With President George W. Bush only a year away from departing the White House and the Republican succession in turmoil some of the most prominent conservative intellectuals and activists have gathered together for one last great crusade. Movement icons from Robby George of Princeton to Harvey Mansfield of Harvard, from David Horowitz to Brit Hume, raised howls of persecution when they learned that two masked men allegedly attacked a conservative Princeton University student. They insisted that the right-wing acolyte was beaten up "for his conservative views," as Horowitz put it. And they accused Princeton of failing to protect conservatives and upholding a hypocritical liberal double standard. Unfortunately, as I have reported for the Nation, the trumpeted cause collapsed when the victim turned out to be a hoaxer.
The embarrassing episode for the conservative leaders began last week when Francisco Nava, a junior at Princeton University, appeared at the hospital with cuts and bruises covering his face. He claimed that two unidentified men repeatedly bashed his head against a brick wall, shouting to "shut the fuck up."
Nava is a member of a student group called the Anscombe Society. Named for G.E.M. Anscombe, a British philospher who opposed her country's involvement in World War Two, the group was founded to promote "a chaste lifestyle which respects and appreciates human sexuality, relationships, and dignity." The Anscombe Society explained its abstinence advocacy on its website: "The nature of this sexual act is itself unitive--two become one flesh. Sex is thus the actualization of the marital union, concretizing the mutual gift of self between the partners."
Nava, a conservative Mormon, claimed his troubles began when he wrote a column for the student newspaper, The Princetonian, called "Princeton's latex lies." He warned "the infectious threat posed by Princeton's hookup culture" would spread if the school continued its policy of free condom distribution. "What Princeton's condom campaign amounts to is a tacit sponsorship of hookup sex," Nava declared.
Nava claimed in the wake of his column that he and other Anscombe members were bombarded by a deluge of death threats from liberal students enraged by their brave stand against promiscuity on campus. Princeton jurisprudence Professor Robert George, conservative star and occasional White House advisor, also reported receiving death threats as the faculty adviser to his student, Francisco Nava.
On December 13, the Princetonian published a column by an Anscombe member demanding justice for Nava's persecution. "There is an intolerable double standard here -- one that the University must erase if it is to be true to its own core values," Princeton sophomore Brandon McGinley insisted.
Nava earnestly described his plight. "For several days I lived in fear of saying, writing or even thinking anything controversial in class or informally among my friends," he told the Princetonian on December 14.
The following day, Nava placed an emergency call to the campus police, claiming he had just been brutally attacked by two men wearing black stocking caps. They slammed him into a wall, he said, and beat him with a bottle of Orangina. While being escorted to the campus health center by the police, Nava reportedly spotted a student wearing a black stocking cap. "Get that guy's name," Nava shouted to a security guard, pointing at the student. He began hyperventilating and was administered a large dose of sedatives. Almost at once, as soon as Robby George heard about the alleged attack, he rushed to Nava's side and launched the campaign to defend him.
Who is Robby George? As the leading light at Princeton for the conservative movement, George founded the James Madison Program, an academic center within the university that serves as a testing ground for the right's effort to politicize college campuses. As I reported for the Nation in 2006, George's program is funded by a stable of right-wing foundations and a shadowy web of front groups for the Catholic cult known as Opus Dei. An article in Crisis, a conservative Catholic magazine then published by George's ally Deal Hudson, highlighted George's machinations, stating, "If there really is a vast, right-wing conspiracy, its leaders probably meet in George's basement."
For years, George has complained that Princeton actively discriminated against conservative students. "If they find out he's pro-life or against same-sex marriage, he might be cut off, or not be able to get through graduate school," he told me, describing the school's purported unfairness.
But before George triumphantly pointed to Nava's beating as proof of anti-conservative bias on campus, he had been presented with evidence that Nava, while at the Groton boarding school, had fabricated a threat against himself and his roommate, head of the Gay-Straight Alliance, in the form of a letter reading "die fags." The letter may have raised doubts in George's mind, but not strongly enough to deter him from attacking Princeton's administration.
In the wake of Nava's latest story about being assaulted, George immediately went to the neoconservative daily, the New York Sun, and exclaimed, "Are there double standards and reforms that need to be made? Absolutely."
George insisted that Nava, in all likelihood, was telling the truth. "Those of us who saw him at the emergency room find it difficult to believe he could have done this himself. The physical manifestations were too evident, too severe," he told the Sun.
George was promptly joined by a chorus of conservative culture warriors infuriated by the lack of outrage. Harvey Mansfield, the most important conservative figure at Harvard, mentor to leading neoconservatives, who has written a book-length ode to machismo called "Manliness" called for a manly response to Nava's supposed beating. "I hope Princeton comes down on them like a ton of bricks, and by Princeton I mean either the university or the township or both," Mansfield proclaimed. "It should be easy for liberals to identify a case of intolerance; they're good at that."
David Horowitz, a neoconservative activist, who has devoted much of his career to combating the supposed scourge of anti-conservative bias on campus, instantly weighed in on the Nava affair. "It's a terrible incident but it doesn't surprise me," Horowitz told the Sun. "The left has now become the hate group."
On December 17, Horowitz reposted the Sun's account of Nava's alleged beating on his website of his magazine, Frontpagemag. Beneath a link to the prominently displayed article, a caption read, "Student beaten unconscious for conservative views."
Fox News anchor Brit Hume also leapt into the fracas. The headline of his report on the Nava affair on Fox's website read, "Little Outrage Over Student Beating At Princeton University." (Hume later corrected his report).
A host of right-wing bloggers joined the outcry. "I wonder if this will get the attention that politically-reversed assaults would get?" mused Glenn Reynolds, the author of the blog, Instapundit. A blogger at Redstate.com mocked author and expert on hate crimes, David Neiwert over the Nava incident, challenging him to report on what could be a "fairly serious hate crime."
For several hours, on December 17, conservatives announced that their darkest fears of persecution had been realized. A pious student had been beaten by liberal brownshirts simply for speaking out in favor of traditional morality. If the student were gay or black, conservatives reasoned, the entire student body would have erupted in massive protests. Instead, the administration stood silently to the side. Princeton graduate and conservative writer Michael Fragoso told the Sun, "There would rightly be outrage had the student been part of some other minority on campus."
At last, an incident surfaced that proved what movement figures had long maintained: campus conservatives are a minority that suffers far harsher oppression than the blacks, Latinos and gays who form the "politically correct" vanguard of liberal identity politics.
But on the night of December 17, as the conservative firestorm was being whipped to a frenzy, there was another development. Nava confessed to Princeton Township Police that he had invented the entire incident. They had suspected the veracity of his tale all along. Signs of an elaborate hoax had been present from the beginning, from Nava's history of fabricating death threats to his cinematic description of his latest victimization.
Nava's sham fit neatly into an epidemic of faked hate crimes on college campuses across America. But in their eagerness to stage-manage the unfolding political drama, leaders of the conservative movement ignored these inconvenient details.
When Nava was exposed as a fabricator, his defenders disappeared almost as fast as they had mobilized. Rather than issue a correction or update, Horowitz scrubbed all accounts of the bogus attack from his website. (Media Matters has taken Horowitz to task for his failure to issue a correction).
Robby George, who had been quick to condemn the university, now praised Princeton for its measured response to the Nava affair. "Princeton, all the way from the administrators down, had the good sense to hold their fire, get the facts first, before drawing conclusions," he told the Princetonian.
George also congratulated himself for his own calmness in the crisis and sharp wittedness in uncovering the fraud. "Within 72 hours," he said, "we were able to expose this as a hoax."
But, of course, Nava's claims were never "exposed" by George or his conservative campus allies. Nava had reportedly confessed to his lying under police questioning. Only hours before George celebrated the "good sense" he and university administrators displayed, he had accused Princeton of upholding a liberal double standard. And while Princeton police investigated dubious details of the alleged assault, George broadcasted his confidence in Nava's melodramatic account.
Nava, a sad young person with a history of self-injuring behavior, now faces expulsion and possible criminal charges. George and the rest of Nava's erstwhile defenders have fallen silent. The mentor has left his protégé to law enforcement. The conservatives have forgotten their would-be martyr.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Don't you love how these conservatives represent everything they say they hate. Can't wait to see what they come up with next.
Senator Vidder attacked and sexually molested by outraged hookers?
Geez.... Max! You were doing so good there but ya' just couldn't HELP your self could ya'?!... "The Catholic cult"..... The Catholic Cult??!!
Are my Jewish friends members of "The Judeic Cult"? Citizens of Lake Wobgon "The Lutheran Cult"??
Why insult such a substantial portion of your readership when it adds nothing to your article?...which was about....ummm...oh yeah,.... I remember..intolerance....................tm
What a shock! A lying conservative. Lies, distorations, etc. are the coin of the realm in Bush/Cheney land. Without lies to hold the fabric of their lives together as authoritians or as one of their empowering followers they would cease to be.
Conservatives like this like to parade their muscular machismo but they're really a bunch of howling pussies. Look at who their role models are- Dick "Deferment" Cheney and all of the other neocon war cheerleaders who have no first-hand experience with the military. Another example of how the 30 percenters must rely on cheating and deception because there's no other way for them to operate.
Exhibit A: Bush's Bring It On braggadocio, hiding behind the troops who actually have to do the bringing on of it for him.
I really think the problem here is not necessarily being liberal or conservative the problem is being on the extreme. College campuses need to be a place where both sides can come together and share and debate ideas. What has happened is that we have allowed the extremists on both sides to set the agendas. This has drowned out the majority of moderates and leaners on campus who do not wish to play dirty or marginalize the other side for simply being different politically. Until the focus of campus politics gets wrestled away from the two extremes we will continue to see stories like this.
