More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Rowe

GET UPDATES FROM Michael Rowe
 

Why Is CBS in Bed With the Religious Right on Super Bowl Sunday?

Posted: 01/30/10 12:50 AM ET

Last week I wrote about CBS's decision to air an anti-abortion commercial from the evangelical political organization Focus on the Family during this year's Super Bowl broadcast on February 7th.

The commercial will reportedly feature Florida Gators quarterback Tim Tebow's mother, Pam, talking about how her "personal faith" convinced her to carry her son to term, against medical advice to terminate the pregnancy, while she and her husband were missionaries in the Philippines.

By accepting it, CBS inexplicably reversed its long-held and inflexible policy banning "advocacy" commercials on the network, particularly during sporting events.

In 2004, CBS famously rejected a commercial from the United Church of Christ, citing a solid policy against running any advertising that

"touches on and/or takes a position on one side of a current controversial issue."

The UCC commercial's message was "inclusiveness," and featured a gay couple attempting to enter a house of worship but being turned away by a bouncer. The "controversial" tagline of the ad was "Jesus Didn't Turn People Away. Neither Do We," a sentiment supported by every Gospel of the New Testament.

The tagline of the Focus on the Family ad is reportedly "Celebrate Family, Celebrate Life," a perky, wholesome slogan that neatly doubles as coded rallying cry for the rabid, occasionally violent anti-choice movement.

The response from the United Church of Christ was swift and to the point. On their website, they addressed the situation by noting that

"[w]hile CBS is reportedly saying that a bad economy now necessitates changes in its policy on so-called advocacy ads, this decision only underscores the arbitrary way the networks approach these decisions and the result is a woeful lack of religious diversity in our nation's media," says the Rev. J. Bennett Guess, the UCC's director of communications. "Because of its own economic circumstances, CBS is affording time to one religious organization while having suppressed another. This sounds as if the broadcasters think they own the airwaves when, in theory at least, they do not

The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD)'s Senior Director of Media Programs, Rashad Robinson went even further, saying

"CBS's decision to run a Focus on the Family ad during this year's Super Bowl can't and shouldn't be considered in a vacuum. CBS spent years denying a platform to an LGBT-inclusive church that wanted to share a message of inclusion with a national audience. Now, when it happens to be financially inconvenient for CBS to hold to the standard it had previously imposed, the network's expediency benefits a virulently anti-gay organization whose advocacy on these issues is the antithesis of that of the United Church of Christ."

When first challenged on the obvious hypocrisy of accepting one religious organization's commercial while rejecting another, CBS was cooly dismissive, replying that it would not comment on past decisions, an obvious reference to their ban on UCC's inclusiveness commercial.

On Monday, a coalition of women's groups including NOW, the Feminist Majority, and the Women's Media Center, sent a letter of protest to CBS. The letter proposed that

"by offering one of the most coveted advertising spots of the year to an anti-equality, anti-choice, homophobic organization, CBS is aligning itself with a political stance that will damage its reputation, alienate viewers, and discourage consumers from supporting its shows and advertisers."

On Tuesday, CBS spokesman Dana McClintock tepidly offered a statement to the effect that the network had changed its policy towards advocacy advertising.

"We have for some time moderated our approach to advocacy submissions after it became apparent that our stance did not reflect public sentiment or industry norms on the issue."

Given the dire state of the economy, CBS's record-low prices for ad time during the Superbowl, and the indisputable fact that abortion is the most polarizing and divisive hot-button topic in the American popular discourse, it's jejune of CBS to expect anyone to believe that this was some forward-thinking move towards modernity on their part. It clearly comes down to which viewers CBS is prepared to offend and alienate when there's a $2.7 million payoff at stake during a recession.

This will be good news for well-heeled right-wing religious and political groups everywhere.

