More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Mark Shriver
 
GET UPDATES FROM Jennifer Garner
 

Pre-School for All: The Time Has Come

Posted: 06/16/11 02:55 PM ET

The conversation about education reform in America often takes place in the realm of 4th-grade reading aptitude, middle school math and science achievement and SAT scores. Last week, on Capitol Hill, we expanded the conversation to the place where all of a child's potential hinges: the first five years.

The science on early childhood education is unequivocal. If the United States were to make a deep investment in this overlooked part of the education spectrum, we'd diminish many social ills, including juvenile crime and teenage pregnancy; we'd increase high school graduation rates and family incomes; and, according to the Brookings Institute, we'd add $2 trillion to the gross domestic product within a generation.

Science also says that early education is crucial not because toddlers are necessarily learning to read and write, but because they acquire vital skills that set them up for learning to read and write. The fundamental experience of being taught to sit still, work with other kids and develop strong and positive relationships with adults sets kids on the path for their K-12 education.

Still, our nation's leaders and our national policy are, once again, lagging far behind science.

Only 60 percent of toddlers are enrolled in some kind of pre-school, including Head Start, Early Head Start, a private pre-school or proven programs like the ones Save the Children's U.S. Programs runs across 14 states.

That means two out of five kids in America walk into kindergarten not fully prepared for school. They're already behind. And so is America. This year, America will graduate a small fraction of the number of engineers -- a key to our economic future -- than China and India will.

In Hollywood, it's all about the story: the beginning, the middle and the end.

Here's the early education story so far:

  • We're not preparing our kids for school.
  • Our kids are falling behind.
  • Now America is falling behind.

So it's not a very happy story so far. But there's hope.

Last month, President Obama delivered on $500 million for innovative early learning programs, which both of us, alongside our partners at organizations like the First Five Years Fund and First Focus, have been fighting to secure.

It's a fabulous accomplishment, but it's only a down payment. It's still not enough to ensure that every toddler is prepared for a lifetime of success.

That's why we were thrilled to join Senators Robert Casey and Barbara Mikulski last week to launch a new effort to ensure that every toddler in America gets access to a quality early childhood education.

They introduced legislation that would make universal pre-school a reality by increasing child care funding and providing grants to states so that every toddler in the United States gets at least one year of pre-school.

We know the first question about this initiative may be: Why now? The budget wars are as hot as ever, dollars are scarce and, most of all, the American people are anxious about the future.

Well, it's the future that this effort is all about.

Simply put, these bills are perhaps one of the best ways to make America an even stronger, competitive and more just nation.

To us, that is is one of the most effective and patriotic actions any of us can undertake and the time to make it happen is now.

 

Follow Mark Shriver on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Mark_Shriver

The conversation about education reform in America often takes place in the realm of 4th-grade reading aptitude, middle school math and science achievement and SAT scores. Last week, on Capitol Hill,...
The conversation about education reform in America often takes place in the realm of 4th-grade reading aptitude, middle school math and science achievement and SAT scores. Last week, on Capitol Hill,...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 74
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
02:35 PM on 06/21/2011
All research that I'm aware of that shows the academic benefits of preschool are focused on low-income kids, but the press always twists this into headlines like, "Preschool Provides Strong Benefits to Kids."

The truth is that many families, mostly not middle and upper-income families, do a *great* job of raising their kids with no preschool.

So, the need for preschool is strong only for low income families, and among those, it's most important in cases in which parents, for whatever reason, aren't doing things that prepare their kids for preschool.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
booksnmoreforyou
Progressive educator, activist for good government
01:35 PM on 06/19/2011
Okay, but a lot of Head Start programs are a joke. The program is supposed to be about promoting phonemic awareness. Ask the teachers what that is and most give a blank stare. They act mostly like baby sitters. This won't change until they are required to have a bachelor's degree and start getting paid like full-fledged teachers.
02:28 AM on 06/18/2011
"60% in programs," doesn't equate to 40% unprepared. There are parents out there doing an awesome job preparing their kids for school. The idea behind Head Start was to close the education gap between those who were prepared and those who weren't. It worked. The gap was not eliminated, but kids who normally would have come in unprepared, were entering school at a level where they could keep up.

So if we now require preschool (age 4) will Head Start have to begin at 3? If we don't, then that gap goes back to the preHead Start level. How early do we start? At what point are we pushing kids before they are ready to learn?

Children have critical periods for learning. If we target learning to these critical periods, learning comes easily. If we push kids too early/wait too late, learning becomes more difficult. We know Language learning is best before the age of 7-10. Yet we wait to until HS to teach foreign language.

Preschool for all is not the answer. The education system is already too stretched. If we are struggling to adequately fund K-12, where do we think the money will come for ages 3&4?

