The Internet as Toxic Avenger: Trafigura and the Ungagging of the Guardian

Here's a cautionary tale in how not to manage your message in a networked media age, or rather, further evidence of John Gilmore's brilliant maxim, "The Internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it." Late Monday night in England, the Guardian posted a strange article reporting that it was being prevented from reporting on a question pending in Parliament. The only thing the Guardian could say was that the case involved Carter-Ruck, a prominent PR firm that specializes in working with global corporations. But that didn't stop the blogosphere, which immediately took affront at the assault on free speech. Within 24 hours the whole story was out in the open, to the chagrin of Carter-Ruck and the oil commodities firm Trafigura, which was trying to hush up an embarrassing report on toxic dumping in the port of Aibidjan by one of its ships in 2006.

Here's the gist of the Guardian's original report on its gagging yesterday:

Today's published Commons order papers contain a question to be answered by a minister later this week. The Guardian is prevented from identifying the MP who has asked the question, what the question is, which minister might answer it, or where the question is to be found.

The Guardian is also forbidden from telling its readers why the paper is prevented -- for the first time in memory -- from reporting parliament. Legal obstacles, which cannot be identified, involve proceedings, which cannot be mentioned, on behalf of a client who must remain secret.

The only fact the Guardian can report is that the case involves the London solicitors Carter-Ruck, who specialise in suing the media for clients, who include individuals or global corporations.

The British blogosphere went into hyperdrive speculating about the case, and swiftly zeroed in on this report, posted to Wikileaks, connecting the oil commodity firm Trafigura to a report of toxic dumping off the coast of Africa. Apparently Carter-Ruck was trying to keep the issue from surfacing publicly and had obtained a court injunction barring coverage of a pending question that was being raised on the matter by a Member of Parliament. The word "Trafigura" also took off on Twitter, essentially making Carter-Ruck's legal efforts essentially moot.

Here you can see how the gagging of the Guardian was rapidly overwhelmed by mentions of Trafigura on Twitter.

For the rest of the story, go here.

 

 

Follow Micah Sifry on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mlsif

Comments

[Valkyrie Ice]

And this is simply more proof of why I say the internet is the single greatest tool humanity has ever made to liberate itself.

Silence one source, fifteen others transmit the information. Coverup and deny and you simply increase the number of leaks and spread the truth faster.

As the net grows and spreads across the world, it is going to bring down dictatorships and tyrannies of every stripe, in both the 1st and 3rd world. America is already being confronted with the untrustworthiness of it's traditional media, and going to the net for the facts. As the number of people online continues to grow exponentially this is going to continue to snowball until no government anywhere will be able to hide from it's citizens.

And government OF the people FOR the people will finally be reality instead of a ideal.

[horhay]

Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

It has been apparent for some time that the British media has been much more willing to get the truth out (or at least give us a different perspective). While American media is filtered & propagandized by the same corporations that a story like this is about, because they're owned by the same oligarchic Board of Directors.

So this story is very disheartening. Many thanks to the citizens of the U.K. for being passionate about free speech & trying to keep us all a free society. Thanks to anyone in the world who promotes freedom, and the internet being a wealth of information & solidarity.