Penn, Carville and the Fat Cats: With Friends Like These...

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Posted April 9, 2008 | 11:36 AM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

On a January flight from Dallas to Des Moines, I looked at the disheveled person across the aisle from me, and thought, this guy looks familiar. Where have I seen him before? His hair's a mess, his clothes don't match, so I can rule out actor or politician.

Living in Los Angeles, you bump into pretty much every famous person at some point, and you can get confused as to whom you actually know and whom you know from TV. This happened to me the other night when I went to the supermarket, and I noticed a familiar looking woman I thought was someone I'd met before, except, after staring for a minute and trying to figure out how I knew this woman, I realized I didn't; it was an actress from the best show on television, Friday Night Lights, and now that she saw me look at her, I had to tell her that my wife and I love the show. I was so flustered by my own stupidity that I said the show is a "religious experience" for my wife and I. Good job by me. A religious experience. I'm surprised I wasn't maced.

But back to our flight to Iowa in early January. Everyone on the plane seemed to be a caucus-goer. The woman next to me was from New Mexico, and headed to Des Moines to volunteer for Bill Richardson. But this unkempt guy across the aisle -- who was he?

I couldn't put my finger on it. And so, I waited until the plane landed, and then I asked him, "How do I know you?" He replied, "Mark Penn." Ah! We chatted for a moment about the campaign. I was there to work for Joe Biden, so I hoped that would give me some level of credibility. Penn did engage me briefly, and he said he thought his candidate, Hillary had been treated unfairly by the media. I readily concurred, because he was right. In the winter of 2007, the treatment of Senator Clinton by the mainstream media was shameful. The debates were all about Hillary and trying to catch her making a mistake.

The other candidates were either ignored, or, when they were asked a question, it was something like this: "Senator Dodd, what do you think about what Hillary just said?"

It was ridiculous, and if I were Mark Penn, I would have been a hell of a lot angrier than he appeared to be at the time.

The treatment of Hillary by the mainstream media did not help her campaign. But it did not hurt it, in as much as the campaign's own miscalculations and mistakes did the real damage.

We know the campaign schedule was literally set up for Hillary to win. We know Hillary's camp thought it would all be over by February 5, and it had not planned for the primaries to go beyond that.

And yet -- despite these errors, despite a switch in campaign managers, Hillary has kept the race close. Only in the last couple of weeks have the superdelegates begun to make the move to Senator Obama, the move that is likely to end this campaign shortly.

Since February 5, 55 superdelegates have endorsed Senator Obama, and Hillary's total is minus five.

In the last two weeks, more and more superdelegates have endorsed Senator Obama. They have come from Minnesota and Montana, Pennsylvania and New Mexico.

This, despite the fact that the Clinton team has 10 people working full time on persuading superdelegates. This, despite the fact that Bill Cinton went to California, spoke at the state convention, and did all in his power to persuade the superdelegates to endorse his wife - and none did. Not one.

Why now? Despite Hillary's overwhelming lead in the next primary state, why did the superdelegates decide now is the time to stand up and be counted?

Is it because Mark Penn told the Colombian government that he was for the free trade agreement that Senator Clinton opposes? Of course not -- that's just so much inside baseball.

Four things have happened to hasten an Obama victory.

1. Senator Obama handled the Rev. Wright issue with honesty and without condescending to the audience. His speech made the superdelegates take notice: this guy can handle a punch. Why? Because Obama is comfortable with himself and that makes him uniquely able to convey his message -- because he knows his message. It's him. And he doesn't change with the prevailing winds.

2. James Carville caused the superdelegates to stand up for themselves when he called Bill Richardson "Judas." Carville, one of the legends of the political world, continued his attacks on the superdelegate from New Mexico, talking about it on TV and writing about it in the Washington Post. Carville's rage caused superdelegates to take note: is this guy threatening us? Is he going to use these tactics against all of us?

3. Hillary's Future Ambassadors Club, the big fundraisers, tried to bully both Howard Dean and Nancy Pelosi with threats to withdraw funding from the Democratic National Committee unless Dean and Pelosi sided with the Clinton campaign. Why in the world Hillary's big donors chose to put their threats on paper is beyond me. Does anyone have an answer for this?

