More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Matt Littman

Matt Littman

Posted: July 1, 2010 01:34 PM

Where is LeBron Going? Everyone Knows

What's Your Reaction:

Today is the biggest day in recent NBA history, and no games will be played. July 1st is the day that the NBA changes, and I for one love it.

I know, some people say LeBron-mania overshadowed the playoffs. Maybe it did. But part of the reason I still enjoy sports is because I also enjoy wild, or even mild, speculation. Any speculation will do. But this? This is great. Everyone seems to be 100% sure as to where LeBron will go. They have sources "inside the NBA," "close to LeBron," and "in the King's inner circle." Their sources are impeccable, unimpeachable, and almost certainly, wrong.

On the wild speculation front: Stephen A. Smith, a man who often confuses certainty with volume, said on ESPN that he was "100% sure" LeBron was joining Dwayne Wade and Chris Bosh in Miami. I heard Skip Bayless on ESPN say he thought it was a 90% certainty, and then some other guy debating Bayless said it was also probable that LeBron and Bosh would head to Miami.

Of course, there's zero percent chance of all three playing in Miami. You don't have to have sources, as Stephen Smith says he had, to tell you that LeBron and Wade will not play on the same team. All you need is a brain. LeBron is a big dog and so is Wade, and never in the prime of their careers have two players joined together so that they can sublimate ego and money, and win titles. It doesn't happen. And don't tell me about Gary Payton and Karl Malone joining the Lakers -- they were at the end of their careers. Or about Kevin Garnett and Ray Allen joining the Celtics -- they were nearing the end of their prime.

No, LeBron will not be joining Wade, but part of the fun of July 1st is hearing the outrageous, total certainty of people like Smith and Bayless (and me, saying there's 0% chance).

We can all speculate on what it will be like if LeBron signs with New York, New Jersey, Chicago, Miami or Cleveland, joined by Bosh, Dirk Nowitzki, Carlos Boozer, and who knows, maybe Stephen Strasburg and Landon Donovan.

William Rhoden in the New York Times said that there is only one way for LeBron to create a legacy: he should sign with... the Charlotte Bobcats! Why? I don't know. You'd have to ask William Rhoden.

Let's take a step back: LeBron is obviously the top free-agent. He has three realistic options: Cleveland, Chicago or New York. Dwayne Wade is the other maximum-contract guy, but Wade is most likely to stay with the team he's played with so far, and where he won a title, and that's in Miami.

After that, other players may get maximum contracts because teams are desperate. Chris Bosh is an excellent player, but he has not yet proven to be a franchise player. Joe Johnson is very solid, but fizzled in the playoffs. Amar'e Stoudemire can certainly score, but he has bad knees, eyes, defensive and rebounding skills. David Lee has great all-around skills for a big man, but how much of his scoring was due to playing in Mike D'Antoni's friendly system? Rudy Gay is young, but is he a star and should he be paid like one? Carlos Boozer could have played alongside LeBron forever, but reneged on his deal with the Cavaliers, and went to Utah. He left LeBron. Do you trust that he wants to win?

There are pros and cons to most everyone. Yet many teams have followed the lead of Donnie Walsh and the Knicks and cleared space to sign some big name, and because of that, teams will overpay.

Sure, every market insists that if they do not get LeBron, it'll be a catastrophe. In New York, the papers run daily LeBron-or-bust articles. Basically, the papers have set up a situation where the Knicks have to get LeBron, or it's bust. The team's management never said they were getting LeBron. This is why LeBron may not want to sign with New York; the all-or-nothing made up media situation.

Personally, as a Knicks fan, I'm fine with the Knicks getting LeBron, or not. I'm not looking for the Knicks to become title contenders overnight. I'll take a realistic shot at the playoffs. It's better than what we've had for the last decade; most games, I know the Knicks are going to lose, so why bother watching. I'd like to turn a game and know that the Knicks have a shot.

