iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Michael Feigin, M.S., C.S.C.S.

Walking Vs. Running: Which Is 'Better?'

Posted: 08/19/11 02:13 AM ET

If your goal is to lose weight and improve your health, what's going to be better for you: walking or running? Like most fitness-related questions, this one takes me back to a joke I heard in third grade:

What weighs more: a pound of feathers or a pound of bricks?

Just as you may be tempted to shout "bricks!" (as I would often do right up through eighth grade, when the subtleties of this riddle and "no soap radio" were finally explained to me), you may be tempted to assume that running is the greater "burn" of the two exercises. And, like all questions in fitness, I remind you that nothing is ever as simple as it seems.

Let's break it down.

Calorie burn is based on energy consumption over a period of time, and the best way to gauge that energy consumption is by monitoring your heart rate as you exercise. But heart rate itself is based on oxygen consumption. In other words, as your body increases its need for oxygen due to exertion, the heart has to pump more oxygen rich blood to the extremities and the heart rate goes up. One of the main reasons that the heart rate is elevated in running is that, every time your foot hits the ground, that little bit of impact puts pressure on the diaphragm, the main muscle that controls respiration, making it slightly harder to take a full breath. So as your foot strike knocks a little bit of wind out of you, the heart is trying to play catch-up and pumps harder to get the oxygen to the muscles that need it. Plus, depending on your running style, that repeated impact can lead to injuries down the road.

Walking is, by nature, low-impact: there is significantly less impact as the foot hits the ground and, consequently, the lungs have a greater opportunity to provide the much-needed oxygen. Therefore, the heart rate does not get as high with walking.

But that's the kind of linear thinking I hate.

I love watching runners, real runners, because they make it look so effortless. Even sprinters try to relax their bodies as much as possible so that they may put the effort where it will best suit them and not energy is wasted through worthless tension. Running mid- to long-distance is, ideally, an opportunity to use gravity and and momentum to your advantage. It takes time and practice to get used to, but once you understand the effortless form, running becomes relaxingly meditative.

Walking can be a wonderfully leisurely pass time. Go for a stroll in the park, pause, watch the birds, pause, stroll some more. Certainly the calories burn is there, and, if you have been inactive it is a great way to get started in an active lifestyle. But the burn is not as significant as running for the same period of time.

But let's take a look at race walking. There is nothing low key about race walking and trying to maintain a rapid pace over a period of time and/or distance. Quite the opposite: the body has to work extra hard because, instinctively, we tell ourselves to break into a jog or a run when moving that quickly. The muscles of the legs, the glutes, the core, as well as the chest, arms, shoulders and back all have to work to create the momentum to move at such a speed. Increase the incline that you're walking on and you will increase the exertion level. Increase the amount your work your arms, and again, the level of exertion, and consequently your heart rate and calorie burn go up as well.

A few of important things to keep in mind:


  • Always warm up before you start race walking for exercise. You might think "walking....what's the big deal?" But it is a big deal and you should warm up to get the blood flowing.

  • When you walk, think about standing as tall as possible, lifting the base of the skull to the sky and not the chin. Your chest should be lifted and your jaw should be nice and relaxed.

  • As you walk, take small quick steps. Let the heel of each step fall just in front of the toe of the previous step. This will give you a much smaller, faster stride.

  • Use a heart monitor to gauge your exertion level. If you want to increase your heart rate, try an incline, faster steps, or greater arm movement, even working to take the arms over head as you walk.

  • If you are just starting out, be conservative. Try the small step, quick pace idea but move a little slower than you might like. You're going to feel a whole bunch of muscles you never knew you had and you don't want to shoot yourself out of a cannon.

Questions about any of this? Shoot me an email: michael@fitnessgurunyc.com

Rock on!!

