iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mary Bottari

GET UPDATES FROM Mary Bottari
 

Wisconsin Worker Fired for Email on Free Voter IDs

Posted: 09/13/2011 11:05 am

A Wisconsin worker was fired last Thursday for reminding fellow workers that photo IDs required for voting are free under Wisconsin law.

A man identifying himself as Chris Larson called into "Sly in the Morning," a popular Madison radio program on WTDY-AM, and said he had been fired and escorted out of his workplace earlier in the day for sending out an email to remind employees to tell the public that they can obtain a state license for free. Larson said he worked for the Department of Safety and Professional Services, which is under Secretary Dave Ross.

The man was reacting to recent news stories that the Wisconsin Department of Motor Vehicles was not being upfront with customers that the IDs, which are newly required for voting in Wisconsin, are free. Hours after his dismissal, a small crowd gathered in front of his place of employment to protest his firing.

Don't Ask Don't Tell = Poll Tax

When a draconian "Voter ID" law passed in Wisconsin back in May, Democrats charged that requiring citizens to obtain a special photo ID was an unconstitutional and illegal infringement on voting, much like the "poll taxes" of the Jim Crow era. To withstand a likely constitutional challenge, the Wisconsin GOP agreed the IDs should be free of charge.

Problem solved? Maybe not.

This week an internal memo was leaked from a top Department of Transportation official that instructed Division of Motor Vehicles service center workers to "refrain from offering the free version to customers who do not ask for it."

In other words if you did not specifically ask for the "free" ID, you would be charged $28 bucks for the privilege of voting.

Walker Voter ID Bill

Wisconsin had one of the most open and transparent voting systems in the United States until this year. No photo ID was required and students and families who recently moved to the state were allowed same day voter registration. At the same time voter fraud was nonexistent. Republican Attorney General JB Van Hollen undertook an investigation after the 2008 presidential race and found only 20 problems in an election of 2,983,417 -- these were mostly former felons who did not know they could not vote.

The new Wisconsin Voter ID law changes voting requirements to require ID and allow only a narrow list of acceptable IDs -- including a driver's license and state-issued ID cards. While this change may sound benign to some, the truth is that many Wisconsin residents don't have these forms of identification, and for many, it may not be easy, to obtain.

A 2005 UW-Milwaukee study found that only 80 percent of Wisconsinites have a drivers license. Among African-Americans, only 45 percent of males and 51 percent of females have a valid drivers license. Fifty-nine percent of the state's Latina women lack the required identification.

The new law also targets a demographic that voted overwhelmingly in support of President Barack Obama in 2008 -- college students. Current ID cards for the 182,000 students in the University of Wisconsin system and 300,000 in state technical colleges do not meet the new requirements.

To make it more challenging, you can only obtain the photo IDs at DMV stations which keep irregular hours and do not exists in every county. Governor Walker proposed closing 16 of those offices but backed down after an outcry. The new law has been challenged in state court under the Wisconsin Constitution.

Voter Suppression, an ALEC Special

The Wisconsin law comes as part of a larger wave of voter suppression legislation that has swept the nation in the past year. This influx of bills, post the Obama election, was not a coincidence. The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) provides a "model" Voter ID bill to member legislators to replicate in their own state, yet disclaims any responsibility for the bills when they get ugly and target key democratic constituencies. According to Campus Progress, which has campaigned against the bills, if every state in the nation passed these laws, 20 million citizens would be disenfranchised, more than one out of every ten voters.

ALEC Co-founder Paul Weyrich was not fond of majority rule either. He once told a crowd, "I don't want everyone to vote.... our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down."

It looks like Scott Walker, a proud ALEC supporter since 1993, and key members of his administration continue to follow Weyrich's lead.

**********

Sara Jerving contributed to this report.

 
FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 77
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
Barbara MacQueen
My Dog Paisley
06:55 PM on 10/20/2011
These people are absolutely evil... Get Out the Vote Campaign... Start loading up buses and bring them to the DMV
12:01 PM on 09/14/2011
There is something inherently wrong with out of state college students and illegals voting in elections in a state and/or country that they are not legal citizens of.

What is WRONG is the fact that the DMV is withholding information from people that do pay tax and PAY THEIR SALARIES. That is just plain deceptive.

