I understand why Rush Limbaugh has made a long series of abhorrent comparisons between President Obama and Adolf Hitler. His sole purpose is to shock, to offend.
According to Limbaugh, President Obama's health care logo was "right out of Adolf Hitler's playbook;" "Obama is asking citizens to rat each other out like Hitler did;" the president "is sending out his brownshirts to head up opposition to genuine American citizens who want no part of what Barack Obama stands for and is trying to stuff down our throats;" and "Adolf Hitler, like Barack Obama, also ruled by dictate."
Along the same line, the president of Republican Women of Anne Arundel County, Maryland, wrote on the group's web site only last year that "Obama and Hitler have a great deal in common in my view. Obama and Hitler use the 'blitzkrieg' method to overwhelm their enemies." Tea Party activists demonstrated with posters depicting President Obama with a Hitler-like mustache. The head of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission declared at a Christian Coalition of Florida banquet, , that the proposed Democratic health care reform "is not something like what the Nazis did. It is precisely what the Nazis did." And radio talk show host Glenn Beck disparaged the president's plan to expand the Peace Corps and AmeriCorps as, "what Hitler did with the SS."
More recently, two mainstream establishment political personalities -- one Republican, the other a Democrat -- have joined Limbaugh and Beck in making similarly repugnant moral equivalences. According to Newt Gingrich, the former Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives, , the Obama Administration's policies, represent "as great a threat to America as Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union once did." And now California Attorney General Jerry Brown, the Democratic candidate for his old job as that state's governor, has likened his Republican counterpart, Meg Whitman, to none other than Hitler's Propaganda Minister, the virulently anti-Semitic Joseph Goebbels.
Commenting on Whitman's enormous war chest, Brown told a radio reporter while jogging, according to the reporter's blog, that "It's like Goebbels. Goebbels invented this kind of propaganda. He took control of the whole world. That's her ambition, the first woman president. That's what this is all about."
Goebbels was not just a run of the mill propagandist. One of Hitler's closest associates, he masterminded the Third Reich's campaign to ostracize and demonize Jews from the instant the Nazis came to power in 1933. He directed book burnings, called for the boycotts of Jewish businesses, and, in November 1938, spearheaded the burning of synagogues throughout Germany and Austria in a violent pogrom known as Kristallnacht, the Night of the Broken Glass.
"The Jews have deserved the catastrophe that has now overtaken them," Goebbels wrote in his diary on February 14, 1942. And a few weeks later, on March 6, 1942: "I am of the opinion that the greater the number of Jews liquidated, the more consolidated will the situation in Europe be after this war.... The Jews are Europe 's misfortune. They must somehow be eliminated, otherwise we are in danger of being eliminated by them."
To be fair, Brown has since apologized, sort of. "I regret making the comments," he said in a statement released by his campaign on Friday. "They were taken out of context."
Not surprisingly, Brown's political adversaries demand greater contrition.
"Jerry Brown needs to take responsibility for the full impact of his words, however carelessly spoken," declared Dr. Joel Geiderman, the chairman of California 's Republican Jewish Coalition whose mother survived the Nazi death camps. "The offensiveness of his likening Meg Whitman to Joseph Goebbels, for Holocaust survivors and the families of Holocaust victims, is obvious and demands accountability."
Geiderman is right, of course, but his focus is too narrow.
Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee's 2007 pronouncement that "more than a million people ... would have been in our workforce had we not had the holocaust of liberalized abortion under a flawed Supreme Court ruling in 1973," , was as misguided and out of place as last year's observation by U.S. Representative Alan Grayson (D-FL) that the absence of adequate healthcare resulted in a "Holocaust in America."
It is not enough for Democrats to condemn the likes of Limbaugh and Gingrich, or for Republicans to attack Brown. Republicans and conservatives must condemn all comparisons of President Obama to Hitler and of the Obama administration's policies to Nazism, and Democrats and liberals must similarly denounce any and all comparisons of Republican political figures to Nazis.
Analogies between present-day America and Nazi Germany are historically absurd and morally unseemly. Every time President Obama is accused of being a Nazi, every time a controversial Democratic policy or a woman's legal right to abort a fetus is compared to the greatest carnage ever perpetrated, every time a Democratic politician evokes Third Reich imagery in describing a Republican opponent, our civil discourse is dumbed down and the memory of millions of murdered men, women and children is trivialized and desecrated.
For once, a genuine bipartisan effort is required. As we approach the 2010 midterm elections, and as the 2012 presidential campaign is about to get launched, the leaders of the Republican and Democratic Parties must join together and declare once and for all that Nazi analogies have no place in our political rhetoric.
Menachem Rosensaft is Adjunct Professor of Law at Cornell Law School and Vice President of the American Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors and Their Descendants
Jeannette Katzir may not be a professional writer, but she's a natural storyteller. Determined to work through her shock and pain, she wades through every betrayal and abuse without any concern for her siblings' reaction.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stab-in-the-back_legend
Just like free speech can not allow yell "fire" in a crowded theatre, spewing hate speech on radio or tv should be prohibited. It is after all the "public airwaves".
But since you believe that free speech should be unlimited, let me remind you child pornography is a form of "speech" that we don't allow because it is dangerous. What Limbaugh and Beck do is incite hate and violence, and we call those "fighting words."
There was plenty of evidence last year, pointing to O'Reilly and Limbaugh being the causes of gun violence. The shooting of George Tiller, and the guy that shot the guard in the Holocaust Museum.
So, no matter how irresponsible, should all speech be unlimited and protected? I doubt that there is a right or wrong answer to that question, but O'Reilly incited someone to gun someone down. I think we have crossed a threshold and have gone too far. Just my opinion.
What's more I said waht I meant.
On top of that, I don't retract nothing.
My post and my opinion stays as is.
But, I agree, needless analogies diminish the horror of that era.
No matter how much propoganda is bandied about and how much hatred and intolerance is present in 2010, these days have nothing in common with 1930's and 40's Europe.
It's very weird. But it is what it is. Cable news and the internet don't help. Creates an us. v. them mentality.
So Republicans are nazis to liberals and democrats are nazis to conservatives.
Meanwhile, untold millions are not dead, a whole continent does not lie in ruin, no citizens are being gassed and burned alive, and there is no ethinic cleansing.
But it doesn't stop the morons of either side.
Ironically, both sides agree there are nazis. they just can't agree who they are. lol.
In the same vein I hate it when someone uses the term 'rape" as an analogy