iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael B. Keegan

GET UPDATES FROM Michael B. Keegan
 

Who's Sorry Now? The Republican Art of the Non-Apology

Posted: 03/ 6/2012 5:07 pm

Ralph Reed reached out to Rush Limbaugh via Twitter yesterday and accepted his apology. "Apology accepted. Let's move on," he said -- a magnanimous gesture had Rush Limbaugh actually apologized to Ralph Reed. Too bad that, despite the too-quick headlines, Limbaugh not only hadn't apologized to Reed -- he hadn't really apologized to anyone at all.

Instead, Reed and Limbaugh, with the backing of Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum, started up the ole vast right-wing fake apology machine -- designed to temporarily quell a too-hot controversy while at the same time not giving an inch.

Unfortunately for them, after too much use of the fake apology, people are catching on.

Although considered by some in the GOP to be a little too rough around the edges, Rush Limbaugh has always been considered a net asset to Republicans. Like fellow right-wing shock-jocks Glenn Beck and Bryan Fischer, he reaches a wide audience with toxic sludge that is ultimately helpful to the Republican Party, saying all the things that fire up the right-wing base, but that the politicians wouldn't want to be caught saying themselves. But Limbaugh has a peculiar kind of power -- no matter how outrageous his comments, members of the establishment Right tiptoe around him, afraid that his toxic words might one day be directed at them. George Will said it best: "They want to bomb Iran, but they're afraid of Rush Limbaugh."

The latest boot-up of the right-wing apology machine began when Limbaugh called Georgetown University law student and contraception coverage advocate Sandra Fluke a "slut," saying "She wants to be paid to have sex." And, as if contraception was sold by the gallon or the pound, he added, "She's having so much sex she can't afford the contraception."

President Obama immediately stepped up, calling Fluke to check in and encourage her after she had been smeared on national radio.

Rick Santorum, in contrast, called Limbaugh's comments "absurd," but then reasoned that "an entertainer can be absurd... He's in a very different business than I am."

Mitt Romney's response was flimsier and even more timid. Asked about it while shaking hands at a rally, he said that it was "not the language I would have used." Apparently, he had no problem with Limbaugh saying that birth control advocates want the government to pay for them to have sex. He would just use different words.

Finally, Limbaugh himself fake-apologized. "I chose the wrong words in my analogy of the situation. I did not mean a personal attack on Ms. Fluke," he said -- before blaming the left and going on to repeat his accusation that she was "discussing personal sexual recreational activities before members of Congress."

"I wouldn't have use those words" is the new "I apologize if anyone was offended."

Ms. Fluke did not accept Limbaugh's fake-apology. Ralph Reed, however, accepted it on her behalf.

Republican leaders can't be responsible for everything that comes out of the mouths of every right-wing blowhard. But if they want to be president they can be expected to provide clear responses when comments like Limbaugh's are this outrageous, instead of hiding their heads in the sand hoping that the public exposure of these outrages will go away. How hard is it to say that women who advocate for insurance coverage for contraceptives should be heard and shouldn't be called prostitutes for stating their position on the topic? Is it really worth compromising basic decency to stay in the good graces of Rush Limbaugh?

The Republican Party is increasingly buoyed by a small base whose values are antithetical to those of most other Americans. If they want to survive politically, they are going to have to stand up and no longer be fake apologists for the likes of Rush Limbaugh.

 

Follow Michael B. Keegan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/peoplefor

Ralph Reed reached out to Rush Limbaugh via Twitter yesterday and accepted his apology. "Apology accepted. Let's move on," he said -- a magnanimous gesture had Rush Limbaugh actually apologized to Ral...
Ralph Reed reached out to Rush Limbaugh via Twitter yesterday and accepted his apology. "Apology accepted. Let's move on," he said -- a magnanimous gesture had Rush Limbaugh actually apologized to Ral...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 737
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nosybear
Liar, damn liar, statistician and brewer
11:48 PM on 03/13/2012
I note that Republicans are generally "sorry if someone was offended," kind of implying it's the offended's fault for their excessive sensitivity. A real apology goes "I'm sorry for what I did." Never hear that from the Right....
09:17 PM on 03/13/2012
A manufactured issue to distract from the Obama Record.
WOmen know that the pill cost 4$ a month at walmart
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Find the Truth
Spencer and Little Girl
12:52 AM on 03/14/2012
We all see through this prevarication as well...
photo
Harry Scrote
Why so hateful, Conservatives?
01:49 AM on 03/14/2012
And their insurance should cover it.
photo
AlfredE69
Liberty Lovin' Tree Hugger
08:59 PM on 03/13/2012
End the assault on our liberty. Tell Obama not to re-authorize the Patriot Act again.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
07:22 PM on 03/13/2012
An entertainer who claims to be a pundit does NOT have the right to be absurd. We need a truthfulness doctrine.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JuliaOceania
Reality Has a Well Known Liberal Bias
06:05 PM on 03/13/2012
Here is what these ignorant people do not understand about oral contraceptives... if you begin to take it, it is a commitment to stay on it for at least 6 months, or you should not take it in the first place. It is not something that a woman can opt in and out of month to month, like cutting back the amount of money they spend on clothing, or makeup, it is an ongoing expense that if a woman cannot afford her prescription she may destabilize her hormones . In other words, you cannot take the pill one month, and go off the next month because you can just cut back the amount of sex you are having.

