iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael B. Keegan

Michael B. Keegan

GET UPDATES FROM Michael B. Keegan

Pandering for the Primaries, Pawlenty Tacks Right

Posted: 05/23/11 04:30 PM ET

Former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty officially launched his presidential campaign today in Iowa. Although he has been campaigning in Iowa and New Hampshire for a couple of years now, you may not know much about him. He has low name recognition and low poll numbers, and his book Courage to Stand is not selling that well. But journalists from The New Republic and National Review think he could well be the GOP candidate. So it's worth taking a good look at his record and his far-right ideology.

Part of Pawlenty's appeal is supposed to be that he is from Minnesota, and was elected as a conservative in a bluish-purplish state. Some people wrongly assume that being from Minnesota automatically makes him some kind of moderate. In fact, Pawlenty is campaigning as a hard-core, across-the-board conservative.

He makes appeals to Religious Right voters by talking up his faith and appearing on even the most offensive radio shows, like that of the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer, who is surely one of the most extreme, hateful and bigoted personalities in Christian radio. Pawlenty helped raise money for Ralph Reed's "Faith and Freedom Coalition" in Iowa. And he appointed an education commissioner who equated teaching of evolution with teaching of creationism but thought teaching sharing in kindergarten was "socialist."

Pawlenty's attacks on reproductive rights please anti-abortion advocates. A National Review Online blogger says Pawlenty "may be the strongest pro-life candidate" in 2012. As governor, Pawlenty signed legislation erecting barriers to women seeking abortions, including a required waiting period and anti-choice lecture. He has spoken at anti-choice rallies, looking forward to a day when Roe v. Wade would be overturned, saying: "We have a dream today that someday soon this will not be an anniversary of sadness, but an anniversary of justice restored."

Pawlenty has also fine-tuned his campaign and his record to be more attractive to the far-right Republican Party of the Tea Party era. He once actively supported regional action to address climate change and even filmed an environmental commercial. But now he apologizes, calls his former position "stupid," and has joined the ranks of climate change deniers. Pawlenty once voted for a gay rights bill as a state legislator, but then disavowed it and embarked on a journey that Think Progress described as "evolving homophobia." And he is a vocal supporter of the current effort to amend Minnesota's constitution to ban gay couples from getting married.

Pawlenty doesn't even support legal protections short of marriage, like those that could be provided by civil unions. He went so far as to sign an Orwellian letter defending the Family Research Council, the American Family Association and other anti-gay groups against criticism that they were promoting hate.

Pawlenty appears at Tea Party events and appeals to Tea Partiers with his opposition to health care reform. He denounces "Obamacare" as unconstitutional and one of the worst pieces of legislation in the history of the country. He compares the health care reform law to drug dealing and has joined legal efforts to prevent it from being implemented. In 2006, Pawlenty, in what opponents called election-year politics, pushed a wide array of proposals to crack down on immigration. Last year, he advocated amending the Constitution to deny citizenship to the American-born children of undocumented immigrants. Speaking to a Hispanic Republican group in January, he fudged his position, but said, "We can't have wide swaths of the country nodding or winking or looking the other way to broad violations of the law," rhetoric that echoes the "anti-amnesty" language used by opponents of comprehensive immigration reform.

And Pawlenty works hard to appeal to the economic and corporate right. He wrote a column in the Wall Street Journal last December slamming government employees and decrying a "silent coup, an inside job engineered by self-interested politicians and fueled by campaign contributions." The nonpartisan PolitiFact rated the column and its claims about government workers "Pants on Fire" -- its most-lying "Truth-o-meter" rating.

Pawlenty's self-portrait doesn't always mesh with reality. He rails against the "immoral debt" and touts his record as a governor of holding the line on growth in government. But in fact, as governor, he used short-term budget tricks that "left the state with a $5-billion projected deficit, one of the highest in the nation as a percentage of the state's general fund." He railed against the Obama administration's stimulus bill but then asked for $236 million from it.

He portrays himself as an anti-tax champion, but that's not how many Minnesotans experienced him. A state revenue department study in 2009 found that Minnesotans earning less than $129,879 saw their tax rates increase under Pawlenty. "Don't let anyone tell you Governor Pawlenty didn't raise taxes," said Sen. Al Franken. "It's about whom he raised them on. He raised them on lower- and middle-income families all across the state in order to pay for our kids' education."

