More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
Matthew Dowd

GET UPDATES FROM Matthew Dowd
 

Think It's Time to Anoint Romney? Slow Down

Posted: 01/ 3/2012 4:22 pm

An increasing number of voices in the media and political classes are crowning Mitt Romney as the inevitable Republican nominee. As I wrote in my column earlier this week, although I believe that he has best odds today of winning the whole thing and is likely to do so, he is not inevitable.

Here are five reasons why we should be very cautious in getting too far out front of the voters:

1.) So far in the six months of this campaign, we have had six different front runners (some brief and some lasting a little longer). This nomination process has been the most topsy-turvy in modern times, and I expect we will have some more twists and turns ahead.

2.) In the last few open races for the GOP presidential nomination, voters have shown great reluctance to anoint someone too quickly and have put up various road bumps along the way. In 2000, George W. Bush came back after losing the New Hampshire primary and won in South Carolina; everyone thought he was on the path to victory, but he lost the Michigan primary three days later. In 2008, John McCain won New Hampshire and then a week later lost in Michigan to Romney.

3.) Romney has not come under a concerted and sustained negative attack by any candidate yet. Other contenders have had to endure such onslaughts, but Romney has avoided being targeted. This will happen at some point very soon, and it will test him and his campaign.

4.) Up until Tuesday's Iowa caucuses, Romney has shown no capacity over the course of this campaign to increase his support above 30 percent outside of New Hampshire. That will become more and more of a problem as voters winnow the field to only a few candidates. Romney must show at some point after New Hampshire that he can win a much larger share of the vote in places like South Carolina or Florida and beyond -- a big challenge for him.

5.) Republican voters have shown a great desire for a candidate who is competent/electable/can be seen as a credible commander-in-chief, as well as authentic in their beliefs and a true conservative. Romney has the first half of this covered, but he remains very vulnerable on the authenticity question. An opposing candidate could still take advantage of this vulnerability.

Again, Romney is definitely the candidate to beat in this race, but let's let this process play out for a while. So far, we have seen more twists and turns in this race than in a California yoga class.

Cross-posted from National Journal.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 126
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
02:10 PM on 01/04/2012
Yeah that California yoga (???) is tricky.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adam of CA
Independent Information Hunter
01:30 PM on 01/04/2012
Columnist Dowd makes a good point that 75% of the Republicans do not support him. The fact is now known the day after the Iowa Caucus that Gov. Romney placed first with less votes than the last caucus. So Gov. Romney has a win in the history books. But that may be all.

Another fact is that the top three vote winners in an Iowa Caucus seldom become the Republican nominee. So the implication that Gov. Romney is a weak candidate is true, because support for him has remained at a permanent 25% .

With the remaining Primaries in Jan. far more Republicans (Iowa only allowed 10% of the voters to participate in its caucus) can now express an alternative choice who is not an evangelical social conservative (Sen. Sentorum is its Poster Boy).
Gov. Jon Huntsman is the dark horse, once Mr. GetRich is removed from the Southern political arena.
photo
SF TKF
Cthulhu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich.
11:19 AM on 01/04/2012
***Republican voters have shown a great desire for a candidate who is competent/electable/can be seen as a credible commander-in-chief***

There is not a single candidate in the current GOP lineup who meets this very low threshold.
photo
demisfine
Often correct, NEVER right.
10:07 AM on 01/04/2012
The difference between Romney and Santorum was one mini-van of senior citizens.
If that one group wasn't late (the doors got locked at 7), Santorum would have tied Romney.
photo
demisfine
Often correct, NEVER right.
10:04 AM on 01/04/2012
Norm Coleman is running some Pro-Romney PAC now.
He was on MPR this morning (we live stream it at work in NYC) blabbing some nonsense about transparency. If you can, listen to it.
Coleman makes absolutely no sense in his statement. He does his best lawyerly dodge of the question posed about voters wanting to know who pays for these negative ads.
Apparently Norm likes transparency, he just doesn't feel responsible for providing any.
Money is the problem, just ask Newt, because he doesn't have enough to play with the big dogs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elbrando
The dream shall never die - Ted Kennedy
09:01 AM on 01/04/2012
When was the last time a candidate won Iowa AND New Hampshire and didn't get the nomination?
photo
demisfine
Often correct, NEVER right.
10:04 AM on 01/04/2012
2011.
You're welcome.
photo
ChiBloger
And the truth shall set us ALL free
11:13 AM on 01/04/2012
Often correct, never ri----I like your style man.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenDedalus82
08:38 AM on 01/04/2012
Romney is so transparently fake. His speech last night told me why he will never generate enthusiasm. Plastic as he can be.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
08:32 AM on 01/04/2012
Remember 2000 - a choice between W, McCain, Forbes, Hatch, Bauer and Keyes.

This year's crowd's only marginally worse, and includes Romney and Hunstman who would beat any of the 2000 in terms of making sense.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cynic1
T'each his own,said the man,as he kissed the cow
07:54 AM on 01/04/2012
With Bachmann and/or Perry likely dropping out. Things will move quickly when their former supporters land. Bachmann and Perry had 15% combined in Iowa and those folks will need a place to land. I think Santorum and Romney get an equal share of the former candidates supporters.

