iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Rowe

GET UPDATES FROM Michael Rowe
 

Why Anne Rice Has Never Been More of a Christian

Posted: 07/30/10 01:15 AM ET

Ironically, author Anne Rice may have been more of a Christian yesterday than she ever was, when she announced, on Facebook, that she was quitting Christianity and renouncing any claim to the title "Christian."

"For those who care,"
she wrote,
"and I understand if you don't: Today I quit being a Christian. I'm out. I remain committed to Christ as always but not to being 'Christian' or to being part of Christianity. It's simply impossible for me to 'belong' to this quarrelsome, hostile, disputatious, and deservedly infamous group. For ten years, I've tried. I've failed. I'm an outsider. My conscience will allow nothing else."

Earlier this week on her public Facebook page, Rice had expressed her horror and revulsion at two different news stories that shared similar themes.

The first was the co-opting of the "Christian" imprimatur by the GOP-linked "Christian punk rock" band You Can Run But You Cannot Hide, supported by Michele Bachmann, who believe that gays should be executed, and who deride America for not being "moral enough" to make homosexuality a capital crime like it is in Iran. The second story was an exposé of a seven-year old boy who had been indoctrinated into Fred Phelps' Westboro Baptist Church, whose sole great commission is virulent hatred.

For a woman who has written extensively about her journey from childhood Catholicism to atheism and back again, her very public announcement came as a surprise to both her Christian and secular fans. At the same time, the raw honesty she exhibited by doing it in the way she did seemed, somehow, entirely Anne Rice.

Rice's own personal trials have been Jobean in scope: the loss of her young daughter, Michelle, to leukemia in 1972; the death of her beloved Dutton editor, William Whitehead; the AIDS-related death of her best friend, gay writer John Preston. And, in 2002, came the cruelest blow of all, the cancer death of her husband of 41 years, poet Stan Rice. Any of us would be forgiven for collapsing -- mentally, emotionally, or spiritually -- in the face of any of these individual tragedies. Rice took them all on her shoulders and bore them courageously over the course of one of the most public and prolific literary careers of the modern age.

In 1998, Rice returned to her faith after years of describing herself as an atheist, and opened her heart to God. If some fans of her vampire, witchcraft, and erotic fiction rolled their eyes at her announcement that she would consecrate her writing talents to the glory of God in future, others did not, and there was still a grudging admiration for her questing determination, as well as an intuitive sense that Rice was on a journey and they could either remain with her or step aside. In 2008, she laid out that journey in a searing, beautifully written memoir, Called Out Of Darkness: A Spiritual Confession.

Rice's decision to leave Christianity carries weight not only as a believer, but a mother. Her son, bestselling author Christopher Rice, is an outspoken and articulate gay rights activist and crusader.

What must it have been like for Anne Rice to watch and listen as her community of believers spent tens of millions of dollars in California making sure that her son remained a second-class citizen, denouncing LGBT Americans in the vilest, cruelest, ugliest terms, bookended with hearty "Amens?" How could she have listened to the hours and hours of gratuitous cruelty and hatred from the various churches and the politicians they've purchased for forty pieces of silver in adjusted dollars and not wondered who these so-called Christians were, and how it was -- given their bigotry and rage -- that she shared a title with them?

At the same time, how many Christian mothers have turned their backs on their LGBT children and cast them out like tragic mistakes, or, worse, embraced them with a toxic, bloody, pitying, non-affirming love that made it clear to their children that they believed they were damned?

"Love" is a quantifiable commodity, much as "faith" is. Neither, if they're true to their nature, can tolerate darkness. Both will eventually surge, gasping, towards the light.

Still, it is possible to murder faith.

You murder faith same way you murder love: one bruise at a time, with small, daily cuts, with grinding contempt, with neglect. You murder faith by exposing it to bullets inscribed with Bible verses that kill Afghan and Iraqi children. You murder it by separating an elderly lesbian couple in a hospital because their union is considered "unnatural." You murder it by linking it to greed, to the "God wants you to be rich" movement which marinates in loathing for the poor and needy, in defiance of Christ's commission to care for them, then call it "good for America." You murder it by exposing it to any number of atrocities wrapped up in an inviolate nationalism that claims divine authority as its basis, with no room for dissent, and no mercy for dissenters. You murder it with self-righteous, violent militarism, with intolerance, with lack of compassion, with lack of humility and, most importantly, with lack of humanity.

