Mayhill, Junehill, Whatever-Your-Name-Is this month:
Please, take a couple of classes--Introduction to Newswriting and Critical Thinking highly recommended.
You're giving citizen journalism a very bad name.
Michelle Obama is just as gifted an orator as her husband, and her talents were on display Tuesday in York, PA, where she gave one of the best speeches I've seen so far in Election 2008. Typically, she talks about growing up South Side Chicago, and this is what she did in York, but in a more fervent and eloquent way than ever before. In the days since "bittergate" broke-- the scandal spawned by the story I wrote last week quoting Barack Obama on "bitter" working class voters at a San Francisco fundraiser-- Michelle Obama has not only refashioned her stump speech to address the charge of her husband's perceived elitism but also she's drilled deep into her herself to find ways to reach people--so that the very act of connection subverts the criticism.
Like a lot of the beautiful old towns in Pennsylvania, York is struggling but it's not down. The Peppermint Pattie rolled on down the road to Hershey twenty years ago (and is now headed for Mexico). Caterpillar has gone, too. But there's still Harley-Davidson and a couple of long-time family businesses. And, of course, there's health care, which has become the number one employer in so many small cities in America. Michelle's audience in the restored Beaux Arts theater downtown was classic Obama: African-Americans and well-educated white folks. The way the race's last lap is playing--with Clinton and Obama hopping about from state to state, in and out, most Quaker Staters will never get a chance to hear and see Senator Obama. Indeed no one in the theater I approached had seen him. His wife was the closest they would get.
As Huff Post readers likely know, Michelle Obama is a funny, feisty woman with a few sharp edges and a shining intelligence. She brought these qualities to York, using them to craft a rhetorical masterpiece, in which she wove the saga of the never-ending campaign with the struggle of average Americans just to get by. Her theme was "moving the bar" so that success is always just out of reach. "They said Iowa was important because Iowa was a caucus," but then "Iowa didn't count, because Iowa was only a caucus." Work hard all your life in order "to be able to put your feet up in later years," only to find the pension has disappeared. Do well in school only to discover that the cost of college has gone up, putting that degree out of reach. "Tell me if I'm wrong! Tell me if I'm saying something that's not true," Mrs. Obama said, punctuating each indictment with a call-out to the audience. And the African-Americans among them responded vocally and in such a way that brought everybody else along.
Michelle Obama's stump speech has always grown out of the story of her father and his dreams for his children and the "solid neighborhood schools" that allowed Michelle and her brother to achieve those dreams. This is one of the foundation narratives of the American experience, and Michelle Obama has lived it, her audience knows she has lived it. Now, however, she provides more detail: her father, who had multiple sclerosis, "went from being a boxer, a swimmer, served in the military--to one day he couldn't walk, without the assistance of a cane, and died, without being able to walk without the aid of a motorized cart." Post-bittergate, she's drilled deep. She's given more thought to the moving bar. "How do you parent and work all the time?" Her audience knows just what she's talking about. How do you handle all that debt? "You're sweating to get that mail--the loan collector." She talks about her husband's and her struggles with their college and law school debt until, "like hitting the Lotto," her husband's two books, an enterprise her mother considered a dubious proposition, became bestsellers. The Obamas' progress through the portals of higher education and subsequent success become not the hallmark of their elitism but the telling contrast to what ordinary people can expect from education today, at a time when every town "has one good school," and kids are "living with Grandma so they have the right address."
She talks about specifics, she always brings it back to her own experience, she never mentions the word "elitism" and she uses the pronoun "they" carefully. "They keep moving he bar." They is the other--the opponent both she and her audience are agreed upon.
Later Tuesday in Haverford, Michelle Obama gave the same speech but not nearly so well. Of course, this would be the event that most of the press covered. Haverford provided the small news clip we've been seeing of Michelle on the PA stump, it's provoked some commentary (from Chris Cillizza on MSNBC, for example) that Michelle Obama is too angry in defense of her husband. If the national media is going to choose between two daily campaign events, a safe bet always is on the event in the more accessible and therefore often wealthier town. By the time Michelle Obama reached tony Haverford in the suburbs of Philadelphia, however, she was tired. She struggled to hit the notes that had come so easily earlier in the day. She could not completely mask her psychic pain from the recent firestorms over her husband. In Haverford, moreover, she was both less sure of herself and less connected to her audience in ways that provide an insight into that educational journey she has taken and that, Ivy League degrees in hand, now make her, as well as her husband, elitists in some people's eyes.
