iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mark Ruffalo

Mark Ruffalo

Posted: July 21, 2010 07:30 PM

I live in a quiet corner of New York State. My wife and I chose to raise our children here because we want our children to grow up in its peaceful, pastoral landscape. But the calm that drew us here is about to be shattered by a gold rush in natural gas drilling.

Most people think drilling happens out on the lonely Western plains or on distant rigs in the Gulf of Mexico. But in the past few years, a natural-gas gold rush has spread across Pennsylvania, is poised to burst into New York State and could spread across the watershed that supplies drinking water to more than 15 million people in New York City, Philadelphia and other locations.

Like people in the Gulf, local communities are learning that when something goes wrong, neither the energy companies nor the government regulators offer much help.

Companies aren't even legally obliged to tell us the names or formulas of the nearly 590 chemicals that have been identified by experts as being used in their wells. I don't know when America got to the point where someone can pour 590 chemicals into the ground with impunity -- where we have to argue for our right to know what's in our water and to protect our families.

But as I watch this natural-gas gold rush get closer to my home, I realize America has a choice to make: We can either keep going down this road of dirty energy's boom and bust or we can pursue something more sustainable. I think America can make the shift to renewable power, but in the meantime, the drill pads keep coming.

I live on the Delaware River -- which the organization American Rivers just named the number one endangered river in the nation because of gas drilling. About a month ago, I got a call from my friend who lives on the Pennsylvania side of the river.

He said, "They're here to drill next door. My one-lane country road has turned into a 30-foot highway. Huge trucks keep coming. They've started doing sonar pounding to see where the gas is and they're going to start test wells just a mile away from the river."

2010-07-21-marknew.jpg

My friend and I wouldn't be so panicked about the arrival of those wells if we knew they could pump gas without endangering the water or the people nearby. That isn't the case.

These wells use a technology called hydraulic fracturing, known as fracking. To get to the gas -- which is buried in tiny pockets deep within a formation called the Marcellus Shale -- companies have to fracture the rock. They drill down and inject fracking fluid -- a mixture of water and some of those 590 chemicals -- into the well at high pressure to blast the rock apart and release the gas.

A loophole in the Safe Drinking Water Act exempts fracking from regulation. States can step in with their own regulations, but most haven't. Two thirds of the states where fracking takes place have done nothing at all to regulate the practice. And Pennsylvania hasn't done nearly enough. It's basically been a free-for-all for companies. So energy representatives go into struggling farming communities and offer to pay royalty for sinking wells on people's land. It sounds good at first, then reality sinks in.

2010-07-21-marknew2.jpg


I have made several trips to Albany to talk to lawmakers. The first few times were discouraging. You pass the well-dressed, well-paid industry lobbyists in the halls and you know the deck is stacked. But after you show up three or four times, you see a light go off in the politicians' heads. They realize, "Hey, these people aren't paid to be here. They are showing up with real science, they aren't coming out of ideological cause. They are here because it is a public safety issue."

Our elected officials are the only firewall we have between us and dirty-energy disasters, and we have to pressure them to stay strong. We have to demand they stand up and say: "We need to know what energy companies are putting in our water. We need to protect our farmland. We need to invest in renewable energy that don't carry these risks."

Right now, New York State's legislature is considering two separate bills that would impose a temporary moratorium or suspension on new drilling in the Marcellus Shale. This is the chance for New York to become the first state to put a halt to any new drilling on the grounds that the risks -- and how to manage them -- are not yet adequately understood.

New Yorkers should act now and click here to tell their elected officials step up and make sure its people and places are protected first.

 

Follow Mark Ruffalo on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mruff221

I live in a quiet corner of New York State. My wife and I chose to raise our children here because we want our children to grow up in its peaceful, pastoral landscape. But the calm that drew us here i...
I live in a quiet corner of New York State. My wife and I chose to raise our children here because we want our children to grow up in its peaceful, pastoral landscape. But the calm that drew us here i...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 237
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
04:34 PM on 07/31/2010
I've done the research in depth, and the film "Gasland" does not contain errors. Go to Theo Colborn's site to see the harm that is done by the carcinogens in fracking.

http://www.endocrinedisruption.com/home.php

Also, to the person who theorizes that this shale is so deep that fracking it will not affect acquifers above the shale...this is just playing with fire. Fracking requires creating a kind of mini earthquake below the surface, and liquid (like fracking liquid) likes to travel in all directions, even upwards. Not to mention, when you use immensely powerful machines to disrupt the layers of the earth, you are not going to be able to predict the harm it will or won't do. Why not depend on the evidence already available that fracking poisons wells, creeks, other water sources, the air, the soil, etc.?? Is the money that these corporations are going to make, and keep for themselves, really worth ruining water supplies and the air we breath? Prefer to spend more money on bottled water and on medical bills??
06:44 PM on 07/29/2010
Lets See:

I own Property - I Paid for it - YOU DID NOT!