It dies a little bit more every time a gay or lesbian teenager commits suicide because they've been taught to hate themselves because God "loves" them but hates what they are.

While Rice says her faith in God remains intact, her repudiation of Christianity is a threefold clarion call, one that should not be written off as a publicity stunt by a bestselling author, or condescendingly dismissed by the Evangelical establishment.

One one hand, her announcement is a profoundly courageous personal declaration of spiritual intent. On another hand, it's a wakeup call to believers who sit by while unimaginable evils occur in the name of Jesus and say nothing other besides defensively whining that "all Christians aren't like that," or that the person reacting in grief and outrage is simply "persecuting Christians" because he's a "nonbeliever" (whether he's a nonbeliever or not.)

On yet another hand, it's a rallying cry for any of us who have held onto our faith by bloody tendons, only to feel the agony when it finally snaps and breaks on the rack that contemporary, virulently politicized Christianity has become.

Like Rice, our belief in the purity of Christ's teachings has chained us to a body of believers who no longer represent anything of what we believe, and indeed represent the very opposite of what Christ's teachings are. There seems precious little Christ in Christianity as it's understood in America today.

Long accustomed to making excuses, to ourselves and to others, for the actions of our nominal co-religionists, we come to realize that there is no possibility of identifying ourselves as Christians any longer, not because of what we've become, but because of what Christianity itself has become. When the word "Christian" has been so thoroughly co-opted that it means something entirely different than what we believed it meant, from how we had always self-identified, it becomes a moral, ethical, and yes, spiritual, choice whether to continue to cling to "Christian" as a title, or leave it.

At the risk of speaking for her -- and without knowing someone else's heart, one shouldn't -- it seems reasonable to say that, in leaving Christianity and rejecting its contemporary manifestation as codified ignorance, bigotry, and intolerance, Rice has paradoxically moved herself closer to the essence of Christ's teachings than perhaps at any other time in her life.

As she has said, she rejects Christianity in Christ's name, and will follow Christ instead. In the words of John 13:35, "By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another."

The title "Christian," in short, is meaningless in and of itself, especially without love.

Whatever backlash Anne Rice might eventually receive from her Christian readers, or from the Evangelical establishment itself, the undeniable fact is that the decision of this sensitive, passionate, and devout woman to leave Christianity is one that Christ himself would likely understand, even applaud, even as He would likely weep at the holocaust of hatred, bigotry, and collateral carnage that has devolved from the grimy, shopworn religion to which His glorious name has been affixed.

2010-07-30-25415_rice_anne1.jpg

View image

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 388
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
01:02 AM on 08/06/2010
Beautiful! Thank YOU!
01:28 PM on 08/03/2010
"[T]he decision of this sensitive, passionate, and devout woman to leave Christianity is one that Christ himself would likely understand, even applaud, even as He would likely weep at the holocaust of hatred, bigotry, and collateral carnage that has devolved from the grimy, shopworn religion to which His glorious name has been affixed."

Do you realize that this Jesus Christ character is the son of the character God, who absolutely condemns homosexuals in the book Leviticus? There can be no question that the God character despises gays as much as Fred Phelps does.

It is futile to try to rewrite the Christian religion, replacing "God" and "Jesus" with "who I WISH these characters were." Admittedly, it's all fiction, so you are committing no crime against any objective truth when you do this.

But the most passionate religionists are those who actually believe these characters were and are REAL. And when they look at the book that supposedly tells us what these characters want us to believe, that book is extremely clear about certain matters, such as the "abomination" of gay behavior and the low status of anyone outside the religion.

