When recently asked why they agreed to feed "pink slime" to our children, school lunch officials said it was to drop the price of ground beef -- by 3 cents per pound. This disturbing admission should come as no surprise, however, for anyone familiar with the meat industry's notorious willingness to cut costs at the expense of consumers' health.
In a study titled "Fast food hamburgers: what are we really eating?" pathologists at the Cleveland Clinic dissected burgers from eight different fast food chains to find out what was, or wasn't, inside. Published in the Annals of Diagnostic Pathology, the paper begins with "Most consumers presume that the hamburger they eat is composed primarily of meat." But what did they find?
Similar to a previous dissection they had performed on hot dogs, the researchers discovered waste and by-products including connective tissue, nerve tissue, cartilage, bone, and in a quarter of the samples, Sarcocystis parasites. But surely these "fillers" were the minority, right? Unfortunately not. After crunching the numbers, the researchers found that the amount of actual meat (muscle flesh) in the burgers ranged from 2.1 percent to 14.8 percent. Instead of fries, perhaps fast food cashiers should be asking, "Do you want meat with that?"
In addition to reducing quality, cutting corners also tends to reduce safety, which is why the pink slime in question is injected with ammonia hydroxide: to kill the Salmonella and E. coli (read: fecal matter) that it's often contaminated with. Instead of addressing the contamination issue itself, the meat industry employs a cheap "technofix" to turn what was once considered waste into slimy profits.
So what do the meat pushers do when cheap chemicals won't do the trick, and their products leave the processing plant contaminated with fecal bacteria? Do they shut down the plant? Order a recall? No. They shift responsibility onto the consumer. "Raw meats are not idiot-proof," a USDA poultry microbiologist said. "They can be mishandled and when they are, it's like handling a hand grenade. If you pull the pin, somebody's going to get hurt." In other words, if you get sick from contaminated meat, it's your fault.
But just how often is meat contaminated? This month the CDC released their latest national meat survey in response to this question. They tested more than 5,000 samples of retail meat products straight off the shelves in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Tennessee, and Pennsylvania. What they found could hardly have been more disturbing: 90 percent of pork chops, ground beef and ground turkey, and 95 percent of chicken breasts, were contaminated with fecal bacteria. No wonder an Alabama poultry science professor was quoted in a meat industry journal as saying, "it's too expensive not to sell salmonella-positive chicken."
Of course, not everyone agrees with the notion that the public should willingly assume these risks. Dr. Patricia Griffin, director of the foodborne diseases division at the CDC, responded by asking, "Is it reasonable that if a consumer undercooks a hamburger that their 3-year-old child dies?"
Which brings us back to the real question: Which is more important, corporate profits or the safety and health of our loved ones? Using "pink slime" as a springboard, let's make our answer very clear.
For more health news, click here.
Follow Michael Greger, M.D. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/nutrition_facts
Leo W. Gerard: A Populace Pink Slimed
Boneless lean beef trimmings - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
TLC Cooking "Pink Slime and Ammonia: Two Main Ingredients in ...
U.S. News - NYC school official: No more pink slime for lunch next fall
'Pink slime' beef out at Safeway, Supervalu - Business - Retail ...
Safeway, SUPERVALU and Food Lion to Stop Selling 'Pink Slime ...
National grocers stop buying "pink slime" meat - Yahoo! News
Safeway pulls 'pink slime' beef | Fox News
Is 'pink slime' in your burger? You may not know until it's in your ...
Chances Are 'Pink Slime' Is In Grocery Store Beef, Too : The Salt : NPR
Free-range, organic, wholly natural, wild caught food is expensive for a reason. It is healthy to get some meat in your diet, but not if it's just the cheapest stuff you can possibly find. Choose much smaller quantities of much higher quality and learn to make it stretch... don't go vegan, but do replace the pink slime with real food as much as your pocketbook allows.
Very, very, very sad that people just don't know there is a better way! Start with the 'Idiot's Guide to Plant-based Nutrition' :)
I always assumed that McD's et al used "pure beef". I guess the definition of "pure" includes slime, fecal matter, and unknown types of filler. And we wonder why heart disease, cancer and salmonella are on the upswing!
However, I am suspicious of YOUR motives as you work for a group with a terrible record for doing anything except fund raising. Like PETA you guys like to scare everybody into giving you money.
============
WELL, there may not be much "Actual-Meat" in them burgers, BUT
, , , THEY ARE 100% BEFF
This is why I never read nutrition labels. It's all market-speak. Corn Sugar? Really? No. High Fructose Corn Syrup. People avoiding your product? Tough. You shouldn't be able to just change your name like that.
If Diet Pepsi didn't say "0 Carbs, 0 Sugar" on the side of it, people would probably stop and ask themselves "What is in it?"
Plus, I was hospitalized in '06 for a SoBe drink (the yellow one) containing Ephedrine, which I am severely allergic to. It wasn't on the label because there were only trace amounts of it in there. We had no idea that was the cause until SoBe removed the drug from the drink.
Going off a bad metric is worse than going off no metric at all. It breeds complacency and invokes a false sense of security.
About the best we can do is have a "No filler added" label. And even then, there's loopholes.
The Pink Slime "controversy" is literally just a silly meme. Because someone decided to call it "pink slime" instead of "finely textured lean beef" now all the plebs are in an uproar and think something they've been eating for 20 years is dangerous and going to hurt them.
It's pure advertising. There's nothing wrong with "pink slime", and there is literally no science behind this sudden controversy. It's safe, period.
The point is - if you're paying for something, you should get what you are paying for. If they start mixing soylent green into meat and you don't know for 20 years does that make it ok?