iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mark Matousek

GET UPDATES FROM Mark Matousek
 

Why We Don't Need God to Be Good (and What Religious Folk Don't Want You to Know)

Posted: 05/03/11 10:12 AM ET

Religious people find it very annoying that people don't need God to be good, as science has now incontestably proved.

For millennia, we've been brainwashed into believing that we needed the Almighty to redeem us from an essentially corrupt nature. Left to our own devices, people would quickly devolve into beasts, more violent, tactless, aggressive, and selfish, than we already are.

Today, we know that this isn't true. With the discovery of mirror neurons by Italian neuroscientist Giaccomo Rizzolatti in the 1990s, we now have physiological proof of why -- and how -- our species became hard-wired for goodness. Mirror neurons are miraculous cells in the brain whose sole purpose is to harmonize us with our environments. By reflecting the outside world inward, we actually become each other -- a little bit; neurologically changed by what is happening around us. Mirror neurons are the reason that we have empathy and can feel each other's pain. It is because of mirror neurons that you blush when you see someone else humiliated, flinch when someone else is struck, and can't resist the urge to laugh when seeing a group struck with the giggles. (Indeed, people who test for "contagious yawning" tend to be more empathic.) These tiny mirrors are the key to most things noble and good inside us.

It is through mirror neurons -- not God -- that we redeem ourselves, achieve salvation, and are "reborn" in virtuous ways once co-opted by religions. Evolution knew what she was doing. A group of successful cooperators has a much higher chance of thriving than a population of selfish liars. In spite of what we read in the headlines, the ratio of bad to good deeds done on any given day across our planet holds at close to zero any day of the year. Although we are ethical works-in-progress, the vast majority of us are naturally positive creatures -- meaning not harmful to our environments -- most of the time in most of the ways that matter. And God has nothing to do with it.

Spirituality does but God doesn't. Evolutionary psychologists tell us that our brains are hard-wired with a five-toned moral organ that focuses on a quintet of ethical values -- one of which is purity, or sacredness. In a world that can sometimes be disgusting, we evolved an upper tier of emotional longing -- the aspiration for purity -- to keep us balanced in this satyricon of carnal delights (where animality beckons and frequently wins). Our need for sacredness is part of our ancient survival apparatus, and manifests in what we call faith, the need to connect with that sacred dimension. This has been the primary purpose of religion, of course -- to congregate people for the Greater Good -- but God has been, in fact, the divine carrot. The important part was communion, a context in which to transcend ourselves, if only for an hour on Sundays. Without this ability "to turn off the Me and turn on the We," moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt tells us, our species would still be wandering around as groups of nomads, unable to create a civilization.

Aside from mirror neurons, there's oxytocin, the molecule of connection (also known as the molecule of love). It's fascinating to learn that the vagus nerve produces more oxytocin when we witness virtuous behavior in others that makes us want to be better people ourselves. That is why people like Oprah Winfrey and Barack Obama are known in neurological circles as "vagal superstars." We are wired by nature to be elevated at the sight of other people's goodness, mirror neurons and oxytocin conspiring to improve the species. Miraculous though it is, this natural human phenomenon has nothing to do with theology. We are born to be beamed up, Scotty.

For agnostics like me, this is the good news -- however it may rankle true believers. Original Sin is a thing of the past.

 
 
 

Follow Mark Matousek on Twitter: www.twitter.com/markmatousek

 
 
  • Comments
  • 462
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
10:52 PM on 06/07/2011
People's dependency on religion without reflection or without taking accountability of choice is sad. I love this article because it provides the logic that doesn't seem to exist for those religious. In Korea there are so many people religious about Christianity whilst making some flabbergasting self involved choices in addition to accosting you on the street or singing on the street hymns about God. From what I've read about religion I don't believe that was why it was created however I stay agnostic because who really knows. I just focus on making choices from the right place the best I can and cross my fingers no one tells me I am going to hell for not going to church however when it does happen I go with Eddie Griffin's line in one of his stand up show and say "nah I am good, I got a sense of humor"
10:29 AM on 05/19/2011
The greatest baseness of man is the pursuit of glory. But is the greatest mark of his excellence; for whatever possessions he may have on earth, whatever health and essential comfort, he is not satisfied if he has not the esteem of men. He values human reason so highly that, whatever advantages he may have on earth, he is not content if he is not also ranked highly in the judgement of man. This is the finest position in the world. Nothing can turn him from that desire, which is the most indelible quality of man's heart.
And those who must despise men, and put them on a level with the brutes, yet wish to be admired and believed by men, and contradict themselves by their own feelings; their nature, which is stronger than all, convincing them of the greatness of man more forcibly than reason convinces them of their baseness.
12:28 PM on 05/16/2011
Whew! Thank goodness we have now proved the nonexistence of God. Haven't we?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddanimal
03:44 AM on 05/06/2011
Nice. Its good to see science validating what us atheists have known for a long time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hayness
A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence
02:30 PM on 05/05/2011
Fascinating! Thank you for providing some facts to counter the oceans of sanctimonious pap.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
a okafor007
Black Atheist from New Jersey
11:00 PM on 05/04/2011
FINALLY AN ATHEIST POSTS on HUFFPO!! ^_^
08:45 PM on 05/04/2011
Maybe it's important not to confuse a belief in God with religious fundamentalism. It seems to me that fundamentalism of any kind, religious, social or political, is a very dangerous thing.
05:56 PM on 05/04/2011
As a religious/spiritual person, I can honestly say that I have never felt annoyed by those who don't believe in God. I do, however, wonder what they mean when they use the word 'God'. I also wonder if they know what I mean when I use the word "God". There are as many concepts of "God"as there are people to have them. Painting us all with the same broad brush is as narrow-minded as religious fanaticism. It is your assumptions about religious people that annoy me - not your agnosticism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hayness
A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence
02:33 PM on 05/05/2011
That's fine - it's just that the majority of Americans believe in Bible God.