Fracking is Safe - Been done for over 100 years, no problems yet.

If you stop my RIGHT to mine the minerals and gas oon my property WITHOUT COMPENSATION, you have stolen my property.

Your "Calm" living conditions DO NOT MATTER TO ME AT ALL!

If you want my proeprty rights PAY FOR THEM!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
booyahcah29
My micro-bio needs a lobbyist.
11:14 AM on 07/30/2010
Are you f***ing serious? It isnt safe. Why dont you allow them to drill in your backyard and then see how the water tastes? You need to be beaten over the head? You work for one of these companies, dont you?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
booyahcah29
My micro-bio needs a lobbyist.
11:14 AM on 07/30/2010
Are you serious? It isnt safe. Why dont you allow them to drill in your backyard and then see how the water tastes? You need to be beaten over the head? You work for one of these companies, dont you?
photo
ghostrider57
Unable to find reality.sys Universe halted
08:44 PM on 07/25/2010
Welcome to the world of Corporate America. Money talks and only money talks. They pay off your local government, are you surprised they have nothing to say?

Profit at all cost. Corporate America proves that everyday. If I have to prove that with links then you either don't read or watch the news or you don't work for big corporate America.

We are serfs and we should be thankful that we get to live another day.
10:51 PM on 07/25/2010
“We know that the white man does not understand our ways. One portion of land is the same to him as the next, for he is a stranger who comes in the night and takes from the land whatever he needs. The earth is not his brother, but his enemy, and when he has conquered it, he moves on.”

Chief Seattle
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quillsinister
05:48 PM on 07/25/2010
I've seen several people asking what they should use for heat without natural gas. It does not occur to many of these people to ask what they should use for water once it becomes too contaminated to drink.

When you've reached the point where you're contaminating aquifers for natural gas, blowing the tops off mountains for coal and drilling under a mile of water (and another two miles of rock) for oil, it's time to declare the fossil fuel age over and start to move on. Aggressively. Like our very lives depended on it, because they do.

If we can't see the writing on the wall by this time, then we need to consider the possibility that our civilization is suicidally insane.

Consider for a moment that we're occupying a thin membrane of habitable space on the surface of an infinitesimal speck of dust adrift in an infinite lifeless void. If we render this place inhospitable to our species, where exactly do people imagine we will go? What justification can there possibly be for killing literally the only place we can survive in the entire known universe?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
earthboy
heavily censored for your protection
02:46 PM on 07/25/2010
Free market capitalism...frack the world.
11:56 AM on 07/25/2010
Watch Gasland. It is a documentary about this exact issue.
01:13 PM on 07/25/2010
ewg.org has further details on fracking and subsequent air dates of Gasland are available on HBO site.
11:34 AM on 07/25/2010
An interesting article. But, doesn't fluid fracking in these shales always occur far below relevant aquifers ? The Marcellus Shale is quite big but it lies mostly below 5,000 feet. Most aquifers in use lie just below the surface and seldom lie more than 1,000 feet below the surface. Maybe it is possible to frack the fluid up into an aquifer - but, this seems unlikely, and the EPA has never suggested this as a possiblity. Or, maybe Mr. Ruffalo is addressing the problem of leaking well pipe. Now, this could be a problem and should be addressed. However, a far more significant problem lies with leakage associated with our aging sewage systems. In the EPA 2002 GAP Analysis, the EPA estimates that 23 % of our some 600,000 miles of public sewage pipe should be graded as poor, very poor and time lapsed. These pipes carry very dangerous pathogens and every industrial chemical know to man. A very serious problem.
01:48 PM on 07/25/2010
The Marcellus Shale gets shallower the farther north you go; it's exposed at the surface in Marcellus, NY, near Syracuse. Shale is sedimentary rock and even at deeper levels, it is riddled with cracks and fissures already, all held in equilibrium at a pressure established over millions of years. When it's disturbed by high pressure hydrofracturing, there's no way to know how far and in which directions that frack fluid will travel throughout those cracks and fissures. See my earlier comments on this article for links to more information about this.