"The left has now become the hate group." The new talking point.........Its not over yet.
More Bushist denial of reality. Of course none of the hysteria whipped up by the neoconjobs was in error. It's just whitewashed. No apology, no mea culpa, no responsibility. Nothing. Theirs is a decadent view of reality that is actually corrosive to society, but of course in denial they'll never admit it.
Conservatives are the biggest bunch of drama queens in the history of mankind.
(Or was that drag queens?)
I am appalled at your lack of consideration for the feelings of Princeton's conservatives. You seem to have no appreciation for how hard it is to be rich and influential. Thanks to the liberal police and their inexplicable need to investigate (more like persecute) Mr. Nava for his perfectly reasonable story (liberal campus hippies are a rough group, if they attack from downwind they can be vicious), he'll most likely need to go to Harvard or Yale now.
Add in the fact that he's not likely to get a cushy political appointment in the DOJ until at least 2013, and you might realize just how hard Mr. Nava really has it. Maybe then you'd have some sympathy.
I think that it should be noted that two wealthy members of the Mormon (L
DS--and hey does that sound suspiciosly like self-cannonization) church, Gov. Romney and the college student who perpetrated the "assault" fraud put out gross inacuacies, virtually on the same day. I've been observing this group since it excommuincated Sonia Johnson on the early '80's. Her book, detailing the attrocities committed against her is called "Housewife to Heretic." Another book, published in the 1990's and authored by another former LDS (both were generational members)provides additional details of the church's attitutes and behaviors toward its women. I'm referring to "Secret Ceremonies" by Deborah Laake. I have an axiom which serves me well and proves very often true: As a person, group, polical party, religion, etc. goes in its attitude toward women, so goes the person, group, pary or religion. See how the men really are behind their "saintly" facade.
It would seem breaking a bottle over one's head and scraping one's head against a brick wall could be an effective way of getting rid of those nasty sex urges. Personally, I'd prefer to just get laid, but what do you expect from a secular progressive?
What needs to happen now is one of the liberal, student organizations at Princeton should defend the student's right to stay at Princeton. They should suggest he be given therapy in order to understand and conquer his obvious mental issues. If he's kicked out, who knows how destructive his rage will become. If he's allowed to stay, if he's helped by the very people he hates, it sends a message. And best of all, it gives the kid his future back.
Though it may be that the law of averages would dictate that there must be some lunatics on the left, the right has a virtual monopoly on the violent ones.
Terrorism, conservative style:
Eric Rudolph
David McMenemy
Michael Townley
Timothy McVeigh
Terry Nichols
Paul Hill
Chad Castagana
Mark Uhl
The conservatives have a long history of crafting these subterfuges. They did the same kind of things to the Unions early on. Creating a riot situation by having co-conspirators fire a weapon in amongst the Union strikers and thereby giving the Cops the needed excuse to fall upon the Union people. Many Union members have died by these devious methods. The Conservatives use the same method Hitler did to enable Germany to declare war upon Poland by manufacturing a supposed attack by the Poles which in turn allowed the Nazis their needed excuse. The conservatives are no better than the Nazis or the Communists. They are Aggressive alpha types who thirst for power. They need to control others. They are a devious lot who will use any means to accomplish their goals. If the rest of us are to survive we must expose them at every turn. We must be active in keeping them honest. A huge task which is necessary for our survival. To view it in any other way is to lay down and die, to throw in the towel and give up. We must be eternally vigilant. The enemy is not outside our door they are among us. We must live free or die. Remember Guy Fawkes.
These are not just the philosophical musings of a new...
I'm pleased to announce the launch today of two new HuffPost...
Long before $150,000-gate, Sarah Palin seemed to...
The Obamas dropped by the Vatican on Friday, with daughters...
Yesterday evening, Greg Sargent reported on The Plum Line that one of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's key reasons...
I never actually heard the words made famous by a certain man on a certain TV show. Instead I got a lot...
Jim Hansen is director of the NASA Goddard Institute for...
Don't write off Saint Sarah all you political pundits,...
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — The former fiance of Gov. Sarah Palin's...
Hermione herself, Emma Watson, charmed David Letterman and...
Think Progress flags David Brooks telling...
While we of course do not claim to know anyone's thoughts, we nominate these...
The Daily Show's John Oliver is unhappy with mainstream journalism, and even drearier...
For this week's installment of their "Lunch with the FT" feature the...
Al Franken's been anointed as Minnesota's junior senator, but how did the...
SYDNEY — Residents of a rural Australian town hoping to protect the earth and their wallets...
"What's for dinner?" A lot of us ask that question right...
Posted December 19, 2007 | 03:34 PM (EST)