Pawlenty promises right-wing groups that as president he will appoint "strict constructionist" judges -- code for judges with an 18th-century view of Americans' rights and interests. Last year he bypassed his state's Commission on Judicial Selection to appoint to a judgeship an attorney with strong Religious Right connections who served as counsel for the Minnesota Family Council in an anti-gay marriage case.

Back in 2008, when Pawlenty was frequently mentioned as a potential vice presidential candidate, he was criticized for being too boring on television, maybe a bit too "Minnesota nice." So the 2012 Pawlenty has learned how to make himself sufficiently aggressive for the GOP zeitgeist. In speeches at conservative conferences, Pawlenty denigrates President Obama, accusing him of appeasing the nation's enemies. In his campaign launch message, Pawlenty said President Obama lacks both understanding of the nation's problems and the courage to address them.

While these may all be traits that will help Pawlenty win the Republican nomination, it's hard for me to imagine that a majority of American voters would agree that what we really need in the White House is a trash-talking, flip-flopping, science-denying, abortion-criminalizing, gay-rights-bashing, Religious Right-embracing politician who is so eager to get elected that he'll promise the far right just about anything. He even faked a southern accent when speaking to conservatives in Iowa, provoking well-deserved mockery back in Minnesota.

Pawlenty's backers are convinced that his polling numbers are low only because Americans haven't gotten to know him yet. But as Nate Silver noted back in November, Pawlenty was not that popular among those who know him best of all:

... a survey of Republican primary voters in Minnesota -- where Mr. Pawlenty is the governor and where his name recognition is near-universal -- showed him getting only 19 percent of the Republican primary vote there (although this was good for a nominal first place with Ms. Palin placing at 18 percent). Mr. Pawlenty's approval rating in Minnesota is also a tepid 47 percent.
 

Follow Michael B. Keegan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/peoplefor