4. The Clinton team has persisted, to this day, in spreading the message that Obama cannot handle the Republican attacks. But by showing he can in fact handle the Clinton campaigns smears, Senator Obama has shown his ability to take on the swift boating to come. The superdelegates are resting easier now that they see Obama is tested, plenty tough, and that his support is still strong. Come November, elected officials want one thing: to win. For themselves in their elections, and for the presidency. With Hillary's negatives rising as she tries to increase Obama's negatives, the superdelegates are quickly realizing that Senator Obama's ability to bring out new voters, and to put more states in play, will increase their chances of victory.

Those are four reasons why the race changed in the last couple of weeks. But if you ask me, the two biggest reasons for superdelegates turning to Obama were Carville and the Future Ambassadors. Those superdelegates will decide the election.

Did the obnoxiousness of Carville and the Fat Cats end this race? I leave that to you and to the history books.


 
 

Comments
23
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ou4JnWQsxKw


Here's what sealed her fate in my mind. It comes at precisely .13 seconds into the video.

That was her kill shot, the one she hoped would take him out of the race once and for all. That was her betrayal of the party, her Judas Iscariot moment. One her supporters could not, and cannot defend.

At .13 seconds just view the look of smug satisfaction, putting Barack in his place for possessing the audacity to hope. She can credit that for her downfall.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 PM on 04/09/2008

Hillary Clinton (in reference to Obama/NAFTA):

"I don't think people should come to Ohio and tell the people of Ohio one thing and then have your campaign tell a foreign government something else behind closed doors," Clinton said then. "That's the kind of difference between talk and action and that I've been pointing out in this campaign." "I would ask you to look at that story, substitute my name for Senator Obama," she also said. "If some of my advisers had been having private meetings with foreign governments and basically saying ignore what I'm saying because it's only political rhetoric ? I think it raises serious questions."

How does that sound now ? CAFTA anyone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 PM on 04/09/2008

Every day Hillary-ous proves and reinforces her weaknesses as a candidate.

While Obama proves his strengths.

Hillary-ous is like a school in summertime. No Class.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 04/09/2008

I don't believe Carville's comment or the big donor's letter made a difference in this campaign and the fact that you make reference to "Clinton campaign smears" and ignore the Obama smears speaks volumes about your spin on things. The credit for Obama's success goes first to David Axelrod who understood the importance of the internet. He flooded the internet with interns to blog for Obama and his internet fund raising speaks for itself. Axelrod spent six years grooming Obama for this race and the Obama caucus team are experts at intimidation. Hillary is well known so, unlike Barack, she couldn't very well create a new persona. Secondly, the Republican owned media played a major part in Obama's success early on. Convinced that Hillary was the threat to their candidate, they concentrated on her and gave Barack a free ride. They gave her so much bad press that they not only poisoned people against her, they inadvertently gave support to Obama by down playing his illegal use of his PAC funds and other lies and mistakes. They sat on the Rev. Wright issue for over a year. Too late.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 04/09/2008

You're just one "vast right wing conspiracy" short of full-throttle Clintonian victimhood. One could point to any number of Clinton missteps that is responsible for her defeat; four of which have been aptly described in this article. I note her staying in the race has forced her to resort to a whole host of undignified and unseemly tactics, all of which have stained the Clinton legacy and brand, and none of which will give her the nomination.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 04/10/2008

The Obama smears?? Please elaborate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 04/09/2008

Barackanot won't because he or she can't. This charge has been slipped into the posts of the Clinton supports always without an example to rest their case on. It's Rovian, the smearer points the finger at the smeared.

How Presidential....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 PM on 04/09/2008

As near as I can tell, Obama doesn't smear. He highlights policy differences in a respectful way. He hasn't ever come out and made inference to Hillary's gender.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 04/09/2008




Clinton supporters seem to categorize his defense of himself from the constant barrage of attacks he's had to undergo in this campaign as Hillary smears.

The unmitigated temerity!