 
 
 

Follow Michael Feigin, M.S., C.S.C.S. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/thefitnessguru

If your goal is to lose weight and improve your health, what's going to be better for you: walking or running? Like most fitness-related questions, this one takes me back to a joke I heard in third gr...
If your goal is to lose weight and improve your health, what's going to be better for you: walking or running? Like most fitness-related questions, this one takes me back to a joke I heard in third gr...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 80
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:56 PM on 09/03/2011
Interesting stuff, but bottom line is the best exercise is the one that you actually DO. Gathering dust equals zero benefit. If you hate running, you can always walk, swim, hike, bike, etc. The point of this article is that there are different ways to get the benefits of exercise, and walking is a legitimate and effective form.
Often a certain amount of scorn is heaped on the exercise that the commenter(s) don't enjoy, but I am a fan of doing what works for you and understanding (newsflash!) that other people are different. I think that we are built for both walking and running, and that they each have benefits.
There is a lot of interesting research in the area of long-distance running. The are compelling arguments that support the idea that humans are suited to long-distance running. One idea in the research is that our unique upright posture separates us from fast sprinting predators. Four-legged predators cannot breathe as much oxygen because their lungs are compressed with each stride, and therefore their air supply is limited by their speed of travel, so they must sprint for prey. Humans do not have any physiological restriction on their lungs because we are upright and are capable of greater distance and endurance. People get very oppositional about long-distance running, perhaps because people do not have respect for the time it takes to build up a running practice, and overdo it. I say, research, and do what works.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
libwingoflibwing
Leftist, Christian, Non-Violent Revolutionary
04:18 PM on 08/30/2011
Why does this article only talk about calorie burn? Isn't the real benefit of exercise building muscle mass and other system changes that affect metabolism, not just how many calories one burns while exercising?

I was hoping for a discussion about which exercise does what in building muscle mass, what kind of muscle mass whether slow or fast twitch, and other aspects of changing one's metabolism. But I found nothing like that here. Oh well.
04:28 PM on 08/29/2011
So whats beneficial walking or running what?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tresco
Sistagirl Laughin' Thingy Award Winner!
04:51 PM on 08/24/2011
Walking can be every bit as strenuous as running. Strap on a 10 - 20 pound pack and hike up a hill as fast as you can for a couple of miles on a rough trail if you don't believe me. I have seen many people blow out their knees, feet etc running. Marathon runners are just weird. Black toenails? Bleeding nipples? Crapping oneself? If you are into running good. If you are a walker good. Whatever works for you. Just do something to get yourself moving.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bryneen Gary
No cash no post
01:00 PM on 08/23/2011
If you Love to Work out all the time, I think Running is better for you. I like to Jog. If you lack motivation and without music, then walking may suit you better.
07:17 AM on 08/23/2011
I prefer walkin. What's the rush.
http://www.lifestyle-after50.com/walking.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alahnar
A strange bedfellow indeed
02:34 PM on 08/22/2011
My two cents: Walking is boring. So boring. Running is not. So.
12:48 PM on 08/22/2011
I think a combination of both and maybe some sprinting to really push yourself when you become more advance. I also think you need to work other muscles too to burn fat faster, combine squats with arm workouts and stuff like that. One good somewhat easy to follow program I found was turbulence training I reviewed at RealLifeReview.com. It's a circuit training program, probably for people a little more advanced but a great way to push yourself for 45 mins a day 3 times a week.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1highstepper
IT'S OK! JUST RELAX AND ENJOY THE RIDE!
11:51 AM on 08/22/2011
I have the best exercise music ever. I could not move a muscle without it! First I dance for 15 min. then I walk on my treadmill for 30 and sprint/run for the last 15 min. I will work some bike time in as well. I also do a Zumba dance class when I can.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
steve12
10:41 PM on 08/21/2011
Unfortunately not all of us can run to stay healthy. In my 50s now, I chose cycling and swimming. I ran when I was younger, but would have frequent injuries that prevented me from exercising for a time. Now, I find that cycling and swimming are less stressful on the joints and have been injury free so far.

