iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mark Ruffalo

GET UPDATES FROM Mark Ruffalo
 

Why I Support the Robin Hood Tax

Posted: 06/18/2012 6:26 pm

The story of how the financial crisis unfolded has been more dramatic than any Hollywood script. Unfettered by regulation, the financial alchemists of Wall Street lost touch with reality, creating an economic leviathan they could no longer control.

It tore through America, ripping chunks from our economy, triggering the biggest recession of a generation, forcing thousands from their homes, leaving families to choose between turning on the heating or putting the next meal on the table.

The tragic irony is that while ordinary Americans are still picking up the pieces today, those most responsible -- Wall Street -- have returned to their stranger-than-fiction reality. Today, the derivatives market alone is 70 times larger than the entire economic output of the planet; a pile of $100 dollar bills the size of Everest is traded on the currency markets every three minutes; computer algorithms earn their master millions by gambling thousands of times a second.

This disconnect between the reality of a privileged few on Wall Street and everyone else sparked the Occupy movement last year. People's sense of injustice can only be pushed so far, and I was proud to join thousands of people across America and around the world who took to the streets not just to say the system was no longer working, but that they wanted to wrest back control and take part in fixing it.

Concrete solutions are needed to make this happen and that is why I'm supporting the Robin Hood Tax campaign that launches today. It offers us a solution to kick-start our economy, to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure, to help those who have lost out as a result of the financial crisis they did nothing to cause -- not just here in America, but around the world.

A Robin Hood Tax would raise revenue from Wall Street while reigning in their worst excesses -- helping to rebalance the American economy.

For all these big ambitions, the tax is surprisingly small: less than half of 1%, or about 50 cents on every $100 of trades. It would apply not to ordinary Americans (the rate is set so low precisely to avoid impacting ordinary people and businesses) but to Wall Street's sprawling, churning predatory casino-style trading that helped drive the financial crisis. We're talking high-frequency trades carried out by computer algorithms, billion dollar bets on currency fluctuations, credit default swaps and other derivatives.

Because these financial markets have grown so large, the tax is capable of raising hundreds of billions of dollars a year. Money that could stop foreclosures, fund new jobs and help repair the social safety net in the U.S.

But the effects of the financial crisis that started on the trading floors of Wall Street rippled out far beyond America -- around the world 200 million people for example have been pushed below the $2 dollar a day poverty line as a result of the crisis they did nothing to cause. There is a responsibility for the financial sector to help out those at home and abroad who lost out -- a Robin Hood Tax could help us do both.

You don't have to trust me on the economics, but when businessmen Bill Gates and Warren Buffet and economists such as Paul Krugman, Jeffrey Sachs, Joseph Stiglitz and 1,000 others have thrown their weight behind the proposal, it's time we started to pay attention.

The idea has been spreading like wildfire -- it's already a movement of millions around the globe. It's sparked the interest of cash-strapped governments, determined to find a way of ensuring the financial sector pay for the damage they have caused. Some of Europe's biggest economies such as France and Germany are hammering out a deal at this moment.

In fact, many countries already have such a tax, known as a Financial Speculation Tax. Over 40 have been implemented around the world, including here in the U.S. until 1966 when the financial sector successfully lobbied for its removal.

For too long, Main Street has been working in the interests of Wall Street when it should be the other way around. A Robin Hood Tax gives us an opportunity to rewrite that script and get America back on its feet

This is not a pipe dream, but a robust and proven solution -- even the Wall Street lobbyists can't argue that a tax of half of 1% or less is unreasonable given the damage they have done to America. But as the campaign kicks off today, get prepared to watch them try.

www.robinhoodtax.org

 

Follow Mark Ruffalo on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mruff221

