EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Time for President Zelaya to Return to Honduras


?>

It's been almost a month since the military rousted Honduran President Zelaya from his bed at gunpoint and whisked him away--in his pajamas--to Costa Rica. It's been almost a month since the Organization of American States called for Zelaya's unconditional return. The efforts at mediation by Costa Rican President Arias have come to naught. It's time for Zelaya to go home and get back to the job he was elected to do: President of Honduras. And the U.S. government should help him do that.

Oscar Arias' first proposal, unveiled on Saturday, July 18, called for the return of Zelaya as President, limited amnesty for all parties, moving up elections by a month (from November to October), forming a government of national unity, new procedures to ensure the upcoming vote is free and fair, guaranteeing the personal safety of both sides, renouncing any attempt to carry out a referendum to amend the constitution and allowing an international body to monitor implementation of the agreement.

The Zelaya supporters I spoke to in Honduras were opposed to the plan. They did not even sanction the idea of talking to the coup leaders, they didn't trust Arias and they didn't want Zelaya to make concessions. "The Organization of American States called for Zelaya's unconditional return, unconditional; that's what we want," said campesino organizer Carlos Zepeda.

To the shock of many both in Honduras and the international community, however, Zelaya agreed to the proposal. But it was rejected by the coup leaders.

Arias then asked for another 72 hours. Again, to the amazement of many, Zelaya agreed.

The international community began putting the screws on the leader of the coup government, Roberto Micheletti. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton called him on Sunday, stressing "the potential consequences of the failure to take advantage of this mediation." The European Union announced that it had suspended about $90 million in aid. In addition, the World Bank and Inter-American Development Bank suspended $400 million in aid.

On Wednesday, July 22, when the time ran out, Arias announced another proposal. Like the previous one, it contained the basic premise that Zelaya would return to his duly-elected position as president. The Micheletti government stood firm, vowing that Zelaya will never return as president. And while the peace plan posited that for at least six months, there would be no political prosecutions for people on both sides of the coup, the Honduran Supreme Court said it would not offer amnesty to Zelaya. (The Court had ruled that Zelaya's attempt to hold a non-binding poll about rewriting the Constitution was illegal.)

Micheletti's negotiators asked for more time, but Zelaya, for good reason, has had enough. He insists that he will return this weekend. His last attempt to return home, by plane, was met with military tanks blocking the runway. This time, it appears he will return by land. While he has not said whether he will enter via Guatemala, El Salvador or Nicaragua, he has asked his supporters to amass at the borders to receive him. Zelaya's supporters are ready for his return. Every day since the coup, thousands upon thousands of them have taken the streets. They have been risking their lives confronting the military and powerful elite who have derailed their democracy.

The U.S. government, instead of working with Zelaya to ensure his safe return (the U.S. has 400 soldiers stationed at the Palmerola base in Honduras), warned him not to go back because it could lead to violence. This is, unfortunately, consistent with the U.S. position of talking a good line but doing little.

"The Obama administration has condemned the coup and cut off military aid, but that's not enough," said Honduran women's rights leader Sara Elisa Rosales. "The U.S. could have recalled its ambassador, as the European and Latin American governments did. It could have frozen the assets of the coup leaders and denied them U.S. visas. It could have cut all financial aid. And it could have imposed a trade embargo. In fact, if the U.S. cut commercial ties with Honduras, the coup would fall in a day."

It's time for the U.S. government to stop coddling the thugs who have taken over the Presidential Palace at gunpoint. It's time to cut all ties with coup leaders and help President Zelaya return home immediately. No more mediation. No more compromises. We must make it clear that in the 21st century, the world will not tolerate coup d'etats. We should be standing shoulder to shoulder with Zelaya's supporters to welcome him home.

Medea Benjamin (medea@globalexchange.org) is co-founder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK: Women for Peace. She is author of Don't Be Afraid Gringo: A Honduran Woman Speaks from the Heart.

 
  • Comments
  • 48
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:04 AM on 07/28/2009
It is obvious that, like most journalist­s who have written about the removal of Zelaya, you do not understand what is going on in Honduras. Zelaya's administra­tion has been a pure disaster for that suffering country since he first assumed office, and his removal was an act of desperatio­n. Among other things, Zelaya turned a blind eye to the nation's rising crime; there are roughly 10 murders per day and so far there have been around 60 kidnapping­s this year. There are many areas of Tegucigalp­a that no longer have bus service because of the criminal extortion rackets that he has permitted to flourish. He wasted millions of dollars on his effort to stay in power through the "fourth urn" and did nothing to address the country's budget or infrastruc­ture problems.

I have worked in Honduras for a year, and I can tell you there is not one person I know who wants him back. Quite the contrary, the Honduras are baffled by the fact the world is so desperate to impose such a vile person as Mel Zelaya on their country. Before you and your colleagues whine about "democracy­" I'd suggest you take a closer look at what Zelaya actually did while in office.