Thanks for putting him thru basic training, Hillary, the war with McCain will be a cakewalk compared to you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 04/09/2008

The primaries were definitely Hillary's to lose - and she's lost. She's a solid candidate and had everything going for her. So what did she do - she turned Rovian, when Obama showed some staying power. If she hadn't played dirty, I think she would have pulled it out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 04/09/2008

Please, Carvile is one of the most intelligent people alive. He knows that your pretty boy Obama has more things hidden and will be out in center after he is crowned. Come on! You all know that things that are said and that are not rumors. Gosh, the attorney for Larry Sinclair now that Judge Kennedy has hatched this, will be enough scandals for the Illinois boy. You will see now the attorney on every mainstream media talking about his client. And, what? You don't think this turns off straight people? OH I forget, this is a liberal blog- and most of you are gay.....geeze...how ignorant of me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 PM on 04/09/2008

I find your argument ludicrous and your name calling offensive. Personally I am not gay but I am willing to learn. If being straight means my arguments are as stupid as yours, then sign me up for the Tops line.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:13 PM on 04/09/2008



Carville is a bright guy, but has a sense of grandiosity about him. He's starting believe his own legend.

The Judas remark is a tell tale sign of too much self importance for example. Likening Hillary to Christ, or perhaps Bill or himself. Please. And like the post says, that did more to alienate the remaining superdelegates, and send them to the Obama camp then scare them into staying.

And asserting he knows something about skeletons in Obama's closet, is a convenient way of absolving yourself of having to cite them here. You have nothing on Obama, so you say someone else must. Desperate and laughable...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 04/09/2008

Intelligence does not equal wisdom, does not substitute for character or ethics.

Carville acts like he's still on that tv show that John Stewart so aptly derogated. He's a divider, not a uniter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 04/09/2008

While I support Obama, I am glad, after all this time, that the race for the Dems is still on. I think that it is healthy to the party and the nation, even if the Dems loose in the General Election. I think this has allowed Obama to shine and it is my hopes that Clinton finds her place in the future government as well.

Its time for the Dems to put the infighting and name calling behind for the sake of the Nation, the People in the Nation and then the Party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 04/09/2008

Clinton campaign smears? As far as I can tell, she's answered one question on the Wright controversy, saying only what millions of us said, "I wouldn't have stayed in that church myself."

What smears?

If that's the "hard ball" you think is coming?

Oh dear.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 04/09/2008

Oh please. Hillary says a lot of things, and most of them are lies. Who knows if she would have left that church and who cares. I wouldn't have left the church. I was part of a religious cult, many moons ago; many of us knew the guru was a megalomaniac; he did and said a lof of good things, and he said and did some outlandish things that we disapproved of. Why did we stay? We stayed because of community. We had created a community with one another and we truly loved one another, inspite of our guru. We began to view him as a wacky father figure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 PM on 04/09/2008

You mean "he's a Christian, as far as I know"...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 04/09/2008

You're kidding ... Hillary stayed with Bill, Hillary stays everywhere too long ... like this race.

You know, there are bad comments made everywhere by people we otherwise like and admire. My grandfather's church used to commonly refer to blacks with the N word and debate whether they could actually go to heaven. I loved my grandfather ... he was a mountain of a man and a very good soul ... but he was wrong about many things and his judgment often colored with racism. We had many debates over our beliefs and disagreed deeply at times. He was, however, at my wedding, he held my babies and brought me to my faith. I attended that little church with him and listened to his Sunday School lessons whenever I visited. I would dare anyone to say I was wrong for not walking out. We have all had to confront this issue in our private lives at one time or another. Leaving is often not the right answer ... but the willingness to debate and bring issues to light is the right choice. Obama's choice wasn't an endorsement of Wright ... it proves he has the ability to forgive, to move forward, and to disagree with ugly statements and behavior without "throwing the baby out with the bathwater."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 PM on 04/09/2008

5) It probably sickened superdelegates, as it did me, to hear it said that McCain was qualified and patriotic, but Obama wasn't. (okay, the patriotic part was only implied by Bill by omission, but hardly subtle). No democrat I know of feels emulating Rove tactics is the future of the democratic party - at least I hope not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 04/09/2008

You got that right, Joisey. Up here in Roe Dylun, I can't tell you how many people I know who were on the fence or were supporting Hillary jumped to Obama in the wake of that remark. What Clinton was effectively saying was, "Vote for me, or vote for John McCain, but for God's sake don't vote for Obama." That was a truly egregious breach of party loyalty. If she'd said it before our primary, she would have lost RI.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 04/09/2008

As disgusting as the Clinton people are the superdelegates are not moved by character and quality. Contrary to the impression given by the moronic media there are two categories of superdelegates: those who are elected and the unelected cronies. Hillary Clinton naturally leads among the unelected many of whom owe the Clintons for previous favors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 AM on 04/09/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Related Tags
 

 Site  Web ask.com