More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Roth

GET UPDATES FROM Michael Roth
 

Budgeting for Greater Inequality

Posted: 07/27/11 05:37 PM ET

This week, while President Obama and House Speaker Boehner gave dueling speeches of blame and recrimination, the Pew Research Center released a report showing the extraordinary increase in the disparity of wealth between whites and nonwhites in the United States. As the New York Times reported:

The study, which used data collected by the Census Bureau, found that the median wealth of Hispanic households fell by 66 percent from 2005 to 2009. By contrast, the median wealth of whites fell by just 16 percent over the same period. African Americans saw their wealth drop by 53 percent. Asians also saw a big decline, with household wealth dropping 54 percent.

The biggest reason cited in the report was that non-whites had a much greater percentage of their wealth in real estate where the losses were deepest and the "recovery" the slowest. We also know that unemployment among nonwhites is more widespread, and that it lasts longer than it does among whites. As Al Sharpton pointed out on the HuffingtonPost, since this report only uses data through 2009, the news could be far worse.

This has led to the greatest disparity of wealth between whites and nonwhites since the Census Bureau began collecting this sort of information 25 years ago. White households now have an average wealth that is 20 times greater than black households and 18 times greater than Hispanic households!

This data allows us to understand the stalemate in Washington over raising the debt ceiling from another perspective. The reason we have not yet had an agreement is that the president is insisting in what he calls a "balanced approach" in which families making more than $250,000 a year will have to pay more in taxes. Republicans (and apparently many Democrats), on the other hand, reject this tax increase and call for deeper spending cuts to further shrink the size of government.

Given the Republican reluctance to count the savings that should come from winding down the military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, shrinking the size of government will reduce services to the most needy. This will certainly mean that services for blacks and Hispanics will decrease, and it will have the immediate effect of accelerating the disparities of wealth between these groups and whites. Cutting long-term investment in educational opportunities will deepen the hole for those struggling for the American dream. The refusal to pass just some of the burden of shrinking government services on to the people who can most afford it will further accelerate greater racial inequality in this country.

Of course, there are poor whites, too, and they would also suffer from an effort to balance the budget so as to further advantage the richest members of our society. And there are some wealthy black and Hispanic households that would not be hurt by cuts to programs aimed to protect the most vulnerable.

But the refusal to consider increased taxes on the wealthiest Americans is part of a network of efforts to maintain the trends toward inequality in this country. The report released this week from Pew Research Center reminds us that this is also a defense of the growing disparities between whites on the one hand, and blacks and Hispanics, on the other. The defense of racial and economic privilege under the rhetoric of "taking back our country," or of "living within our means" further undermines our political culture today as it starves future generations of cultural and economic opportunity.

 
This week, while President Obama and House Speaker Boehner gave dueling speeches of blame and recrimination, the Pew Research Center released a report showing the extraordinary increase in the dispari...
This week, while President Obama and House Speaker Boehner gave dueling speeches of blame and recrimination, the Pew Research Center released a report showing the extraordinary increase in the dispari...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 216
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
07:15 PM on 07/28/2011
Michael Roth writes that the "rhetoric...of living within our means" constitutes a "defense of racial and economic privilege." But racial and economic privilege have been well served by our failure to live within our means, as when the Treasury paid AIG's counterparties at par. Federal government spending of nearly $4 trillion a year is increasingly captured by the people who can afford to buy access to the political process by which federal largesse, and spending derived from federal largesse, is dispensed. And so JP Morgan Chase secures contracts in 26 states to process "food stamps" (EBT cards), making more profit from more poverty. And so the counterterrorism industry grows and profits, as the Washington Post showed in its "Top Secret America" series. And so the federal debt feeds the "primary dealers" who sell Treasury bonds in exchange for generous fees. And on and on.