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised at the depth of ignorance that people in this country have about their own hormones, much less the hormonal makeup of their opposite sex partner, because this is the only Western Democracy that thinks Abstinence Only education is good public policy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
07:44 PM on 03/13/2012
Hmmm. Its ignorant in your view to expect women to be able to plan for their needs and make decisions about important things in their lives?

Wow. And they claim that the GOP h8es women!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JuliaOceania
Reality Has a Well Known Liberal Bias
09:11 PM on 03/13/2012
You have a reading comprehension problem, or you are intentionally creating straw men, either way, your post bears no relationship with mine, and it seems pretty much out of left field...

Republican men tend to not understand reproduction and female hormones... people like Rush Limbaugh, who seems to be under the impression that women take birth control every time we have intercourse, instead of once daily. GOP men think oral contraceptives work like ED medication... silly old goats that they are
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
isfturtle
09:14 PM on 03/13/2012
Going to their doctor and getting birth control isn't planning for their needs or making decisions about important things in their lives?
05:48 PM on 03/13/2012
Relax folks, no one wants to prevent contraception... This is a non issue on the right and the left.
FORCING a person to pay for another's behavior is the issue. I trust we can all unite on this simple principle? Electing politicians so we can take turns "screwing" one another makes zero sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
isfturtle
09:15 PM on 03/13/2012
So you must be against insurance coverage for Viagra as well, right?
08:23 AM on 03/14/2012
I'm certainly against that. It should be removed from coverage immediately.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
elkabong
Campaign finance is the disease.
10:31 PM on 03/13/2012
Who is FORCING you to pay Sandra Flukes insurance premiums?

If you want to know the issue, you should really change the channel.
08:24 AM on 03/14/2012
Everyone else on her plan. That's who.
03:13 AM on 03/15/2012
The force is applied when govenment coerces an employer (or such like) to offer coverages with which they morally disagree or simply cannot afford. If one doesn't like the coverage offered you are free to work or, in this case, to attend college elsewhere. I am an employer and we offer a basic plan that does not offer much more than major medical. In this economy it's all we can afford. Let's not pretend the employee pays anything. I would not hire them if I was asked to pay for such things...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JuliaOceania
Reality Has a Well Known Liberal Bias
05:47 PM on 03/13/2012
Tell me, why does Ralph Reed think he can accept an apology not directed at him over something that did not injure him? There really is no shame in conservatives... and there is no end to the hubris with which they conduct themselves...
11:10 PM on 03/13/2012
It's an unfortunate variation of a certain kind of Christian thought: That God can forgive a sin against another person and the other person doesn't have to enter the picture.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
RButler
I've always wanted to have everything I wanted
04:57 AM on 03/14/2012
Does God ever say "NO! You're not forgiven". Such a deal. They ask God, and only they can hear that God has forgiven. It's a permanent 'Get out of jail free' card. No wonder Christians are difficult to deal with. They live in a fantasy world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
conscioushope
"There is no darkness but ignorance." Shakespeare
08:25 AM on 03/14/2012
Julia, thanks for your posts! well done! fanned!
05:22 PM on 03/13/2012
She said she spent $3000.00 a year on birth control (a lie) and demanded the taxpayers pay for it. She opened herself up for ridicule.

There's no reason for this debate to exist, that's why she's being made fun of. Some insurance companies cover birth control, some don't. Nobody was stopping her from getting a plan that did cover it.

If democrats are so offended by this kind of language they should have taken issue to obama inviting common to the whitehouse.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drosco
09:46 PM on 03/13/2012
Ya and 140 advertisers left because they share your views.
10:27 PM on 03/13/2012
They're already starting to beg to come back and he's already got new ones.
10:19 PM on 03/13/2012
Ugh. Stop repeating the false statements of personalities like Limbaugh. She was not demanding that taxpayers pay for her birth control. Taxpayers would be paying for it if we had universal health care. She wanted to testify that it should be part of the insurance available to her. She wanted to testify that it sometimes is used as a treatment for medical conditions, such as ovarian cysts. Unfortunately, only a panel of men were allowed to testify about birth control as it relates to women. This is the situation as created, not by Ms. Fluke, but by Darrell Issa.
By the way, if I'm not mistaken, most if not all colleges and universities require matriculating students to have health insurance.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edgarcaycedoc
05:08 PM on 03/13/2012
Rush Limbaugh is the poster boy for what is wrong with America. He is not only a misogynist, he is also a misanthrope and a (not so closet) white supremacist. But he invokes Ronald Reagan and the Gold Over People party just swoon at his feet.
11:43 PM on 03/13/2012
You have just proved your ignorance on the matter.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
RButler
I've always wanted to have everything I wanted
04:58 AM on 03/14/2012
Don't forget 'liar'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joffan
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.
04:29 PM on 03/13/2012
Internal dialog for Limbaugh:

-- Anyone who disagrees with me is immoral. By definition. Because I know everything.