Trying to combat the clear words of Christianity's chief reference book with your WISHES is a fool's errand. You will only succeed in getting eager nods from people such as yourself -- people who have a value system NOT based in Bronze Age myths, but who inexplicably wish to attach it to Bronze Age myths.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Michael Rowe
Author and Journalist
01:35 PM on 08/03/2010
Very passionate, TravisB, but Jesus wasn't the author of Leviticus, nor is he quoted in Leviticus, nor did he ever say word one about homosexuals in any of the Gospels.
01:46 PM on 08/03/2010
So you worship Jesus but reject God?

Rather than cherrypicking what you like in the Bible -- as well as flat-out making up the opinions of Jesus where his opinions are absent in the Bible -- why not just admit that you have a decent value system that is pretty much incompatible with the Holy Bible?

You don't hate gay people. God does. You don't believe that every non-believer is doomed. God does. You wouldn't order people to slay, enslave and rape your enemies. God did.

Why attach your moral philosophy to this guy?
photo
Michael W Camp
Author of Confessions of a Bible Thumper
03:38 PM on 08/04/2010
TravisB,
The low status to anyone outside your religion? Why don't you pay attention to what Jesus actually said: love your enemies, all of the law is summed up in love, do to others (everyone--not picking and choosing gays and straights) as you would have them do to you. Moreover, learn what "abomination" means to the Jewish culture of antiquity concerned with purity codes and pure lineage. If homosexuality is an "abomination" the way you imply it is, then be consistent and call anyone eating pork, planting two types of seed in the same field, sewing 2 types of cloth in the same garment, or having heterosexual sex during a woman's period an "abomination."
11:42 AM on 08/03/2010
I sympathize with Ms Rice's stance. I took the same road many years ago. A love of God made me want to share with others, but I found I had to get away from those toxic people (i.e., "Christians") or lose whatever faith that remained to me.

Thank you, Michael, for this article. You spoke for the pain of many sincere seekers who are unwilling to condone evil or compromise their honesty. I hope these thoughts find the wide audience they deserve.
11:36 AM on 08/03/2010
Wonderful article Michael! Thank you, as always, for such a great literary presentation with a teleological view of genuine faith. Hugs~
11:49 PM on 08/02/2010
"christians" ruined christianity... as much as I'd love to have a beer and a good conversation with Jesus, the people who cheerlead him kind of make me sick...
11:41 PM on 08/02/2010
Met Anne at a booksigning for "Servant of the Bones" in '96. That thing they say about "never meeting your idols" is WAY too true...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RobZantay
05:17 PM on 08/02/2010
I understand what ann is trying to say. You cannot judge Christianity by what people do in its' name. all men are flawed sinners, to judge the body of christ (the real definition of the biblical church or the callled out) We christians need to remember that all sin is the same to God, so to pick out one group to harrass is not what we are supposed to do. God would have all men (or women) to be saved. You can't leave out liars or thieves or anyone. remember sincerity is not proof of truth, many very sincere people have been wrongly taught and pass on those wrong teachings with all their hearts. The only truth is the Word of God, and if some part of that Word doesn't fit with your denomination, your denomination is wrong, not the Word.
04:57 PM on 08/02/2010
The sins of the church ridicules the discipline of discipleship that the church offers. Having strayed unto paths strange to the apostles, the church finds itself fighting political battles and losing them.
Christians have no business trying to enact laws that will make their religious laws the law of the land; rather they should be evangelizing and winning souls whose lives will not conform to the dictates of man, man made constitutions and laws but to the laws of God. One God given right that these political "Christians" seek to deny people is the right to be a sinner so long as it is not harmful to you like stealing. Every sinner has a right to be a fornicator, a liar, a homosexual, to commit abortion, etc. It is a God-given right that no one is authorized to take away. Who wants to be in the fore front for fornication/adultery to be made a crime punishable by imprisonment and/or fine?

The bible defines sin. You don't have to agree with the bible and that is freedom, but you cannot impose your definition of sin on the church. A person suffering from kleptomania steals things and nobody has come to say it is not stealing, although it is a genetic problem. People are born blind and no one has come out to claim it is normal, we still seek to turn it around if we can.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ronoliver
02:33 PM on 08/02/2010
Wow. All these comments!! Remarkable to think that in 2010 we, as a relatively advanced culture, are still arguing that "My Imaginary Friend can beat up Your Imaginary Friend"!

