iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael B. Keegan

GET UPDATES FROM Michael B. Keegan

Huntsman Polishes His Magic Mirror to Show GOP Voters Whatever They're Looking For

Posted: 06/20/11 02:08 PM ET

Just who is Jon Huntsman? At this stage, he is whatever anyone hopes that he will be. As he prepares to officially join the gaggle of GOP presidential candidates, his campaign strategists seem to have adopted an "all-things-to-all-people" approach: play up his conservative credentials for Republican primary voters while courting general election voters by promoting his media image as the only moderate in the race. A CNN commentator, for example, calls him "the lone standard-bearer of the center-right in a crowded GOP field." Katrina Trinko, a reporter at the conservative National Review Online, sees this all-things-to-all-people approach as a potentially winning strategy:


It remains to be seen whether Jon Huntsman can successfully be all things to all men. But if, by stressing different parts of his record, he can successfully sell himself as a moderate to centrists and a conservative to hard-liners, he could be difficult to beat.

An analysis of Huntsman's record shows that, faced with the reality that he must appeal to the increasingly far right Republican base, he is quickly trying to jettison formerly held "moderate" positions. We agree with Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, who has publicly rejected the notion that Huntsman is a RINO (Republican in Name Only), saying "there's no question he's a conservative."

It's worth noting that many Americans first met Huntsman when he introduced "my friend Sarah" Palin at the 2008 Republican National Convention, exulting that "history will be made tonight!" He praised her strength, tenacity, authenticity and originality, calling her a rebel and a renegade who is "not afraid to kick a few fannies and raise a little hell." Said Huntsman, "We are looking for a beacon of light to show us the way. We are looking for Sarah!"

Huntsman and the Religious Right: Ralph Reed's 'Great Friend'

There are plenty of reasons that former Christian Coalition director Ralph Reed recently introduced Huntsman to a group of right-wing activists as "a good conservative and a great friend."

In 2009, Huntsman told a reporter that he has little patience for traditional "culture war" issues, saying "I'm not good at playing those games." That sounds like a promising and refreshing break from the norm of Republican presidential candidates, but in reality he has played those "games" devastatingly well. He made his efforts to make abortion completely unavailable to women a centerpiece of his address to Reed's "Faith and Freedom Coalition" summit:

"As governor of Utah, I supported and signed every pro-life bill that came to my desk," he said. "I signed the bill that made second-trimester abortions illegal and increased the penalty for doing so. I signed the bill to allow women to know about the pain an abortion causes an unborn child. I signed the bill requiring parental permission for an abortion. I signed the bill that would trigger a ban on abortions in Utah if Roe v. Wade were overturned."

Huntsman has also appealed to the public school-hating wing of the Religious Right. In 2007, he signed a statewide school voucher bill that provided up to $3,000 in taxpayer funds for students attending private schools. That was too much even for voters in conservative Republican Utah, who rejected the attack on public education and overturned the plan through a referendum.

At Reed's recent confab, Huntsman also joined the chorus of speakers warning Tea Party conservatives not to abandon social conservatives. The Republican Party, he said, should not focus on economics to the detriment of the fight to make abortion unavailable, saying that would lead to "a deficit of the heart and soul."

Huntsman and the Economic Right: A Full Embrace of the Ryan Budget

Huntsman, who is making his tax-cutting record as governor of Utah a major campaign theme, has praised Rep. Paul Ryan's radical budget proposal as a "very, very good one." Even though Republicans have been abandoning the Ryan plan in droves, Huntsman has said that he would have voted for the Ryan budget if he were a member of Congress. He has specifically embraced the Ryan budget's plan to essentially abolish Medicare, saying the size of the national debt required drastic policy changes. However, unlike some other Republican governors, Huntsman's concerns about the debt did not prevent him from welcoming federal stimulus funds.

He embraces the Tea Party's warnings about the economy and the suggestion that the nation is being destroyed by internal enemies. He says that America is "buying serfdom" with its deficit spending. Invoking Ronald Reagan's 1964 "A Time for Choosing" speech on behalf of Barry Goldwater, Huntsman says America is at a crossroads, with voters needing to choose "whether we are to become a declining power in the world, eaten from within, or a nation that regains its economic health and maintains its long-loved liberties."