FOLLOW POLITICS
The story of how the financial crisis unfolded has been more dramatic than any Hollywood script. Unfettered by regulation, the financial alchemists of Wall Street lost touch with reality, creating an ...
The story of how the financial crisis unfolded has been more dramatic than any Hollywood script. Unfettered by regulation, the financial alchemists of Wall Street lost touch with reality, creating an ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 614
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:33 AM on 06/26/2012
If you were to place a Robin Hood tax on my business I would move it overseas along with any jobs and patents that go with it.
We are a global community now and places like India and China are just begging for new companies too invest in their future. We must compete for our share of the action!
So go ahead and chase what's left of them away along with this country's future!
Encourage the world market to change the global currency and move away from the dollar to perhaps the yen and see where it leaves us.
The world is full of people with good intentions who act without thinking about the consequences of those actions.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wbearl
Retired Manager Mechanical Operations
10:16 PM on 06/24/2012
I often wonder, if these same people had worked their posteriors off to build a company, if they would feel the same about taxes? I've often wondered if their business was threatened with a new or higher tax rate if they would sit, applauding it or start looking for a way to beat it or just plain move your business or money else where?
08:54 PM on 06/24/2012
Yo Mark. You said something on Bill Maher's show that bears repeating. Your acting mentor taught you that those who are blessed have an obligation to promote social equality and opportunity.

This wealth obligation more rarely espoused...will never be espoused by the right...of the founding days of 1776. The upper class of this country in 1776 from Washington to Jefferson understood that at some point just having wealth buys wealth, putting those without wealth at a disadvantage and thus creating a moral obligation for those who are wealth fortunate to take on more moral responsibility in keeping an open playing field for all.

Sadly, this country's blind pursuit of capitalism has erased this founding moral underpinning: success means more social responsibility. Naked, corrupt capitalism today is vaunted by the right as pure unfettered good; the ends justify the means (corruption, nepotism, etc.) and no amount of wealth implies a social contract. Its just "me, me, me" by the party of Christianity. In fact, we are back to the Dicksonian ERA of Scrooge: be thankful for a lump of coal for Christmas and to even suggest any tax on the rich is evil. The rich earned their money, go earn yours. That's the pre-1776, right-wing sentiment today cementing just how "conservative" conservatives are today: next they will be wanting a King.

It was good to hear you voice this. Made me want to go back and read early American history.
Thanks!
08:46 PM on 06/24/2012
A true robin hood tax would extend into Hollywood and the world of professional sports, this is where the truly large personal fortunes lie. And since lib/progressives tell us no one could be rich unless they stole it from the poor, let's go after these master theives in Beverly Hills and Malibu.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:41 PM on 06/24/2012
robin hood took money from a rich dictator that forced poor people to provide an uncompromising amount of money. It was their money in the first place.
07:08 PM on 06/24/2012
we already have a robin hood tax
the politicians take money from the
producers
and give it to the
moochers
08:29 PM on 06/24/2012
I suspect you and I have differing opinions about who constitutes the moochers and who the producers. I hate you personally and intimately.
10:41 AM on 06/25/2012
moochers = millions on assistance
many due to the current administration
08:56 PM on 06/24/2012
Making you a corruption denier.
10:40 AM on 06/25/2012
not so
www.fairtax.org
professor
Correkt the Spelling and Pick on the Moniker
06:06 PM on 06/24/2012
Rich people are multi-billionaires.

Who cares what "fair" means? "Fair" means we all starve to death.

Can you believe people are so brndd that they don't understand how the rich steal our money?

Ever heard of the defense industry?

Ever heard of Walmart?

Ever heard of cartels?

Ever heard of bribery of Congress?

Just for starters.

Anyone who says "gummint bad" is obviously a more on.
08:30 PM on 06/24/2012
The only thing worse than government is the private sector. But mostly it's human beings that disgust me.
professor
Correkt the Spelling and Pick on the Moniker
06:02 PM on 06/24/2012
I like the more on trose on here who are incapable of saying anything less more on ic than "gummint bad." I mean that's all they say they are that stpd. Take the money from the gummint. As if the multi-billionaires are good kind understanding all-americans with their caring feelings for all of us who deserve to keep all of their money.

