EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Michael R. Bloomberg

Michael R. Bloomberg

Posted: May 5, 2010 09:41 AM

It's amazing but true: we can prevent terror suspects from boarding an airplane, but the FBI doesn't have the power to block them from buying dynamite or an AK-47.

I believe strongly that they should. And so do the 500 mayors who are members of our bi-partisan coalition of Mayor Against Illegal Guns.

It is time to close the "Terror Gap" in our gun laws.

This morning I will be testifying at a hearing of the Senate Homeland Security Committee about the easy access that terror suspects have to guns and explosives. I wanted to share with lawmakers the hard-earned perspective New Yorkers have on this national security risk.

The car bomb the New York City Police Department found in Times Square on Saturday night was not the only attempted terrorist attack on our city since 9/11 -- far from it. And sadly, it won't be the last.

Since 1990, there have been more than 20 terrorists plots -- or actual attacks -- against our city.

In the last year alone, the NYPD -- working closely with federal authorities -- prevented two major planned attacks on our City. The first was last May, when the terrorists purchased guns and explosives as part of a planned attack on a Temple and Jewish Center in the Bronx.

The second was in September, when the City and federal authorities broke up a plot to detonate explosives in the New York City subway system.

And, of course, attacks and planned attacks have not been limited to New York.

Last June in Little Rock, Arkansas, a man opened fire at a military recruiting station, killing one private and wounding another. At the time of the shooting, the FBI was already investigating the man after his arrest in Yemen with a fake Somali passport. He was charged with murder and 16 counts of terrorist acts.

And on November 5, 2009, Major Nidal Hasan shot 43 people at Fort Hood -- killing 13. We know Hasan was able to buy a handgun despite having been under investigation by the FBI for links to terrorism.

The Bush Administration first proposed closing the Terror Gap in 2007. But because Congress has failed to act on that proposal, people who may want to do our country harm have been able to buy guns and explosives.

Today, the Government Accountability Office has released new data showing that suspects on the terrorism watch lists were able to buy guns and explosives from licensed US dealers 1,119 times between 2004 and 2010.

That is a serious and dangerous breach of national security.

That's why the more than 500 mayors in Mayors Against Illegal Guns, a coalition that I co-chair with Mayor Tom Menino of Boston, support legislation to close the Terror Gap. This issue is a centerpiece of the coalition's fight to strengthen the federal background check system. Today, we have launched a new website -- www.TerrorGap.org -- to help educate Congress and the public about the Terror Gap and its consequences.

This legislation would give FBI agents the authority to block terror suspects from buying guns and explosives. It would also give them the ability to make exceptions when they determine that blocking a sale might tip off a suspect who is under investigation.

And the bill also allows those on the list to appeal their status to the Justice Department -- and challenge the determination in court.

Attorney General Eric Holder supported closing the Terror Gap in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last year. And so does the vast majority of Americans.

A December poll by Republican pollster Frank Luntz found that 82% of NRA members, and 86% of other gun owners, support closing the Terror Gap.

To learn more and take action, please visit: www.TerrorGap.org.

In New York City, we are doing everything humanly possible to prevent another terrorist attack. Under Commissioner Kelly's leadership, the NYPD has developed one of the world's most advanced counter-terrorism programs. One thousand of our best officers work on counter-terrorism and intelligence efforts every day.

A key element of any smart counter-terrorism strategy is to make it harder for terrorists to strike.

That's why air passengers walk through metal detectors.

That's why our police officers randomly check bags in the subway.

That's why our police officers patrol sensitive locations.

And that's why it's just common sense to give the FBI the authority to keep terror suspects from buying guns and explosives.

Now, finally, it's time for Congress to act and fix the Terror Gap. Visit: www.TerrorGap.org.

 

Follow Michael R. Bloomberg on Twitter: www.twitter.com/NYCMayorsOffice

It's amazing but true: we can prevent terror suspects from boarding an airplane, but the FBI doesn't have the power to block them from buying dynamite or an AK-47. I believe strongly that they shoul...
It's amazing but true: we can prevent terror suspects from boarding an airplane, but the FBI doesn't have the power to block them from buying dynamite or an AK-47. I believe strongly that they shoul...
 
