More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Marshall Fine

Marshall Fine

Posted: November 3, 2010 10:03 AM

When I saw Alex Gibney's Client 9: The Rise and Fall of Eliot Spitzer at the Toronto Film Festival in September, I wrote that it made you see Spitzer as a "modern-day 'Mr. Smith Goes to Albany' -- like a Jewish Jimmy Stewart with anger issues and a yen for strange women -- in a version of the movie in which Claude Rains wins."

Which I think pretty much summarizes it. Gibney tells the story we all know, but only as background to the story we don't know.

Which is what makes Gibney one of the most valuable filmmakers out there. He may not have the flair for self-promotion that Michael Moore and Morgan Spurlock do -- but Gibney does have the requisite sense of outrage. More to the point, he possesses the clarity of vision and intelligence to take complicated stories -- whether about Enron, a civilian death during the Iraq war or uber-lobbyist Jack Abramoff -- and make his material both comprehensive and interesting.

For his subjects, that's an uncomfortably deadly combination. And so it is with Client 9 -- though the one who should be squirming isn't Spitzer. It's Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, who drove AIG into the ground, and Kenneth Langone, former director of the New York Stock Exchange. And Joseph Bruno, former New York Senate majority leader who was convicted of corruption on charges originated by Spitzer.

Together they make an unholy trio of right-wing power brokers, all of whom were targets of Spitzer's anticorruption zeal. They all suffered because of Spitzer -- and, Gibney shows, they all had a hand in bringing him down. So did squirrely dirty trickster Roger Stone, another villain in this piece.

Gibney's case is that, while Spitzer absolutely did the things he admitted, he was the target of right-wing-powered federal investigations into relatively minor tax infractions. That investigation - seemingly motivated by revenge and an effort to target Spitzer - is the kind of thing that could easily be applied to the malefactors involved in the financial collapse of 2008 but which, as Charles Ferguson's lucid Inside Job discusses, never were.

Yet, somehow, the feds -- under the Bush administration, of course -- found time to pursue a prostitution case to snare Spitzer.

Gibney's other point is that Spitzer made no friends while in office. Zero. None. He alienated people with his self-righteousness, failing to recognize even the most harmless of political niceties. A ruthless competitor, he was the guy who had to win every argument.

So when his transgressions were uncovered, as minor in the larger scheme of thing as they were (how many Republicans have committed the same sins, yet remain in office?), Spitzer had no political capital in Albany with which to leverage himself. He could find no support -- among Republicans, certainly, but also among Democrats -- to simply apologize and stay in office.

Gibney does talk to Spitzer, though the former governor (and current talk-show host) squirms and fudges about the hookers themselves and what hubris led to his fall. But that's less interesting, ultimately, than the kind of victory lap that the oily Greenberg, the blowhard Bruno and the cheesy Langone take, as they gloat about Spitzer's downfall.

Where there's smoke, as they say -- and in that respect, Alex Gibney's Client 9 is on fire.

Click here: Find more reviews, interviews and commentary on my website.

 
 
 

Follow Marshall Fine on Twitter: www.twitter.com/hollywoodnfine

 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:54 PM on 11/04/2010
Heard Gibney on NPR at lunch, seems the Fed court papers detailed 10 clients, each had a brief sentence, but Client No 9 had 5 full pages devoted to him, with hints here and there about who he was. Enough for any investigative journalist to figure out who it was.

And while Spitzer has indeed stated this was all of his own doing, and his fault, anyone who cannot see the hit job it was, by the Feds, under the Bush administration, which used the DOJ for political ends, just doesn't get it. Oh, of course, unless they actually like the US Department of Justice being used for that purpose.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
mrclark
I search for the America I believed in as a boy.
04:50 PM on 11/04/2010
Spitzer was a man who was smart enough to see through to the criminal actions on Wall Street and was therefore a threat to the status quo. Bush and his ilk were just an extension of the Wall Street power brokers in a hunt to remove him from office. I sometimes wonder if the Wall Street fall and the necessary bail-out by the rest of america would have been as bad if he had remained in office. He was above reproach in his job but was sadly human at the wrong time. This was a hit job either way you look at it and I would love for him to be in Geithner's position. Everyone talks about Elizabeth Warren, but he scares Wall Street much more than she ever could.
08:22 PM on 11/03/2010
Don't forget, Spitzer was about to close in on Fannie and Freddy, all Dems. You have no case at all. And as for Clinton, blame the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled that a sitting President could be held liable for a felony, in the case of Paula Jones. Monica was only the icing on the cake, or blue dress. So are you saying all the women whom Clinton screwed around with and blew the whistle are Republicans? Guess again.
Democrats routinely dismiss the Clinton scandal as regular old marital infidelities and ignore the legal precedent set. Fine, past history. But let's get the facts straight.
bichn
There ain't no rest for the wicked.
01:10 AM on 11/04/2010
No but the people who spent millions of dollars over the course of Clinton's presidency to destroy him were all right-wing conservative nutjobs. They failed then, but succeeded with Spitzer. Nice try though.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
02:47 PM on 11/03/2010
Isn't it amazing how the media will never pass up a chance to talk about Spitzer or Clinton's infidelities, yet they won't even get CLOSE to mentioning what Sanford, Vitter, and Ensign, and other far right conservatives were caught doing?