More

Mayhill Fowler

Mayhill Fowler

Posted: March 4, 2008 09:14 AM

The Obama Balloon Loses Air Over Texas


Before it ever happened, it's already over. That was the feeling last night at the small Obama rally in Houston less than twenty-four hours before the Texas primary. The evening wore that familiar holiday air: you haven't opened the presents, you haven't had the feast, but you feel like you have, and secretly you're ready for January. This is just a roundabout way of saying that it--I wish I could tell you what--has passed.

No clairvoyance accompanies my sense that something has come to an end. The campaign may have reached the moment Obama, from his tone last night, believes to be near: "Here we are with the possibility of winning the nomination." Or is this the end of yet another phase of a long campaign that now cedes the momentum and must regroup for the next battle?

Last night Obama acknowledged that he's taken some hits in the last few days, although he never talked directly about the damage--never mentioning NAFTA and naive college professors, or national security and ringing phones, or even Jesus. He merely said, "a toxic politics works."

What was the campaign's strategy in sending Obama back to Houston so soon after its huge rally that drew 20,000 people to the Toyota Center? Inevitably, last night's rally wore an air of anticlimax. Maybe the second appearance is an indicator of how important Houston is for Obama. He needn't have returned, however; he already has the African-American vote here, and after Hillary Clinton's backhanded testimonial to his Christianity on 60 Minutes , every black Baptist Texan who can crawl on his or her deathbed to the polls is going to get there. Last night's rally brought out Obama's Texas base, African-Americans, just as Clinton's recent events here have been mostly Hispanic. It's as if Houston has emptied of white people and the hundred or so ethnicities that have thriving communities here. But then Houston is, by and large, a Republican town.

"There's a tendency to start feeling kinda like, huh!, like things are just always gonna go the way they should," Obama said last night. "But one of the things I've learned is that, what makes this powerful, is not that things always go easy, but rather that we are willing to go forward even when it's hard." Earlier, Obama reiterated the familiar themes of health care, education, energy, Iraq--and frankly, that part of his speech sounded tired. Like Clinton, Obama needs a fresh start, a new tack, and certainly a new speech. At the close last night, Obama retold the Greenwood story. "I was gonna bring it back out for this evening," he said. Now I've heard the "Fire It Up!" anecdote at least twenty times as I've followed Barack Obama from state to state, but last night was the best he's ever told it. Even some of the press were laughing. The perfection of his storytelling, the time when he gets it just right, also suggested closure, even as Obama himself was talking about going forward.