Federal spending is the *source* of growing inequality of wealth. We have an oligarchy; more oligarchy does not mean more fairness.
06:18 PM on 07/28/2011
Too many say that it is the blacks that don't have the money or jobs. It has hit the white people just as hard. It may be that the whites have an edge but not very much.
05:33 PM on 07/28/2011
Some of the problems as I see it:

- racism still alive and whites can go far w/o the so-called credentials needed by minorities
- business won't train their potential super-stars if they can pass this expense to taxpayers
- greedy business owners feel they don't have to participate in giving back to society
- rich politicians are completely out of touch with what's going on in America
- tv is becoming cheaper via reality shows where the rich cut out actors/actresses
(eliminates the need for both training and the studies of the arts now doesn't it)
- news is not news and lying on air has become legal
(keeps all constituents confused and incapable of casting votes based on facts)
- ineffectual law enforcement aside from cracking down on minorities and illegals
(keeps fear alive.)
- the Wall Street crew can get tiny percentage "settlements" for their crimes rather than
being charged criminally -- even when they crash entire economies on a global scale.
- too many lawyers and none available to help the poor with enforcement of U.S. civil laws.

At the end of the day, minorities are shoved under the bus and their ability to attain wealth are subjected to the tricks the republicans play on society. They are mean and nasty group that is guided by racism and every single policy they enact or push has racism underneath it -- be it blatent or having some long-term effect on the minorities they hate.
06:15 PM on 07/28/2011
It is not the poor that are taking your tax dollar, it is the PROFIT made by the companies that sell to them.

Anything the government tries to do for the poor whether it is housing, food, college etc., the businesses will charge the maximum for it.

Then of course the stock market takes another 10 to 20% profit off of everything sold.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:24 PM on 07/28/2011
Very well said...
05:16 PM on 07/28/2011
Congratulations to all the liberals/progressives who have fought to change laws and tax policy that help non-whites have a better chance. All the changes you have brought about have resulted in... (drum roll, please)... GREATER WEALTH DISPARITY between whites and non-whites!!!

So now, after your brilliant policies have resulted in the exact opposite of what you claimed what they would achieve, you want us to support more of the same policies. Please tell me how this makes any sense.
05:36 PM on 07/28/2011
If the republicans would get out of the way and allow funding for the programs the American PEOPLE decide are for the good of the nation, the disparity in income/wealth would not be as reported today. I know, I know. Your republican leaders are too busy trickling the wealth up to the wealthy "job creators" that have created zero jobs. Succkkkerrr!
05:42 PM on 07/28/2011
Actually, we'd just like our tax dollars to go towards the policies Americans agreed on as laws were enacted instead of to the lobbyists' corporations of their choosing. Our policies work. Its the republicans that end the funding for what the PEOPLE of AMERICA choose as our way forward.
photo
intellectualTradition
corruptisima re publica plurimae leges
05:09 PM on 07/28/2011
if i were non-white I would move to a country where i was treated better !!
04:48 PM on 07/28/2011
Let's just put this in the simplest of terms. A lot of people are born into this world with nothing. A few people are born with something. The lucky people with nothing work for the people with something, the less lucky work for the other nothings, and the rest steal, or get charity, from the somethings who have laid claim to everything.

It's not unfair for the nothings to take a share from the somethings. America is mythologized is as a place you can stake your claim. Well, all the claims have been staked now. That makes it the obligation of the somethings to provide an endowment for the nothings to make a life. Taxes should be a burden borne by the somethings, to provide us with education, a safe, clean sustaining environment, infrastructure, basic health care, etc. Taxing the somethings more than the nothings is the only fair policy for the privilege of protecting their claim to almost everything.
05:08 PM on 07/28/2011
Please explain why taking money from people who earned it to give to people who didn't is "fair." Sounds like the most unfair thing in the world to me.
06:36 PM on 07/29/2011
Most money is not earned, but generated from wealth, which is mostly inherited. If our laws allow people to control wealth (the capital and means of economic production), those people have an obligation to provide for society at large. One way they do that is by redistributing some of their money through taxes to government for the well being of all society; if their taxes are too low, our entire economy will founder (including their income).
04:47 PM on 07/28/2011
The wealth disparity between whites and non-whites has increased. And this has occurred during a time where wealth redistribution has increased as well -- to the point where 50% pay $0 in Federal income taxes. Apparently, the policy of wealth redistribution does not fix wealth disparity. So now what?
05:04 PM on 07/28/2011
But food stamps and rent subsidies are the humane thing to do, yes?
05:18 PM on 07/28/2011
I don't have a big problem with programs like this (would be nice to curb abuse) but at some point we have to reexamine what kinds of policies will reverse the trend, not perpetuate it.
05:26 PM on 07/28/2011
If the 50% had larger incomes they could pay more Federal Income Taxes. Low wages keeps many in a low or zero tax bracket.