The journey from York to Haverford is a stark display of the disparity in American education. Before and after Mrs. Obama spoke in York, I talked at length with Tim and his daughter Mary Beth about the town and county of York and about the schools there. Mary Beth, a high school sophomore, would like to go to either Yale or Swarthmore, but her suburban high school offers no A.P. courses. She was the one who taught ninth grade geometry, because the teacher didn't know the subject and just sat at her desk working at her computer during class. Mary Beth taught herself and taught her peers as she went along. Nevertheless, her school is better than those in York itself. Michelle Obama often talks about that one good school in town; but York has no one good school.
Suburban Philadelphia, however, is rich in schools. Villanova, Bryn Mawr and Haverford College are an easy bike ride from one another. Only an hour-and-a-half from York, these are the good small schools that might as well be on the moon for small-town high school kids like those I met in York. The audience for Michelle Obama's afternoon appearance in the field house at Haverford College is the whitest and wealthiest for any Obama Campaign event I've covered in the near-year I've been following the campaign. This audience, mostly women, absolutely adore Michelle Obama. Ivy League, well-to-do, civic-minded, lawyer, mother, member of charitable boards, she's one of them. The audience is comfortable with her and for her, even when, through exhaustion, she wanders in her speech, veering off into generalities and repetitions. In Michelle Obama, there's an underlying wariness. She loses her way in her speech also because she's not so sure of her audience as she was in York. She doesn't see her audience in quite the same way that they see her. "I'm still that girl who grew up on the South Side of Chicago," she says. And she is.
She went to Princeton, she got her degree. Even now Princeton is a very white and a very preppy school. It must have been even more so in the 1980s when Michelle Obama was there. Some of the town history--that graduation day is also a celebration day in the local African-American community because in centuries past Princeton students, many of whom came from wealthy Southern plantation families, had a tradition of freeing their manservants upon graduation--would have been more than just history to Michelle Obama. The discipline and determination to get that Princeton education, never losing sight of its worth, are very much a part of Michelle Obama. But just like her husband, she straddles two worlds, one of which, even as she gracefully moves between the two, she is more sure of than the other.
This duality is evident in her speech. At Haverford, for example, one minute she chose the subjunctive. "I wouldn't be here if it weren't for those schools." The next minute she's South Side Chicago. "But let me tell you who me and Barack are." Linguistically, she's become adept at moving back and forth. But in Haverford, tired out, unsure exactly whom she was speaking to, she used the word "elitism" instead of more deftly suggesting its presence without calling its name. She began to wander into fields of negativity, talking about fear and isolation in rural America, trying to define for herself and her audience something neither likely know much about.
Past the sound bite moment, Haverford and York together revealed much about Michelle Obama. Even her clothes--and here's a woman with a great sense of style who loves style--suggest the tenor of her life. Lately, she's been channeling Jackie Kennedy, choosing sleeveless classic sheath dresses, little sweaters and pearls. She's even adopted the Jackie Kennedy flip hairdo. On the other hand, Michelle Obama has her edgier style. She has a black jumpsuit she often wears with tall, shiny black boots and a tight black belt. If she had either a whip or a tail, she'd be Catwoman. On Tuesday, she combined her two styles, as she often does now, wearing a tight bronze bustier that looks a bit faux snakeskin over a taupe sheath dress, and with this interesting ensemble a tiny pearl-buttoned cashmere or cashmere-like cardigan.
In this way, a fashionista could probably deconstruct Michelle Obama's entire life and persona from her clothes--and undoubtedly they will if she becomes First Lady. But as the imperatives, especially the education imperatives, of her speeches, show, she is part of so much more than mere dress.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Mayhill, Junehill, Whatever-Your-Name-Is this month:
Please, take a couple of classes--Introduction to Newswriting and Critical Thinking highly recommended.
You're giving citizen journalism a very bad name.
I think the HuffPo needs to address this rightwing hack being allowed to post her SNEERING drivel here. Many many issues have been raised about her violation of ethics, her destructive influence on our politics, and her suspicious qualifications and background.
Until then, I and many others will 1) refuse to read this drivel and 2) continue to denounce the FRAUD of Mayhill "Fouler".
HuffPo needs to explain why MF is still here.
Dissent from Obamaism will not be tolerated?
Just a tidbit, Fowler,
Black women do not like being compared to animals. In the past, all too often blacks in general especially women have been tagged with animal commentary and it is demeaning.