-- Free speech for other people is worthless.

-- Some inconvenient aspects of reality force me to say things that sound like apologies.Don't worry, I don't mean it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
conscioushope
"There is no darkness but ignorance." Shakespeare
08:30 AM on 03/14/2012
haha! Exactly! Thanks! However, come to think of it rushie may be a friend to all non-goopers because he is so hatefully outrageous.
photo
YouTubeJEFF9K
Big on the Big Picture.
03:57 PM on 03/13/2012
Maybe it started with Ronald Reagan's "mistakes were made." In any case, today's Republicans are a sorry group.
11:45 PM on 03/13/2012
I do not think so some of my best friends are Republicans. Good upstanding citizens. Not my friends who are democrats that is another story.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zanzig
04:30 AM on 03/14/2012
I'd be really surprised if any Democrat would befriend you based on the remarks you've made here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frenchautopilot
Liberté, égalité, fraternité
04:41 AM on 03/14/2012
Is english your first language?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
conscioushope
"There is no darkness but ignorance." Shakespeare
08:33 AM on 03/14/2012
It's really sad, isn't it? And, although I never really like fake-acting Reagan at the time, at least he was not petty and mean-spirited like those who invoke his name now.
03:54 PM on 03/13/2012
Only in republicans mind would Ralph Reed think because he said apology accepted its the end of it. Its only the beginning.........
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
conscioushope
"There is no darkness but ignorance." Shakespeare
08:35 AM on 03/14/2012
I know. Really immature thinking, or non-thinking I should say.
03:41 PM on 03/13/2012
I'm calling the Washington offices of Speaker Boehner(202-225-0600) and Leader McConnell(202-224-2541) to ask why their responses are so fearful. Mr. LimbaUGH's 3-day sickening unhinged screed should be denounced not shrugged off. "Inappropriate" is an inappropriate response. It is a snivelling, lickspittle response. Call now please.
04:29 PM on 03/13/2012
Are you interested in an honest answer from them or are you hoping a stronger condemnation from Boehner and McConnell will drive a wedge? You don't really care what they think do you? Would a tougher stance by them somehow soothe your pain?

Stop playing politics about things like this. Both sides look for edges hoping that it will hurt the other. This continuing saga of meaningless gotcha's when the world is being torn apart is just so destructive.

How about if there's truly regret, that's what's communicated. And if there isn't, then silence reigns.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zanzig
04:31 AM on 03/14/2012
Playing politics? This IS politics.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
RButler
I've always wanted to have everything I wanted
05:01 AM on 03/14/2012
Someone remarked that 'inappropriate' was using the wrong fork and not what Limbaugh said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gfs5541
03:40 PM on 03/13/2012
Looky looky, dittoheads are trying to save Rush from oblivion! Oh noes!
09:20 PM on 03/13/2012
Rushy Advert rates are up 20%
He is stronger than ever with MORE listeners..
photo
Slartibartfast
You're either for America or for republicans..
09:22 AM on 03/14/2012
Link?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:34 PM on 03/13/2012
The people pushing for this mandate are the same ones who stand infront of government chanting "STAY OUT OF MY UTERUS" and "STAY OUT OF MY BEDROOM" and "STAY OUT OF MY PRIVATE LIFE". And yet here they are demanding the government do that very thing.....

They are trying to convince people that without this mandate, women won't have access to birth control. They are trying to convince people that birth control actually does cost a woman $3000.00 over the span of 3 years. They are trying to convince people that no ones insurance premiums are going to increase if this mandate becomes law. They are trying to convince people that even contraception for medical conditions are being denied. They are trying to convince people that the insurance companies WANT this mandate and it's the religious zelots who are stopping it. They are trying to convince people that without this mandate, contraception will be banned.

None of those things are true. And anyone willing to use their computer for anything other than pushing entitlement programs would know it.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
GeorgeBurnsWasRight
My micro-bio is running on empty.
04:04 PM on 03/13/2012
You're trying to convince people that "personhood" laws don't impact birth control. Apparently your computer doesn't work so well, or is it PEBKB?
photo
lakat
Haiti lives.
04:43 PM on 03/13/2012
We are not telling women what to do with their uteri, their bedrooms or their private lives, we are insisting that big business (in this case the medical insurance business) stop trying to do just that. Why is it you people can't see that one side wants to dictate how a woman behaves sexually (even married ones!) and the other side just wants choices for women?

Hey republican boys, how bout keeping it in your pants and stop seducing women to have sex with you? You know this would not be an issue if men could get pregnant. (I'd pay to see that happen!)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:55 PM on 03/13/2012
So because we do not want to HELP PAY for your contraception, you see that as us trying to stop/dictate women's choice or sexual behavior? What kind of logic is that? How does that, in any way, say that we want to deny you contraception, deny you sexual encounters/relationships, or deny you choice?

How about this.....I do not want to help pay for your lunch today. Now, are you seriously going to accuse me of trying to deny you access to food? I hope not because no one would take you seriously.