  • Comments
  • 2,090
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (38 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:16 PM on 05/08/2010
Does everyone know that the street vendor that reported the smoking car to police is a MUSLIM.Has not seen his face on any program. Let us not assume all moslems are bad. Tens of thousands of Muslims live here are born here , parents coming from India, Pakistan and other middle east nations. Over 99.9 percent of them are innocent law abiding citizens Many rules are being passed to check on them and all brown people. All people ought to be vigilant in this matter. The stewardess­es on air planes and the hick on them often harass brown passengers­. A doctor with Diabetes was not allowed to use the bath room.. and when asked why, was reported to the FBI, and arrested on landing in LasVegas a year ago! Why he was brown! Stop getting too excited about an abandoned or forgotten bag on the street! or a truck un attended. Calm down but be careful. Do not excite and scare citizens. That's what Bin laden wants, and he is rejoicing in his hidden home some where.
10:51 AM on 05/09/2010
The American public is largely ignorant of the fact that the violently radical fundamenta­l Islamics who declare jihad on the civilized west actively declare the exact same jihad on all muslims who do not actively support their cause.

In short, their jihad is against the whole sane world.
03:13 PM on 05/10/2010
good point
11:55 AM on 05/08/2010
Mayor Bloomberg = Sen Joseph McCarthy..­.hang the accused/SU­SPECTS. Accuse anyone you don't like or who don't agree with you.
10:42 PM on 05/07/2010
Terror suspects..­.criminals­...gangs..­..hunters.­..and good ol boys
are all buying guns....ho­w does anyone propose to sort them out.
What they can't buy, they manage to steal....s­o you would have to keep them locked up at Fort Knox or something.
Maybe the first thing to do would be to stop the manufactur­ers
from making assault weapons and selling them to anyone except the Military.
Or maybe the second thing would be to start the draft and keep those soldiers in the U.S. Give the guns to the military to protect America and maybe that would be better than taking guns away
from everybody.
As far as I am concerned.­....
Give me Liberty or give me Death doesn't sound too appealing.
12:34 AM on 05/08/2010
The military has no use for assault weapons. They use assault rifles. If you don't know the difference­, ya might want to check it out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rebelle
09:42 AM on 05/08/2010
yes, only the Taliban and Al Qaeda have any use for assault "weapons".
02:09 AM on 05/08/2010
berry--you­r proposal doesn't pass the smell test
08:54 PM on 05/07/2010
Gee, Mayor Bloomberg. I thought you were just randomly searching bags in the subway because of your hatred for the fourth amendment to the Constituti­on. Thank God I know now that it is to keep me safe -- next time I'm in NYC, I'll thank my lucky stars that your officers violate my civil rights for my protection­.

While I've got you here, though, a brief suggestion­: perhaps someone who isn't actively arming his police forces and training them in the use of military-g­rade assault rifles should pick up the "gun control" lobby for you, Mayor Bloomberg.

Or, you know, we could all pretend while visiting that New York City is a sovereign micronatio­n run by a police state dictator who really digs taking guns away from people while militarizi­ng the police forces in order to violate the rights of search and seizure.

Heh heh. "Pretend".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:24 PM on 05/08/2010
Ill informed people like those who want more guns and bigger ones, do not realize that average people want safety from these gun carrying folks. And the guns in hands of police is better than guns in every home and pocket.The­re is not a single story I have heard that a gun carrying man or woman, saved himself from bad guys! There are many where an innocent person or child has been killed., accidental­ly. This happens almost every day, not in Europe, India or China but in the Gun Country of USA!
03:18 PM on 05/08/2010
"There is not a single story I have heard that a gun carrying man or woman, saved himself from bad guys! "

You don't read much then. http://www­.thearmedc­itizen.com­/
06:53 PM on 05/08/2010
Guess its a good thing the ANTI Gun Clinton Justice Dept and the Non Partisan National Academy of Sciences BOTH examined the question and determined that armed citizens prevent a minimum of 750,000 crimes each year. A number several orders of magnitude greater then the number of gun homicides , which is around 12,000 or so per year
08:48 PM on 05/07/2010
Dear Mayor Bloomberg-

The problem with what you are saying is this: If the US government has enough evidence to put these people on trial or in jail then they would not be on a 'No Fly List'. As they are not in jail, that makes them no different than you or me. If they have no previous (criminal) record and are legal residents in this country, they can buy guns.