It is time that we FIRE EVERYONE IN GOVERNMENT and vote in a new guard EVERY SINGLE ELECTION. That would 'fix' what ails our politics. Let no incumbent prevail... They need to learn that what they do is a service to the people NOT a career.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:38 PM on 09/14/2011
So, refraining "from offering the free version to customers who do not ask for it." is the same as "withholding information?"
photo
akdennis
Texas. It's like a whole other country. Seriously
02:01 AM on 09/14/2011
Well, between what they are doing at all levels of government at least everyone can now see the true heart of the GOP. Hard to believe that this is the party of Lincoln. With the population of the U.S. become more and more beige over time I wonder how they think this overt racism is going to serve them in the long run. What really scares me is that many of the issues that new GOP laws are creating will likely wind up before the supreme court. I don't think I need to remind HuffPost readers where the majority justices' loyalty lies. I think that we can agree that it's not with impartial interpretation of the constitution. The only thing that is going to turn things around at this point is to send the Republican party to the same place where the Whigs now reside.....oblivion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:39 PM on 09/14/2011
What "overt racism" would that be?
photo
akdennis
Texas. It's like a whole other country. Seriously
08:03 PM on 09/14/2011
OK, "overt" was a tad bit strong. Let me rephrase substituting "subliminal" for "overt". That's actually much more accurate. Thanks for calling me on my histrionics. I usually try to keep things rational but got a little carried away that time. Oh well, it happens.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Pasterczyk
Banned!
09:52 PM on 09/13/2011
Lovely lawsuit just waiting for the WI ACLU here.
08:49 PM on 09/13/2011
the voter id problem is bad enough; a republican administration attempting to disenfranchise minorities and poor voters who typically register and vote democratic.

but an equally important issue, in my opinion is the loss of personal privacy while the state and corporations claim perfect and total secrecy.

already our internet providers can track everyone we email, every web site visited, and basically everything we read, write, or view on the web. corporations maintain personhood rights 24/7, 365 days each year as guaranteed in our constitution for citizens but when a real, actual human being steps onto the property of their employer ALL rights are voluntarily suspended.

the supreme court has ruled that employers can photograph and film you secretly, monitor computer use and all emails, listen to phone calls, demand samples of any and all bodily fluids, and demand external or internal bodily exams.

chris larson was fired for a free speech violation committed at work through an email.

until 300 million of us realize that the other 20 million are in the wrong, nothing will ever change for the better. the u.s. security state exists not to protect us from terrorists but to protect the american haves from the american have-nots.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ultrawiz
Holding the Middle Ground
05:22 PM on 09/13/2011
I just might make a temporary move to WI just so I can vote to recall Walker.
08:35 PM on 09/13/2011
Hey untrawiz, the majority of the people in wisconsin like Scott Walker, because we're sick of paying some of the highest property tax rates in the country in order for state employees to retire with a fat pension that we'll never see in the private sector. So why don't you get yourself over here, get a taste of our property taxes (which basically return very little to the average citizen) and then you can talk about voting against Walker. Until then, why don't you worry about your own state? And as for Mary Bottari, what's the big deal about having an ID to vote? I've got a drivers license--have had one since I was 16. Most responsible citizens have something. How can you prove or disprove voter fraud if no one carries an ID? In the past, I could have easily voted 20 times in this crazy state and no one would have been able to say a thing. It's as easy as showing up and producing a name. That's a little too loosey-goosey, and the voters in Wisconsin have the sense to know that. No surprise that the brain trust at the huff post disagrees with common sense.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
traceymarie
the President is black, deal with it
10:04 PM on 09/13/2011
BS, try texas for property taxes and we are a right to work state. Does not work that way bag
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckjr2000
been there done that & tired of it
02:28 PM on 09/13/2011
Those who don't want to require that voter's identify themselves as citizens and eligible to vote are quick to say "The amount of voter fraud is actually miniscule." The actual truth to this statement is really unknown. On numerous occasions when there was suspicion of voter fraud and the local authorities requested assistance from Federal Authorities they were turned down. DoJ will not assist in Voter Fraud investigations brought by the states. In Aug. 2010 Pajama Media reported "Just in the last month there have been indictments, convictions, or investigations of voter fraud in: Atlantic City, New Jersey; Troy, New York; Canton, Mississippi; Brooks County, Georgia; Independence, Louisiana; Dillon County, South Carolina; Adair County, Oklahoma; Muncie, Indiana; and most notably, Minnesota, where there have been dozens of felon voting indictments arising out of the closely contested 2008 elections. Voter fraud is decidedly more common than unicorns." Requiring a valid state or federal I.D. is not voter suppression by safeguarding citizens rights. They should be free of charge.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brian Novotny
What happened to Democracy?
02:47 PM on 09/13/2011
Even as all the accusations were flying, there was no hard evidence to back up their preposterous claims. The U.S. Justice Department launched a massive probe between 2002 and 2007 but failed to prosecute even a single individual for going to the polls and impersonating an eligible voter, for which the anti-fraud laws are supposed to stop. During that period, 300 millions votes were cast, and prosecutors only prosecuted 86 people for voter fraud, and most of those were immigrants and felons who were just unaware of their eligibility to vote. Wisconsin's much proclaimed massive voter fraud scheme led to the prosecution of only .0007 percent of the local electorate for alleged voter fraud. To put it more plainly, a 2007 report by the Brennan Center for Justice claimed that "it is more likely that an individual will be struck by lightning than that he will impersonate another voter at the polls." The GOP claims of massive voter fraud really took off after the 2008 election, as in 2007 and 2008 nearly 2/3 of all new voters registered as Democrats. In Wisconsin, the Republican led government and DMV told employees at the DMV NOT TO VOLUNTEER INFORMATION ON FREE VOTER ID's!, so if that isn't a assault on the voters rights I don't know what is.

http://greenplanetethics.com/wordpress/are-your-voting-rights-in-danger-tea-party-plan-assaults-voting-rights-act/
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
06:25 PM on 09/13/2011
Mickey Mouse may have registered but he did not vote.
02:02 PM on 09/13/2011
As for showing ID to vote, we have to show ID to cash checks, use credit cards, etc and we do not feel infringed upon because if we don't, we don't get to cash a check or use our credit cards. So based upon the theory the the evil politicians are trying to control votes, that would make the big box stores as evil?! Use your noodle people, its not ALWAYS about politics!
04:14 PM on 09/13/2011
It isn't really about showing a photo ID. It is really about the imposition of a requirement for people who would have trouble getting around to getting a photo ID and also the cost of the ID in some states. I've worked the polls for over 30 years and we just haven't seen cases of voter fraud. There have been issues of possible voter fraud with the programing of voting machines. How about requiring the the programing be open to inspection by state officials.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:42 PM on 09/14/2011
Of course, the ID is free in Wisconsin.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tpondering
04:19 PM on 09/13/2011
Macaroni is neither a right nor is it free. Voting is both. Don't make people jump through hoops to do the one great thing that democracy allows them. Showing ID to prove you are the actual owner of the funds or credit you plan to use has nothing to do with it.
01:58 PM on 09/13/2011
This article is total BS, state employees were told not to offer "free" voter id's unless people ask for them. The $28 fee mentioned is for a drivers license, which is an appropriate form of identification to vote, so....no "free" id is needed and would be a waste of taxpayer money and time. The point is to avoid doing both. If they have no drivers license, they can get a "free" state id to vote, but not a drivers license, there is a difference. Get your facts straight.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bellestarr21445
Too soon old...too late wise.
02:35 PM on 09/13/2011
RTFA

This week an internal memo was leaked from a top Department of Transportation official that instructed Division of Motor Vehicles service center workers to "refrain from offering the free version to customers who do not ask for it."

In other words if you did not specifically ask for the "free" ID, you would be charged $28 bucks for the privilege of voting.
03:11 PM on 09/13/2011
What part of my comment did YOU not understand? They can't charge $28 for a free ID, its FREE, BUT they have to ask for it. The $28 is for a drivers license, look up Wisconsin DMV.com and ck the fee for a voter ID and for a drivers license. Or you can just take the word of some journalist who didn't bother to ck her story. You can't by law be charged $28 for something that is free, the folks at the DMV understand this and why they were asked to refrain from issuing DUPLICATE legal ID's.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kirk Johnson
12:51 AM on 09/14/2011
You are utterly wrong, and Huffpo is correct. Take a look at the Wisconsin DOT website: they DO in fact have ID cards (not Drivers Licenses) that cost $28.

http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/drivers/drivers/driver-fees.htm#identification
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:56 PM on 09/13/2011
Some states are starting to practice cracking or packing. Cracking means redrawing voting districts to lessen the inpact of minority votes. No big blocks in one district. Packing means redraw the lines to put many blacks and/or Lainos in one district to keep the votes all in one area. Leave it up to Texas and the south.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Comeplayinmyreality
enter at your own risk
01:40 PM on 09/13/2011
just another way politicians are trying to control who votes and who wins. shame on them
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lasjazzman
Stress = perfectionist + lousy typist!
12:58 PM on 09/13/2011
Brilliant - this is what we are teaching our young - - look what happens when you stand up and do the correct thing kids -- if you want to keep your job in a tough economy.........
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:50 PM on 09/13/2011
How did people get on the voter registration rolls to begin with? Was there no check on their eligibility previously?
If the existing voter registration rolls have so many fraudulent names on them, what proof will applicants have to produce to get the new 'official' ID? Will these individuals that have 'illegally' voted in the past be prosecuted?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:50 PM on 09/13/2011
jqcitizen, did the article state there was very little fraud in past elections? Yep!
photo
1johnf
What would Studs say?
01:54 PM on 09/13/2011
You mean all 20 out of 2,983,417 votes?
12:40 PM on 09/13/2011
It was only a matter of time before the southern dominated GOP started using voter suppression strategies inspired by the segregationist governors in the south and this is what we have been seeing all over the country and we shouldn"t be surprised that they will lie and cheat at every turn in order to steal the next election because these things are second nature to them.
photo
essbird
IOKIYANO
12:56 PM on 09/13/2011
It happened in Maine this year too, photo ID. A successful petition drive has put repeal on the ballot in 2012.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:00 PM on 09/13/2011
Countess, it worked then and I guess it will work now. Cracking votes, breaking up minority districts to lessen power. Packing votes, putting as many minorities in one district and the power of the votes are in one large district or they are in several smaller districts. How low can Republicans sink? Sewer??