"Hitler's a joke," Viggo Mortensen tells a friend in the new film, Good. "He won't last."
Gee -- didn't they say that about George W. Bush?
I've been wracking my brain for the right quote or analogy to capture the gradual encroachment and irresistible rise of evil which the Nazis represented -- but all I could come up with was the one about the frog in the pan of water that's gradually heated to boiling. And it's too facile to invoke the current Bush administration, too trivializing of the Holocaust. More about that in a minute.
Still, why bother when these ideas are so casually captured in this adaptation of C.P. Taylor's play of the same name?
That transformation is embodied in Prof. John Holder (Mortensen), a distracted literature professor who, in 1937, is summoned to the Chancellery of the Nazi high command. A novel he wrote some years earlier -- about a man who euthanizes his terminally ill wife to spare her pain -- has caught the fancy of Hitler and Goebbels. Would Holder like to work for the Nazis to put his ideas into practice?
Nothing big, mind you -- just some writing to justify mercy killing as a humane practice. And the Nazis are paying big money.
How can Holder resist? After all, his wife seems perpetually on the verge of a nervous breakdown. His mother has both tuberculosis and dementia. And teaching literature isn't nearly as fulfilling since the Nazis started burning books.
So to suddenly be appreciated -- even if it's by the Nazis -- doesn't ring alarm bells in his head. True, their ideas are dangerous, but they don't threaten him, because he's not Jewish. When he's blindsided by an assertive female student (Jodie Whittaker) who seduces him away from his high-maintenance wife, Holder is suddenly afloat in a sea of moral relativism, drifting into dark waters.
Writer John Wrathall, working from Taylor's original play, employs the same device Taylor did to explain Holder's ability to disengage from reality: Holder plays classical music in his head, which creates a layer of illusion over the reality before him. It's like a form of self-hypnosis, except in teaching himself not to give in to the urge to smoke, Holder is removing himself from the world at large, finding ways to rationalize his own selfishness.
Which, in the end, is the problem with this script and this film. Ultimately, Holder is both spineless and amoral; by the end, he's wearing an SS uniform and feeling no guilt -- after all, it's just a uniform. Yes, the SS is herding Jews into camps to kill them -- but Holder is doing what he can to save his own Jewish friend, the libidinous psychiatrist Maurice (Jason Isaacs).
As played by Mortensen, Holder seems less like a good man who gets lost than like a distracted man who simply gives in to distraction. Rather than doing the right thing, he starts doing the easy thing, never reckoning on a reckoning later on. He's living in the moment and the moment feels good: a new mistress, more money, less hassle from wife and mother, a measure of power.
He's a hard character to care about, even though Mortensen is an exceptionally human actor. It's almost impossible to understand what a vibrant character like Maurice, played with laser-intensity by Isaacs, would see in Holder as a friend, except possibly as a foil.
We've just suffered through almost a decade of selfishness and self-serving in the name of public service. And really, when the best thing you can say about a president is that he didn't foment a genocide (at least not at home), well, moral relativism really does rule, doesn't it?
In that sense, Good is an unintentional reflection of the Bush years -- and the Bush administration. But it's a mediocre movie, nonetheless.
For more of my reviews and interviews, visit my website,
www.hollywoodandfine.com.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.