The rich steal our money. If you don't know how they do that, you are either stpd or a liing tro.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jack Glastra
My best comments are still pending.
05:30 PM on 06/24/2012
I don't necessarily think we should take from the"rich" to give to the poor. Instead I believe that we should liquidate the corrupt, to redistribute to the impoverished. When I say redistribute I don't mean 'hand out' either. I think that the largest banks ought to be liquidated and their funds should go partially to a revamped SBLA and partially to offset student debt.
08:32 PM on 06/24/2012
Everyone over the age of sixteen should set himself on fire voluntarily and immediately. That would solve most of the problem.
Goaheadmakemyday
Tennessee tuxedo will not fail
05:00 PM on 06/24/2012
I support a 10% tax on all liberals, since they love taxes so much it would I am sure make them happy.
08:33 PM on 06/24/2012
I would prefer keeping a banker in my basement until Thanksgiving, when my family will eat him.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
verflixed
It will come to pass
03:49 PM on 06/24/2012
I think in Europe they call it a financial transaction tax. While we are at it we should also vote for a consumption tax and get rid of the IRS. With a consumption tax there would be no more cheating or non-reporting, allowances can be made for the very poor. But as usual common sense has gone out of the window.
professor
Correkt the Spelling and Pick on the Moniker
02:18 PM on 06/24/2012
Gosh are there a lot of trose with their in_sayn proposals, all meant to sound "fair." "Fairness" means rich people get everything. I am against "fairness." I am for being unfair to the rich.

Fact. The economy has doubled since 1973. Real wages have not changed. Guess where all the money went? Let's take it back from the theves.
02:29 PM on 06/24/2012
So give me the specific example ho stole your money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Blass
said it wasn't a tax but it was
09:27 PM on 06/24/2012
oh man, you mean I hadda work for it to get it before some rich guy could take it? dayyum.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ray Cote
02:45 PM on 06/24/2012
I agree, let's take it back from the government.
professor
Correkt the Spelling and Pick on the Moniker
02:15 PM on 06/24/2012
Rich people are rping the country. And the trose think it's great.

Nobody can "earn" a billion dollars. How many bricks do you have to lay to "earn" a billion dollars.

Thus, 100% tax over a billion. If you make 2 billion, we get half. And don't tell me how you'll starve on 1 billion. Hardehar.

The graduated income tax was originally meant to soak the rich, period. The rates were huge the higher you go. And the poor paid nothing, unlike now. Look it up.
08:44 PM on 06/24/2012
Yes. It's an unfortunate thing called "history," which the Right will not acknowledge.
photo
laymancanuck
IGNORANCE has used up its quota of TOLERANCE
01:47 PM on 06/24/2012
The economic system should be supporting and benefiting society. Not what we have developed, society supporting the economic system.
08:48 PM on 06/24/2012
Yes. The stock market has become the American equivalent of throwing poor virgins into a volcano. Blood, money, and oil are the only sacrifices their god understands. The next right-winger who weeps over baby jesus while extolling the virtues of a free market, just remember: every dollar you take from welfare drives a fat nail through baby jesus' hand. Sleep tight.
12:54 PM on 06/24/2012
Robin Hood is poor usage of words in a country where all that we need is for the rich to pay their fair share of the taxes that keep this country going. Robin Hood "stole" from the rich. I don't want to steal anything, just make a bunch of rotten apples pay their own way for a change instead of ducking their responsibilities. These "individualists" who won't pay for greed's sake should remember that if it were not for the rest of us they would have nothing.
martman1
retired business owner
01:05 PM on 06/24/2012
Technically, you could say that Robin Hood "reappropriated" from the king what he had stolen from the people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EndRacismNow
"Diversity is our greatest Strength"
01:10 PM on 06/24/2012
Robin Hood robbed from the rich in the first place because the government levied oppressive taxes on everyone. It's a poor analogy to say the least.