iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Matt Kane

Matt Kane

Posted: November 30, 2010 01:47 PM

The recent WikiLeaks cable dissemination has garnered strong reactions from government officials. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called the leaks "an attack on the international community." Rep. Peter King of Long Island called for the organization to be labeled terrorists. Former U.S. Senator Rick Santorum went further and said that the Obama administration was to blame for not preventing the release of the documents.

What this country's politicians are missing is the fact that your average American has been subject to the same kind of scrutiny and invasion of privacy that the upper echelons of government are now experiencing. Since 9/11 Americans' privacy has been quickly eroded with little more than a peep from the populace, yet we are expected to be outraged that the government is now going through the same thing?

On October 26, 2001, George W. Bush signed the USA PATRIOT Act into law, codifying numerous privacy-depleting measures. Among other things, the act allowed the government to spy on U.S. citizens and non-U.S. citizens alike, whereas before it was only the latter that was subject to this clandestine surveillance. It eased procedures to tap into emails and voicemails of citizens and it allowed "roving wiretaps." We were told that it was for our safety and that it would be used professionally and responsibly.

Needless to say the law was abused. Again. And again. And again. Don't expect things to get any better, either, as the only Senator with the gastrointestinal fortitude to stand up to this blatant disregard for Americans' rights lost his re-election bid in November.

Unfortunately it does not end with the Patriot Act. Think about your airport experience post-9/11. If you want a bottle of water you have to pay the shamelessly gauged price once you go through security because explosives can come in liquid form. You have to take your shoes off at the security checkpoint because a bomb can be put in shoes. Now, you have to get sexually assaulted by a TSA employee or provide naked pictures of yourself before you board a plane because you can put explosives in your underwear. We're one step away from cavity searches, given that you can put explosives in your rear. Don't think that this will be limited to airports, either. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano recently indicated that mass transit could be the next mode of transportation to receive these invasive screening techniques.

As American citizens we have no recourse. You may not be able to sue your telecommunications company for complying with illegal wiretaps during the Bush administration because the Obama administration wants all suits against these companies dismissed out of hand. If you don't want your unmentionables manhandled by a TSA employee, you can't fly.

So it should go without saying that many Americans have been living with the possibility that all of their personal calls, emails and files could, at any point, be confiscated by the government for little or no reason. Yet when the American government goes through the same humiliation and transparency the perpetrators are terrorists and should be prosecuted. As blogger Evgeny Morozov said, "WikiLeaks is what happens when the entire US government is forced to go through a full-body scanner." The government wants to complain about this erosion of privacy? Get in line.

 

Follow Matt Kane on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RealMattKane

The recent WikiLeaks cable dissemination has garnered strong reactions from government officials. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called the leaks "an attack on the international community." Rep. P...
The recent WikiLeaks cable dissemination has garnered strong reactions from government officials. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called the leaks "an attack on the international community." Rep. P...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barringtonmorr
Democracy: Where any two |diots outvote a genius
10:51 AM on 12/02/2010
The government's invasion is astonishing but the government did the right thing by coming out against wikileaks. It can seem "soft" on incidences like this.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kye154
07:35 AM on 12/01/2010
Aside from the fact that there is quite a police/prison industry in this country, that profitted from the Paranoia that got us the Patriot Act, Americans are easily duped into thinking it is for their betterment. They sheepishly accepted it.

Another fact that should be known about our "law enforcement". The U.S. has 5% of the world's population, and 25% of the world's prison population, beating out Russia by a large margin. Is there truly a criminal lurking around every corner in the U.S., as they have you believe, or does this say something about the direction this nation is heading?
10:11 PM on 11/30/2010
"What this country's politicians are missing is the fact that your average American has been subject to the same kind of scrutiny and invasion of privacy that the upper echelons of government are now experiencing."

The boomerang effect in action.
11:59 PM on 11/30/2010
You know what they say about payback.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ishmael1
A Man Born To Hang Ain't Gonna Die Of Drowning
10:03 PM on 11/30/2010
Well said. As a 30-year Telecom worker, I can honestly say, Privacy of communications is DEAD. So, as long as WE have no privacy, why should our government be any different? SUNLIGHT IS THE BAST DISINFECTANT. Bravo Brad Manning AND Wikileaks.
09:24 PM on 11/30/2010
Excellent post! I've had the same thought as yourself: now the watchers know what it's like to be watched. What is it we've heard ad nauseam since the Patriot Act was enacted? "If you're not doing anything illegal you have nothing to worry about."

For a clever little response to being scanned check out this website:

http://cargocollective.com/4thamendment
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
06:13 AM on 12/01/2010
Hey, WildBill, thanks for the link. It's great!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wespenn56
Progressives = progress.
09:01 PM on 11/30/2010
Sure, because government pay has always been so good when compared to comparable positions in the private sector.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:34 PM on 11/30/2010
This guy is really over-exaggerating. He should be thanking the government for stepping up their security in terrorist attacks because:

1. More research on technological tools against terrorism
2. Safer country obviously
3. Researching of the core or base of terrorist activities.
4. Advancement in security.
Although we have our privacy invaded and there are cases of suspects that the US have taken, there is no fault in the law because it is for our security. Maybe it is the US's fault that terrorism has taken over the country, but we need tight control.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
06:19 AM on 12/01/2010
In other countries - and often in ours - citizens are the best security and the best defense against attacks. I'd rather be treated like an adult by my government than like a criminal. Historically governments are paranoid and prone to attack their own people. And if we would stop creating artificial wars to justify military spending people wouldn't get so furious with us.

