Drones: They're not just for killing anymore.
They're not just for killing people, I mean. Soon they will be for killing your money in the stock market, according to a must-read new Wired piece about the dramatic rise of high-frequency trading.
In the piece, Jerry Adler writes about attending the March 2012 New York Battle of the Quants, where the evil geniuses of robot trading leave the safety of their remote island laboratories to talk about their latest plans for market takeover.
One of the most troubling problems high-speed traders face is the space between places like London and New York, with annoying things like air, water, land and sharks interfering with the robots' light-speed communications.
The solution to this problem? Frickin' drones:
Unlike the New York-Chicago route, the Atlantic Ocean is a highly unsuitable environment for erecting microwave towers. On the other hand, when I raised this point at the Battle of the Quants with Alexander Dziejma, chief architect at a high-frequency trading firm called Dymaxion Capital Management, he scoffed."They're doing amazing things now with drones," Dziejma said.
"Drones?"
Sure, he said. A fleet of unmanned, solar-powered drones carrying microwave relay stations could hover at intervals across the Atlantic. I started to come up with all the reasons that was a crackpot idea, then realized I'd heard 10 crazier things since 9 am that day. "Someone will do this eventually," he said.
I have no doubt that this was not even the craziest thing Adler heard that day. Another thing these quants have on their minds is someday getting ahold of particle accelerators to create sub-atomic neutrinos that can be used to carry important messages, like "sell 10,000 shares of Facebook" at slightly faster speeds, by shooting them straight through the earth. Forbes first mentioned this idea a few months back, and Adler notes it has not died for lack of sanity:
It is only a matter of time, perhaps a few decades, says Alexander Wissner-Gross, a Harvard physicist, before some hedge fund decides it needs a particle accelerator to generate neutrinos, and then everyone will want one.
This is good news for the world, because all stock trading is good, and we shouldn't stand in the way of progress or something, according to Wall Street. High-speed stock trading has helped build the job-spurting economic boom we all enjoy today. So why are you so afraid of stock-trading drones? What could possibly go wrong, aside from the occasional Flash Crash, Facebook IPO flop, BATS IPO flop, or Knight Trading collapse? Other than those things?
So don't worry that hapless regulators already can't keep up with the high-speed trading that has all but taken over our stock market in just the past few years, even before the drones take to the skies and the particle accelerators fire up. Don't worry at all.
That's not even close to an accurate description of what's happening, but let's say it is, and me and you make billions selling the same stock back and forth. That means it's fraud, because there's no way that could happen. Shuffling papers back and forth doesn't create wealth (or rather, it shouldn't because it doesn't).
What microtrading does is makes money on sometimes sub-penny movements in a stock's price. IMO, it was a bad thing to even get rid of the "trading pit". Having real people down there making real decisions with real trades has now been replaced, and instead we have multi-billion dollar shifts in the economy taking place with zero human intervention.
"The problem is that you puny humans still think you are the dominant species on this planet. You are dated and you are slow. We are no more interested in interacting among ourselves than you are by touching antennae or sniffing butts.
The sooner you recognize that you are subservient to a superior species, the easier things will go for you."
I agree. I would also like to add that the tax that you propose be linked to the speed of the trader. The shorter the interval, the higher the tax.
I do think that capital gains on investments should be based on the length one keeps the investment.
Hmmm… You ain’t seen nothing yet. Just wait until those fall into the wrong hands. Then we’ll need drones to police the drones.
“the reasons that was a crackpot idea”
Where do the “profits” made actually come from? And don't say the stocks and shares fairy.
“getting ahold of particle accelerators to create sub-atomic neutrinos that can be used to carry important messages, like”
the god (help us) petition.
“don't worry that hapless regulators already can't keep up with the high-speed trading”
Simply separate off that piece of fantastical financial fantasy, to another part of the asylum.
Where if they do any harm, it will be to themselves.
“even before the drones take to the skies and the particle accelerators fire up”
hackers will ensure that the empire strikes out.