iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mark Gongloff

GET UPDATES FROM Mark Gongloff
 

Lawsuit: Incompetent SEC Struggles To Rein In High-Speed Trading Fraud

Posted: 09/24/2012 1:35 pm

Having the Securities and Exchange Commission police high-speed trading is like pitting Barney Fife against Michael Corleone: The odds are not in its favor.

You might think it unfair to compare the SEC to the bumbling deputy sheriff of Mayberry, who couldn't be trusted to carry a loaded gun. But the Andy Griffith Show wiki reminds us that Fife was not totally useless: There were occasions, like that time he stood up to those farmers, when he showed backbone. Same thing with the SEC, which has managed to tear itself away from the pornography long enough extract some big fines from Wall Street after the financial crisis.

But the agency is clearly outgunned when it comes to dealing with high-frequency trading, many experts agree. And a new lawsuit goes so far as to accuse the SEC of covering up high-speed fraud so nobody will know just how incompetent it really is, Courthouse News reports.

In the suit, a Wisconsin company called EMM Holdings accuses the SEC of not investigating a Houston high-speed trading firm called Quantlab Financial. According to EMM, Quantlab is perpetrating fraud amid all the high-speed churning and burning it does in the stock market. EMM notes that Quantlab has been flagged six times in the past eight years by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the brokerage industry's self-regulatory body, for not properly documenting its trades. EMM thinks this is evidence that Quantlab is trying to cover up some fraud, and it has asked the SEC for any documents showing an investigation of Quantlab. The SEC has refused, on the grounds that doing so might interfere with law-enforcement activities. EMM has sued the SEC to force it to give up whatever goods it has on Quantlab.

Trouble is, it's not entirely clear if the SEC is actually investigating Quantlab at all. EMM argues in its complaint that the only way the SEC could deny its record request is "if there is an on-going and active investigation." And EMM accuses the SEC of letting this investigation fester, hoping the statute of limitations will run out.

"Given [the SEC's] near complete abdication of its prosecutorial duties during the 2008 financial crisis, inaction and delay may unfortunately have become [the SEC's] modus operandi for dealing with complex financial malfeasance," EMM said in its complaint.

The SEC says it conducts all of its investigations privately and would not comment when asked whether its denial of EMM's request for documents amounted to an admission that it really is investigating Quantlab.

Quantlab did not immediately return a request for comment, but it has previously denied allegations of fraud.

It is worth noting that this appears to be the latest in a long drama involving Quantlab and Emmanuel Mamalakis, the principal of EMM Holdings. About five years ago, Mamalakis formed his own high-speed trading firm, called SXP Analytics, with a couple of former Quantlab employees. Quantlab accused them of stealing its secret high-speed trading recipe. The two parties have been brawling in court ever since.

But even if Mamalakis has an ax to grind, he's probably on to something when it comes to the SEC's ability to keep an eye on high-speed trading. And that's a huge problem, given the outsized influence high-speed traders have on our financial markets.

A new Chicago Fed study last week detailed how flash-trading robots have triumphed over financial markets, making up the majority of global trades in stocks and stock futures and huge chunks of the global foreign-exchange and bond markets.

The Chicago Fed study pointed out that high-speed-trading firms can barely control their own robots, a fact noted by Robert Oak of the Economic Populist blog:

Chicago Fed staff also found that out-of-control algorithms were more common than anticipated prior to the study and that there were no clear patterns as to their cause. Two of the four clearing BDs/FCMs, two-thirds of proprietary trading firms, and every exchange interviewed had experienced one or more errant algorithms.
If the market's robot masters can't handle their own algorithms, then surely the regulators, who are paid less and have worse technology, probably can't do it, either.

That makes it all too likely that we will get more Flash Crashes and Facebook IPO flops in the future, further eroding investor confidence. And it means plenty of opportunity for fraud, as high-speed traders blow through millions of trades in seconds -- long before Barney Fife can even get his single bullet into his gun.

 
FOLLOW BUSINESS
Having the Securities and Exchange Commission police high-speed trading is like pitting Barney Fife against Michael Corleone: The odds are not in its favor. You might think it unfair to compare th...
Having the Securities and Exchange Commission police high-speed trading is like pitting Barney Fife against Michael Corleone: The odds are not in its favor. You might think it unfair to compare th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 207
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frankenchrist
04:57 PM on 10/09/2012
Can we sue Obama for incompetence? His manifest failures have cost the USA much more than the SEC ever could.

