iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Kaiser

GET UPDATES FROM Michael Kaiser
 

Needed: A Federal Arts Policy

Posted: 07/06/09 12:25 PM ET

There is frequent discussion about the validity of federal funding for the arts in this nation; most recently, the inclusion of $50 million for employment in the arts in the stimulus package was the source of heated debate.

What we really need is a debate over federal arts policy. Most people do not know that no fewer than nine government agencies provide support to arts in this nation. That is not a typo. In addition to the National Endowment for the Arts, the national Endowment for the Humanities, and the Institute of Museum and Library Services, arts money is also granted by the Departments of Commerce, Education, State, Agriculture, Defense, and Transportation!

Those of us in the arts are grateful for the many opportunities presented for federal support. The problem is that there is literally no coordination between these agencies on their arts spending, nor is there any central governing philosophy or policy.

For example, grants for arts education are given by several agencies yet there is no effort to coordinate the educational programming of the arts organizations receiving federal funds. This cannot yield the most effective or efficient results.

There is also no organized process for sharing what has been learned so that every arts organization must learn from its own mistakes. As a result, the federal government has been funding arts education in our public schools for decades and we still have not implemented a coherent approach to using the arts to benefit our children.

The problem is not that federal funding for the arts is unwarranted; the problem is that we need to be assured, as citizens, that we are getting the most value for our money. What is needed is a coordinated approach to arts grants to ensure that the arts programming supported by federal funds truly serves our national interest.

But how can we accomplish this? How can we coordinate the efforts of so many federal agencies? There has been discussion of the need for a Ministry of Culture in the United States. I am concerned that the formation of such an entity would cost too much and put too little money in the hands of the grassroots arts organizations which truly do the most important arts work in this nation and rarely get the spotlight. (Why do we always use arts celebrities to lobby for government support? Doesn't anyone realize that the American people do not believe their tax dollars should support the work of the most famous and richest performers?)

Instead, we need someone in the administration, perhaps the new Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts, to provide leadership and coordination to ensure that all grants-making agencies are working in a common direction and that the money expended creates an arts ecology that benefits all Americans. We need policies in at least three key areas: sustaining American arts organizations (both large and small), arts education, and cultural diplomacy.

The arts have so much to contribute to this nation. We can teach our children to be the creative thinkers that our economy requires now and in the future, we can help rebuild the image of our nation abroad, we can assist in the effort to bolster tourism in the wake of the current economic crisis, and we can publicly celebrate the diversity of our nation.

But these vital goals will not be accomplished with the current helter-skelter approach to federal arts funding.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Campbell
09:12 AM on 07/14/2009
It was stated best in the film-The Dead Poets Society-that we need business & commerce to sustain life but the arts are why we stay alive. They do not have to be defended as "practical" in any way. We are all dependent upon the arts to give meaning to our lives, all the music we find so essential, the films, the stories, the glory of dance and the inherent need to create beauty in our buildings and homes. The arts are our lives and they should have priority in funding and support. FDR made certain that artists and writers had special funds and opportunities during the Great Depression. Let's request our new FDR to do the same.
(I am not a fan of me but perhaps of Charles Darwin)
04:34 PM on 07/07/2009
For starters you can outlaw grant writing-for-profit, (they rake in 10% if grant if awarded) and secondly break up the monopolization of Ivy League and Uber-Liberal Universities and their incestuous relations with curators at all major museums. This is an exclusive group of people back slapping, and creating for each other’s entertainment. Do we need another Hurst embalming tank or Koons balloon animal? no, I don't think so, though we also should avoid government handing out crayons to the masses as well; I have an idea: try making it on your own in the private sector as an Artist, on your own merit, WITHOUT big brother having to spoon feed you real-life experiences. ..I’m just say’in.
11:51 AM on 07/20/2009
I am an artist working in the private sector, and let me tell you, it is not a milk and honey existence. We artists work very long hours, usually spend many more years and dollars on schooling than the average citizen, and yet have people like Superpower tell us how overpaid we are.
01:47 PM on 07/07/2009
Health care IS important for the arts, but so is access to professional artistic status for people who were not born into the upper middle class. Access through the exchange of physical labor and personal service as apprentice to a "master" has been replaced by expensive grad school "credentials" and long unpaid internships where the intern must not only live and pay off education costs on less than a living wage, but do it in cities where the cost of living is highest. This economic gatekeeping isn't just hard on aspirants: it leads to art by for and about a small subset of society. This is simply not acceptable in a democracy. The experience of people of all backgrounds should feed into our artistic production.
Artists also need access to honorable but not totally absorbing jobs, especially part time jobs. Many of my artist friends, in addition to their 20-50 hours of art creation, work 35-40 hours a week in exactly the fields that are being cut in this recession. Employers lay them off knowing that they aren't the sole supporters of families nor the hardest working single minded job-devoted workers. But their contribution to the common welfare is not inferior to that of a worker who puts in long hours and aggressively pursues money and status. I'd argue it is at least potentially superior, especially now when greed and self-interest have upended our economy and we need to re-assess our values.
07:47 AM on 07/07/2009
In addition to their being no cultural policy, there is an enormous waste of time and resources in the Federal Arts Granting system (in much of the private and corporate funding system as well). In the Arts Education categories run by the Department of Education, hundreds of of Arts Organizations spend scores of hours preparing grant applications and only a handful of these organizations receive funding. This is a terrible waste of time and resources. Grantsmakers need to evaluate the impact of their PROCESS and the dollars they are giving on the field, not just in terms of what is accomplished, but in terms of how much human resource is needed to move those dollars into the field. Too much of the money is going to administration due to the complexity of the grant process and applications, short-term giving cycles (longer cycles allow for more planning), project-oriented grants(rather than Operational Support). This last point requires much more explanation, but may be the biggest reason that so much time and money is wasted in funding the arts.
09:15 PM on 07/06/2009
you know what would help the professional artists in this country most?

DECENT HEALTH CARE
01:33 PM on 07/07/2009
That is the truth.
05:51 PM on 07/06/2009
Agree, coordination and credibility is everything.

I say, hire Linda Ronstadt, singer, Artistic Director for San Jose Mariachi Festival, for new Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts.

Her remarkable testimony given early this year can be found here.
http://appropriations.house.gov/witness_testimony/INT/Linda_Ronstadt_03_31_09.pdf

Wynton Marsalis also spoke that day,
http://appropriations.house.gov/witness_testimony/INT/Wynton_Marsalis_03_31_09.pdf