So this statement: "If she had either a whip or a tail, she'd be Catwoman. " , can disappear.
Catwoman is not an animal, sorry to knock your statement. I agree with what your saying, but your sentence you were offended by has no standing for the position you took. I imagine you do not read comics so it is of course a comical mistake. If your offended by a cat loving woman who decided to dress up like a cat and use a whip because she suddenly found out she had nine lives then that is a whole different ballgame. Otherwise this is a pointless "tidbit".
Check google for Eartha Kitt and then comeback. Michelle Pfifer is not the Catwoman being referred to. I do not dispute that Mayhill may have been picturing her when she wrote this, but there is no proof of it either. As soon as you take on the title of Journalist with or without the qualifier of "Citizen" you are automatically held to a higher standard. I expect Mayhill to do her research, recognize the inherent sexuality and animal descriptors that have been used in the past to minimize, dehumanize, and villify Blacks in general, and Black women specifically.
Accidental or purposeful, it is irresponsible of a journalist... and not at all surprising.
I wonder if anyone else read the hidden insult in the title and last paragraph of this story.
"Me and Barack" -- Poor Grammar and Ms. Fowler is bringing attention to it, albeit, it a very subdued manner.
Also, in the last paragraph, Ms. Fowler writes, 'But as the imperatives, especially the education imperatives, of her speeches, show, she is part of so much more than mere dress.'
Education imperatives of her speeches? This means you think it's imperative that Mrs. Obama work on her grammar?
Ms. Fowler, you may have thought no one would notice, or maybe you were hoping the readers would notice.
I noticed.
What I don't quite undertand is why you want to fake your support for Obama.
Is every older woman who supports Hillary as conniving and manipulative as she?
PATHETIC
Good catch.
I didn't bother to read it because I think she's a big FRAUD.
I think this Tennessee born Clintonista is subtly racist. Your catching her subtle mockery is further proof.
If only she were "subtly racist."
Mayfair is blatantly racist. The only piece by her I had read here was her first Citizen
Jouirnalist blog about the SF meeting. My immediate reaction was that she was
a racist. She used the word "cocky" to describe Obama a few two many times in that
one piece.
Mayhill,
I cannot believe the intensity of the anger piled against you. I have read your posts and they are balanced and inteligent.
As for Michelle Obama and her claims, I will grant that she had a solid middle class upbringing. However, her discussion of public schools always bothered me. She attended one of the MOST exclusive (public - magnet) high schools in the nation. Her husband attended Punahou, an exclusive private high school in Hawaii.
The Obama campaign clearly uses the same "old" politics the Clinton campaign uses. I don't expect ANY objectivity from the masses who visit this site. If they chose to step back, though, they would see a normal politician, sending surrogates out to attack. Or, take his new add, attacking Senator Clinton, using personal invective, then claiming to be above the old style tactics. Brilliant.
Yes they did not attend public school did they, I am becoming disillusioned by the whole Democratic primary season and it has lasted way too long. Objectivity here, I am not impressed with Obama's MT crew, even though I am an Obama supporter, normally and independent. I find his state director too young and inexperienced, brash and rude. I had hoped the Obama campaign would have put a better foot forward in MT. He chose a member of the Crow tribe to organize the MT Native American voting effort. A word about the Crow tribe, they are known among other tribes in MT to be 'elitist' and have a stranglehold over BIA operations in the local Area Office in Billings, MT. They are not known to be very effective at dealing with other tribes, although it is too early to know if he made a good choice, we will see. So far, the Natives are too impressed with the Obama campaign, this is a crucial swing vote. We Native Americans in MT will be giving Clinton a second blush.
Obama's brilliant "dirt off your shoulder" brush off to FOWLER, Clinton and ABC to the tune of
Dirt Off Your Shoulder by Jay Z!
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=yel8IjOAdSc
I won't be on the bus until Rosen and Cooper apologize for calling Mayhill an 'ardent Obama supporter' (strange love there). Post her all you want fellows, but as a right wing hack.
I wanted to read about michelle obama, but considering the writer, i declined, i just read some of the comments. She is already boycotted in my mind. I will never read anymore of her yellow journalism.
It's a testament to the Obamas' decency that you are still allowed to report on Obama. If it was Nixon or Clinton you would have literally been thrown under the bus. Feel good knowing that Obama is a decent man.
Bush and Cheney would have arrested her a long time ago.
Decent men don't flip off their opponents.