Define your god and I'll tell you why I don't believe in that god, either. (Most people decline to do this, I believe out of a vague fear that their god will vanish in a puff of logic.)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ajita Kamal
I'm a fluzlbuwlzum saint.
03:55 PM on 05/04/2011
Nice to see a sensible article on HP.
photo
JohnFromCensornati
Free your mind and your ass will follow.
10:47 AM on 05/04/2011
"It's fascinating to learn that the vagus nerve produces more oxytocin when we witness virtuous behavior in others that makes us want to be better people ourselves. That is why people like Oprah Winfrey and Barack Obama are known in neurological circles as "vagal superstars."

Honestly, I think this is going just a little too far. Is BHO a "vagal superstar" because people intentionally ignore behavior that is not virtuous?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
17andlife
do you REALLY want to know?
10:20 AM on 05/04/2011
I can admit that one does not need any deity to do good. The voice that tells us what is good is within our hearts. Who or what put it there is irrelivant. What matters is what we do with that voice. Do you listen and follow - or ignore it. That is the choices we make.
We all know instinctively right from wrong. It comes down to how we make others feel. We know when we hurt someone that it will hurt. In many cases, that's the point of the action. But we also know how to treat each other right. How to be kind and loving. The only obsticle in the way, is our own prides and egos. Once one can master their own self, then one can do anything.
So, no, we don't need a god to do good. But, in the same thought, it doesn't hurt anything either.
08:49 PM on 05/04/2011
Well said.
08:07 AM on 05/04/2011
.
this article further validates the existence of God. From a single cell, a fertilized egg, a single strand of DNA, the cell manufactures this most-complex machine called a human. Somewhere in the DNA are the instructions for manufacturing motor system, pumping systems, optical systems; saline machines and hydrochloric acid machines; healing and self-correcting systems. The brain can auto-correct the visual hole caused by the blind-spot in our eyes and filter out sounds so we can hear a baby sighing down the hall, even in a noisy city.
.
and this article says that the single strand of DNA has the blueprints to assemble "mirror neurons" so people experience sympathy / empathy (among the many psychological systems built into the brain)
.
I think it takes a tremendous amount of faith to believe that all this was assembled by luck and chance. The more we understand the body, the more it exhibits complex design.
.
08:53 AM on 05/04/2011
Not by "luck and chance." Evolution is the word you're looking for. No designer required.
12:38 PM on 05/04/2011
Evolution = luck + chance + lots and lots of time
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
a okafor007
Black Atheist from New Jersey
11:03 PM on 05/04/2011
Since you believe in god and use microbiology to support your claim, why does he allow genetic disorders to occur???
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:01 AM on 05/04/2011
A good starting point for an actual inquiry into the subject is:

'Evolution of morality'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_morality

... comes up top of the list when you google "origin of morality".
07:52 AM on 05/04/2011
.
"Mirror neurons are miraculous cells"
.
- Thanks for giving God a plug by acknowledging the "miraculous"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Herkv
Caught in a loop . . .
05:35 PM on 05/05/2011
A miracle can be defined as "any amazing or wonderful occurrence." It's not surprising, I suppose, that you choose to use the narrower definition, "a marvellous event manifesting a supernatural act of a divine agent".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Corvid
07:22 AM on 05/04/2011
What never ceases to amaze me about agnostics and atheists is their utter refusal to follow their own logic along their own path while they elevate themselves above the rest of us and endlessly tut-tut over our silly supposed ignorance.

So let me follow their unassailable logic for them. Consider this:

If it's true we are merely hard-wired for moral behavior, it's equally true that we are intelligent beings who will eventually discover that we are so hard-wired and will realize that, absent any real higher purpose (God, for instance) it is advantageous for any individual to take advantage of the cooperation and morality of others and game the system in favor of ourselves. In other words, the only rational choice for any individual agnostic or atheist is to be a sociopath.

Except it's worse than that. Because if nature is predetermined, as they insist, we cannot have any free will. It's just as much an illusion as God; in fact, it's impossible to posit free will without some acknowledgment of a god or creator of some sort. And without free will, there is no reason to care about anything. Therefore, if you truly follow the logic of the agnostic/atheist, joy becomes impossible, despair is inevitable and suicide is the logical outcome. I'd say it's the logical choice, but there is no such thing under atheistic reasoning.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
hornedcog
Tax Tea Now!
08:56 AM on 05/04/2011
Sociopathy is the inevitable outcome for Godless intellects? Your definition of rational is the fatal leap in this fantasy. Stay with God. We are all better off.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:55 AM on 05/04/2011
Ahh, the tortured logic of the religious! Classic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddanimal
03:56 AM on 05/06/2011
The "logic" has been tortured, beheaded and utterly destroyed and turned to dust. LOL.

Its a massive, 5-alarm logic fail