Will this be the year that "cell phone only" voters wreak havoc on the results of pre-election polls? And does the cell phone only problem doom pollsters that depend on automated, recorded voice methodologies? Two new recent polls from SurveyUSA suggest the answers are not as obvious as some may think.
Let's start with the first question. SurveyUSA, a company that has been conducting recorded-voice surveys for local television news stations for nearly twenty years, has recently released two statewide surveys based on dual samples of both landline and mobile phones. In both cases including cell-phone-only voters interviewed over their cell phones did not make much difference in the results. Their recent Washington poll, for example, shows Democratic Senator Patty Murray leading by a not-statistically-significant four-point margin (37% to 33%) over challenger Dino Rossi in a combined sample of landline and mobile phones. Murray's lead would have been a virtually identical five-point margin (39% to 34%) had they interviewed by landline phone only.
Similarly, a North Carolina survey released just yesterday shows Republican Richard Burr leading Democrat Elaine Marshall by ten points (46% to 36%) in the combined sample interviewed over both landline and cell phones. Burr would also have led by a 10-point margin (47% to 37%) had they interviewed all respondents via landline phones only.
These are just two surveys, of course. A more comprehensive assessment of national data gathered by the Pew Research Center earlier this year found that, "weighted estimates" from a large landline sample "tend to slightly underestimate support for Democratic candidates when compared with estimates from dual frame landline and cell samples in polling for the midterm congressional elections this year." But if that slight understatement is real, it may not produce many "significant" differences, either statistically or substantively, in individual statewide surveys.
What is more interesting here, however, is that an automated pollster managed to conduct a "dual frame" survey at all. The underlying story gets us closer to an answer to the issue of the impact of cell phones on automated surveys.
Some background: Pollsters have a harder time interviewing Americans on their cell phones because of the provision in the 1995 Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act (TCPA) that places restrictions on unsolicited calls to mobile phones. As explained by the Marketing Research Association:
The TCPA forbids calling a cell phone using any automated telephone dialing system (autodialer) without prior express consent. This rule applies to all uses of autodialers and predictive dialers, including survey and opinion research.
Virtually all pollsters use some form of "autodialer" to place calls to landline respondents, so virtually all pollsters are affected by the TCPA's restrictions on calls to cell phones. With the exception of CBS News (the only operation I know of where interviewers still hand dial each number), virtually all pollsters use some form of computerized interviewing system that dials the phone so interviewers don't have to. Some also use "predictive dialers" that place calls and only connect the respondent to an interviewer once a live person answers the phone (a process that creates that annoying pause that anyone who has answered a call from a telemarketer is all too familiar with). Finally, all recorded-voice pollsters use an "automated dialing system" for their complete process, though they could theoretically begin with a live interviewer and then hand off the process, with the respondent's consent, to an automated interview.
So when live-interviewer pollsters want to interview respondents on their cell phone, their interviewers need to place the calls manually. Their process becomes less efficient and more expensive, but they do not face a total barrier.
Pollsters that use a recorded-voice methodology face a much bigger problem. Yet somehow, SurveyUSA managed to interview voters in North Carolina and Washington over their cell phones. How did they do it? They used live interviewers:
Cellphone numbers were dialed one at a time, cellphone respondents were interviewed by call center employees. Landline respondents heard the recorded voice of a SurveyUSA professional announcer.
In North Carolina, SurveyUSA used more expensive live interviewers to conduct 404 out of 1,000 interviews, although only 250 of those were in cell-phone-only households (see their methodology statement for more details).
So while this approach amounts to a technical solution to the challenge of reaching cell-phone-only households, it creates a huge challenge to the underlying business model of automated pollsters like SurveyUSA. Consider the chart below, prepared by SurveyUSA CEO Jay Leve for a presentation last year. It suggests that in this case, their costs were somewhere between triple and quadruple what they would have been had they done all interviews using a recorded voice methodology.
Any other lessons here?
First, this issue provides another demonstration of why all automated surveys are not created equal. In this case, SurveyUSA is actually doing more of a "mixed mode" poll that combines both recorded-voice and live interviewers.
Second, all "dual mode" surveys based on combining landline and cell phone samples are not created equal either. Pollsters have to decide whether to use the cell phone samples to reach just the "cell phone only" households, or whether to also include the "cell phone mostlys" as well. And either way, they need to decide how to weight the combined samples, often without reliable estimates of the percentage of cell-phone-only households at the state level (see the SurveyUSA release and the Pew Research report for more detail).
Third, as is true for many aspects of poll methodology, pollsters could do a better job disclosing the procedures and methods they use to interview Americans over their cell phones and combine those results with interviews conducted via landline phones. CBS News, for example, tells us only that the numbers for their just released survey "were dialed from random digit dial samples of both standard land-line and cell phones." The release for the NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll tells us that their sample of 1,000 adults included "200 reached by cell phone," but nothing more. There are exceptions, of course -- most notably the Pew Research Center -- but they are few and far between.
Follow Mark Blumenthal on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MysteryPollster
Loading comments… 
However, polling informatio
I don't think any form of internet poll is all that helpful. Phone polls are losing their muster...
How about we add something to your phone contracts that we can 'check' and allow polling groups (must meet some kind of public good qualificat
Just about everyone in my age group that I know ONLY has a cell phone. I wouldn't mind being contacted by Gallup, Rasmussen or Zogby contacting me.
We (the respondent
There is zippo, none, or "no" point in conducting these polls except that the statistica
Congratula
I am so pleased to read your comment.
POLLOCRACY has become a HUGE Industry..
making numbers up so as to DeMORALIZE the DEMS.
I called it
SWIFTBOATI
Google POLLOCRACY and POLLOCRATS (pollsters with a political agenda ) at the service of Pollocracy to undermine Democracy
Pollocracy versus Democracy.
www.polloc
eg. if you tell one team of basketball player that they are going to lose for sure , it affects their MORALE and ..........
In this case of course it is the DEMS that are the victims and the Gop the predicted victors
if you do not believe me ..........
VOTERS should BEWARE of the influence of poll numbers and act accordingl
PROVE them Wrong ..........
Polls impact outcomes of elections. If polling groups are not held accountabl
The issue about land lines versus cell-phone
The difference really comes into play when questions that are influenced by a patient's age are asked. Issues like spending on Social Security and Medicare are markedly (18% in one study I read) more likely to be pro-spendi
Finally, the issue of whether "all registered voters" or "voters likely to vote" must be specified. When questions are asked of "voters likely to vote," up to a 7% more conservati
There are a lot of subtle variables that impact a poll. Democrats, as a broad group, aren't at home much during the day or on the weekends. Sutble things like that.
And you must carefully review the published analysis because I've caught even CNN rigging the analysis to benefit a certain candidate.
very good ..........
www.polloc
you can make polls say whatever you want !! that was a line of Pres.BUSH
We need to know the exact questions that were asked, who or what asked them, via what method was the contact made; what time of day, day of the week they were asked; how did they construct their sampling; what statistica
I'm sure there are other specifics, but those are the ones I can think of now.
Ever try to get that informatio
Continued.