iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Likosky

Michael Likosky

Posted: January 26, 2011 12:11 AM

President Obama reaffirmed his economic philosophy in the State of the Union address -- a government that works, invests, delivers opportunity, and that we can believe in. It is a lean government, not a big government. It is not a problem, but a problem-solver. The approach that Obama laid out for infrastructure and clean energy investment is emblematic. I describe it in my book: Obama's Bank: Financing a Durable New Deal.

Rather than looking to 2012, the State of the Union Address returned to 2008, on the campaign trail in Janesville. In front of an audience of workers at the GM Plant, Obama first set out his economic philosophy. The GM plant would not survive to see his inauguration; however, the approach that Obama set forth in Janesville was the template for the State of the Union address. What Obama said in Janesville in 2008 is far more inspiring and durable than Paul Ryan's rebut tonight.

Importantly, the Janesville speech -- and the State of the Union -- start off by reminding us that our crisis has been decades in the making. In other words, our crisis did not emerge in the subprime mortgage market, and it will note be solved there. Instead, we have divested from our real economy for decades. In the meantime, our new competitors -- China, etc -- have invested in state-of-the art infrastructure. As a result, we risk loosing our competitive edge.

In other words, we do not have the state-of-the-art infrastructure that makes companies like GE see the US as an attractive place to do business. Enlisting Jeffrey Immelt in our recovery effort is valuable for exactly this reason -- he knows what it takes to insource jobs, repatriate the operations of American firms, draw money out of the TARP banks and into our real economy.

And, just as in Janesville, Obama explained how we can co-invest with the private sector to return the country to its prestige place. The State of the Union spoke of the types of co-investments that happened during the Cold War that produced the Internet. Forget about the controversial shovel ready projects, few would deny that Obama's examples tonight of entrepreneurs who benefited from a little federal help -- not a lot -- have excelled in the midst of the crisis. Certainly, this is the story of GE in Schenectady.

When it came to infrastructure investment, Obama too returned to Janesville. We have a long term deficit in the infrastructure field. Our bridges crumble. The American Society of Engineers awarding us a D. Obama once again explained how we have to bring private investment into US infrastructure to solve this problem. Government lends a hand, but only as honey to attract private sector money.

And, it's all about the importance of opportunity -- from the nod to Biden and Boehner and their uniquely American stories to the need to invest in infrastructure not only to make our powerhouse metropolitan regions even more competitive. But instead, to make sure that the off-ramps of the high speed rail and our highways that we build today become the on-ramps of vibrant cities and towns tomorrow. This was the benefit of the Transcontinental Railroad, the Eisenhower national road system, and the Internet. This is the essence of not only the Progressive Movement, but also America Dream

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:23 PM on 01/26/2011
I don't care about big government­. I lived in Denmark. They love their big government and the services they get from it. Government has to be big in order to provide the infrastructure we expect and deserve. What I want is transparen­t government and clean government­. I want a government that takes on corruption­. Financial expert, William K. Black says the whole financial meltdown was caused by "mass corruption." If this is the problem-- and I believe it is-- then why is this not discussed? Why does nobody want to talk about the roots of America's problems and how to fix them? The problem with America is that "small government­" people who use this argument to take office sell off their government to their friends, privatizin­g services, often times making the delivery of services worse and without aberration they makes costs go up, sometimes as much as 40%, sometimes more.

http://money.cnn.com/2010/08/17/news/economy/private_prisons_economic_impact.fortune/index.htm
http://bucknakedpolitics.typepad.com/buck_naked_politics/2007/12/privatizing-int.html
http://www.cic.nyu.edu/staff/docs/bah/sherman/sherman_pubcost.pdf
02:03 PM on 01/26/2011
This seems to be a very superficial take on Obama... He is relatively clueless about economics. His choice of economic teams shows it, I'm afraid. His economics is simply tactical politics...taking received wisdom in Washington and repackaging it in a "centrist" way.
01:13 PM on 01/26/2011
WaPo