If LeBron isn't in New York, so be it. Let's move on and build a team. If that means signing Rudy Gay, keeping David Lee, and looking to move Eddy Curry's contract for, say, Monta Ellis, Jose Calderon, or someone else, that's just fine. Build a team that we can watch. Do not overpay. That's how we got into this mess. Don't react to the pressure and throw a max contract at Sebastian Telfair.

Heck, today, Minnesota signed Darko Milicic for $20 million. Darko? I think their GM looked at the draft that produced Wade and Bosh, and said, wait a second, Darko was picked ahead of those guys and he's available? Let's lock him up. But it's really the Wolves GM who should be locked up.

The Knicks aren't going to overspend like that, are they? I'm speculating. And so should you. We have a few weeks to enjoy the madness, and then, soon enough, training camp will be upon us.

The Summer of Speculation will be over. Until next year: Carmelo Anthony?

 
Today is the biggest day in recent NBA history, and no games will be played. July 1st is the day that the NBA changes, and I for one love it. I know, some people say LeBron-mania overshadowed the ...
Today is the biggest day in recent NBA history, and no games will be played. July 1st is the day that the NBA changes, and I for one love it. I know, some people say LeBron-mania overshadowed the ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:11 PM on 07/03/2010
I will make some fearless predictions....Lebron, Bosh and Wade will play in Miami (maybe not at the same time, but I bet they will all play a game in Miami). I am also 100% certain that the best player on the planet will be Laker. I also guarantee that wherever Lebron plays (short of taking little money and going to the Lakers, Boston or Orlando) will not be favored to win the championship, and will probably not even be favored to win his conference (although him in Chicago, would put him ahead of Orlando and Boston).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doughnut70
07:49 PM on 07/01/2010
I got cut off. Include the Clippers in that. There he has to worry about the crazy owner, but the pieces are basically in place. Going back to Chicago, the point about Reinsdorf is that just as he let Michael Jordan get away, he can't help tinkering and he doesn't have the money to do a Steinbrenner and be bigger than the game. No matter how much excitement Lebron might bring to Chicago, he would be looking for ways to save pennies to keep paying both Lebron and Rose and he would skimp on the other players that he would need to win a titel.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doughnut70
07:46 PM on 07/01/2010
Gee, Wilt was considered by many to still be in his prime when he joined the Lakers. The idea of stars wanting to band together to have a super team is as old as the playground. But let's be honest. If he goes to Chicago, they need a big man and he will never match Michael's reputation. Chicago also doesn't have the ability to be the New York Yankees unless they win a title every year which they won't be good enough to do. They just don't support well enough. Same with Miami. Bosh isn't that type of player to fill the hole in the middle. His three options are the Knicks because he enjoyed playing in the Olympics for their coach, New Jersey because the owner is crazy and will make sure he becomes a billionaire if he has to pay Lebron himself.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Matt Littman
08:52 PM on 07/01/2010
Wilt joining the Lakers was 40 years ago. And while the idea of players wanting to band together is old, the idea of them actually doing it, at this young age, is never seen, mostly because players want to compete with their team and beat the best competition. Magic wouldn't play with Bird. Your argument about Chicago is interesting and worth considering. However, I cannot believe LeBron would agree to play for Newark for three years. Just don't see that as a possiblity.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Bart Motes
01:51 PM on 07/01/2010
Uh, Kobe and Shaq?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Matt Littman
02:03 PM on 07/01/2010
The Lakers signed Shaq and drafted Kobe in the same year. Remember, it was awhile before Kobe became the Kobe we know now. Your statement would be on the money if Shaq in his prime signed with Kobe in his prime.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Bart Motes
03:07 PM on 07/01/2010
Fair enough. I still think that LeBron will sign with another big star. Maybe the Cavs put something together, maybe another team does, maybe it is the Heat. I am a complete homer for the Heat so disregard anything I saw, but I think given that LeBron is about the rings, Riley is the best positioned to make the case.