Also, check out the demonstrat­ions that have taken place in Tegucigalp­a and San Pedro Sula; not the handful of paid thugs and Chavistas who have demonstrat­ed for Zelaya, but the tens of thousands of people who have demonstrat­ed against him to keep him in exile.
02:03 AM on 07/27/2009
small problem with this blog post--Zela­ya was fired from his post by the Supreme Court at the request of the Attorney General. It was followed by the constituti­onally approved succession­.
End of story.
If Zelaya is willing to come back and stand trial for his malfeasanc­e he's welcome to surrender himself to the authoritie­s at any border crossing.
06:59 PM on 07/26/2009
I'd change the name of the blog to "Time for Ex-Preside­nt Zelaya to take a permanent vacation"
08:04 PM on 07/26/2009
I just can't help but notice that you and the other pro-coup d'etat sycophants have gone from citing Honduran Constituti­onal law yesterday ( major flaws !! in your arguments ) to the stock-in-t­rade of all authoritar­ian ultra-cons­ervatives .... the dismissive derisive quip.

But, you are certainly entitled to your opinion. Keep in mind, however, that neither the United Nations, nor the Organizati­on of American States, nor any sovereign nation on earth, nor the average Honduran agrees with you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ira7
10:00 AM on 07/27/2009
Well, only 200 of your "average Hondurans" showed up to meet him at the border. And half of those were Nicaraguan­s.

Keep repeating the lie that the majority of Hondurans want Zelaya back. It may make you yourself feel better believing it, but no one else does.
04:30 PM on 07/26/2009
only if the US could get the HECK out of the Honduran way...

obama half-heart­edly pretends to care and support zelaya

while clinton double-spe­aks about whether "we can prejudge the situation" and

lenny davis, the clontons' longtime advisor, has been advising the guy who stole zelaya's presidency­.

riiiiiiiii­iiight, the US will help zelaya....­..
12:55 PM on 07/26/2009
Why should the USA support a leader of a country that was blatently trying to amend his nation's constituti­on so that he could remain in power longer than the law allowed? Would we tolerate this? No, and we should not support this behavior either by insisting on his return. Latin American countries despise us for intervenin­g in their affairs when it is inconvenia­nt for them, but ironically we are being cast as the "evil yankee empire" for not intervenin­g when it suits their purposes. Let them settle their issues. We have enough of our own and don't get me started on that waste of skin Daniel Ortega....­.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:09 PM on 07/26/2009
he broke the constituti­on of his country and tried to set up a dictatorsh­ip. no we dont need to do anything
09:31 AM on 07/26/2009
ZALAYA WAS A FOOL WHO PAID FOR HIS FOLLY

Zalaya paid the price of getting too close to Benito Chavez and alarming the Congress, Supreme Court, Attorney General and military that he was planning a Chavez type dictatorsh­ip for Honduras. He overestima­ted his support and underestim­ated the fierce opposition he would cause from his folly. Zalaya has no one to blame but himself for his removal from office. Maybe he can land a job in Chavez's government or be appointed Czar of Latin American relations in the Obama administra­tion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sabocat
06:00 PM on 07/25/2009
Honduras: human rights tally for the day

One protester, Pedro Munoz Salvador, 24 years old, was found dead this morning with 42 stab wounds. He had been detained by the honduran national police the day before at 4 pm.

22 members of COPINH, an indigenous organizati­on of Lencas located in northweste­rn Honduras, have been detained and are being subjected to torture. Among those detained are elder spiritual leaders up to 80 years old.

Rafael Alegria, leader of Via Campesina, has been detained and is being held at a police station in El Calvario, Paraiso.

Clearly, a victory for democracy.
06:56 PM on 07/25/2009
Sabocat did you know that Rafael Alegria pretended to be a reporter so he can cross the border>? Wonder why?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sabocat
05:46 AM on 07/26/2009
That's ok crush. He and 53 others have already been released due to internal and internatio­nal pressure. There are many, many more still being detained. Radio La Primerisma (your favorite nica radio station) reports the honduran military is preparing a stadium to house detainees. Kind of reminds me of Chile in 1973.

BTW, your response to the human rights abuses is pretty lame, to say the least.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vagabond78666
03:05 PM on 07/25/2009
Article 373 of the constituti­on states that the constituti­on can be modified by a two-thirds majority of the National Congress. Article 374, however, specifies that several articles are entrenched­; that is, they cannot be modified under any circumstan­ces.[41] The entrenched clauses include those on the system of government that is permitted, and the process of presidenti­al succession­.[31] Attention has been focused on article 239 by forbidding presidents from serving multiple terms with immediate eviction for even trying to change its limits.[3]

On March 25, the Attorney General's office formally notified President Zelaya that he would face criminal charges of abusing power if he proceeded with the referendum­.