The term 'person of interest' is another lesser word for suspect, used when you don't actually have any way to legitimize that latter term but want to put a person through the media ringer. Saying someone is on the No Fly List is equally meaningles­s, in legal terms, although it does play well on CNN.

It has been proven repeatedly that a STATISTICA­LLY SIGNIFICAN­T number of the names on that list are 5 year olds or people with similar sounding/l­ooking names-- people that are American citizens and in no way involved with Terrorism.

So you propose to prohibit their Second amendment rights? Now it's suddenly OK for you and a bunch of 'under-int­ellectuali­zed' government bureaucrat­s to determine who is going to have the protected right to self-defen­se?

I have a solution. Actually do the police work that proves someone is involved in illegal activity and arrest them, otherwise you are turning our country into a second rate banana dictatorsh­ip, you troglodyte­.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EpicSarcastic
10:33 PM on 05/15/2010
And because of the exception for 'not tipping off' , They're not even using it against the actual threats!
06:12 PM on 05/07/2010
Want to know what happens with secret government lists and no due process???

http://caf­fertyfile.­blogs.cnn.­com/2010/0­5/07/shoul­d-govt-rev­oke-citize­nship-of-a­mericans-i­nvolved-in­-terrorism­/?hpt=T2
04:03 PM on 05/07/2010
21% of New York State's fiscal budget is devoted to investigat­ion, prosecutio­n and incarcerat­ion of illicit drug use. Twenty-one per cent! (Only .5 %, or half of one per cent, is devoted to prevention­, treatment and support of long term peer-to-pe­er programs.)
New York State policies are abhorrent and barbarous. This yields theft of service. But Gov. Paterson would rather do budget cuts. Mr.Mayor, Honorable Mayor Bloomberg, please stop him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
t-boy42
03:05 PM on 05/07/2010
I think the NRA is out of control but STOP FEAR MONGERING Mike. The times square and 911 attacks had nothing to do with gun ownership. Control freaks like Bloomberg just love to pick up an incident and run with it.
02:54 PM on 05/07/2010
The mayor seems to be opportunis­tic. He is using the "would be" Times Square bombing in order to scare people into forfeiting their rights. Not to mention he seems to be making the equivocati­on that guns and explosives pose the same threat. I can't take down an entire city block with a gun.

What is the criteria to be labeled a "TERROR SUSPECT"? Just suspicion? If the government sees you as a threat, PRESTO you are a terror suspect. No need to be proven a criminal by a court of law to have your rights taken away.

The Time Square terror idiot, was not on any watch list. So would this "Gap Closure" have helped? NO. He had propane tanks in the Nissan. I can but that at the home depot.

This is a B.S. attempt to give the government the authority to violate your rights when it feels like.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Waltfl
Peccatum tacituritatis
01:29 PM on 05/07/2010
I don't have a problem with the loophole being closed, I have a problem with the fact that government­-created watch-list­s would bed basis for denying rights.

Any type of weapon in a potential †errorsit'­s hands is something that has to be prevented at all cost, but a noble goal in no case justifies bad means. \

Who is to say that someone on a watch list is indeed a †errorist? What is the criteria to get on such list? Mere suspicion? It happened more than once under Bush that journalist­s/writers ended up on such lists and weren't allowed to fly any more. Typically these were writers that were critical of the Bush Administra­tion.

We already have the Patriot Act, that allows the President to lead troops against US citizens, detain people on mere suspicion, and seize their property. Someone protesting can be seen as a domestic †errorist, if the government "feels" intimidate­d.

A secret "list" created in the secrecy of a government office, without any oversight, cannot be a legal basis to revoke any right, whether it is gun ownership or any other citizen's right.

Take the hard/hones­t way, and change the laws. If this list-thing­" is applied once it can be done with any other civil right in the future.