It will be interesting to see how Ron Paul's message has been received in South Carolina. Santorum must win South Carolina - if he can't win the Deep South he's a goner.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wikwox
So there I was, playing the piano....
08:38 AM on 01/04/2012
Cut to chase: Goner.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MacTheBlogger
Radical Independent. Keep your partisan BS.
07:11 AM on 01/04/2012
I'm no political pundit (and I consider that fact to be among my better qualities), but it seems to me that Perry and Bachmann are about to exit, and their supporters are more likely to fall in line behind Santorum than Romney.

Santorum. Holy crap, I can't believe I just typed that name in reference to the GOP presidential nomination. Obama's the luckiest guy on the planet.
.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alak0926
05:20 AM on 01/04/2012
Mr. Dowd how about cutting back on the spin. This is a weak showing for a strong favorite. He can't crack 25% and lets face it nobody likes this guy. The GOP is doomed if he gets nominated.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MacTheBlogger
Radical Independent. Keep your partisan BS.
07:22 AM on 01/04/2012
I'd still love to know the REAL reason why so many potential top GOP candidates stayed home when they could have run against a vulnerable incumbent President. Weird.

While the entertainment factor of this group has been high, the whole circus has also been an embarrassment. I would have preferred a higher-quality campaign in general.
.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cynic1
T'each his own,said the man,as he kissed the cow
08:08 AM on 01/04/2012
The "real" reason is that no one has the guts to take the reins. It's easy to throw stones and criticize but the strong candidates all flinched. The strong candidates were scared because the solutions needed for the country are not palitable with a re-election come 2016. It's ironic that in making the decision to wait the "strong" candidates indicated they lacked strength of character.

I think the country will be shocked at the candor that Obama has after his next term begins. Many of the issues brought out by Occupy Wallstreet, the Tea Party, and in the debt debates ...etc will be dealt with without the fear of re-election to worry about.
photo
SF TKF
Cthulhu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich.
11:21 AM on 01/04/2012
Because Obama isn't as vunerable as some people think...
photo
demisfine
Often correct, NEVER right.
10:06 AM on 01/04/2012
Exactly!!!
Santorum had one mini-van of senior citizens less than Romney.
Embarrassing.
01:51 AM on 01/04/2012
How can you even talk about "anointing" or not "anointing" Romney? Do you not known that he has already been "anointed" since birth as a member of the Mormon Royalty and Priesthood? The principles of his LDS faith teach him that once he makes it to the Celestial Kingdom and becomes perfect, he will become a god of his own planet and populate it with the spiritual children engendered by himself and his goddess. Just go to lds.org and search on "principles" and read it in black and white for yourself.
photo
janmB
INSPIRED
04:50 AM on 01/04/2012
Yes as a member of the "Mormon Priesthood" MITT reportedly rushed to a Boston Hospital to convince a woman not to have a medical abortion. She chose to live instead. She said he didn't care about her well-being.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
lodger16x
01:32 AM on 01/04/2012
The twists and turns of this "race" are like those on a roller coaster- it always ends the same. Romney has the backing of the REPUB establishment. Game over. They can use a few media outlets (FoxNews, Rush, Newsmax, etc), to manipulate the base. Political "journalists" and analysts have to play the daily primary report game to keep their jobs. But objective observers know Romney was chosen months or years ago.
11:33 PM on 01/03/2012
I have a serious question if anyone can help me, and please give me a link proving it.

Gary Johnson says he's going to run for President on the libertarian ticket. If Ron Paul doesn't win the primary what does that mean for him? Would there be a primary for libertarians? Just asking.
Zip Zinzel
If a Nation expects to be both Ignorant & Free . .
01:05 AM on 01/04/2012
OH BOY
The Liberatarians DO have a Primary, but it is a One-Day event if I remember it.
They always broadcast it on CSPAN

Ron Paul has stated pretty clearly that he wouldn't go to a 3rd Party.
IF HE DID GO TO ANY 3RD PARTY, it would guarantee a landslide for Obama.

He is not running concurrently for his existing House seat.

Some pundits have suggested that if he did go 3rd party, and hurt the Party in the upcoming election, that the Republicans would retaliate against his son, Rand Paul US Senator .

FOR MORE INFOR START HERE
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_National_Convention
06:46 AM on 01/04/2012
He should run 3rd party if he gets squeezed out. Repubs have treated him like shite.
photo
ChiBloger
And the truth shall set us ALL free
11:23 AM on 01/04/2012
I am in no way a Ron Paul fan, but why shouldn’t he? What has the republican Part done for him? We progressives observe the Republican party as a “diverse “ party which include right and far right people.

Paul is a dog and pony show that offers another flavor of Right wing. But certain views that the establishment corporate money people within the Party can not abide. He could do no worst.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cynic1
T'each his own,said the man,as he kissed the cow
08:28 AM on 01/04/2012
Gary Johnson is a good candidate. The media thought they were throwing the libertarians a bone by including Ron Paul. But the strength of that movement goes much deeper and is not all wackjobs. The media highlights the extremist elements which marginalizes the whole movement. I don't think that is a conspiracy - it's just journalist's natural tendency to report the sensational story. The Libertarians have the support to create a third party.

I count myself as one of the few Obama supporters that would consider Mr. Johnson for President.
photo
julieJgoldengay
Buffalo Woman of the L-Train
10:59 PM on 01/03/2012
Just Like...
A Californian.
Fluid Hot,
Yoga Class.
In the Nude.