"The reality, as Mr. Obama understands, is that the country is headed for fiscal catastrophe unless it does some politically unpopular things: unwind the Bush tax cuts, including for the middle class; reduce projected Social Security benefits for future retirees, exempting the poor and disabled; rein in the cost of health care; limit popular income tax deductions. Mr. Obama knows this, but last night he did little to prepare Americans for any of it."
12:57 PM on 01/26/2011
I don't care about big government. I lived in Denmark. They love their big government and the services they get from it. What I want is transparent government and clean government. I want a government that takes on corruption. The problem with America is that "small government" people who use this argument to take office (Republican cognitive dissonance always astounds me. Why would anybody who hates government want a government job?) sell off their government to their friends, privatizing services, often times making the delivery of services worse, and always without aberration makes costs go up, sometimes as much as 40%, sometimes more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamenta
There are other human values besides greed.
12:44 PM on 01/26/2011
Wallstreet embezzlers are the problem. Not low payed American teachers - Mr. Pretend President.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClarcKing
Citizen
10:21 AM on 01/26/2011
There may be some value in this post. However, our economic crisis is located in the US submission, collaboration and facilitation of the monetary financial system's subversion and retardation of the government and the national economy. Anyone who tries to further the goals of Globalization through "competitiveness" or disguise the world financial system's disintegration is a criminal.

Failure to perceive the danger and provide competent strategy for remedial action compounds the crisis.

A national security crisis exists: the Federal government must fund the 50 states, or the total collapse and dissolution of the US will ensue. Can you imagine each state cutting its' own deal with the bankrupt private sector? A lunatic Confederacy is born!

Hyper-inflation and speculation is now in the food supply; Hunger, homelessness, foreclosures, bankruptcies, loss of health-care, unemployment, and contraction of production are still expanding, threatening the population as all out war.

Specific crisis economy formation measures must be implemented now, starting with the reenactment of the Glass-Steagall standard in US banking as the imperative, for the protection of the population, the defense of the nation.

Statecraft demands the termination of the usurious monetary system: Reenact Glass-Steagall in US banking, put the Fed into bankruptcy protection, recover the bailout trillions, banks that qualify will join the US National Bank. Then fund the necessary facilities that enhance our standard of living.
No other options exist.

The US citizenry must be given the mission to create the necessary higher order of existence humanity demands.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RDWidner
A Libertarian by nature. A free man by act of God.
09:21 AM on 01/26/2011
The President's Economic plan is to tax and spend. The American public voted in the last election that they disagree. All the President did with his speech was re-affirm he doesn't get it!
10:48 AM on 01/26/2011
You couldn't be more wrong.

Don't pay any attention to the president's party affiliation; look at his actions. Our president is actually a repulican and his economic plan is to destroy the middle class.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RDWidner
A Libertarian by nature. A free man by act of God.
10:51 AM on 01/26/2011
The President is definitely a liberal Democrat. He just isn't liberal enough for you!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TrekBear
This space is intentionally left blank
10:52 AM on 01/26/2011
Meanwhile, the GOP's borrow and spend has worked out ever so well for the country - not!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RDWidner
A Libertarian by nature. A free man by act of God.
11:28 AM on 01/26/2011
Actually this President is the one borrowing record amounts of money.
09:04 AM on 01/26/2011
What a load of bull. Obama's economic philosophy is summed up by saying that he doesn't believe that you are competent to make any decision on your own.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
08:51 AM on 01/26/2011
You may be right about Obama's STATED economic beliefs.  His beliefs IN PRACTICE appear to revolve around preserving wealth for the wealthy and defending the status quo at all costs.  You can't help the working class because then you "might be helping people who don't deserve it!" unlike helping Wall Street and Bankers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeanrenoir
09:29 AM on 01/26/2011
Older members of the working class are facing a globalized economic mess for them that no one can fix adequately. They are victims of huge economic forces beyond anyone's control, including, as Obama pointed out, the march of technology which has cut as many jobs at factories as global competition has by replace men with machines and computers. The ONLY hope for the kids of the working class is exactly what Obama said it it: EDUCATION. Asians who barely speak English have come to this country with less money than working-class Americans and, through pushing their kids to get all A's, have gotten the kids into Harvard on scholarship. Why can't working-class American families push THEIR kids to these levels of educational excellence which guarantee a highly successful job future for life? Obama's working-class family did it for him, why can't ALL working-class families focus on education as the key to their kids' futures? Instead, working-class American kids get weaker and weaker in international educational achievement with each passing year. This is a very damning indictment of working-class PARENTS.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
09:56 AM on 01/26/2011
None of this was "beyond our control".  We did this to ourselves quite deliberately.  Failures of EDUCATION didn't cause this problem and focusing on education won't get us out of it.  It was the well educated who crashed the economy.  And no level of education "guarantee a highly successful job future for life".

You bought the pipe dream.
photo
GlobalCtzn
WE are creating our world
07:18 AM on 01/26/2011
When I read this article the first word that comes to my mind is 'cheerleader'.