Think again, Mayor Bloomberg.
02:59 PM on 05/07/2010
Another way of looking at the situation -- the Bush administra­tion created this "watch list" system that throws basic due process parameters right out the window in the name of "fighting terrorism.­" [N.B. Even in 2001 a resident of NYC was more likely to die in a car accident. Food for thought.] Notwithsta­nding the serious constituti­onal issues with putting people on secret lists and then subjecting them to disparate treatment, the whole obnoxious system rolled on unabated. The reality is that it's not just the Bush Administra­tion that wanted/wan­ts carte blanche to unilateral­ly blacklist people. The Mayor of NYC would also like this power, for one.

For political reasons that are uniquely American we now have the opportunit­y to fight this unconstitu­tional exercise of government­al power by teaming up with one of the largest and most powerful lobbying organizati­ons in the country.

So instead of, "I can't believe the NRA would oppose this" or "oh so NOW the conservati­ves decide they care about due process" perhaps people should just be going, "well, at least now we have a fighting chance." More food for thought.
03:27 PM on 05/07/2010
That's fine and dandy. It is also the same reasons for keeping the access to weapons in the US that provides 90% of the ones used by Mexican gun cartels, who of course are scaring people in places like Arizona. The constituti­on authorizes weapons as part of well ordered militia, not to provide those who hate or want something from other people the option of killing those people.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Waltfl
Peccatum tacituritatis
03:54 PM on 05/07/2010
No it's not the same reason, and it has actually noting to do with a milita-iss­ue either. My reason is a procedural reason, the reason to keep weapons accessible is a reason based on the interpreta­tion of the 2nd Amendment. I have no problem with closing the loophole through proper legal procedures­, but I have a problem with the method that is proposed now.

What is a watch-list­? Something some government official created as an aid for law enforcemen­t, because something associated with an individual raised a red flag. Millions of people are on such lists, half of them probably in error, because they happen to have a name that resembles a terrorist'­s name.

Now you want to use this list and start taking people's rights away, simply because they are on that list? Come on.
photo
JimInHouston
Arma virumque cano...
04:04 PM on 05/07/2010
"keeping the access to weapons in the US that provides 90% of the ones used by Mexican gun cartels"

Incorrect statement. It should be "90% of the guns SUBMITTED FOR TRACING". This number is a small subset of the total number of guns, most of which were not submitted because it was obvious that they couldn't the traced to US markets (e.g., foreign manufactur­e, military origin, etc.).
12:57 PM on 05/07/2010
Bloomberg is naive about weapons bans. The controls already in place work and work well. When they don't as in the case of the Fort Hood shooting, it is because warning signs are ignored due to political correctnes­s. He wants to take the peoples legitimate right to keep and bear arms and trade it for "security"­, that doesn't work. As the bumper sticker says if you outlaw guns only outlaws will have guns. As a gun owner and a prior service Army veteran, I have a deep respect for guns. I do not treat them lightly, but I understand the enormous responsibi­lity they requre to use safely.
The founding fathers created the second amendment for very sound reasons, it allows a person to provide food, and protection­, for themselves and their family and it creates a sense of self reliance. These are important qualities that we should never give up.
10:01 PM on 05/07/2010
You are wrong. He's not Naive. He's a hater. He hates on 2nd amendment rights, and 4th amendment rights. Yet he has armed security protecting him wherever he goes, and isn't subject to the search and seizure humiliatio­n that he puts on others.
12:40 PM on 05/07/2010
This will send all the lefties into fits of apoplexy.

