand accomplishment of getting birth control legalized in our country. It was illegal and almost unavailable for poor women. She helped get it legalized under medical prescription and set up clinics around the country where the prescriptions could be given for birth control and making it cheap and available compared to what it was. Rich women could get anything and did. Furthermore, she was against abortion. She believed government shouldn't make it illegal, but she was against it. She believed the answer was birth control made easily and cheaply available with family planning. She was a hero to women and her long life achievements stand by that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carla van der Meer
in scientia opportunatis
06:57 PM on 03/06/2012
How little things have changed. would M Sanger be shocked? Personhood for fetuses and young women happily participating in their own exploitation, under the guise of empowerment. I'd wager many of them have never heard about the women who fought for their rights.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mother77
06:27 PM on 03/06/2012
From the time I was a little girl I heard about Margaret Sanger because my grandmother and her sisters went to her clinic. They had multiple births, more than 5 pregnancies apiece, and were desperate to stop increasing their families especially after the Depression. Margaret Sanger was spoken of with reverence.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
COPESTIR3
09:47 PM on 03/07/2012
fanned and faved.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nance Cedar
Agitating for a better tomorrow.
05:54 PM on 03/06/2012
Thank you for an excellent article, Marilyn. We need to be reminded how great the struggle was for women to gain control over our reproductive destinies.
researcher
researcher
05:13 PM on 03/06/2012
Rush is only projecting his own self hate and hate of women onto the world. compassion is in order and that does not mean he should not be responded to a such a way that most americans responded.

compassion is the most difficlut of the three most common religious and spiritual responses. sympathy, empathy, and compassion; and compassion is as rare as a white crow.

he is supported by a group of people called evangels, that is the real danger to this nation and corporations that will use anyone to sell a product for profits and mega CEO bonuses.

think about what it would be like to have the beliefs and consciousness of a Rush?
03:29 PM on 03/06/2012
Well written as always. Thanks.