Of course, everyone is different and I applaud those who can continue their running into middle age and beyond.
photo
WhoIsNoOne
What I need is a Micro-Brew-o
10:01 PM on 08/21/2011
Run..Run..Run...
then when the knees fall apart, walk. just kidding
Run or walk? it all depends on so many factors.
I would have to say, if you are relatively fit, and injury free
then running will do more for you in a shorter period of time.
I love running, and you dont have to be a little Kenyan to enjoy
running (I'm 230lbs).
on that note, running is something you need to work into. If you are
not fit, walk. Then as you get fitter you can split running and walking.
also, as I get older, I need the warm up and the stretch.
anyway, get out and move around
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tresco
Sistagirl Laughin' Thingy Award Winner!
07:38 PM on 08/21/2011
I'm a day hiker. I walk about an hour a day. 3-5 miles a day. About 20 miles a week. I move at about 3.2 to 3.5 MPH. I take my dogs. They are unleashed. This is never a problem as they are well behaved and we seldom see another person. What we do is more of a hike than a walk. Rough dirt trails. Lots of hills. Heavy boots. I wear a 12-15 pack with 3L of water and trail necessities. It works for me.
photo
WhoIsNoOne
What I need is a Micro-Brew-o
10:06 PM on 08/21/2011
fanned Tresco, for being a fellow hiker, and also for a sensible
work out routine.
I only get out hiking on the weekends, but there is no better
place for a run or walk, than out on the trails.
I dont mind the unleashed dogs either, they cheer me up when I'm tired out (sorry
that some other dog owners can give unleashed dogs a bad name)
keep up the hiking
03:33 PM on 08/21/2011
(this is not directly related to this article) I am far from any expert, but in evolutionary terms, there seems something wrong in running for long durations. Why would our body thrive on that kind of exercise? I doubt if our ancestors ever did that. That's why i think that if it's running, then it has to be interval training.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alahnar
A strange bedfellow indeed
02:29 PM on 08/22/2011
There's a huge body of research exploring this very idea. There's a theory that our sweat enabled us to chase prey, while running, over miles and miles and miles - 10, 15, 20 miles. We can sweat, whereas other animals can't as well, so they collapse of exhaustion/heat stroke. It's just a theory obviously, but there are many others that provide insight into human beings' pasts. We have been running short distances and long distances for a very, very long time.
11:17 AM on 08/23/2011
Even long distances? I would imagine that they had to run in intervals for hunting, but it seems unlikely that they ran in treadmill like fashion - fixed speed, long distance and duration. Lately I run on treadmill where it keeps changing speed such that my heart rate remains in target-85% of target zone.
08:14 AM on 08/24/2011
I don't believe for a moment that our ancestors ever engaged in long distance running. Our ancestor probably did sprints when they had too. Man is basically a lazy animal and secondly the ability to run for miles takes training , calories and good nutrition of which I doubt was abundant.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tresco
Sistagirl Laughin' Thingy Award Winner!
04:45 PM on 08/24/2011
Long distance chases burn a lot of energy. I can't think of any predator that chases it's prey for more than a few minutes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kmh40
04:09 PM on 08/20/2011
I think the important thing is just to do SOMETHING! Four years ago I worked out 6 days a week, I'm talking sweat dripping down my face workouts and then life stepped in. I was diagnosed with stage 3 breast cancer and fitting into my skinny jeans took a back seat to staying alive.
I put 25 lbs on during my treatment and surgery. When I finally was in remission I realized I needed to focus on my health overall and not just how my jeans fit. I powerwalk not just for my body, but my mind. Nothing clears the mind like a solitary powerwalk. Nobody with you, no music, no phone, just you and your thoughts.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:47 PM on 08/20/2011
what about sprinting (as in all out run-for-your-life for forty yards)? I've read that sprinting both burns calories and promotes the release of HGH (I've read that only powerlifting and sprinting release HGH, and that long distance running before powerlifting inhibits release during lifting). I would imagine (but I'm not a medical doctor) that HGH increases one's metabolism, because younger people (people under 30) have faster metabolisms than older people.