- BIG NEWS:
- Newspapers
- |
- MSNBC
- |
- NBC
- |
- Rachel Maddow
- |
Jennifer Preston, a veteran reporter and editor, became the New York Times first social media editor this week, and from her early tweets it looks like she'll be learning on the job.
Following the rules of online organizing, Preston made her twitter debut by asking for input, tweeting, "How should @nytimes be using Twitter?" Within a day she garnered over three thousand followers and probably had more innovative suggestions than she knew what to do with, but from the look of her latter tweets nobody thought to suggest anything so germane as learning Twitter etiquette 101.
Around 8pm on Tuesday Preston retweeted, "@AAdamGlenn: Thanks for all your help. This blog post you suggested is excellent: '10 Golden Rules of Social Media' http://bit.ly/2..."
Due to the "RT" that appears at the beginning of every retweet, Preston's entry went over 140 characters, the limit set by Twitter based on the length of most text messages, which led Glenn's original link to be shortened. The result: instead of linking readers to 10 Golden Rules On Social Media, she sent readers directly to eBay's homepage.
As though to highlight the importance of eBay to the Times, Preston retweeted the same thing only moments later.
The message didn't get through, as the two problematic tweets have not been removed.
The Wild West of new social media platforms can be a minefield, and the dangers inherent to Twitter in particular have been well documented (here's my favorite of all Twitter faux pas). But Preston's rookie mistake begs the question of whether the expertise of a veteran news reporter carries over into the world of social media.
The Times deputy managing editor Jonathan Landman admitted that Preston might be a little rough around the edges. According to Matt Haber at The New York Observer Landman said, "She's not an expert to start with, but I don't think that's a terrible handicap here in real ways. Nobody's an expert."
Seeing as how social media has been around as long as the Internet, I wonder if Landman is correct in saying there are no experts out there.
I'm interested to hear what you think. And let's have the conversation over twitter. I'm @mpalevsky.
Jennifer Preston (NYT_JenPreston) on Twitter
Gawker - New York Times Hiring 'Social Media Editor' To...Do ...
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
"Twitter etiquette"...
Ah! The Progress of Man!
My Twitter account has been suspended. It seems I violated the Terms of Service and Rules policy, specifically, "You may not use our service for any unlawful purposes or for promotion of illegal activity." In my defense, I was referring to a news story that was reported on most Internet news services, including time.com. Red Bull Cola was pulled from store shelves in Germany because trace amounts of cocaine were found in the drink. Yesterday, in my blog, I estimated that it would take at least 400 cans of the popular energy drink to get high on the cocaine. In my Twitter comment, I wrote: "Red Bull Cola is pulled from the stores in Germany; 0.13 micrograms of cocaine found in drink. I just bought 400 cans." Then I sent out another message with a link to my web page: "I'm getting high on Red Bull." Within a half hour I was informed on my Twitter page that my account had been suspended due to "strange activity." If you would have read my blog yesterday, you would have learned that although the amount of cocaine found in the drinks was insignificant, because of the high sugar and caffeine content, anything close to 25 cans would have caused cardiac arrest.
full story at: http://paulsolomon.blogspot.com/2009/05/twitter-suspended-my-account.html
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with