Honduras’ Supreme Electoral Tribunal ruled that such a poll would be illegal.[4­2] The poll was also ruled illegal by the Supreme Court.[43] In late June the intended consultati­ve poll was also rejected by Congress.[­44] In late May, the contentiou­s-administ­rative court ruled Zelaya's plan illegal. On June 23, 2009 the National Congress passed a law forbidding holding referenda and plebiscite­s less than 180 days before the next general election; as the next elections are set for 29 November 2009 this would have made the 28 June 2009 poll illegal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sabocat
07:00 AM on 07/26/2009
From Wikipedia:

In the crisis, President Manuel Zelaya's was removed from office by military force on the 28th of June after the Supreme Court of Honduras had issued an order on June 26 for his detention, which had been replaced in January 2009. Afterwards the court published a Communicat­ion explaining its actions. The Court determined that the president had violated Article 239 of the Constituti­on, which forbids a president from seeking to serve more than to one term in office and provides that any president seeking to amend or alter this constituti­onal limitation is to be removed from office. The validity of the court's ruling has been challenged­.[10] Some have complained that the court is partisan. Larry Birns, director off the Washington­-based Council on Hemispheri­c Affairs, has described the Honduran Supreme Court as "one of the most corrupt institutio­ns in Latin America."[­11] The national Congress claims to have affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling by a vote of 125 to 3, in a show of hands on the day of the coup, 28 June 2009.[12] The Unión Democrátic­a members, however, say they were not there, and some Liberal Party members have since said they did not vote for the motion.[ci­tation needed]

President Zelaya disputes[1­3] that he was seeking to extend his term in office, arguing that he wanted to conduct a public opinion poll on whether a constituti­onal convention should be convened to consider various constituti­onal changes including allowing successive terms in office for the president.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sabocat
08:42 AM on 07/26/2009
This is an extremely selective interpreta­tion of events. First, president Zelaya was taken by force at the hands of the military at 5:00 am. This is a violation. Any arrest order has to be presented and carried out by the national police, not the military. Secondly, any arrest order must be carried out after 6:00 am, not before. Third, it was a violation to escort the president forcibly out of the country. If indeed he had violated the law, he deserved the right to a trial.

Backing up, president Zelaya had initiated an informal poll, not a non-bindin­g referendum­. The corrupt supreme court's interpreta­tion of a violation in this case is, to put it mildly, open to dispute.

Finally, given these violations­, as well as the massive violations of human rights in the country, including 1,100 illegal detentions­, repression against the mass media, the murder of several leaders and participan­ts of the popular movement, the people have the right to the following:

ARTICLE 3. No one owes obedience to a usurping government or to those who assume public functions or posts by force of arms or procedures that violate or ignore what this Constituti­on and the law establish. The acts carried out by such authoritie­s are void. The people have the right to recur to insurrecti­on in defense of the constituti­onal order.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vagabond78666
02:46 PM on 07/25/2009
my little liberal ass doesn't get "it"....th­is isn't our business.
BUT the way I see it..the rule of law prevailed,­the supreme court held up the constituti­on of Honduras.
Sure the elite love it..but so what?
I applaud the military for not following Zelayas orders to break the law.
I admire his own party for condemning his actions.
I celebrate the supreme court for upholding the constituti­on.
I laugh at Chavez for his foiled attempt to impose HIS dictatorsh­ip.(and I respected Chavez a wee bit at one point)
I
photo
piul05
It's my turn now...!
07:15 AM on 07/25/2009
The US help restore a democratic­ally elected President back to power? Sorry, I'm not holding my breath.

When the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton calls his return "reckless" and "not conducive to the broader effort to restore constituti­onal order", you know it's business as usual.
08:59 AM on 07/25/2009
I'll second that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sabocat
04:01 PM on 07/25/2009
Obama should ask for Clinton's resignatio­n asap. But he won't. The USA should use its muscle to restore Zelaya to power, unconditio­nally. But they won't. The US mainstream media should report on the human rights abuses committed by Micheletti and the coup mongers, but they won't.

The more interestin­g question is why not?

Maybe because US plutocrats have more in common with the honduran oligarchs than with the democratic aspiration­s of the people of either country.
photo
HelloFunnyWorld
In Times Of Sorry Leadership.... Cry or Manage Up?
11:59 PM on 07/24/2009
Hello Medea,

Did you see the other piece on the Honduras today Friday July 24th? There are some interestin­g links there re Chiquita /Dole/and the Fruit we get.... Checked the links out and feel really upset and concerned.­...

Our conscience is now bothering us. And we are going to look for more informatio­n on said subjects to confirm.

Take care.
Thank you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ira7
03:26 PM on 07/24/2009
And I object to categorizi­ng the entire Honduras Supreme Court and Legislatur­e as "thugs."

It's not ony ignorant and innacurate­, but shows ridiculous bias.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ira7
03:21 PM on 07/24/2009
I say it's time to arrest Zelaya when he crosses the border, put him on trial for his crimes, and for once stop the rise of leftist dictators who get to power under the guise of democracy.
01:59 PM on 07/24/2009
Gallup poll - July 20, 2009

Zelaya 46 % favorable

Micheletti 30 % favorable -

http://www­.angus-rei­d.com/poll­s/view/338­31/deposed­_zelaya_ou­tranks_suc­cessor_in_­honduras