As governor, Huntsman proposed abolishing corporate taxes altogether; campaigning in New Hampshire recently, he suggested that he would cut federal corporate taxes. The 2012 campaign, he says, will determine whether the nation will endure an economic "lost decade" or "unleash the economic magic."

Moving Right on Climate Change

This month the Salt Lake Tribune examined Huntsman's shift on climate issues. Four years ago, he supported a regional cap-and-trade program, saying, "If we do this right, our citizens are going to have a better quality of life, we're going to spawn new technologies and industries, and we're going to leave our most important belongings in better shape for the next generation." That was then, as the paper noted:

But now, in a political environment rocked by recession and a rowdy tea party, and with Huntsman's eyes on a possible presidential run in 2012, his position has evolved. He's still defending the science of climate change, but he has ditched his support for cap-and-trade.

Given that most of the GOP field is in full denial on climate change, Huntsman has gotten some credit for simply acknowledging reality. "All I know is 90 percent of the scientists say climate change is occurring," he told TIME magazine. "If 90 percent of the oncological community said something was causing cancer, we'd listen to them." But, he says, now "isn't the moment" to deal with climate change.
That led the Washington Monthly's Steve Benen to comment:

This is, in general, the worst of all possible positions. Much of the right believes climate change is a "hoax" and an elaborate conspiracy cooked up by communists to destroy America's way of life. These deniers have a simple solution to the problem: ignore it and pretend there is no problem. Much of the left takes the evidence seriously, is eager to address the crisis, and has a variety of possible solutions to the problem, including but not limited to cap-and-trade plans.

Huntsman apparently wants to split the difference -- he accepts the evidence and believes the problem is real; Huntsman just doesn't want to do anything about it.

To borrow his analogy, Huntsman has heard the collective judgment of 90% of the world's oncologists, but believes it'd be inconvenient to deal with the cancer or what's causing the cancer anytime soon.

Moderate Image, Conservative Reality

Huntsman's moderate image is based in large part on his 2009 endorsement of civil unions for gay couples. Five years earlier, when campaigning for governor, he had supported a state constitutional amendment that bans marriage and "other domestic unions" for same-sex couples. Huntsman's rhetorical shift did not find its way into any policy that offers legal protection for gay couples in Utah; he still opposes marriage equality, calling himself "a firm believer in the traditional construct of marriage, a man and a woman."

Huntsman has taken some heat from far-right activists who cannot tolerate the slightest sign of heresy against right-wing dogma. But former George W. Bush official Michael Gerson thinks Huntsman's moderate media image could actually help him by setting initial expectations low among GOP activists:


The media have often covered Huntsman as a liberal Republican -- a Rockefeller reincarnation. After all, he supports civil unions. He made it easier to get a drink at a bar in Utah. This easy press narrative gives Huntsman an odd advantage in a Republican primary: He is more conservative than his image. For many Republicans, he will improve upon closer inspection.

Huntsman's campaign is just getting under way, but his positioning is already clear. Tell Religious Right activists you're one of them by emphasizing your support for the most draconian anti-choice measures. Tell the Tea Partiers you're one of them by backing Paul Ryan's radically anti-government and anti-middle-class budget. And encourage more moderate Republicans to believe you're one of them by calling for civil discourse and offering rhetorical support for short-of-equality measures for same-sex couples. It's a calculated strategy that might make some sense politically, but it seems unlikely that trying to be all things to all people provides a path to victory through the restrictive gauntlet of the Republican primaries.

 

Follow Michael B. Keegan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/peoplefor

Just who is Jon Huntsman? At this stage, he is whatever anyone hopes that he will be. As he prepares to officially join the gaggle of GOP presidential candidates, his campaign strategists seem to ha...
Just who is Jon Huntsman? At this stage, he is whatever anyone hopes that he will be. As he prepares to officially join the gaggle of GOP presidential candidates, his campaign strategists seem to ha...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
10:26 AM on 06/21/2011
I suppose it takes some talent to pander to the tradition Republican Party and the Tea party after being close to Iran on business deals, no to mention procuring those American jobs to China through the US Chamber of Commerce. This shouldn't affect the business community much but i wonder how working Republicans that have lost their jobs feel about it? So business deals around the globe isn't so much who you deal with it is how much you stand to make when dealing with communists and radical regimes...........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alafonse
It's definitely a crap-shoot.
06:31 AM on 06/21/2011
It's always entertaining to see the candidates-in-waiting prosti-tute themselves to the base.
Some peek-a-boo spike heels, fishnet hose, a low cut top, a fur boa and the picture would be complete.
08:39 PM on 06/20/2011
"Huntsman Polishes His Magic Mirror to Show GOP Voters Whatever They're Looking For"