Beyond that, yes, there are leakage and disposal issues that can lead to water contamination. In another new documentary (ALL FRACKED UP), two little girls talk about how their dirt road has become too slippery to ride their bicycles because the gas company trucks have been driving back and forth spraying water that leaves the roads "greasy and foamy." That's what the gas companies consider a "method of disposal."
09:58 AM on 07/25/2010
thanks for drawing attention to this system of injecting chemical poisons and a lot of the area's water supply into our earth to extract gas. life on our planet can not exist without water so one does wonder why this subject isn't as much front page news as deep water drilling, without a clue of how to clean up an accident, is. i urge everyone to view the documentary film, Gasland. if that doesn't wake everyone up nothing will. we must all push for greater investment into clean energy research and development.
09:12 AM on 07/25/2010
I live in Upstate NY and my question to the author of this article is: What should we use to heat our homes with in the long bitter winters - do you have a substitute for Natural Gas? Our energy bills are already high and we already pay energy for the poor. The middle class can not afford higher bills, the money would not go to other things like food, clothing, toys, eating out, etc. We have this resource and we should be able to use it. We can not heat our homes with windmills!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
09:51 AM on 07/25/2010
Solar and wind power produced electricity is the best choice for heat pump technology. Stop clinging to the past, you are not able to live without clean water. Just say no to hydraulic fracturing.
03:09 PM on 07/25/2010
heat pumps alone don't work well in the winters of the northeast - too cold outside. if you add in geothemal piping though, they can be effective. a friend of mine put in a sytem himself. he rented an excavator for a few days and dug a few hundred feet 6-foot deep trenches. he snaked a loop of piping in the trenches and covered them back over. now there is a fairly constant temperature year round of about 50 degrees that provides a sufficient temperature differential to allow the heat pump to function properly. return on investment for the entire system - about 12 years. (since he needed a new heating system anyway, the roi for the "extra cost" is only about a 5 years)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ragtag
11:24 AM on 07/25/2010
But drinking contaminated ground water is somehow acceptable to you?

I was born and raised in the southern tier of upstate NY (Mohawk valley) and believe you me, I remember the winters all too well. I know they can get really cold, but there are alternatives to NG. Although kind of pricey to install, a ground-source heat pump would probably pay for itself pretty quickly...might be worth checking on.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aneesia
09:11 AM on 07/25/2010
Natural gas fracking should only be done if it is environmentally safe. But lobbyists (bribery) run this country and it has to be taken back by the people, any way they can do it !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
booyahcah29
My micro-bio needs a lobbyist.
11:21 AM on 07/30/2010
Lobbyists should be extinct.
09:08 AM on 07/25/2010
Richard Heinberg, a fellow at the Post Carbon Institute, has written about our search for energy "Searching for a Miracle" and it is downloadable free online. Go to the Post Carbon Institute website. I recommend reading Mr. Heinberg's books if you want to understand the big picture of our need for energy and the reality that Mother Nature imposes.
01:49 AM on 07/25/2010
So...what should we use for energy?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:10 AM on 07/25/2010
Certainly not energy that poisons the water, to live we need water more than we need natural gas. Do you really think these companies injecting the chemicals into the shale would be refusing to provide the information if there were not evidence these chemicals were dangerous? You cannot be that naive.

What good is an energy source if it endangers the lives of the people in the surrounding communities?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:45 AM on 07/25/2010
Mark,

I commend you for your actions on this. Most people are either ignorant of this issue, or buy into the "Picken's Plan" to energy independence. Natural gas is not viable source of energy. The scientific evidence supports your position, keep it up your strife.

(Good luck with Avengers, I've loved you in everything you've been in so I know you'll be great.)
08:08 PM on 07/23/2010
sTeeve. I guess you probably learned more about fracin wells off the internet than I ever did as treater for one of those 'clown' well services companies. Jeez, everyone suddenly thinks they're an expert. 'No! We shouldnt listen to the guy who has actually frac'd a well before. He's just trying tell us a bunch of lies! He is just a tool of Big Oil and Dubya'