iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Brune

Michael Brune

Posted: February 16, 2011 01:26 PM

Growing up in New Jersey, I was a huge fan of Bruce Springsteen (still am), and I've had the pleasure of seeing him perform live more than a few times. Years ago, Springsteen would typically kick off his encores with a pitch for a local food bank and end with his homespun credo: "And remember: Nobody wins unless everybody wins."

Believe it or not, that phrase actually became a political issue in the 2009 gubernatorial race in NJ. Chris Christie, who professed to be a Springsteen devotee (apparently without listening to his lyrics), took issue with the Boss's call for fairness and equality. Now, as governor of New Jersey, Christie has cut pensions, laid off teachers, and seems to delight in antagonizing union workers who are struggling to make ends meet in these turbulent times.

I'm typing this as I fly home from Washington, DC, after a couple of days of meetings with environmental, labor, and other progressive leaders. Many of us, particularly in the labor and environmental movements, face similar challenges. Just as green groups and public-health leaders are fighting against attacks on environmental and public-health protections that have been in place for more than forty years, so too are America's workers trying desperately to prevent rollbacks on their rights to collectively bargain for fair wages and a safe workplace.

I'm proud of the Sierra Club's role in forging a tighter bond between the environmental and labor movements. We call it the Blue Green Alliance, and it's a natural fit, because hard hats and tree huggers share fundamental goals and values, including the right to safe and healthy working conditions and the creation of good clean-tech jobs in America and abroad.

Dirty-energy corporations and their political allies share different goals and values. But it's still shocking to see Tea Party-backed governors like Christie and Wisconsin's Scott Walker union-busting with the enthusiasm of a coal-company kingpin. Walker and the state's Republican-controlled legislature in Wisconsin plan to summarily strip almost all of Wisconsin's public employees of their right to organize and bargain collectively.

Walker's excuse is that Wisconsin (like a lot of states) has a budget deficit. But rather than work with public employees to figure out a solution, he wants to silence them forever. The money he saves will come out of the paychecks of dedicated public servants who are already earning less (4.8 percent less, in fact) than their counterparts in the private sector.

Why should environmentalists care? Martin Luther King, Jr. put it best: "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." If America's workers lose their voice, then corporate polluters will have won a giant victory and all Americans will end up paying a price.

If you need an example, here's a spectacular one: Last year's Deepwater Horizon oil explosion began as a workplace health and safety incident in a nonunion work setting. It turned into the worst environmental disaster in our nation's history. If the 11 workers who were killed had been members of a strong union, their lives might have been saved -- and the oil spill itself might never have happened. We know that unionized workers are more likely to sound the alarm about workplace hazards -- and so do the companies they work for.

That's why Wisconsin Sierra Club activists were among the 10,000 people who turned out in Madison to protest Governor Walker's union-busting yesterday, and it's why the Club will continue working closely with our brothers and sisters in the labor movement to build a stronger, more equitable America that protects the health of our communities, creates clean-energy jobs, and advances policies that help working families across the country. That's an America where everyone does win.

 

Follow Michael Brune on Twitter: www.twitter.com/bruneski

 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:02 PM on 02/24/2011
What is the commitment from labor unions to support and show up for environmental issues? What about the dirty energy unions? I've seen unions support bad bad projects regardless of the environment - and many unionized plants are dirty and have problems. The environment is taking more cuts than labor as taxpayers attempt to hold the political process accountable for financial sanity. Didn't the Sierra Club notice that the voters of Wisconsin voted for change? Don't you see the trends to do more with less? You should be supporting conservation and not political gamesmanship.
09:08 AM on 02/17/2011
as an ex Sierra member it could be said that if the Sierra Club's members and democratic friends would have bought the GM GEO METRO car factory in 2002, ( the last year of production of this great fuel efficient 45mpg 4 door vehicle for 25 million, less than what BING spent on Pro 87, remember? ) so if the Sierra Club would have advertised this subcompact car in its Sierra Club Magazine to ITS MEMBERS and supporters, ten years ago, then we would have less co2 in the air today. My question is. Union members don't want to drill in 1002 area of ANWR, onshore but they drive fuel inefficient vehicles. GOT IT ON FILM. So we displace drilling in ANWR for 400.000 barrels per day for Angola's 400.000 Bpd. What does it cost for our military presence there? Who's the imperialists here? So perhaps the Sierra Club's management style is inefficient like some of GM's cars. Exxon could do better. GM could do better we say. GE could do better. Democrats could do better. And the Sierra Club could do better with its resources.


because i went to a Sierra Club meeting and they drove 20mpg SAABs and 17MPG Cadillacs and SUVS and sports cars and not one 45mpg Metro. Got it on film. Did EXXON force them to buy these vehicles? Why didn't Sierra members buy and support this 45mpg car during the 90's, Mike?

Joe Vecchio NY
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snesich
02:08 AM on 02/17/2011
Chris Christie said in that same speech where he advocated the eventual dismantling of Social Security and Medicare, that it is time to take on "Big Issues".

"Big Issues"!?!? Coming from Chris "One Big Mac Too Many" Christie?!?! Wow.

If Chris Christie wants to take on "Big Issues", the man should look in the mirror and start there, maybe by exercising some self-control and discipline in his own life...