How exactly is the idea of denying people their protected rights , by being arbitraril­y placed on a secret governemen­t list, as Mr Bloomberg and Sen Lautenzomb­ie suggest ANY different from the secret govt list used by Joe McCarthy ??
InYourWorld
Progressive, educated, redneck but fan of no party
12:54 PM on 05/07/2010
Many lefties would shred the constituti­on to further advance their anti gun rhetoric. However if we began to deny individual­s posting to political blogs due to being on a secret lists they would throw a fit. I find great hypocrisy in people rallying against the Partiot Act and yet supporting Bloomberg'­s ridiculous idea. Both of these are unconstitu­tional, yet many people like to hand pick the parts of the constituti­on they deem appropriat­e.
01:31 PM on 05/07/2010
Protected rights to what? Why was it that the good people, maybe ignorant as some of you would suggest, of towns like Dodge City and Wichita, Kansas by 1870's make it illegal to carry any firearm concealed OR NOT illegal. All weapons were to be checked at the local hotel until the carrier left town. This was vigorously upheld by law officers such as the Earp Brothers. If you didn't comply, a buntline special along side the head. 140 years later and you insufficie­nt males want to be stupid. Duh!!! You people aren't even willing to wait for bacground checks. Ahh, Afganistan is calling.
12:43 AM on 05/08/2010
Why should LEO's have more Rights to carry weapons than the people they're supposed to protect?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dimensio
What? Huh?
01:45 AM on 05/08/2010
In fact, the carrying of firearms was prohibited only on one side of Dodge City, not within the entire city.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
333888999
JCPenney-Retired
11:05 AM on 05/07/2010
The day the government can deny consitutio­nal rights to a citizen it believes is a "suspect" is the day America ceases to exist.
02:58 PM on 05/07/2010
Patriot act.
03:34 PM on 05/07/2010
Have you just awoke from 7 year coma?
10:45 AM on 05/07/2010
You are right, of course, Mr. Boomberg; but why beating around the bush; it is not enough to just block terror suspects from buying guns and explosives to stop terrorism: the sale of weapons should be stopped in the first place. There is no need for weapons anyway except to terrorize.
I can't understand why there are so many petitions for all this "stuff" but no reaction from the government­.
Annette Thiry, a HuffPost reader
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dimensio
What? Huh?
10:59 AM on 05/07/2010
Your proposal is wholly Unconstitu­tional.
07:22 PM on 05/16/2010
why not...
11:12 AM on 05/07/2010
"There is no need for weapons anyway except to terrorize.­"? Does this mean you would be willing to have our police forces and military disarmed? Or do you assert only that the government should have a monopoly on force? Please don't think I am being sarcastic, as I am really interested in why anyone is willing to surrender their right to self defense and preservati­on to a third party, who has NO DUTY to protect you, as several Supreme Court cases can attest, eleven at last count I think. Are you willing to give this third party complete jurisdicti­on over your safety and well being?
07:21 PM on 05/16/2010
... look how it works in so many EUROPEAN countries.
10:27 AM on 05/07/2010
So the logic is the 'terror watchlist' couldn't even keep a guy off a plane but we should strip people of due process based off of it? Some headlines:

WASHINGTON – Federal law enforcemen­t officials offered no explanatio­n Tuesday for how the suspect in the failed Times Square bombing was allowed to board an internatio­nal flight despite being hunted by the FBI and placed on the government no-fly list.

WASHINGTON - The name of the Justice Department­'s former top criminal prosecutor turned up on the government­'s terror watch list.

Meet Mikey Hicks, 8: U.S. has him on watch list
Since he was 2, he has been frisked, his family delayed every time they fly

As of Nov. 2009, there are well over 1.3 million names on the list covering an alleged 400,000 unique individual­s. 5% of those are US citizens or residents and 9% are on both lists according to the FBI.

There are 1,600 names suggested to it daily with over 20,000 added per month.

The qualificat­ions to be put on the list? Classified­. (Yet Hasan didn't make the list)

An audit by the DoJ found a 35% error rate based on spot checks of names on the list.

A check on 216 known terrorists found 35 who were NOT on the lists.

http://day­sofourtrai­lers.blogs­pot.com/20­09/11/susp­ected-terr­orists-by-­numbers.ht­ml
03:42 PM on 05/07/2010
As a former flight-att­endant, I can add to that --- most airline employees are 'randomly' selected to secondary searches eventhough they have completed numerous background checks, have unlimited access to secured areas, etc.

Why?...for looks.

My husband, children and I were always 'randomly' selected although both of us worked for the airlines. One time it was my family and a pilot in uniform going through the secondary check while 5 Middle Eastern (no offense) ranging 20-30yrs old boarded all together - this was a few months after 9/11. We were furious, and the pilot was outraged - he almost was refused boarding for making a comment that they had 3 airline employees and two very small children being frisked while people of a "higher suspicion" should have been there instead of us.