I'm moving past Darwin-ism and into Barnum-ism.
photo
BN2112
My micro-bio does not meet standards
07:43 PM on 08/02/2010
Astounding isn't it! Like the late, great George Carlin said, "my god's got a bigger d___ than your god".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:01 PM on 08/02/2010
The Abrahamic patriarchal religions are strikingly similar to a big dysfunctional family , all of whom claim the inheritance of their father , salvation, and are more than willing to kill each other , and anyone else who happens to intrude, over it . They are psychologically spiritually and physically unbalanced, because they all to some degree exclude, women from their versions of divinity , or find some way to oppress women. They in reality and with their actions ; hold more closely to their own power, wealth and influence than to their spiritual teachings.
I fond my spiritual fulfillment on a more numinous, peaceful Buddhist path ..which includes the divine Feminine. I wish Anne well on her journey ..
09:06 AM on 08/02/2010
That fact is that Jesus taught compassion, love, and charity. I agree totally with Ms. Rice. The Church has completely lost track of what Jesus taught. They have made Paul's teachings more important than Jesus'. Do you Christians realize that Jesus never spoke of Homosexuality. He spoke about adultery and over half of the Church have had divorces because of adultery. I must reiterate the words of Jesus. "Oh ye generation of vipers."

I love God and Jesus with all of my mind, body and soul. That means that I follow what he says to the best of my ability. That being the case means that I will not judge homosexuals as Jesus did not judge the woman caught in adultery. You should not either. Again he never taught anything about it!
01:38 PM on 08/03/2010
Why do you side with your imagined version of Jesus versus the Bible's version of God? Jesus was silent on homosexuality. But his dad was not. God condemns homosexuality as an "abomination" and says homosexual behavior should be punished by death. If you love God, why do you contradict him?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Michael Rowe
Author and Journalist
02:04 PM on 08/03/2010
The Bible is a deeply flawed attempt to understand the Divine. God didn't "speak" in Leviticus and I'm always amazed when otherwise intelligent people act like the authors of the Bible were taking dictation from God, or that God wrote it.
03:50 AM on 08/02/2010
Does she think that our present day quarrels are more heated and contentious than those between Paul and Peter, Athanasius and Arius? Were the Church Councils simply tea parties? Controversy, debate and politics have always been a part of the Church....part of humanity. This is how progress happens, how change occurs, how tradition is established. This is how things like our understanding of the nature of Jesus, the concept of the Trinity, the establishment of Easter, all came to be accepted. Division, Argument, Discussion, Consensus. The division wasn't the goal. It was the means to Truth.

Conflict must be difficult for her. I am pretty sure that Christianity didn't ask Anne to leave. She choose to identify herself with those that are more like herself. She wanted to surround herself with people who agreed with her. So who is the intolerant one? Who is the "Anti" one? "If it is too hot get out of the kitchen." That is what she did.

I am pretty sure that when she returned to the Church a decade ago, she joined it. It didn't join her. Did she really expect the Church to change because ANNE RICE now believes? "Okay, Anne what do you think? Wow, how insightful! I wish we would have thought about that. We totally agree with you now. Thank you for enlightening us!" I wouldn't be surprised if Anne becomes a leader of some spiritual "Jesus is just all right with me" organization in the future.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Michael Rowe
Author and Journalist
03:58 AM on 08/02/2010
Did it happen to occur to you how idiotic is sounds to propose that Anne Rice "expected the Church to change because ANNE RICE now believes" when, in fact, no such suggestion was made by her, much less made in this article? Not sure what you're reviewing in your mind, dude, but it's sure not Anne Rice's personal decision to leave Christianity, or this story. You're obviously entitled to your religious views, and if you expect to be respected for them, it might be smart for you to respect those of others as well.
04:14 AM on 08/02/2010
I did read this and her entire statement. I would have to disagree with you. I think it is idiotic that she expected anything different than what she got when she joined the Church 10 years ago. The Catholic Church is the same as it was when she was little. Is she surprised that now they are as she put it anti-gay, anti-this, anti-that? What did she expect? Did she not know anything about the Church then? So now 10 years later she has buyer's remorse and castes ALL of Christianity in the exact same light. She wrote "quarrelsome, hostile, disputatious, and deservedly infamous group." So I am responding directly to her statement. So did the Church just now become these things? Of course not! Whether they are or not is not what I am discussing. She knew this when she wrote the book and took the PR campaign. Probably another book is at the publishers now. I respect people with conviction who truly believe what they say. I don't know that I believe Anne. What will it be in 10 years when she is irrelevant again?
photo
ez duz it
οὐκ ἔστιν θεός
02:26 PM on 08/02/2010
Hi, Michael_Rowe-