pol·i·ti·cian noun \ˌpä-lə-ˈti-shən\: A person who polishes a magic mirror to show voters whatever they're looking for.

Synonyms: United States President(s), United States Congress, Governors, You Get The Idea
photo
KevinMac59
Independently Dependent
07:50 PM on 06/20/2011
As a citizen of the State where he was Governor, I can tell you, Mr. Huntsman is whatever he thinks you need him to be at the time he needs a vote!! He's for "civil" unions but also for the ban on gay marriage. He want's to do away with corporate taxes, course, that benefits him personally. He still has that silver spoon in his mouth. I was no big fan of Norm Bangerter, but at least he didn't emulate a chameleon. He just did the best job he could without attempting to be anything but what he was. A man with convictions, not a recipe for "waffle"ing.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Wallysmom
"I'm taking on stupid wherever it exists"
09:34 AM on 06/21/2011
Seems like he is also channeling Obama's "civility" aura and trying to stand out against the other candidates who do not know what that term means. Interesting view from someone who lived in the state that he governed. Is it me, do you agree, that there is something wrong about him that I can't put my finger on?
photo
KevinMac59
Independently Dependent
08:35 PM on 06/21/2011
He's been pampered and had his life "directed" for him since the Reagan Administration. Here, he tried to appear to be all things to all parties, with no clear agenda. This is a total blue state, so the legislature also directed his agenda, and when the minority dis-agreed, he then blamed it on the "folks on the hill" even though he signed everything that came across his desk. I really don't remember him vetoeing any bills. He was pretty much a rubber stamp, and he'll continue to be one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NJP1
06:30 PM on 06/20/2011
once again the politics of comfort takes centre stage
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
innerpuppie
The truth is an absolute defense...
05:36 PM on 06/20/2011
"He says that America is "buying serfdom" with its deficit spending."

More like America is buying serfdom with each tax break for the wealthy.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
05:06 PM on 06/20/2011
This kind of wolf in moderate clothing scares me more than anything.
04:51 PM on 06/20/2011
Very interesting point about how the media portrayal could help with conservatives who will br pleasantly surprised by him. That could help him in gaining momentum as a newer name in the process.
Christina Moorshead
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
powermuffn
Humble, progressive viewpoints since 1972
04:46 PM on 06/20/2011
Unfortunately, Mr. Huntsman sounds like he is merely "for" anything and everything that is politically expedient at the moment. I find deeply troubling his comment that we are heading toward "fiscal serfdom", yet in almost the same breath says he would repeal ALL corporate income taxes. How, exactly, does LOWERING taxes deal with the deficit again? I know there's a Republican argument in there somewhere, I just keep trying to forget about it.

And, most egregiously, Mr. Huntsman supports the most "draconian" anti-women legislation as has been seen in recent government. With the exception of the "heart beat" legislation (that still may get traction, I fear) Mr. Huntsman wants to assure religious conservatives that he is all for the 800-pound gorilla-like presence of government in a woman's private life, while publically denouncing government's intervention into enforcing regulations and restrictions that would keep our food edible, our water drinkable and our lives survivable.

And, in summary, it is exactly THAT that I think Mr. Huntsman most vividly depicts: He wants you to merely "live" your life within the narrow constructs of the laws government will most assuredly impose on you as an individual, while at the same time allowing big corporations to skate free of any niggly little regulations or taxes that might make them actually accountable for either the public's safety or their due contribution to society's programs.