Before it ever happened, it's already over. That was the feeling last night at the small Obama rally in Houston less than twenty-four hours before the Texas primary. The evening wore that familiar h...
Before it ever happened, it's already over. That was the feeling last night at the small Obama rally in Houston less than twenty-four hours before the Texas primary. The evening wore that familiar h...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 128
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
09:00 AM on 03/06/2008
How dare we declare a winner of the Democratic Texas primacaucus without first counting the caucus votes??!! The Texas election had two components - a primary and a caucus. The votes for the primary came in first, and they are stil counting the votes at the caucuses. Shouldn't we wait for all the results before declaring a winner, especially since the primary outcome was so close? We know the caucuses account for one-third of the delegates. But I am not even talking about the delegate allocation. I am simply referring to the actual voting results. We behave as if these caucus-goers never voted!!! What we should have done is wait for all the results, from both components of the election, and THEN declare a winner based by weighting the two results according to the Texas rules (2/3 for the primary and 1/3 for the caucuses). Then, and only then may we truly and fairly say who won the Texas election for the Democratic nominee!!! If Obama wins the caucuses by 55% or more, there is a sincere case that can be made, with integrity and conviction, that Obama won Texas or at least that the win was split... especially considering that Clinton only won the primary portion of the Texas election by such a slim margin. Would someone in the national forums and media please discuss this dynamic? We talked so much about the "Texas two-step" and yet we treat the election as if it was done just like the other three states!! Seems patently unfair to dismiss the work and votes of all those voters who went back to caucus that night. I know the big "comeback" story loses its lustre... but this is about fundamental honesty and justice for the voters and the candidates.
10:46 AM on 03/05/2008
If there was no bias for Ms. Clinton would not her claim to 35 years of exprience be up for a more intense examination. i live in New York and have what I think is a pretty good memory. i can't recall any plan put forth for universal health care for New York. Nearby Mass. has it i kept wondering why if Mitt Romney could get it for Mass. why have not Ms. Clinton even proposed it for New York. I also wonder if she is so intuned to equal pay for equal work she has never pushed it in her home state. I know single moms now who are paying $ 400 dollars a week for childcare. I really wonder why the Junior Senator from New York has done nothing in her own state to help take some of burden off single moms. If my senator is using the years that she was Chief Hostess of America on her resume why should not Whitewater. Foster, impeachment , renting of bedrooms in white house, last day pardons for money and so on be fair game. Oh i forget that would be ganging up on poor Hill and she just might cry. Has anyone asked her what decision has she made at 3AM in the morning. OOPs there i go again beating up on poor Hill. Guess she forgot the little people from New York I know she won't them forget as president. Guess traveling alot qualifies you as president. Maybe i will run my aunt for president next year she likes to travel. Wondering why poor kids who get sick in New York City still go the emergency room to see a doctor. Guess my senator overlooked that. She has her mind on more pressing matters.
Wonder why i must still send my kids to private school guess my senator has no time to help the public schools in my state. she has more pressing worldly matters on her mind. My city wants to charge 6- 8 bucks to drive tthru mid town now guess that only hurts the dunkin dounut crowd not the starbucks guys. Guess my senator has no opinion on that either. She has other matters on her mind. The 30 thousand jobs she promised upstate New York,as referenced by Russert in the last debate, that never materialized. i forgot again she more pressing issues on her mind. Media bias my foot its like the run up to the war the media is asleep at the wheel.
11:16 AM on 03/08/2008
Oops, how sad. Lacking a little knowledge of government, are you? All your complaints are State or City matters not U.S. Senate matters. Call your Governor or State legislatures, don't lay these state issues at Senator Clinton's feet.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
flodlite
02:01 AM on 03/05/2008
Obama looks like a wilting mushroom in that cowboy hat. I wonder if Obama will wear that hat

to court when called to testify at ......Antoin "Tony" Rezko's........"TRAIL"....... for FRAUD, scheming to

pressure companies seeking state business for kick backs and FRAUD, campaign contributions,

pouring thousands of $$$'s into OBAMA's campaign. Rezko also gave Obama land, which is in ?
12:05 AM on 03/05/2008
I think this article is fair--it's not pro hillary or pro obama. The wave in Texas crested a bit back and you need more than momentum. Obama does do well when talking about specifics, but he's going to have to adapt and get a new fresh start for going into Pennsylvania. But that's as it should be, you need to bring out new tactics. Going negative isn't the way to go, but changing gears will be great. We've got 7 weeks or so until the next big throwdown. I don't think it's unfair to say that as one balloon looses air, you can always float another.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:29 AM on 03/05/2008
Maybe it is time for some equal smearing by the media
Hillary's Experience - Not one question?

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
-Whitewater
-Monica
-Peter Paul
-Dubai
-Uranium Millions
-Tax Returns
-"first lady" schedule
-Hsu

The republicans will ask all of these questions and the media is ignoring that now. Not one question. Why?
03:17 AM on 03/05/2008
How many lies can you repeat all the time. Get a life. Shame on you. I think your a REP. Shame on you for this crap.
11:03 AM on 03/05/2008
HILLARY WINS OHIO

HILLARY WINS RI

HILLARY WINS TEXAS

GO HILLARY GO!!!! GO HILLARY GO!!!!!
10:17 PM on 03/04/2008
Save yourselves the headaches and do the delegate math....better yet, the Slate website has an effortless calculator to do the math for you....http://www.slate.com/features/delegatecounter/