I LOVED your article. It is clear, reasonable and empathetic.

I am a Gay man and you articulated my experience in Roman Catholicism and fundamental Christianity so beautifully. If you are Gay, your ability to speak to the pain LGBT people have felt over the centuries is impressive; if you are not, your ability to speak from our perspective is all the more remarkable.

Your statement, "it is possible to murder faith. You murder faith same way you murder love: one bruise at a time, with small, daily cuts, with grinding contempt, with neglect" is one that will stay with me for quite some time.

Thank you for your article. "Fanned and faved."

--ez
03:46 AM on 08/02/2010
What a very small view of Christianity! I would have expected that one as worldly sophisticated as Anne Rice would be able to transcend the tiny contemporary, political American flavor of Christ followers and see the Church as global, enduring, and necessary. It is a shame that she has problem with being anti-gay, anti-feminist, anti-democrat, anti-secular humanism, but no problem being anti-Christian. Her reasons are wildly inconsistent and intellectually dishonest. She wrote “It’s simply impossible for me to “belong” to this quarrelsome, hostile, disputatious, and deservedly infamous group.” Does that mean that gays, feminists, pro birth control groups, democrats, secular humanists, scientists, lifers (whatever that means) are less quarrelsome, hostile, disputatious, and deservedly infamous? Not that the groups that she delineated are mutually exclusive with Christianity. She offers a false choice in her comment. Another error in her comment is that there is no Christ without his Church. Being committed to Christ involves being committed to his Church. Christ is coming back for his Church, his bride. Salvation is not attained in a vacuum. She has disowned not only the contemporary manifestation of Roman Catholicism/Protestantism, but she also rejected the lives of those those that have written the scriptures, that have passed down THE STORY, that have died proclaiming THE STORY. Her comment comes across as an arrogant person who does not need the nourishing and guidance of the Church. She has preferred her own ideology to the transformation found in Christ’s body.
09:20 PM on 08/02/2010
thirsty, nicely put and fanned!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SteveCampsOut
And the Nerds Shall Inherit the Earth...
12:15 AM on 08/11/2010
What you fail to take into account is the fact that not "everyone who calls Jesus Lord" has his word in their hearts. It's usually the loudest and most vocal who get the most attention and the current crop of people "Claiming" Christianity as theirs while spewing hate, intolerance and unforgiveness are no more Christians than Mickey Mouse is the Budda! It is this loud and vocal Harlot mentioned in Revelations that Ms. Rice is rejecting. Not Christ.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trittydi
Special on pap smears at Walgreen's this week ....
12:58 AM on 08/02/2010
This is very important ... a highly considered public figure discussing the reasons they cannot support a corrupt religious establishment.

Paul Krugman's blog is titled "The Conscience of a Liberal" ... Clearly Ms. Rice considers herself "The Conscience of a Christian"

I once belonged to the Catholic Church but it has been over 30 years since I decided I could not support them in good conscience.

And I'll NEVER regret not giving them my daughters to belittle and diminish.
*
03:47 AM on 08/02/2010
I am sorry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trittydi
Special on pap smears at Walgreen's this week ....
01:01 AM on 08/03/2010
That the CC will never have a chance to demean and belittle my girls? To make them feel inferior and make them "submissive" when they are equals?

That their priests won't have a chance to rape my son - like they did my brother?

No - we make sure our children know all there is to know about the Catholic Church.
*