With a large share of their nuclear power plants down at the moment, both Japan and Germany are scrambling to meet energy demand and figure out how to get by without nuclear in the future.
Two-thirds of Japan's 54 nuclear reactors are currently down, most of them for maintenance and testing. To cope with the power shortfall, Japan's central government asked consumers to cut back on electricity use. But by spring of next year, all reactors currently running in the country would need to shut down to go through scheduled check-ups. If they fail, or if local opposition prevents them from restarting, it could lead to "a once unthinkable scenario," the Japan Times reports, with the country losing all its nuclear power generation.
After Japan's nuclear disaster, Germany temporarily shut down seven of its oldest nuclear reactors, and later decided to keep them shut. Not long after, the country's parliament voted to phase out all of the country's nuclear power plants by 2022. But Germany's Federal Network Agency said last week one of the old reactors may need to be restarted to meet energy demand.
Less Nuclear Means More Coal, Gas
While Germany has voted for an "energy revolution" based on renewables, the country is slated to boost its reliance on fossil fuels in the short run. Germany plans to build new coal and natural gas power plants, subsidized by revenues from selling emissions credits -- money previously slated for energy efficiency efforts.
Germany also signed a deal with Russia to boost cooperation between the countries. Germany is already Russia's biggest natural gas customer, and their purchases will likely increase once a new pipeline under the Baltic Sea opens in October.
In Japan, if all the nuclear plants did go offline, in the short term the country would be unable to fill the gap with fossil fuels, according to a study by the Japan Center for Economic Research. Nonetheless, Japan will boost its use of fossil fuels this year, raising its greenhouse gas emissions significantly, which could potentially throw the country off its targets under the Kyoto Protocol. Morgan Stanley estimated Japan would use more coal, liquefied natural gas, and oil -- including, in the worst-case scenario, an additional 540,000 barrels a day for the rest of the year.
Oil Addiction Leaves Few Options
If terrorists were to attack the world's largest oil production facility in Saudi Arabia, the U.S. would have few options to deal with the resulting massive oil shortfall, according to a "war game" run by Securing America's Future Energy, a coalition of retired military leaders and business officials.
Global oil markets are well-enough supplied for the moment, concluded the International Energy Agency in a 30-day review of its release of emergency oil stocks in June, so it will not coordinate release of more stocks right now. The agency is still waiting to see the effects of its release of 60 million barrels -- less than one day's worth of global consumption -- which is still in process.
One reason for the agency outlook is some members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries have boosted production -- in particular Saudi Arabia. That country's own oil consumption has reached a record high, and is set to continue rising -- meaning in the longer term their exports will probably dive.
Green Helmets
The United Nations Security Council heard arguments for the creation of a peacekeeping force to deal with climate change-related conflicts. The President of Nauru, a small island nation in the Pacific, pushed for the new force, and also wrote an editorial for the New York Times, arguing his own country's unsustainable reliance on phosphate deposits, now largely depleted, is a cautionary tale about ecological limits and the threat of climate change.
However, the U.N. failed to agree on whether climate change poses a security threat.
Carmageddon's Unforeseen Benefit
Americans are willing to avoid gridlock traffic, at least for a few days, as Los Angeles found. The city closed its most heavily used freeway for roadwork to add a carpool lane. Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa warned residents to "stay home. Or go on vacation. Walk. Go on a bike. But do not get in your car ... It's going to be a mess." The feared traffic jams were quickly dubbed "carmageddon."
What actually happened was anti-climactic, as people heeded the warnings and stayed off the roads, leading to a dramatic drop in smog levels. County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky said locals "turned Carmageddon into Carmaheaven." He added, "Why can't we take some chunk of L.A. and shut it down to traffic on certain days or weekends, as they do in Italy?"
The Climate Post offers a rundown of the week in climate and energy news. It is produced each Thursday by Duke University's Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions.
Ambassador Marlene Moses: Needed: A UN Special Representative on Climate Change and Security
Jigar Shah: The New CAFE Standards Are Good, But We'll Still Be Drinking Oil
See E-Cat at www.aesopinstitute.org
Then read Moving Beyond Oil on the same website.
Moving to a 24/7 program of validation, development and mass production now makes sense.
And it can revive the world economy, providing plenty of good jobs.
See the same website for reasons to decentralize cheap green energy faster than might be imagined.
It can be done.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf40.html
Talk about minimum risk they have placed several of these reactors on the border with Germany.
Seems like a case of having your cake and being able to eat it too!
Meanwhile mostly in the south of Germany far from the winds they're going back to fossil fuels.
We need to go to renewables but their are no easy solutions.
http://community.nasdaq.com/News/2011-07/top-solar-stocks-new-leaps-in-solar-technology.aspx?storyid=86463
Go solar, I did!
Off shore wind with the added benefits as habitat for fish makes sense. Individual homes with solar panels makes sense. Large scale solar power plants at this time in my opinion for Europe does not.
Lets do all the above.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,775209,00.html
I think we need to consider development of solar, wind, geothermal, biomass and tidal energy not at an accelerated rate but with the intensity of the Manhattan Project or putting a man on the moon during the 60s.