WHO Obama surrounds himself with shows where this WH's priorities are. His wonderful oratory and his excellent ideas (which I support strongly) stop having any REAL meaning when he does not take the physical action steps required to attempt to implement them with integrity.

At this point I focus almost entirely on the economic side of things, as I feel most everything else will flow from there. All of Obama's spoken agenda is in jeopardy if the economic situation we are in is not addressed intelligently. Obama has, in my opinion, already missed the primary chances he has had to make real change (bank regulation, healthcare, being the two biggest), he has given away the farm without a fight. The cake is already baked. Some aspects of what we are going to experience economically as a nation (the people, not the corps. - let's not confuse the two) are already totally assured. Timing may be a question, but some very ugly economic realities are already 'when's not 'if's. Obama has capitulated to entrenched power rather than risk his presidency and really take them on. And so the people will lose a lot, and the corps will consolidate power, and on this nation will march.......................further away from our potential.
05:53 AM on 01/26/2011
Except we have a one-sided free trade deal with communist China. Any money we invest into R&D just creates technology to be offshored to China. We see it again and again. Evergreen Solar was the latest US company to move to China. They received US taxpayer subsidies and direct aid. And as soon as they could they moved to communist China. How was that a good investment?
photo
GlobalCtzn
WE are creating our world
07:22 AM on 01/26/2011
Fanned for stating clear, simple REALITY Mashtoe!

So stupid it makes me want to pull my hair out. When on top of these realities I have to see Boehner crying it is truly more than my brain can handle and I have to go get myself on a trout river......
08:01 AM on 01/26/2011
Right on. The former CEO of Google when he was blabbering on and on about how the government needs to invest in basic research was asked essentially why bother if the jobs will be created elsewhere. His response -- pretty much none - just dodged the question and blew it off.
photo
Catriona
Wha daur meddle wi me?
04:32 AM on 01/26/2011
"...it's all about the importance of opportunity -- from the nod to Biden and Boehner and their uniquely American stories...."

Kindly cut out the bullsh*t and bloviating. There is nothing 'uniquely American' about Biden and Boehner's stories. Tens of thousands of Europeans have risen from their poor beginnings in a similar manner, including my English husband, who made sandwiches after achool and on weekends to earn a few bob. (His mother took in a lodger to make ends meet.) He became a biochemist and founded a successful software company.

Or our friend who grew up without electricity or running water in his family's farmhouse in rural Ireland, and never saw a ÂŁ10 note until he cashed his first army paycheque. He now owns a successful construction company in England.

Then there is old Henry in Glasgow, born in 1933, who grew up in one of Glasgow's worst slums, but attended Glasgow Uni and became a chartered engineer. (That's like a P.E. in the US.)

There is nothing uniquely American about opportunity and success.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Realbluesky
11:44 AM on 01/26/2011
Here! Here! My European friend. I am an American, but it irks me to no end when politicians (or whoever) go on and on about how unique Americans are for being successful. That's such nationalistic nonsense. You are absolutely correct that "There is nothing uniquely American about opportunit­y and success."
photo
Catriona
Wha daur meddle wi me?
07:27 PM on 01/26/2011
Actually, I have dual-nationality. ;)

Bright, ambitious people have had more opportunity over here for many years, with free uni education available. (Only recently did the Labour government impose their so-called 'top up' fees for uni education in England and Wales. Uni education is still free in Scotland.)

Uni is free in France, Ireland, and in most of the EU. These educated people begin their professional lives free of debt. Couple that with a lifetime of free healthcare. Now that is real opportunity.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:24 AM on 01/26/2011
now if you could just get a Obama speech to line up with his actions you'd have something
07:20 AM on 01/26/2011
Obama's speeches are kind of like the old Beatles records. You have to play them backwards to get the hidden meaning. " nyack minyow rish spend more money vrash drigh sdorf spend more money."
photo
GlobalCtzn
WE are creating our world
07:24 AM on 01/26/2011
Exactly.............

So simple..............yet seemingly unattainable.
12:54 AM on 01/26/2011
Obama's gov't is certainly not a gov't I believe in and is neither lean or small. Since he took office the spending grew by 25% across the board before you even figure in the stimulus program. Do you know he hasn't even spoken to at least 6 cabinet members since they took office and that he plans to govern through his czars and by presidential edict when Congress fails to pass legislation that he wants, such as the Cap 'n Trade bill. Rough times are ahead for America!