Former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty officially launched his presidential campaign today in Iowa. Although he has been campaigning in Iowa and New Hampshire for a couple of years now, you may not kn...
Former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty officially launched his presidential campaign today in Iowa. Although he has been campaigning in Iowa and New Hampshire for a couple of years now, you may not kn...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 96
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
johngary66
Accused of heresy and decided to go with that.
02:50 AM on 05/25/2011
I think it is important to understand how Tim Pawlenty won two races for governor in Minnesota. In his first race in 2002 he won with 44% of the vote. Not exactly a ringing endorsement. He ran against two popular liberals. The Independence Party candidate was Tim Penny who had been a popular Democratic Congressman who got 16%. The Democrat was a State Senator who won 40% of the vote was from out state Minnesota and not that well known statewide. So 56% did not vote for Timmy. In 2006 he ran in another three way race and won with 46% to 45% for his democratic opponent. There was a last minute infusion of $750,000 from John Kerry's nemesis, the Texan head of the swift boaters. It was timed so that it wouldn't have to be reported by state law until after the election. The Democrat also made a major blunder in the last week by publicly criticizing his female running mate for not knowing enough about ethanol. Timmy was never popular with the majority and he always lost big in the Metropolitan areas. The article says he currently has 47% approval in Minnesota. That was probably by one of the Republican slanted pollsters and I doubt it is close to accurate. Pawlenty ,was a member of a church far from where he lived that is considered a favorite of wealthy evangelicals. Don't buy his humble roots act, he has been a social climber since he left home.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jstrate
04:45 PM on 05/24/2011
At least Pawlenty adheres to one principle--doing whatever it takes to promote his election and political career. In this regard, not a lot different from others.
03:58 PM on 05/24/2011
Once again a Huffpost writer can't discuss a Republican candidate without peppering "right wing" and "far right" all over his copy. Is there such a thing as a "left wing" or "far left" Democrat on the national scene, or do they all float along in the mainstream; perhaps that's how it must look from Mr Keegan's perch on the left bank.
Remember Mr Obama was a lets-close-Guantanamo and bring-home-the-troops liberal while he was running for president. He had to adjust to the realities of the job, and so would Mr Pawlenty if he should happen to win.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Glenna Jones-Kachtik
04:39 PM on 05/24/2011
That depends on how he campaigned & what promises he made to Minnesota to get elected. If he indeed did do all the things he did there - I DON'T CARE HOW MODERATE YOU THINK HE MIGHT BECOME - he doesn't deserve to be in the white house.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
too young but old enough
I already know how this is going to turn out...
05:16 PM on 05/24/2011
There is A 'left wing' or 'far left' Democrat on the national scene, but only one: Dennis Kucinich...and you'll usually see him referred to as such (even in HuffPo articles).
12:41 AM on 05/25/2011
Ditto that. There is no real left wing left in Congress any more. To paraphrase Bill Maher: In congress, you have the Democrats, a Center-Right Party perfect for Hedge Fund Managers and Bankers with a gay friend or two, and they sit across the aisle from a Crazy Party for Flat-Earthers and Street Preachers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barry Dennis
personal decisions, personal consequences
02:45 PM on 05/24/2011
Pandering is something that both the Left and Right seem to do well. Truth-telling, speaking to power seems to be left to the voices in the urban forest, the hinterlands of desolation peopled by those who wait, seemingly endlessly, for a true Son of America who can engender the support needed to be elected president. Then. use that momentum and the attenant public support to force the changes we need; a restoration actually, to the values of personal responsibility, free enterprise, and belief in community of interest.
That's a truth-teller I'd support.
05:08 PM on 05/24/2011
If you want a truth-teller, then King Pander-lenty is NOT your man. He narrowly skated into office twice with less than 38% of the vote, yet declared he had a mandate from the state. He changed his position on any topic based upon his audience, and refused to even play at working with his congress - rarely attended budget meetings, just vetoed everything he disagreed with. He abused his power misusing a legislative loophole intended for economic emergencies only. He played semantics games ("fees" are still taxes), he gutted healthcare aid for low income kids, and property taxes increased 30-50% during his 2 terms. He spent his last year+ as gov out of the state, stumping for recognition. He's unethical, incapable of empathy, sleazy, and forgettable for a reason... who wants to reminisce about the night they had food poisoning? All politicians may "lie"; but Tim Pawlenty believes whatever comes out of his mouth at any given moment is true enough. He is a wannabe political hack who left behind a huge mess, and desperately wants a bigger pond to pollute. "True Son of America", my donkey. Narcissistic son of a female dog is more accurate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barry Dennis
personal decisions, personal consequences
03:08 PM on 05/26/2011
I don't know how you somehow read from my Comment that I supported Pawlenty; I don't. I made the point that as far as I am concerned Pandering is not the exclusive property of either the Left or the Right, finding comfort in the "pandering zone" is to be equally despised from both.
I promoted a "truth to power" platform; a return to personal responsibility, free enterprise, and Founding principles, and hope for a candidate who not only preaches this platform but is credibly certified to believe in it.
That's what I guess I failed to get across.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Boodieugwumba
Crusader
02:29 PM on 05/24/2011
Like I keep saying, I almost feel sorry for the Republican Party in its frantic but doomed attempts to manufacture somebody, anybody to run against President Obama. They're left with this pathetic group after everybody who could have created a wimper chickened out.

They really have no answers to the truth as represented by the Democratic Party under Obama and even their best liars recognize the futility of trying to counter this truth and would rather bide their time until 2016 to try again.