Have at it and decide whether Hillary Clinton should continue trashing the democratic party's chances of winning over the White House. She really needs to start thinking of the party. So things didn't go quite the Clinton way, at least she can walk away with what little dignity she has left.
10:57 AM on 03/05/2008
Obama will never be president. The press is starting to awaken from their slumber. And Obamas past and present is about to bring him down. Tick tock, tick tock, tick tock...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chronic
09:14 PM on 03/04/2008
In Nov. the traitorous mainstream media will ensure another right freak will be elected to the Presidency to protect the interests of the corporations.


Americans will continue to get screwed!
09:08 PM on 03/04/2008
12 IN A ROW!
09:07 PM on 03/04/2008
A pundit wrongly predicting that a candidate's predictions would be wrong?

Irony.
08:42 PM on 03/04/2008
As comical as this article seems now, looking at the exit polls from Texas makes me think that it will be even more so tomorrow morning.
03:50 AM on 03/05/2008
IN TEXAS EXIT POLLS:


Over 65 years old:

67% Hillary

30 % Obama


Worried about own financial situation ( TEXAS)

56% Hillary

43% Obama


Decided in last 3 days: ( TEXAS)

61% Hillary

38% Obama


Who has a clear plan to deliver (TEXAS)

66% Hillary

53% Obama


YOU DID GREAT HILLARY! THANK YOU TEXANS!
07:21 PM on 03/04/2008
The gender bias over the Obama and Clinton race is unmistakable. While gender bias is cutting both ways it is most telling on the Clinton side, with white women making up not only Clinton's base but also her base among pundits. The numbers of white women pundits writing pro-Clinton pieces or biased articles against Obama are striking. There are legitimate reasons to be for Clinton but one of them is not that she is a white woman. I'm not for her because she was wrong on the war and she is in bed with the bankers and lobbyists.

Clinton can't have it both ways - whining about the media while benefiting from some pretty strident bias herself.
03:14 AM on 03/05/2008
Obama is the only one whiney. And the only bias is against Hillary.

As I said weeks ago, the Obama butt kissing media will turn. And when they do Obama is going to be so very sorry, It will be slow but the truth about the empty shell will be exposed. Here is comes....
06:35 PM on 03/04/2008
Find a delegate calculator and do the math.
06:27 PM on 03/04/2008
You Hillary supporters are something else.

Imagine for a minute that Hillary had won 11 straight contests by an average of 33 points. Then imagine that Obama responded not by bowing out gracefully for the good of the party and the country -- but decided to throw the "kitchen sink" at Hillary and go negative with everything he could think of -- even promoting rumors he didnt really believe -- like Hillary was having an affair with Vince Foster when he killed himself or the lost billing records, the travel office, Whitewater, she stayed with Bill for political ambition etc.

Can you imagine what you Hillary supporters would be saying?

Well I for one am disgusted with Hillary and the people she has surrounded herself with. You cant tell me there is any daylight between Mark Penn and Karl Rove or Hillary or GWB when it comes to campaigns. Just becuase she has had ambition to be President her whole adult life does not mean she has the right to harm the party at any cost. Blind amoral ambition has been one of two prime problems with the Clintons (why do you think she voted for the war?)-- the second one being lying of course. If she ends up winning this somehow -- I plan on leaving the party. Hillary, Bill, Mark Penn, and Howard Wolfsen do not represent me and if that is what the Democratic party has become -- I dont want any part of it.
07:30 PM on 03/04/2008
I'm with you bb, the coup d' grace was the "faux news report" advertisement.. What a rove-like move. At the beginning of this campaign, my wife and I were uncertain who to vote for. By the time we voted in CA, we had decided to support Obama, but felt comfortable that even if Hillary won, no big deal, we could easily vote for her in November.

