Pro-lifer's! Who can't love 'em? The new S.D. bill will allow abortions in cases of rape or incest,
but only if the woman reports the crime to police? The women who don't report are just S O L., and criminals themselves, huh? But why stop there? Why not mandate that all pregnancies, regardless of the circumstances of the conception, be reported to the proper government (church?) authorities and monitored at regular intervals (by church elders, perhaps) for fetal development? This is a real possibility if the anti-choice block takes control. The bill also allows for an abortion in cases where the woman is at "serious risk of a substantial and irreversible impairment of the functioning of a major bodily organ or system." Will a woman's own doctor be allowed to make that call, or will government sponsored physicians have the final say about the state of a woman's health? Given that anti-choice forces don't trust a woman to make her own health care decisions anyway, it's not likely that they would trust the opinion of the doctor that the woman has chosen as her private physician, is it? Also, the other narrow exceptions for an abortion--organ or system impairment--disregard completely the psychological, emotional, social and myriad other aspects of a woman's life that could be irreversibly impaired or even destroyed totally by government interference in her health care decisions.




Loading comments…
Posted May 26, 2008 | 01:03 PM (EST)