Michael Markarian

Michael Markarian

Posted November 19, 2008 | 12:35 PM (EST)

Taxing Prognosis for California's Pets

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The current economic crisis has impacted many aspects of our lives, and pets are no exception. Pet food and regular veterinary care are necessities, not luxuries, for the companion animals in our lives, and we can't skimp on these costs without jeopardizing the health and safety of our pets. Animal shelters are filling up with dogs and cats who were abandoned or relinquished when their families lost their homes due to foreclosures.

Rather than find solutions to help pet owners during this money crunch, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has found a way to make matters worse. He announced plans to add a sales tax on veterinary services as part of a larger set of program cuts and revenue increases to deal with the state's multi-million budget shortfall. In other words, because state lawmakers failed in their basic responsibility to keep government functioning, pet owners have to foot the bill.

Cat in woman's hands, credit istockphoto Under the governor's proposal, essential veterinary services like routine exams, vaccinations, and prescription medications would be lumped into the category of taxable services such as "appliance and furniture repair, vehicle repair and golf." All other medical professions were excluded from the sales tax proposal. As Dr. Barbara Hodges of the Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association said, "Veterinary services should not be considered nonessential or luxury services, but as truly essential family medical services."

Gov. Schwarzenegger, in the past, has been a friend to animals, but his attitude of late has taken a turn for the worse. He sided with agribusiness giants against Proposition 2, which had the support of veterinarians, family farmers, religious leaders, environmentalists, and animal advocates, and received more than 63 percent of the statewide vote. Now, he appears to consider our companion dogs and cats to have no more value than a stovetop range or a nine-iron.

Under the governor's plan, pet owners who are already making tough choices would be forced to add approximately 9 percent to the current cost of veterinary care. This financial burden would jeopardize the health and welfare of our companion animals, and may result in more dogs and cats being abandoned or relinquished to animal shelters if people simply cannot afford to pay the additional costs. It's bad policy, and rather than alleviate the state's economic problems, it will add to the financial burden of animal control and sheltering in our communities.

Our friends at the California Veterinary Medical Association are working hard to defeat this draconian, anti-pet proposal, and we need every pet owner in California to join the chorus of opposition. A special session of the legislature has convened to act on the budget deficit, and this issue may be decided in the next few days. We need to send an urgent message that veterinary care should be treated like other essential medical services, not like home decorating or auto detailing.

Please contact the governor and legislative leaders today and ask them to remove the proposed sales tax on veterinary services. You can also ask your own veterinarian to get involved, and send an urgent alert to his or her clients. This is an issue that affects all of our beloved pets, and we can't let Gov. Schwarzenegger get away with terminating their health and safety.

The current economic crisis has impacted many aspects of our lives, and pets are no exception. Pet food and regular veterinary care are necessities, not luxuries, for the companion animals in our live...
The current economic crisis has impacted many aspects of our lives, and pets are no exception. Pet food and regular veterinary care are necessities, not luxuries, for the companion animals in our live...
 
Comments
4
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

Arnold has continued to refuse to put a tax on the oil pumped out of California when Texas and Alaska tax there. There is revenue right there he is missing.

Arnold has continued to refuse to tax luxury purchases by the uberwealthy, like yachts and jets. All the rich have to do is buy them out of state and wait a few weeks, then they are tax free. There is revenue he is missing.

Arnold has refused to bring our car registration up to the same level as other states.

There are plenty of areas where Arnold could increase revenues.

Instead he is going to tax our pets. So you either pay through the nose or you risk being prosecuted for animal abuse when you don't take your pet to the vet.

Will someone kill this bill please? It's a stupid idea. It punishes the poor more than the rich. (Which seems to be a talent for Republicans.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 AM on 11/20/2008
- M1 I'm a Fan of M1 permalink
photo



Electing actors has turned out to be nothing but disasterous. This Governor is a huge loser.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 11/19/2008
photo

Thank God he can't run for President.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 AM on 11/20/2008

Besides the fact that the tax is a stupid idea for so many reasons, nine percent is an extremely high tax for services that often and easily run in the hundreds or thousands of dollars. Taking in a starving stray cat with a thyroid condition found in my driveway quickly set me back $700. A tax of $63 on top of that to rescue a stray is punitive to people doing their best to look after those that can not look after themselves. A $35 repair on a microwave may be a luxury, but a vet bill is most often a necessity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 11/19/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect