iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Roth

GET UPDATES FROM Michael Roth
 

Antonin Scalia and Political Diversity

Posted: 03/ 1/2012 3:09 pm

Next week Justice Antonin Scalia will be delivering the Hugo Black Lecture at Wesleyan University. It's been a long time since we've welcomed a Supreme Court Justice to Middletown. Justice Harry Blackmun visited the campus in 1993, giving the second lecture in this series. We've invited others, but given the busy schedule of the Court, we have not been able to arrange a visit. When Justice Scalia accepted the invitation, he said that he had heard positive feedback about the lecture series and Wesleyan from his former law clerk, Lawrence Lessig, who spoke here a couple of years ago.

I was very impressed by Justice Scalia's comment. After all, everyone knows how far to the right Justice Scalia is, and Professor Lessig is pretty far along the opposite end of the political spectrum. It seemed to me a very good thing that these two men were in conversation, and that Justice Scalia seemed to have respect and affection for a legal theorist with whom he undoubtedly differs on a slew of important issues.

Predictably, some faculty and students have objected to inviting to campus a public figure with whom they fiercely disagree. Less predictably, hundreds of Wesleyan students lined up to get tickets to the event. I suspect that this doesn't mean they want to hear views they will find congenial. They want to hear a powerful advocate for a point of view that is having a decisive impact on the country. They want argument and disagreement -- not an echo of their own thoughts. They want an educational environment.

Although as a citizen I have frequently found myself opposed to Justice Scalia's views, as a professor and college president I am eager to hear them expressed in the setting of a public lecture. We need more vigorous debate on campus about political issues, and debate that does not just feature different views from the same sector of the ideological spectrum. We live in very polarized times, when differences of opinion quickly give rise to personal attacks on the one hand, and to retreats into like-minded groups, on the other. Sure, people may at first seek out others who share their strongly held views, but that kind of ideological and cognitive reinforcement is anti-educational.

One of our trustees, himself a libertarian activist and free market advocate, asks me from time to time how we can achieve more political diversity on campus. I haven't found a good answer for him. It seems to many conservative observers that we at selective universities are pretty homogeneous politically, and I can't say they're wrong. We don't seek out historians, critics, economists or scientists of one political persuasion or another, but we should be more aware of prejudices that might lead us to hire people whose political views reinforce our own. A certain amount of political prejudice is part of the culture of the campus -- many take for granted that with education comes political commitment associated with the Left. This is a mistake. If we don't recognize this mistake and try to correct it, we ourselves will be guilty of intolerance. We will have no ground to stand on when faced with the arrogant, pseudo-populist ignorance we've been seeing recently on the campaign trail.

I often describe Wesleyan as representing the best in progressive liberal arts education. To truly be progressive, to develop programs that lead other institutions to learn from our example, we need to hear thoughtful voices from a variety of political perspectives. Although I consider myself a person of the Left, it is a serious error to think that all educated points of view will come from those who share our particular vision of critique, of progress, or of social justice. We should not welcome those who cannot tolerate difference, those whose views close down thinking and social interaction. But we should welcome dissent. Making the conservative case at a liberal arts university like ours is a tough thing to do, and I admire those who try to do so.

By bringing intelligent conservative discourse to our campuses, we will increase our capacity to combat the idiot wind of know-nothing anti-intellectualism that is all too prevalent in our political culture. I am hopeful that Justice Scalia's lecture and discussion will contribute to this capacity.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:06 PM on 03/21/2012
'Political diversity' should not imply the protecting of supposedly-downtrodden conservative views through the silencing of more leftist ones. This article was written by a Wesleyan alum after Scalia spoke at the school:

https://radfag.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/busting-the-spectrum-what-does-political-diversity-really-mean/
08:04 PM on 03/13/2012
My comment is that I found it very disturbing not to mention ironic that during a speech on the First Amendment, four students who removed their civilian clothes to reveal orange Guantanamo jumpsuits and who just stood to silently protest the most radical activist judge the Supreme Court has ever known were removed from the auditorium when they weren't even disturbing anyone. This is not the Wesleyan I attended.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:53 PM on 03/08/2012
President Roth... Your words are eloquent but ring sadly hollow when you bring a United States Supreme Court Justice to your campus and he is not given the respect that he deserves, regardless of your political or social preference. You should be ashamed of the liberals amongst your student body for not showing him the very tolerance and decency that they seek from society. These immature children need to be schooled is respecting others opinions in the same manner that they would like theirs to be respected - that is the basis for a real and fruitful discussion of the issues that divide us.
11:52 AM on 03/03/2012
An honest man, Michael Roth. Obviously this is why Scalia is going there. I understand that Scalia and Kagan are great friends on the Supreme Court. Good for Wesleyan to promote this kind of discourse. It's time we understand that American pragmaticism and the Judeo-Christian ethic have always existed side by side in America, at least since the 1800's.
07:29 PM on 03/01/2012
How do you differentiate between anti-intellectualism and very opinionated ?
T-Haight
What was wrong with federalism?
06:45 PM on 03/01/2012
Mr. Roth's sentiments are certainly welcome in this day and age. What will be telling is whether he, as President of Wesleyan, manages to secure the honest, open speech and debate he wants. Far too often, right-leaning speakers have found themselves shouted down when giving campus speeches, occasionally requiring a security escort off campus. Mr. Roth's chief responsibility now is to make sure that the speech is conducted in a secure and honest way, to prevent any heckler's veto, and to discipline any students of other attendees who take actions to the contrary.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thoreau101
06:36 PM on 03/01/2012
Wesleyan shames itself. Scalia has done much damage to our country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
flacon
05:02 PM on 03/01/2012
I respect and welcome your intelligent discourse pursuit. Sad to say, you won't find much of it at HUFFPO. Attempts at contrary opinion are usually met with derision and personal attack. If you're not in lockstem, you're not welcome here.
04:45 PM on 03/01/2012
"...We will have no ground to stand on when faced with the arrogant, pseudo-populist ignorance we've been seeing recently on the campaign trail...."

Pretty much a day late and a dollar short don't you think ?

Where were you when ....(insert liberal hypocrisy here)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OleProfessor
"Ours is not a system based upon trust"
04:17 PM on 03/01/2012
Antoni Scalia is one of the top recruiters for the vile Tory Usurpers of the Federalist Society but also a hard core heretic blasphemer zealot member of the Opus Dei Cult as well and his son is an Opus Dei priest...he's a disingenuous Totalitarian Authoritarian who claims to be an "Originalist", when he is nothing but a Scaliaist..!

"You chose poorly.."
photo
flossophy
the unfamous anti-establishment classical liberal
05:24 PM on 03/01/2012
You are a riot. 

Scalia is a classical liberal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thoreau101
06:37 PM on 03/01/2012
You are a riot. Play your word games elsewhere.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OleProfessor
"Ours is not a system based upon trust"
10:22 PM on 03/01/2012
I know of what I speak...your allowed your own deluusional opinion..