Obama can't do anything right.
krist6804
retired, tired and been retreaded 3x
12:54 PM on 09/25/2012
If Jon Corzine walked into the SEC office and told them he wanted to confess about his handling of MF Global client funds; they would get him a to-go cup of coffee and tell him to go home and think about it for a year and then come back.
bullthull
Enemy of all that is stupid
07:55 AM on 09/25/2012
But we health care !
07:31 AM on 09/25/2012
Jail is where they belong sharing the same cell as the banksters (...if any ever go to jail and not holding my breath on that).
photo
cyanmanta
Thinking outside the box is for smart people...
06:39 AM on 09/25/2012
Considering every government regulatory agency is now run and staffed by businessmen whose primary goal is to dismantle it so they can then return to the private sector and act with impunity, I don't know why anyone is surprised.
06:33 AM on 09/25/2012
The SEC is a farce.
It is a regulatory agency that has been 100% captured by industry.
08:08 AM on 09/25/2012
The S.E.C. is just another criminal in a cop suit.
The problem is not just high speed trading out of control.
The true problem is hypotheification. This is where one underlying asset is sold many times. One share of stock 'naked shorted' into many shares trading.This is why the markets are tanking.
Or one mortgage 'bundled' into a CDO that is then sold over and over, this is what the Federal Reserve is buying 'without limit ' until the economy improves, this is being 'bought 'by the Fed for the American people who have no choice the Fed is buying it FOR us , because the rest of the world wised up and would NOT buy them so the Fed is force feeding it to the American people.
CAN WE AFFORD TO BUY CRAP CREATED BY WALLSTREET THAT WALLSTREET THEN BET AGAINST?
IS THIS THE WAY TO SPEND WHAT MONEY AMERICA HAS LEFT?
IS THE FEDERAL RESERVE OUT TO DESTROY AMERICA?
READ WHAT OUR FOUNDING FATHERS THOUGHT ABOUT CENTRAL BANKS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
World Citizen
06:26 AM on 09/25/2012
Perhaps it is the easiest to charge her with incompetence. Whatever... Not sure it's incompetence.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
05:13 AM on 09/25/2012
Like Harry Markopolis said after the Madoff scandal broke, SEC investigators "couldn't find a steak at the Outback".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
02:15 AM on 09/27/2012
FYI this was in response to Senator Schumer's committee questioning in approximately '07 or '08.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
senorlou
yep.
04:50 AM on 09/25/2012
It's obvious the whole lot of them are incompetent, if they're supposed to be regulating the market. It's a free for all over there. In a way, I'm really sorry the taxpayers had to bail it out - but seeing as everybody now has the misfortune of owning a 401(K) for a "retirement plan" (insert hysterical laughter here), I guess it had to be done. How I wish Wall Street would just go away.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
05:13 AM on 09/25/2012
Nothing worse than a faux regulator.
photo
General Washington
In the future, I return as Geddy Lee
04:38 AM on 09/25/2012
Well, now I've seen it all.

More action on Wall Street fraud from a holding company in Wisconsin than from an company man named Holder in Washington...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
01:56 AM on 09/25/2012
can we sue every congress man and women who did vote to dismantle G / S

that did protect the nations citizens from economic hit men

after we vote them out of office of course
don't want to have to fight that diplomatic immunity thingy that passed in the middle of the night for them selves ! while middle class was sleeping from a hard days labor I bet !
12:02 PM on 09/25/2012
we should start with Clinton...1997 and 2003 — the late Clinton and/or early Bush administration — when all the rules just went away. We went from a period, a regime, where people did have at least some concern about going to jail, to a point where everything is legal, and derivatives couldn’t be regulated at all and nobody went to jail for anything. And looking back I would say that this period definitely started under Clinton. You absolutely cannot blame this on George W. Bush. Clinton deregulated banking,housing,and mortgage..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:33 AM on 09/25/2012
Actually, how tough have ANY government regulators been in the last four years ???

Except for the zealous persecution/prosecution of Assange and Manning.
Manning has been incarcerated for three years and has yet to be tried.

President Obama has changed more things (against us) than you realize.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
05:16 AM on 09/25/2012
Four years? Wasn't Bernie Madoff's dirty laundry dragged across the desks of SEC investigators for years and years before the scandal went public?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TJax123
Progressive - the alternative is unfathomable
06:02 AM on 09/25/2012
nearly 11, from December 2001.
08:19 AM on 09/25/2012
It's an oversight not to mention that these issues go back well before Obama. So let's not point out only Obama, but ask also what Bush did to be tough on the industry through SEC investigations and regulating. And if the SEC has been ineffective under Obama, it's been ineffective on the state the markets where in when Bush left office.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:32 PM on 09/25/2012
All I know is it's O's Justice Dept fining these conglomerates a measly percentage of their ill-gotten gains rather than serious jail time.

And Manning sits in prison without conviction.
01:13 AM on 09/25/2012
This is certainly one reason to have a financial trade tax (Tobin tax). If there were a small charge for each share of each trade then then these "free" giant high-speed trades would be pulled way back. Presently there is no cost and the brokers make a fortune in fees for which they pay little in taxes due to more gimmicks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
05:19 AM on 09/25/2012
That sounds OK and I would propose that banks be required to hold onto any mortgages they originate for at least 5 years. If that was required you can bet your bottom dollar a lot of real estate hanky panky would disappear overnight.
04:04 PM on 09/29/2012
We agree and maybe banks should be prohibited from bundling those mortgages into resale securities that make mortage ownership very difficult to trace
12:56 AM on 09/25/2012
Please, Mr. Gongloff, keep on top of this story. I'd be exceedingly interested in where it all goes. The SEC has given all the appearances of a lapdog to the trading sector for far too long.
photo
JayInDallas
I lika...do...the cha cha...
12:12 AM on 09/25/2012
The reason why the SEC is toothless is in large part due to the special interests who spend tremendous amounts of money to keep it that way. Liz Warren struck fear in the hearts of Wall St when the potential for her to step in and revamp the SEC was proposed. She was an insider who knew their tricks and scams and therefore could smell the garbage Wall St was shoveling long before it could hit the streets. Credit-Default swaps are an abomination. The idea that brokerage houses can create a festering turd of an investment bundle, unleash it, actively sell it to investors all the while taking out a CDS, effectively betting on the failure of that investment.

Lobbyists and special interests poured huge amounts of money into Washington to make sure it didn't happen so now she is settling for beating Scott Brown in Massachusetts. Our Best Hope for reform within the SEC was allowed to be thrown out by lobbyists and special interests with minimal outrage. We get what we deserve.