As for Pawlenty, I only wonder how he's going to answer when he will start to face questions about the mess he made of the finances of the state of Minnesota.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barry Dennis
personal decisions, personal consequences
03:31 PM on 05/24/2011
It appears hat Conservatives haven't yet discovered a candidate that attracts passionate support. It is untrue that the reason is because Obama represents the "truth" as Demoncrats see it.
When people wake up to the fact that an as yet then unknown-Obama- was, and is, the product of assembly and management by the traditional Democratic machine, and that he is a puppet speaking in whatever voice he is allowed by the majority of his "handlers," the public may yet come to see the need for real truth-someone else.
02:18 PM on 05/24/2011
"Pandering."
That describes every thing that every Republican says. Do we really want a crew of panderers, AKA pimps, running this country?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Lee Morris
02:05 PM on 05/24/2011
Let's assume that Pawlentry is executing a "southern strategy." His strategy panders to extremists with the belief that no matter what, the poor and left leaning majority will never vote for him. So make the left leaning majority wrong for all things that build community, safety, health, going green, etc. This kind of strategy is very delusional.
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
01:58 PM on 05/24/2011
Oh, this is shaping into a fun year with Republicans who are throwing their hats into the ring being torn apart and the rest of them afraid to announce for fear of the tearing apart. How does anyone think that the winking moose hunter who so strongly dislikes being interviewed and put on the spot to come up with intelligent answers could deal with the trounsing? We'll just sit back and see who survives the tearing apart with any kind of authentic charactor left.
photo
ernestkp
Plant more hardwoods!!
01:43 PM on 05/24/2011
Having lived in Minnesota much of my life I have never been a big fan of current Govenor Mark Dayton but I will readily admit he is a breath of fresh air compared to Pawlenty. Gone is the self-righteous, self-serving, far-right agenda and rhetoric we have had to endure for some time now. As stated in this article, Pawlenty did spend his time in office catering to every far-right special interest while running up huge deficits that we are now struggling to deal with. He quite literally abandoned our state to run for national office years ago. As far as presidential material goes, this is not the type of individual anyone would want leading/representing the United States. Just giving all a heads-up.
01:38 PM on 05/24/2011
The Republicans will try again to use gullible Christians to get their vote, On both elections Bush got 35% of the votes on issues such abortion and gay marriage plus many other promises, as pay back he had about 150 graduates of Pat Robertson's University working as aides.
McCain selected Sarah as a running mate because of her refusal to abort more than her presidential qualifications. Christians be ware they will take you for a ride again seeking your vote based on religion instead of the more humane issues such as jobs and the economy.
01:27 PM on 05/24/2011
Promise them anything just to get elected? That's exactly what Clinton did and Al Gore tried to do.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aimleft
02:56 PM on 05/24/2011
Oh really? And do you have one recollection of those "promises?" Just one?
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
01:18 PM on 05/24/2011
Promises made by conservatives are a big part of the decay of morals and concern for the poor, the elderly and our environment. How can anyone equate Christianity with tossing whole groups of humans out on their butts and destroying Mother Earth? I've said this before, and again, I ask you who claim to be Christians, please stop voting for these politicians who have contempt for middleclass & lower income humans and for the health of our earth. What will they promise away next to get their individual "wants" met and how do you trust politicians who bend so easily and turn completely against their former stated morals? Where will you be when there are only the super wealthy and the poor? Where do you think you'll be when our earth is bankrupt of its ability to grow food and our air is unfit to breath? Do you think you will have a vote anymore or even a job that will provide basic necessities? Think hard on this
12:41 PM on 05/24/2011
I hope the national press points out repeatedly that both of his terms as governor in Minnesota were from winning a plurality of the vote - far short of a majority. Both elections had strong third party showings, so he was essentially elected twice even though about 2/3 of the state voted for someone else.
photo
girldog
I support Elizabeth Warren
01:17 PM on 05/24/2011
Interesting point. Thank you for posting.
12:02 PM on 05/24/2011
Let's face it. In a quasi-democracy with an unqualified voter electorate, the lowest common denominator for the politicians to appeal to are those of less than above avg. intelligence - the scientifically illiterate, the great unread, the superstitious and those most afraid of change they don't understand - and that's what the both parties do, but the R's much more so. How else could you account for the politicans that have been elected in the last 40 years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barry Dennis
personal decisions, personal consequences
03:45 PM on 05/24/2011
Mostly agree. Those who don't "care" about the issues far outnumber those who do. In generations past, politics was the national sport, not baseball. People had opinions, and weren't afraid to voice them, their motivation coming out of their own work ethic, their family values, their personal responsibilty "plank."
Kinda reminds me of the politician who said, "When I want to know your opinion, I'll give it to you."
11:52 AM on 05/24/2011
Is this just the flip side of someone promising the left everything, just so they could be elected?
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
01:26 PM on 05/24/2011
There is a BIG difference between "what is being promised." Take your choice between a party which promises everything for corporations with hopes of "handouts" for politicians or the party which promises livilihood and a sustainable way of life for all, including the middleclass and lower. you need lots more information about the people who you listen to. Find more broad sources.
05:17 PM on 05/24/2011
I'm just guessing, but you feel the Democrats are promising livilhood and a sustainable way of life for all.
The first thing Obama should have done when he took office, would have been to key in on jobs. If he would have done that, we would have more people working. Working people usually have health insurance, and working people pay taxes. Many problems we have now could have been avoided. Promises, talk is cheap.