Get class sizes manageable so that teachers can individualize assignments as needed. Teach CRITICAL THINKING, and get away from bubble tests. Target learning to critical periods in development. This is how we reach the top in education again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean Taylor Teacher
Literacy is a right of all people
12:09 AM on 06/18/2011
32-36 Students and one teacher, teaching in a Title I class with 90% poverty. This is the new norm with all the cuts to education at my school. 65%-75% of the students are below grade level in reading and one other academic area. 30%-40% of our students will not complete the school year at the same school. No matter the ability of the teacher that is an imposable task to ask any professional. This is efficacy under GOP leadership? We will make our children pay a heavy price for our lack of wisdom today. "A stitch in time saves nine" Effort and investment today will prevent more adversity later.
Sean Taylor M.Ed.
http://reading-sage.blogspot.com/
05:20 PM on 06/17/2011
Toddlers in preschool? Maybe we have a different idea of what a toddler is. Either way, I'm always skeptical of what preschool advocates are suggesting. Is preschool two-three days a week, a few hours a day? That's fine. Or are the authors advocating a full day, everyday preschool that's really just a guise for free daycare.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Benjamin Sisko
Fortune favors the bold.
03:53 PM on 06/17/2011
The fact that this is even an issue demonstrates that we aren't nearly as advanced a society as we like to think. With each passing year, our students lose ground to children in other nations, and the idea that pre-school for all is something that needs to be debated? Ancient Chinese saying: if we do don't change course soon, we will wind up exactly where we are headed.
03:42 PM on 06/17/2011
"The science on early childhood education is unequivocal" Let's put aside the assumption that school=education and talk about how tearing small children away from their parents will help them learn critical pre-skills. How do you propose we fund this? What of the millions of parents who are calling for LESS schooling and more critical thinking and community involvement. If there is one thing I am sure of it is that more school is NOT the answer. We have been shoving education down the throats of children for 40 years and it doesn't seem to be helping- what makes reformers think even more school at earlier ages and longer time-frames will solve the issue?
01:11 PM on 06/17/2011
The problem is, the current Congress cares only about pre-born children. Pre-school children are post-born and, therefore, according to the Republicans in Congress, on their own and entitled to nothing.

On a more serious note, since there isn't enough support for funding education during the traditional years of schooling, and the differences from pre-school tend to diminish during elementary school, in our current climate, the focus should be on K-12.
12:22 PM on 06/17/2011
Yes let us get kids away from parents into the hands of bureaucrats as long as possible!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
veggiequeenmo
Proud to not be republican.
09:01 AM on 06/17/2011
Let's be real. First, early education begins at home. Where are the parents in all this? Parents are becoming less and less responsible for their children. Many expect teachers to be the ONLY ones who teach their kids anything and everything.

I believe parents are the problem. They have become lazy when it comes to their kids, whether it's teaching them to read or disciplining them when they do something inappropriate. Most of the teachers all 3 of my kids had were good teachers. When they came home from school, it was up to the adults to make sure they did their homework and studied. Studying and learning was the top priority and still is.

It's time for PARENTS to make the investment in their children.
10:24 AM on 06/19/2011
As a parent who is married to a school counselor, I would have to agree.

Parents are the biggest problem.

Not all, but far too many.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rlugbill
08:58 AM on 06/17/2011
You guys are going way beyond what the research shows about preschool. The only benefits shown are for low-income children in high-quality programs. Few programs are high-quality.

People reading this will mistakenly think that they need to put their three year old in preschool or they are depriving their child. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Unless you are poor and your home is disfunctional in some way and you are putting your child in the best preschool in town, there is no benefit and there could be a significant detriment to this.

My daughter is 13 and has never been to school of any kind. She consistently scores at the 99th percentile in standardized tests, she is one of the top violinists her age in the state and she was accepted and will enroll in the best college prep school in our city in the fall. People often comment about what a great kid she is and she is popular with her peers.

You don't need to put your child in any preschool. If you are poor and your home is disfunctional, then yes. If not, your child will do great at home.
09:50 AM on 06/17/2011
Bottom line: compare the preschool environment to the alternative. If a child gets to follow his mom or other adult around and ask questions, "help", try stuff, do stuff, follow his interests, look at a bug for 20 minutes, take a nap when he's sleepy -- he's far better off than being one of 20 kids being herded from activity to activity and maybe learning to rote count to 10. If he's sitting at home or grandma's in front of a tv or video game or in a crack house, he's better off in a preschool.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glockman
07:44 AM on 06/17/2011
"The science on early childhood education is unequivocal."

Yes, the molding of young minds into dutiful working citizens must begin early.
07:08 AM on 06/17/2011
Ms. Garner, If you haven't read John Taylor Gatto yet - time to start reading before you continue to use your celebrity for a cause that has its roots in some truly pernicious ideas...Ideas have consequences - take a look at the cities in our country where these ideas have been given full legislative approval - and you will see what those consequences have been (Detroit is a good place to start).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean Taylor Teacher
Literacy is a right of all people
06:00 AM on 06/17/2011
America Needs To Get "EDUCATION FEVER" we have at worst a languid detached approach to education as a Nation and lately, it seems a total disdain by many on the right, WHY? The rest of the developed world will soon overtake us in science, math, and technology, as long as we refuse to educate all US citizens. We are sabotaging our future! Kids only get one chance at the Apple and we are making it impossible for any but the rich to get an education.
Sean Taylor M.Ed.
http://reading-sage.blogspot.com
03:44 PM on 06/17/2011
Um- no we need INNOVATIVE LEARNING FEVER- not more education.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Benjamin Sisko
Fortune favors the bold.
03:48 PM on 06/17/2011
Fanned and Faved.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ember Firedog
A satiated micro-bio is not empty.
12:07 AM on 06/17/2011
A well functioning democracy cares about all of it's citizens, not just the top two wealthy percent. Let' s begin acting more like a responsible democracy, which includes providing the best educational opportunities for our youngest citizens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glockman
07:44 AM on 06/17/2011
Shouldn't we be a well functioning republic?
photo
nypoet22
Psychology Ph.D., Civics Teacher, Songwriter
06:54 AM on 06/20/2011
A republic is a representative democracy, as opposed to a direct democracy.