Flip-off? When? Where? HAve a picture or any other form of corroboration? If you were talking about the brushing the dirt off... that is not the same thing. Different meaning, used on different situations. And while someone could try to extrapolate that into a F-U the way the middle finger is they would be missing the cultural context.
Maybe if there is enough backlash the news networks will think twice about the distractions issues in the GE and talk about what matters to most America"s like the War, Healthcare and Jobs
http://pol.moveon.org/enoughdistractions/?rc=homepage
I knew Jackie Kennedy and Michelle Obama is NO JACKIE KENNEDY!
There is no fricking way I can listen to that big mouth, Michelle Obama for the next four years, no way
Talk about big mouths spouting nothing .... Does this look familiar???
"Just sent a note to ABC and Charles Gibson to let him know what a fine job he did and not to buy into this Rovian style smear!"
You are so transparent I almost missed your post.
Tool!!!
i hardly believe you knew jackie kennedy... and even if you did, you obviously dont know michelle obama. so how can you make a statement like that unless its 100% opinion and 0% fact.
And I would much rather have "that big mouth" than whats in the white house now (a small brain).
Thank you and goodnight.
Well, I suggest you leave the country then! The world does not revolve around YOU!
Who's the sexist now?
Any "journalist" who gives money to political candidates is not a journalist. Please remove her from the HP.
stop giving her hits! stop reading her posts! stop her now!
Clinton paid basher!
who is this woman? what are her qualifications? why is she given this platform? what the heck is going on around here?
I didn't realize that First Ladies or potential First Ladies had to meet any specific qualifications? What are Laura Bush's qualifications to be FIRST LADY? What were Hillary Clinton's qualifications to be FIRST LADY? What are Cindy McCain's qualifications? To answer your questions, Michelle Obama is the potential First Lady of the United States of America. She is certainly as qualified, if not more, than any First Lady of the past and the only other potential First Lady in this race. As the wife of a presidential candidate, she is given this platform in the tradition that has given this platform to every other spouse of our presidential candidates.
Obviously, you see a distinction between Mrs. Obama and other past or present First Ladies or potential First Ladies, and you are troubled by it. Can you elaborate on this?
Still I Rise.
she's a brilliant ivy league graduate with a law degree who's the wife of the leading democratic candidate for the office of president of the US...
who are you??? what are your qualifications?
I think copesthetics was talking about Mayflower
Oh! In that case, my bad! Sorry copesthetics! I am so used to people putting Michelle down unfairly that I just assumed ... sorry!
On clinton payroll to bash anything on the web...
All accross America, there millions of kids who are doing exactly what Michelle did, and it is high time that her story gets out in all media. This will keep our kids from dropping out and do something for themselves, their families, and even something for our nation and the world. Go Obama!
I saw where you referred to yourself as a journalist--you are not. Your reporting of Obama's talk in S.F. described the "hurt" you felt as you listened to him. That emotional reaction, which comes from your own baggage, kept you from putting his remarks in the proper context. I hope now, after so many in PA have declared that they were not offended by what he said, that you see that your reaction was not one that an objective journalist should be "reporting"on--you need to get a different job.
"And the African-Americans among them responded vocally and in such a way that brought everybody else along."
Funny...or not so funny....one line stands out ....no whites "responded vocally" on their own? They had to be "brought along"?
PLEASE!
" a few sharp edges?" wait.
Thank you Mayhill, for ALL your posts. Some of the criticism you've received on HuffPost has been so astoundingly ignorant that I expect it must come from Republicans.
You have certainly helped to illuminate the Obama campaign for me. Keep it up!
if there is any one voice who is having an disproportionate, unearned, unwelcome influence on the media narrative in this primary, it is Mayhill Fowler.
I'm a Pennsylvanian, now living in Harrisburg but grew up in Pittsburgh and have strong ties to Philly. My reaction to a few of Fowlers earlier posts from the ground in Pennsylvania was, I'm not kidding, that she could not possibly be on the ground in PA filing those reports, that she must be elsewhere, taking second hand accounts from the AP or Youtube and reworking them as first person reports.
I'm assuming she botches the basic facts of other aspects of the race as badly as she botches her portrait of PA voters. And she has zero credibility with me.
The capper for me: About 24 hours after 'bitter gate' story broke...i found out the Fowler had her fingerprints on the 'reporting'. That's when I absolutely knew where to file it.
Posted April 17, 2008 | 07:40 AM (EST)