But now, with all the crap that her and her campaign have pulled, I equate their moral fiber with bush and mccain, whose current stand on waterboarding aka torture and sucking up to george 'he's got a brown baby' bush has decimated any respect I might have had for the vetern.
08:35 PM on 03/04/2008
yeah... veteran.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
midwesthousewife
11:49 PM on 03/04/2008
I'm also with you all. I won't be voting this fall if it is between McCain and Hillary. They are both just part of the status quo, which is the problem with this government.
12:25 AM on 03/05/2008
"For the good of the Party'?what party is that?You Egobamanuts care nothing about the party.The party is the people.The people have not all had their say by a long shot.there are at least fifteen states to vote yet.We will not allow them to be robbed of their right to vote because of a pack of rabid dogs. Michigan and Florida are included in those.So forget any ideas that Senator Clinton will just conveniently step aside so this unfit ugly jerk takes over our country.No way.WE ARE THE PARTY.WE DO WHAT IS BEST FOR US.Get over it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:33 AM on 03/05/2008
You are represented by less than half of the party. You can bet your a$$ Hillary will get crushed by McCain if the minorty gets its nominee.
07:33 AM on 03/05/2008
AMEN! The Obama people could careless about our great party. It is all Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama sickening.
05:54 PM on 03/04/2008
I am an independant voter who finds the latest remarks and actions coming from Hillary Clinton and her militant surrogates utterly disgusting. What part of denounce and reject represents affiliation?
Hillary Clinton is a divisive and destructive element in modern politcs, she is a dinosaur from the past.
She has reintroduced Arkansas political tactics and race baiting to her national campaign.
She lies every single day to the American public, and she changes her positions from one side to the other on national television, she is a complete hoax. She claims "35" years of experience, but her resume is largely corporate as she spent most of her professional career with the Rose Law Firm in Arkanas. Obama has more years experience in PUBLICLY Elected office as he spent 8 years in the Ilinois Senate and his years as US Senator. Her only true experience with anything of great political consequence was her husband's Health care program. She FAILED miserably to bring about any changes in this important matter, and alienated herself from the American public, ushering in 12 years of Republican dominance in congress and subsequent impeachment. Wake up Democrats, the Repubs have her ticket, they want to run against her, they know they can beat her easily. I will vote for Obama in November, unless the Dems nominate Clinton, then I will vote for McCain, gladly.
05:49 PM on 03/04/2008
Dear God,

Am I going to have to vote for Nader?
05:19 PM on 03/04/2008
You clearly show your inability to grasp the ramifications of such a diplomatic blunder. A "naive college professor" advising Sen. Obama, with no clue how such messages will be received and interpreted, should give anyone pause to reconsider the Senator's vaunted "judgment". It doesn't matter what anyone spins it as now, statements like that can cost people jobs. Canada is getting wealthy by exporting to the U.S. The fact that he's allowed to talk out of both sides of his face on this issue just shows what kind of "judgment" he really has, which is none. The Economist magazine thinks he's more in favor of liberalized trade than Sen. Clinton. That should signal to anyone that he is completely misrepresenting his true intentions on NAFTA. He needs to stop lying and condescending to the voters. Not telling people what they want to hear and telling them what they need to hear, as he has has said he does and will do belies what he actually practices. If he thinks international trade agreements are so bad, why has he supported them? Because he's not speaking truthfully. I don't trust his "judgment" if he's too afraid to state his case honestly.
06:06 PM on 03/04/2008
The naivete was in assuming that hillary was an upright and honest person.

Hopefully Senator Obama has learned, albeit the bard way, that she is a lying slime machine.
12:34 AM on 03/05/2008
In spite of the complete pass he has gotten fron the national media,we are learning what a lying slime machine Egobama is.Of course the gulible sheep will not listen even though every one else knows.Who cares anyway?
06:39 PM on 03/04/2008
thanks for the straight Clintonbot line there!