<i>Django, ZD30</i>: What Exactly Are We Arguing About?

The discussion aboutseems diffuse and unfocused. People can't seem to agree about what it is they disagree about when criticizing or praising the film. The same is true of Kathryn Bigelow's.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
Quentin Tarantino poses with the award for best screenplay for a motion picture for "Django Unchained" backstage at the 70th Annual Golden Globe Awards at the Beverly Hilton Hotel on Sunday Jan. 13, 2013, in Beverly Hills, Calif. (Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP)
Quentin Tarantino poses with the award for best screenplay for a motion picture for "Django Unchained" backstage at the 70th Annual Golden Globe Awards at the Beverly Hilton Hotel on Sunday Jan. 13, 2013, in Beverly Hills, Calif. (Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP)

When I was in college, I once interviewed the late Rupert Crosse, an African-American actor who got an Oscar nomination for a 1969 film called The Reivers, whose star was Steve McQueen. If I'd known then that I would, 40 years later, write a book about John Cassavetes (in whose seminal film, Shadows, Crosse had appeared), well, it obviously would have been a different discussion. But who knew?

Instead, we talked about The Reivers, adapted from a William Faulkner novel, which, among other things, dealt with race. Which brought up another film of that same period, The Learning Tree, directed and written by Gordon Parks, adapted from his novel. I mentioned that that film made me feel uncomfortable at a couple of points, as had The Reivers, when Crosse's character was mistreated by white characters (since it was set in the American South in the 1920s). When he asked why, I said, well, it made me feel guilty for the way white people mistreated black people.

I thought of that again recently when the arguments began about Quentin Tarantino's film, Django Unchained, with its copious use of the word "n*****." Django unleashed a tornado of discussion points that found their way into reviews, into public discourse and beyond.

[There was even a television reporter whose interview with Samuel L. Jackson went viral when Jackson wouldn't let the (white) reporter ask a question about "the 'N' word": "Which word is that?" Jackson challenged him -- and when the reporter refused to actually utter the word "n*****," Jackson refused to answer his question.]

Yet the discussion about Django seems diffuse and unfocused. People can't seem to agree about what it is they disagree about when criticizing or praising the film.

The same is true of Kathryn Bigelow's Zero Dark Thirty, a film that has provoked controversy in a variety of ways. Indeed, both the Django and ZD30 controversies have been so heated -- and yet so unfocused -- that I wanted to dissect just what it was that people were arguing about in relation to these films.

What exactly is the discussion here? I guess it depends on your context.

This commentary continues on my website.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot