More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mary Zerkel

Mary Zerkel

Posted: April 15, 2010 09:00 AM

Tax Dollars Must Go to Jobs, Not Wars

What's Your Reaction:

Today is Tax Day. The media around the country are likely to focus on Tea Party activists and their flashy rhetoric about how no tax is a good tax and that the government has no business spending the people's money. These activists may be loud, but fortunately they do not represent most Americans.

Most of us would tell a different Tax Day story; one where we the people pay taxes to boost job creation and fund vital public services like schools, Medicare, and roads. While we grumble on April 15, we realize that taxes are an investment in our neighborhoods and our neighbors' and our own health and prosperity.

Unfortunately, that's not the whole story, either. Too much of our tax money - about half of it, in fact -- is going to fund wars abroad.

In most polls, the majority of the public wants peace and an end to the costly wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The nearly $1 trillion we've already spent on these two wars could have gone a long way toward creating the jobs needed to reduce our nearly 10 percent unemployment rate.

So today, Tax Day, we should all remember that military spending is crippling job creation and that employed people help create and sustain our communities. Each dollar spent on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is a dollar that could be better spent creating jobs here at home. A 2009 study by the Political Economy Research Institute examined the impact on the economy of $1 billion spent in different sectors. If we spend $1 billion in education, it will spur the creation of 29,100 jobs; in health, 19,600 jobs; in clean energy, 17,100 jobs. Spending $1 billion for the military, only 11,600 jobs are created. While it is true the military-industrial complex creates some jobs, there are more cost effective sectors that provide good, well-paying jobs and buttress our communities.

Of course the financial cost is not the only cost associated with military action. Over 5,000 U.S. troops and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and Afghans have died in the last eight and a half years of war. Their deaths cannot be forgotten - or measured in dollars. Morally, we cannot afford to continue funding more death and destruction. Practically, we simply can't afford it any more.

So, use today to inform people in your communities about how the government can more effectively spend their tax dollars. Talk with your co-workers, family members and neighbors. Help them understand that war spending isn't good for our country, and that tax dollars spent on job creation and other human needs will help strengthen the U.S. and save lives.

Secondly, tell Congress how you want your money spent. In addition to the 59 percent of the discretionary budget that already goes to military spending, Congress will soon be asked to approve a $34 billion emergency war funding bill to pay for the escalation of U.S. troops in Afghanistan. Tell your representatives in Washington to say NO to the war funding supplemental. Sending more troops will only lead to more violence. U.S. efforts should instead focus on supporting Afghan-led peace building efforts, economic development, and regional diplomacy.

While you're communicating with your representative, tell them to support the "Local Jobs for America Act" (HR 4812), introduced by Rep. George Miller (D-CA), to help create jobs in your community.

While Tax Day makes most people cringe and some race to find receipts and fill out forms, our job is not over when we submit our materials to the IRS. We must also make sure that the government uses our taxes well -- to meet human needs, not to perpetuate war.

The 2009 PERI study can be found here.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 107
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opsudrania
A Humanist and investigative journalist
11:14 AM on 04/16/2010
The Afghanistan war is being fought on a false premise with a wrong ally in Pakistan. The whole root cause of all evils on the planet at present is the bastard mindset of Pakistani Military/ISI setup. Initially, US herself used them and now they are using the US/EU setup. Osama bin Laden will never be caught as he is the milking cow for Pak Military and corrupted leaders including the US itself. Pakistan has been reduced to a wholesome lawless land with no trustable credibility in her kind of religious dubious fervour. Unfortunately, as they kept using US $s, provided easily, they have found it a good source to suck more and more, in the name of Al Qaeda/Taliban. In stead, all that money has gone, either in the personal accounts or used in creating Mujahideens, in the name of "Holy War" in Kashmir and India. US kept a blind eye. But the Genie is out of the bottle now. There is no known 'Mantra' to put it back. The Monster is Pakistan, wrongly labelled as a (spurious) ally. They are a danger to the whole World now. Yet an "Ally". US need to change her lens of recognition of the truth between the right and the wrong, before it hopes to succeed. "Tell me the name of your friend, I shall tell you, who you are".
Dr. O. P. Sudrania
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Romanwolf
Truth, Reality, Being
11:13 AM on 04/16/2010
Unfortunately human history shows war is inevitable. These however were not, they are the left over, unfinished business of Desert Storm. Just as WWII was the left over business of WWI and the Cold War, that fueled so many other smaller wars, was the result of not finishing the business of WWII. A trillion dollars off a 12 trillion dollar debt that is destined to get higher does not impress me. Our unwillingness to stay in Lebanon in the early '80s after the Marine barracks bombing has resulted in all the deaths since. People crying for an ideal world does not change the real world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cgoodie
09:44 AM on 04/16/2010
It is my opinion that there is a conspiracy to keep us at war for, among other things, JOBS! Think about how many jobs are connected to a war time economy and what it would do to the jobs market if we were suddenly not at war and have no need for all the munitions, security, transport, and of course soldiers.... It was WWII that finally pulled us out of the depression... Just Sayin...
FaceReality2
Democracy in the U.S. is an illusion
10:32 AM on 04/17/2010
Yes, military Keynesianism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Keynesianism

I wish the baggers were smart enough to realized this.
09:37 AM on 04/16/2010
Interesting: the study cited shows that switching investments from the military does produce more jobs and that these jobs, on average, pay about 25% less. So the switch would exacerbate the trend to McJobs: more people working for less money.
08:31 AM on 04/16/2010
Jobs! Jobs! Jobs! I'm sick of hearing it! I pay taxes and work for myself...no government program helps me...so let's call these programs what they are...corporate subsidies with none of the background legislation to make reform meaningful. Private equity groups have continued since Ronald Reagan to prey on companies that have kept a healthy reserve. They are 'fat with cash' these scavagers can steal from pension funds (over capitalized) and once all of the cash is stolen, huge loans taken out in the company name, mostly going to the thieves that do this business, the business is so unhealthy that any economic blip causes them to let go of trained people, costing them in the long run. Until this cannibalistic behavior ends, this country will continue to decline...welcome to the third world again!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen Leverett
09:54 AM on 04/16/2010
I cannot agree more. My only addition is that now there is a greater burden on small companies and it is the new Health Care disaster. Small company businesses rates are now set to increase by more than 20+% and 60+% for individuals.

Needless wars(and military in places like Japan) should be reexamined but a few dollars spend in Afghanistan can solve many future problems.

But whatever money we save on wars amounts to pocket change compared to the disaster developing as a result of what is now the new Health care slavery program and the proposed green nonsense(yes, I studied physics unlike the green idiots) which will bankrupt our nation and push any high paying jobs out of the country.

Let's stop crying over money well spent on military as opposed to a complete waste of money in healthcare and green fraud.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:29 AM on 04/16/2010
The reason given for being in Afghanistan is to keep Al Qaeda from using it as a safe haven.
Al Qaeda doesn't need Afghanistan; they can go lots of places.
So what's the real reason for being in Afghanistan?
FaceReality2
Democracy in the U.S. is an illusion
10:29 AM on 04/17/2010
It has no strategic value at all to the U.S., as one general admitted last night in a TV interview.

Because we have to have a war going somewhere to satisfy the "defense" industry's demand for more military spending?
FaceReality2
Democracy in the U.S. is an illusion
01:16 AM on 04/16/2010
Wars and the maintenance of far flung military operations destroyed previous empires, and they will destroy ours.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bayard Waterbury
social philosopher
10:39 PM on 04/15/2010
What we have in America is military Keynsianism, and even that isn't working any more.
FaceReality2
Democracy in the U.S. is an illusion
01:11 AM on 04/16/2010
And we have had it since the end of WWII.

The baggers complain about government spending but I have yet to hear any complaints about military spending. I doubt any of them is bright enough to understand the term military Keynsianism.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:22 AM on 04/16/2010
I don't understand it either, but it's interesting there hasn't been a peep about military spending. There's a whole different mentality between right and left on this one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bayard Waterbury
social philosopher
10:36 PM on 04/15/2010
I can feel President Eisenhower rolling over in his grave. Although he is, perhaps, the greatest general in American history with George Washington, he warned us by coining the phrase Military-Industrial Complex. Think about our history since WWII. We have developed histories greatest armory of weapons, including an amazingly superfluous stockpile of nuclear weapons. We are the only country in the world with bases on soil other than ours (at least 750 in more than 130 other countries). We spend billions and billions of dollars supporting the military establishment, only to feel threatened by the very terrorism our global posture has produced. I completely agree. Rather than spending a million dollars a year per soldier only to have many die needlessly in fruitless combat, we would be better off producing effective defense and deterence at less than half the cost, and assure our national security. What we do now is completely absurd and unteneble.
FaceReality2
Democracy in the U.S. is an illusion
01:07 AM on 04/16/2010
Well said.

Eisenhower's first draft used the phrase Military-Industrial-Congressional Complex, and it was more accurate.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carol Green
08:27 PM on 04/15/2010
Thank you for a spot-on article. But outside of contacting our representatives, what else can we, as Americans, do to stop these wars?

This past March a couple of us participated in the annual peace march in D.C.: we were shocked: only about 8,000 people showed up for this once-per-year march.

If the tea-party can get tens of thousands in D.C. at a moment's notice, why can't pro-peace people do the same?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bayard Waterbury
social philosopher
10:40 PM on 04/15/2010
It's easy to find your Senator's and Congressperson's email address. Just look them up on Google, you can do it by zip code. If they get enough emails it will create convictions.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
moonglowsun
Humanitarian
07:48 PM on 04/15/2010
You have my vote! It's time to invest in positive programs, not negative ones. Part of those funds can improve security, which will protect us, the other portion used to reduce the deficit, fund domestic programs to help the struggling population and stop the lobbying in Washington so our government can move forward and not stall like it has so often lately. Imagine, a day when our Congress actually went into work unfettered by the strings attached to the kickbacks of their campaign funders.
07:47 PM on 04/15/2010
Tax dollars have already gone for too many hand outs. Since Health Care was shoved down America’s throat the Obamanoides have wasted Trillions on nothing but band aids and worthless temporary fixes and hand outs. Jobs should have been first, but NO, the power mongers of the democrat party had to have their way with health care. (A complete waste of time and your money.) And now they are crying for jobs, a year too late. As the foreclosures mount up and the qualified loan recipients who should not have qualified are clamoring for another hand out and the government to bail out their stupidity. Sure blame the war against the evil, drug pushing, prostituting, and murdering AL-Qaida. What it really is that Obama wants to divert money away from his buddies in Islam.

Wake up! Wealth is not evil, hard work is not bad, Christianity is not the wrong way, its what is keeping this country afloat while the democrats milk it dry. If you want any hope for this country, vote Republican!
10:35 AM on 04/16/2010
I thought we did that in 2000 and 2004, That worked out really well
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
429freckles
Ex Republican Now Devoted Democrat
08:18 PM on 04/19/2010
Ha Ha -- Good joke.
We all know how good voting Republican did. It sucked the life out of our economy. It killed so many more young people lives than were ever lost in 9-11. It took away our civil liberties. It "lost" billions in Iraq. It cost us 1 trillion dollars to fight in someone elses back yard. Laughable.
scipio2009
Alan Wolfe's "The Future of Liberalism"
07:35 PM on 04/15/2010
If folks are truly honest about their worry over taxes and tax dollars, than they need to be in honest in actually bringing forward sound ideas to help the problem, instead of using tax dollars as a prop for a nonsense issue.

And that means winding down the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq along the lines of the frameworks already emerging, allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire for EVERYBODY, regardless of income level, implementing the healthcare bill that just passed, especially in regards to the way it deals with eliminating the Medicare Advantage private insurer drug subsidy, and taking a serious look at resolving the problems with our entitlement programs, which will most likely mean an increase in payroll taxes and raising the eligibility age by a few years.

That's just being a realist
scipio2009
Alan Wolfe's "The Future of Liberalism"
07:30 PM on 04/15/2010
And even in Afghanistan, a timetable is on the table there as well. It is nowhere near as clear as the SOFA, but at least it gives a solid framework for the re-assessment of the war. US troops surge in Afghanistan through the summer, and by the end of the year, another assessment of the country is made, figuring out which areas are ready for full Afghan control, which areas are finally being secured for eventual Afghan control, and which areas still face heavy resistance.

If the entire coutry is still facing massive resistance, even after the end of the surge, the decision moving forward becomes a far clearer one. If the entire country is finally coalscing around Afghan-led forces securing areas, the decision moving forward is clear as well.
scipio2009
Alan Wolfe's "The Future of Liberalism"
07:30 PM on 04/15/2010
I'm a realist, and to be frank, the ideas put forward by this poster, and the clowns who support the ideas, are ridiculous.

Calling for an immediate pullout of Afghanistan and Iraq, and going futher than that, by trying to rally folks to nonsense ideas, like getting our elected officials to refuse to pay for the supplies and equipment that protect our young men and women, is even more ridiculous.

The simple fact of the matter is the SOFA is already in place, and as terms for the SOFA clearly state, US forces will be wholly out of Iraq by the end of 2011. Yes, after the expiration of the SOFA, a new agreement to have a small residual force in the country, for some time beyond the SOFA, could be called for by the Iraquis; still the SOFA holds firm. If 2011 is too far away a date to settle your grievance for a pullout, that's your own problem to deal with.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carol Green
08:46 PM on 04/15/2010
>>>Calling for an immediate pullout of Afghanistan and Iraq ... is even more ridiculous.
10:25 PM on 04/15/2010
Staying in Afghanistan after Osama Bin laden had left and invading Iraq were even more ridiculous. They are wars without a point we are stuck with because of George W.
Bush who obviously wanted to be a "wartime president."
scipio2009
Alan Wolfe's "The Future of Liberalism"
03:33 AM on 04/16/2010
Yes, 200,000 soldiers, all at once, leaving two countries that are currently facing 'hot" wars is stupid! I'm not going to back down from that point.