iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael P. Owens

GET UPDATES FROM Michael P. Owens
 

How Newt Gingrich Can Win the Nomination by Coming Clean About Climate Change

Posted: 01/24/2012 5:53 pm

And just like that... Newt Gingrich is suddenly the front-runner for the Republican nomination.

It is not surprising Gingrich's win of Saturday's primary in South Carolina was due to his strong backing by conservative voters in the state. While Gingrich is no pauper, voters already alienated by Romney's wealth, appear to be balking at his reticence to produce his tax returns. Perhaps, the 99% movement is not just a liberal thing after all?

Though I can't say whether Gingrich will be able to maintain this momentum through the upcoming primary in Florida, I do have a suggestion that I believe would improve his chances significantly:

Gingrich should come clean about his well Documented beliefs on climate change!

Now, before you suggest that this would be political suicide for a "conservative" presidential candidate in 2012, I ask that you please hear me out.

The United States is lagging behind China and Europe in the clean energy race!

The U.S. is the only developed nation where believing in climate science is a political issue. Meanwhile, the rest of the world agrees that climate change is real; and has focused on finding innovative, profitable solutions to mitigate its effects.

When it comes to global investment in clean energy, the U.S. now ranks third, behind China and Germany (respectively). But those numbers understate the issue. In fact, China has actually invested three times more than us. This statistic is even more alarming when combined with the Pew Center study that predicts that the global market for clean energy will reach $2.3 trillion by 2030. Since reviving the sluggish economy and restoring our nation's competitive edge remain key election issues, why are none of the candidates talking about these alarming statistics?

Gingrich's View on the Environment

In 2007, Mr. Gingrich authored a book titled, A Contract with Our Earth, which called for "bipartisan environmentalism" to save the planet. In 2008, he starred in a commercial alongside Nancy Pelosi, for Al Gore's Alliance for Climate Protection, in which he acknowledged that despite obvious political differences, "we do agree our country must take action to address climate change."

For the past year, revelations like these about Gingrich have been used by his rivals to label him a moderate. Unfortunately, in an effort to appeal to conservative voters, Gingrich has pulled an about-face. According to a recent survey by The Pew Research Center, only 31 percent of Republicans believe in global warming (compared with 77 percent of Democrats). This capitulation was never more evident than when Gingrich cut the chapter on climate change from his soon to be released book.

How the U.S. Can Grab a Slice of the Estimated $2.3 Trillion Global Market for Clean Energy

Republicans have been led to believe that the only way to address climate change is through a combination of higher taxes and new regulations that would burden business owners. This is shallow thinking from the party that touts the merits of free markets and capitalism above all else. If there were a tax on carbon emissions, the market would step in to provide alternatives. In turn, the country would develop new industries and jobs -- putting us on the fast track to grabbing a slice of the estimated $2.3 trillion global market.

To quote the same Pew Center survey: "America's entrepreneurial traditions and strengths in innovation -- especially its leadership in venture capital investing -- are considerable, giving it the potential to recoup leadership and market share in the future."

My suggestion to Mr. Gingrich is that he simply come out and declare that if we want to be serious about reviving our economy, we must have an honest conversation about climate change. After all, the rest of the world is.

Gingrich can state honestly that he has reservations about a cap-and-trade system and a carbon tax, but that he believes capitalism and American ingenuity can find a solution. The words Conservative and Conservation come from the same root. If Gingrich properly demonstrates these connections to his base, and highlights the risk of losing more economic ground to China, Germany and others, I believe he would gain additional supporters.

Honesty Trumps All

Poll after poll illustrates Americans' intense distrust of government. The people want honesty, not political pandering. If Gingrich were to come clean about his true beliefs on climate change, he may just win the nomination and more.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:31 AM on 01/26/2012
Yes, and maybe Newt should fess up about going to the hospital to ask his dying 1st wife for a divorce, so he could marry his mistress/2nd wife. That should also get him some sympathy votes.
07:09 PM on 01/25/2012
Given how radicalized and anti-science the Republican base is now--a development that Gingrich had his share in advancing--calling for "an honest conversation about climate change" would be the kiss of death in the primaries. And in the general campaign, who, among those who actually care and know something about climate change, would trust any Republican on that issue? (We can hardly trust Democrats.)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:00 PM on 01/25/2012
Global warming is a loser with the electorate. People just don't care very highly about it --- outside of 20% of the population that will vote Democratic no matter what.

The US is the world leader in shale gas and shale oil development. The amount of BTUs from these two energy sources dwarfs the energy being captured from wind and solar, and probably will continue to dominate for the next 20 years.

Sorry, those are the facts, that's what Newt is going to run on .... it's what Obama is running on too.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:38 PM on 01/25/2012
I agree with this statement: "Poll after poll illustrates Americans' intense distrust of government. The people want honesty, not political pandering."

Unfortunately (and what does it say about us Americans??) that's not what gets people elected. So politicians deceive to get elected, because it appears that's the only way they can. So do Americans 'really' want honesty? Or do they want a good slogan?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blackorpheus
the decisive blows are always struck left-handed
12:00 PM on 01/25/2012
If Newt "came clean" he wouldn't be Newt, would he?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
duegger
onto others
11:48 AM on 01/25/2012
Honesty is not in his rhetoric
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
05:38 AM on 01/25/2012
It might allow him more chance in the general election, but he has to get the 'baggers to nominate him first. Maybe the idea that lowering the average albedo of the world population could help with climate change would win him some primary votes?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
02:14 AM on 01/25/2012
"If there were a tax on carbon emissions, the market would step in to provide alternatives."

But more expensive alternatives. Our competitive edge would be lost.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
02:11 AM on 01/25/2012
"In fact, China has actually invested three times more than us."

But all they have to show for it is a very huge dam. I suppose we could compete by adding a dam to the Mississippi.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jlmurt
01:19 AM on 01/25/2012
He's right about one thing: The rest of the world gets it
10:18 AM on 01/25/2012
LOL
What do you know about the rest of the world?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jlmurt
01:13 AM on 01/25/2012
What is scary is that the enormous Republican dirty energy money influence has rigged so much control that Obama may lose.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rock0267
12:06 PM on 01/25/2012
What's scary is if he actually win re-election!
photo
progressivestance84
The Right is Wrong.
12:01 AM on 01/25/2012
"Now, before you suggest that this would be political suicide for a "conservative" presidential candidate in 2012, I ask that you please hear me out."

No I will not hear you out. You know nothing about the modern conservative party. Nothing at all. The green movement is a kiss of death on the rightwing. Don't quit your day job.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:56 PM on 01/24/2012
Ummm pretty sure that's a loser for any republican. Newt should come out and say he is pro pollution and anti science that will probably get him more votes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:11 PM on 01/24/2012
Doesn't matter at this point for Gingrich. The gop, fossil fuel, and coal indrustries have convinced too many uninformed voters that climate change is a hoax. I suspect the US has a higher % of poorly informed voters on important issues than any other country. Too many vote based on GAGG (guns, abortion, gods, and gays), even though most of the time it's against their own best interest to vote that way. And most media is culpable.
10:56 AM on 01/25/2012
I agree
Most of you dont have the slighest idea about what is going on.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
hazbro24
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro- HST
09:27 PM on 01/24/2012
This would not get him the nomination. And if by meteor strike it did, why would we choose him over Obama?