Many pay property taxes, vehicle taxes, sales taxes and State taxes. Sales taxes are the most unfair if it is on groceries.
05:54 PM on 07/28/2011
Exactly. Pay working people MORE and collect MORE taxes. This is not hard and the quest for cheaper labor either by outsourcing or insourcing is nothing but the republicans' way of defunding America in its entirety.
03:34 PM on 07/28/2011
How much of this disparity is a result of the huge influx of illegal immigrants? If the low wealth/low income illegals were eliminated from the calculations (after all, they are ILLEGALLY here), the disparity would fall, possibly by a large amount. Guess that is just another unintended consequence the left can use to further decimate the middle class while increasing their voting constituency. Numbers are funny in that they can be manipulated for a specific end result.
04:53 PM on 07/28/2011
Pay attention. It is the right-wing that abuses the illegal immigration system. It's their way of avoiding taxes, underpaying workers and getting Americans to train Indians to do former Americans' jobs as the right-wing migrates its businesses to India. Look up H1B visas and L1 visas if you really want to know what's up.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Steinhauer
Ex-Patriot, Europe
02:53 PM on 07/28/2011
The thing I don’t understand about this article is why is it always about race, color or social class. Life is hard and life is not far, some people are born into money while others are not. When I went to college, I worked two jobs and I joined the Army National Guard to help pay for tuition. I worked my butt of to get my degrees. I graduated with $20K in student loans but I graduated. I later served 10 years in the military and then chose to get out. I tried to find a job outside of the military but despite having two BA degrees and 10 years of military service I could not find a job. So I ended up working 3 additional years as a private contractor in Iraq, not because I wanted to, but because I could not find a job in my own country. I hated being apart from my wife and the constant threat of getting maimed or shot was unnerving, but you know what was more unnerving? Not being able to find a job and losing my house. So I chose to stick it out and work in Iraq not because I liked it, but because I had to. My point is, minorities aren’t the only ones hurting financially or having to make tough choices. We all are.
04:57 PM on 07/28/2011
It is ok to make it about race when the actual statistics show it. Why, exactly, do you think the EEOC is underfunded? Your story is noble and demonstrates the hard-working American attitude. But I would like to point out that others that are not white have probably similar stories to tell. The problem that needs fixing is that we here in the U.S. have a set of laws that outlaw discrimination while underfunding a way to enforce that law. I am guessing that at no time during your struggles were you wondering if your inability to find a job was directly related to you color/race.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:33 PM on 07/28/2011
Here's the scenario people:
There are 10 people at the table and 1 pizza.
Two people have helped themselves to 8 pieces of pizza and the 8 people have to share the remaining 2 pieces...
Have you ever split 2 pieces of pizza between 8 people....
Punk'd anyone?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Osmona
Its GREAT to be alive and SANE.
02:51 PM on 07/28/2011
Mr. Roth, I'm so happy that YOU have the intelligence and honesty to write this piece. I have not read the comments here before writing this to you. Hopefully, the people on this board will NOT react to you as NEGATIVELY as they reacted to Mr. Sharpton who wrote the very same thing. It is a hard truth, but it is TRUTH nonetheless.
04:59 PM on 07/28/2011
I agree. The only thing he forgot to mention was the inherited wealth that is passed down generation after generation that creates a situation where it is nearly impossible to actually catch up wealthwise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Osmona
Its GREAT to be alive and SANE.
05:55 PM on 07/28/2011
True.
02:45 PM on 07/28/2011
Last night I watched the news on my local PBS station. One of the segments was about this newly developed income disparity. One of the speakers put the problem in a perspective that was intuitive. He said that the gathering of wealth by the few left much less wealth with the great body of our population and one of the consequences was that the ability of the middle and lower classes to buy things was drying up. In our consumer driven economy his thesis clearly implied an ongoing contraction in the economy. I do believe he was correct and as such this is the reason for a greater distribution of wealth. All of us know something is wrong with what is going on, the problem is that the only entity capable of correcting the problem, the government, has been hijacked by the people with that wealth.
05:01 PM on 07/28/2011
100%Fanned.. and faved,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patricia Lunsford Pearson
Be careful when a naked person offers you a shirt.
02:44 PM on 07/28/2011
The minorities,in a few short years , will be the majority of voters and then and only then will they get their come uppence. I am a working poor single white lady that will always be in a minority group. There is no representation for "the people" anyway. I pray the now minorities enjoy what WILL come for them.Both sides should stop the disparaging now, they will remember.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shaboopus
Proverbs 13:20
02:44 PM on 07/28/2011
What REALLY, REALLY pisses me off is that Democrats are not talking about this every day! They continue to, like saps, allow Republicans to dictate the national discussion!!!!

And as for the jackwads that support/subscribe to Teapotty politics, the bigger problem is not the disparity between the haves and have nots but between the know and know nots!!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Hector Boag
Fast & Furious? Not me!
02:37 PM on 07/28/2011
I'm considered white, grew up poor, worked many low wage jobs, lived within my budget, and for the first time in my 53 years I am finally going to be making that mystically rich $250k where my taxes are going to increase this next year or so. My question for the liberal community is should I be taxed more because I'm white or because I worked my butt off and sacrificed for years to make it to where I'm at today just so some unfortunate non-white can live easier off of my tax dollars?
02:57 PM on 07/28/2011
No, you pay more in taxes because you make more, and are more able to pay. You also pay because you have been given the opportunity to rise to where you are, and because you are living in a society that has helped you - and continues to help you. there are a lot of folks who work harder than you do, who still never get to get their piece of the "American Dream. There are also those who have worked hard all their lives, and seen their pensions not cover their expenses. It's not just "unfortunate non-whites," though there are plenty of them who work hard, but still need help.
03:27 PM on 07/28/2011
Sacrificed? What did you do, go to college?

If you want to keep your job you will pay enough taxes to keep this country from getting worse. How long do you think your job will last if very few have jobs? I know it depends on what your job is.

Many white people work their butts off and earn $40,000 and pay a large percentage in taxes. You know what, that is essential money. Every penny is necessary to them.

You aren't taxed because you are white or because you worked your butt off and sacrificed.

Taxes are the price you pay if you want a peaceful country without revolutions.

Taxes are the price you pay for the privilege you had of doing well in this country.

You are falling prey to the unethical super wealthy who want to influence you to hate taxes as much as they do, so they keep stirring the pot and feeding resentment.
02:26 PM on 07/28/2011
Those statistics should read that the gap between educated and uneducated workers have widened. that is really the crux of the matter. The unemployment rate is highest for those without a high school diploma and higher for non college graduates. Education is the key. Instead of just throwing money at the problem which has not worked., We need to look at how to motivate young people and spark ambition. Peer pressure is a problem. Television shows that promotes teen culture as pleasure seeking instead of goal oriented is also a problem. How do we instil a sense of responsibility for the choices our teens make? We have all worked hard to give the opportunity to a college education to those who work for it in the lower income families so why are the numbers so disappointing? These are the questions that need to be asked if we are to ever hope to solve the condrum. Finger pointing and demonizing sucessful people will accomplish nothing. We have already been spending alot of tax dollars and effort to turn this around with lack luster results. It is time to figure out why it is not working.
02:44 PM on 07/28/2011
Fact based reasoning is discouraged here. Much more fun to blame the wealthy, productive people, Tea Party followers, Republicans or anyone else who doesn't believe you should pay more taxes simply "because you can afford it", whatever in the world that means.

We get a lousy return on our current government spending. Why would anyone think the next batch will be better? We saving the really good projects and programs for when we tax more?
05:28 PM on 07/28/2011
Actually, the premise is false. Americans that WANT to be educated are much better educated than any other time in our history. Free classes available on the internet and also live (usually sponsored by grants or some company that wants to teach to their own brand).

I agree with you on the qualify of tv, but education is available.

Also keep in mind that degrees mean nothing given the fact that globalism has taken hold and any unethical country that needs money can invent degrees out of thin air for a few rupees. In the business world, degree'd and certified folks make the biggest of the mistakes that end up taking companies down.

Bill Gates and many others that made it to the "top" are drop-outs. The only commonality between those that made it w/o degrees is that they are white drop-outs.