He may not be a "wizard", but he certainly scares me.
04:04 PM on 06/20/2011
Part IV, and end: So it seems the carrot on the stick remains in that regard, and the anti-abortion voter base remains hopeful and stays interested in the candidates who speak to them on that emotional level. Why haven't they thought about lost opportunities? Why no dissent about their choice of candidate not carrying out their claimed support? Why no feelings of betrayal? I have not heard anyone in favor of ending abortion rights say anything about Party elects and non-performance. Evidently, it appears that for voters who are passionate about an issue, what is ignored is the ability to freely employ critical thinking about what was said, and then what was done -- or not done, by their candidate of choice after their candidate of choice is elected. What might that say about emotion and its ability to override sensibility? Voting with emotion, I contend, is dangerous.
03:59 PM on 06/20/2011
Part III: A lot of work has been done to "hook" them, and keep them hooked. That particular carrot on the stick has been employed over and over, yet if you look back to a time when the Party expressing anti-abortion sentiments held both the House and the Senate and the Oval Office, did they carry through on their alleged sentiment; something they could have easily passed into law when in total control as was the case in part under Bush? That would have been like shooting fish in a barrel for the ruling Party. Simply put with a majority in all divisions, passing legislation banning abortion would have been a sure bet. But they didn't do it...and I don't know anyone who has questioned why they didn't take the advantage when they had it. Interesting. But had they done so; had they satisfied those disfavoring abortion, that would have been the end of that. No more opportunity to entice that section of voter base on the promise of Party support for their most passionate concern, should they actually pass law. Part IV and end follows....
03:49 PM on 06/20/2011
Part II: The "hook" one looks for is the thing that your intended audience is most [emotionally] passionate about. So of course to sell yourself not by factually stating your REAL stand on things, claim you stand for those things the people you want to sway your way will respond to in an optimal way. "Hook" them with your claim to have their values. What you do when you do win office thereafter may be an entirely different agenda from the one you proposed in order to get voter support. We see evidence of that in these last mid term elections. I see more evidence of that in the recent 'busy work' being undertaken for an agenda of future importance by garnering support from those who are anti-abortion. Part III follows....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
powermuffn
Humble, progressive viewpoints since 1972
04:54 PM on 06/20/2011
In re: Abortion legislation. I do believe the issue is one of "state's rights". I remember vividly the time when it was on my home state's election agenda back in '92, I think, and it overwhelmingly (65%-35%) passed that women would have the right to choose. I don't think the House or the Senate can actually take that issue head-on: it would have to come up as another case before the Supreme Court, at which time the Court COULD walk-back the previous Roe v. Wade, seeing the make-up of the Court, such as it is now -- 5/4.

All in all, good posts! Enjoyable reading. Fanned.
05:13 PM on 06/20/2011
Yes, the abortion issue is an issue of Constitutional proportions, but the big cry about states' rights seems to be stronger now than it was in the first decade of this century. (I cannot help but wonder if the big cries about states' rights now are an attempt to defend the radical changes taking place in certain states.) So, if, and it was the case, the Republican Party held majorities in House and Senate; the President was Republican, and a majority of Supreme Court Judges were Republican, why couldn't "interpretation" of the Constitution be swayed in favor of that Party's alleged anti-abortion sentiments? I mean, strange things are occurring at the State level now; and strange things in other areas (such as 'enhanced interrogation' something going against Geneva Convention), were wantonly and patently ignored under Bush, couldn't that Administration have done as they pleased in the case of abortion they alleged disfavoring?
03:48 PM on 06/20/2011
I believe that the thing most practiced, and most dangerous to practice, is voting with one's emotions; not with one's ability to first engage in critical thinking, siding with one party or one presidential contender because you like "that side of the isle" and that is the basis for your voting one way or the other. Without introducing artificial bias, without being a "team player" because that is expected, weigh the proposals of ALL presidential hopefuls. Look for holes in what they say; look for someone whose principles have held steady no matter the social climate and who one wishes to attract to their voter base. Look what happened to Newt when he tried to play to both Party and to the views of both Parties at the same time. I saw Trump, after leaving the campaign make some comments about how he was "reconsidering" everything, and HE began speaking negatively about the Republicans. Once Newt got shown the door, we didn't hear anymore of that out of Trump; we've heard nothing at all. Having had experience writing speeches, the practice involves using a "hook" as it does in writing advertising pieces; corporate annual reports...so on. Part II follows...