Truly
04:00 PM on 12/01/2010
laughable. http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/09/71743
Evidently YOU need tight control but please don't throw around the "WE" pronoun. I sir value my liberty above all else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
E Pluribus Unum 2010
06:56 PM on 11/30/2010
21st century bedtime story: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." --Benjamin Franklin
04:59 PM on 11/30/2010
The TSA scanners are set up so the person looking at the image can't tell who it is - no possible privacy invasion there. Legal analysis here: http://brighton-towne.blogspot.com/2010/11/jeffrey-rosen-is-wrong-scanners-are.html
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Matt Kane
05:34 PM on 11/30/2010
To think that the public would never be able to get a hold of an image like this is ludicrous. It has already happened: http://gizmodo.com/5690749/

And after all of the Patriot Act abuses, are we all really ready to blindly accept that the government will not abuse this tactic?

Some TSA employees apparently think it's funny stuff: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/jokes_about_tsa_scanner_package_r07BeUPwveXGc53E6KuWYL
07:48 PM on 11/30/2010
So the person looking at the image can't tell who it is...so effing what? Is it a search? Was there probable cause? Was a warrant issued? The fourth amendment is pretty clear. Maybe the young lady doesn't want the government agent to look at her sanitary napkin. Maybe cancer survivor doesn't want the government agent to see his colostomy bag. And just maybe they don't want to be subjected to extra groping because the government agent saw those things. I don't believe the fourth amendment has the escape clause "EXCEPT if the government agent can't tell who they just searched". But thank you for your Scholarly Constitutional Legal 'analysis'.......
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
04:29 PM on 11/30/2010
United States Constitution - Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Seems pretty all-inclusive to me! Does it work both ways?

photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
06:43 PM on 11/30/2010
Gee, how do you suppose that happened? I couldn't do it again if I tried, and I didn't try above at all!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruelyFedUp
Ethics is nothing else than reverence for life.
06:25 AM on 12/01/2010
Ha ha ha aaaaaaaaa! Hilarious!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GENERATIONaleX
04:13 PM on 11/30/2010
The Bill of Rights..well, the Constitution as a whole has been ignored, then shredded, and now thrown away. The right to privacy is essential in a republic, and we are just giving it away. The 4th amendment violations are sickening. But, how do we make it stop? I'm afraid we are past the point of no return.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elijah A Alexander Jr
Elijah NatureBoy
05:05 PM on 11/30/2010
Generation,
The constitution is ignored is the least. From Supreme Court, Administration, Legislators, Military and Police Departments, none are protecting the constitution they've taken an oath to protect. Not only in Washington, look how some states are criminalizing videoing arrests for our own protection and assurance no rights are violated.

I disagree "we are past the point of no return," however. The first three words of the Preamble gave We The People the control over the governors. All we have to do is organize, show specific violations of all groups and recall congress and replace them with people the people chose, instead of parties who then require their allegiance to their platforms and not the people's, have the new congress to impeach the president replacing him with someone ensuring "faithful execution of the laws" (Article 2:3) and he will eliminate Generals and Justices to maintain his position.

Encourage everyone you know to go to change.org and search for the petition "Eliminate Capitalistic-Military Regime" and sign it, it goes to both state senators and your specific representative. Give them enough time to do what is required and recall senators and representatives and require those replacing them to do what the petition require.

If we allow The People to take up arms against the government, we loose, they declare Marshal Law and impose the Patriot Act loosing all. Take action now or loose our Constitutional control over the governors.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
06:46 PM on 11/30/2010
Enforce all of the Bill of Rights as originally written and understood.
The 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th 9th & 10th Amendments especially.
04:10 PM on 11/30/2010
Of course they don't like it, and of course the tables have been turned, but do you really think believe there is no control here?

Anywho, I'm with this blogger who finds it all quite unexciting - http://freedomnetwork.blog.com/2010/11/29/the-complete-idiots-guide-to-wikileaks-latest-document-dump/
02:49 PM on 11/30/2010
I don't agree with the comparrison. I choose not to fly hence no TSA. If TSA was coming to my home frisking me that would be different. Also government isnt posting my emails to everyone to read. So i don't agree with comparison.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Tommygun264
2Q2BSTR8
04:25 PM on 11/30/2010
How do you know WHO is looking at your emails? They said the naked TSA scans could never be viewed by anyone other than qualified personnel and then the images could never be copied or transferred to other media, but then a few hundred show up on the internet. Oh, but those were from someplace else, they say, not the TSA. Well, if "they" say it, it must be true, right?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Matt Kane
04:29 PM on 11/30/2010
But Napolitano said that it's not out of the question to have TSA-like procedures for other forms of transportation.

And the government is not posting your emails for everyone to read, but if they wanted to there is little, if anything, in the law to stop them.

The government took away many civil liberties that protected citizens' privacy, yet when it happens to them the perpetrators are terrorists? It just doesn't add up.
photo
OMEGA MAN
A wise man learns from the mistakes of others.
02:42 PM on 11/30/2010
People who use their REAL names on the Internet are crazy. Identity theft gets easier by the day. It is much more common than you realize. Use your common sense.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Matt Kane
04:30 PM on 11/30/2010
I'm going to assume "OMEGA MAN" is not your legal name...?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cael
04:40 PM on 12/01/2010
It's his stage name