On Friday, the network rejected a humor-driven commercial from the gay dating site ManCrunch.com, which features two apparently straight men who suddenly begin to make out in the heat of the moment as they celebrate a touchdown on television. The commercial is not pornographic, nor is there nudity. There will be more exposed flesh on the field than there would have been on the screen.

James Hibberd at The Live Feed reports that CBS offered the following explanation in a letter to the ManCrunch.com:

[T]he creative is not within the Network's Broadcast Standards for Super Bowl Sunday.

CBS also released the following statement:

"After reviewing the ad--which is entirely commercial in nature--our Standards and Practices department decided not to accept this particular spot."

According to spokeswoman Elissa Butcher, the commercial cost $100,000 to produce, and the company is

"100% serious. We have the money to pay for it. If the ad showed a man and woman kissing it would have been accepted. You see ads for erectile dysfunction morning, noon and night. It's discriminatory that they wont show this."

In reality, the problem is not with the quality (or not) of the ManCrunch ad. The network's rejection of it merely highlights the obvious: that CBS had already decided where its ethical priorities lay when they accepted the commercial from Focus on the Family last week. Those priorities clearly don't lie with women, or with progressives, or with any group that happens to find itself on Focus on the Family's no-fly list.

The tagline for the Tebow commercial--"Celebrate Family, Celebrate Life"--is particularly ironic, given that Focus on the Family has likely destroyed at least as many families as it's "celebrated" in its relentless pursuit of what amounts to fundamentalist Christian social eugenics at the expense of maintaining existing families through education, acceptance, respect, tolerance, and love.

Furthermore, in late-breaking news, Focus on the Family may have led CBS into even hotter water and courting even more controversy.

Famed attorney Gloria Allred has questioned the veracity of Mrs. Tebow's claim that doctors advised her to terminate her pregnancy, since abortion in the Philippines has been illegal since 1930 and is punishable by a six-year prison term for both the doctor and the mother. Given that, the attorney has grave doubts that doctors would have advised an abortion According to Radar Online, Allred has announced she will file a complaint with the FTC and the FCC if the ad airs "and fails to disclose that abortions were illegal at the time Ms. Tebow made her choice."

It might be time for CBS to stop proposing a specious platform of how up-to-date they've recently become regarding "advocacy ads" and just admit they have a financial stake in courting the Religious Right for advertising dollars. Last year Focus on the Family contributed $727, 250 to help pass Proposition 8 in California at a time when they were making preparations to lay off nearly 20% of their employees, which seems an odd decision for an organization that allegedly "celebrates families."

Either that or admit they're simply afraid of them, afraid of applying the same standards to a powerful, multi-million dollar right-wing religious conglomerate as they've always applied to left-leaning liberal groups, and progressive churches whose message of tolerance and inclusiveness didn't meet their "standards and practices" for primetime. Even if it means running a Super Bowl commercial whose primary purpose is to shame and intimidate women who've made, or might make, the painful decision to terminate a pregnancy, for whatever reason.

In the end, money always talks, no matter how ugly what it says might be.

In CBS's mind, it's clearly more lucrative for them to radically alter their own long-held and strictly-enforced policy, at whatever ethical cost, than to just do the right thing.

2010-01-30-jamesdobsons.jpg

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 707
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
02:03 PM on 02/05/2010
Even more disturbing than the ad itself is the alignment of CBS with Focus on the Family. This is an extreme and dangerous right-wing group that advocates hitting children (Guess their motto could be "don't kill 'em, just beat 'em"). You won't believe some of the things James Dobson has said over the years.

CBS, I will be boycotting your programming. I will also be sending the message to everyone I know that you are in bed with a crazy wing-nut organization.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CBreeze27
Jedi Mind Master
08:51 AM on 02/04/2010
Just because you haven't seen the ad, doesn't mean it hasn't been seen (and why it's being debated now)

Here it is: http://video.ap.org/?f=AP&pid=q4qbByKGV65OVoUvexOgiqzfAZNaXbyt
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
booktone
04:56 PM on 02/03/2010
I think you're giving the suits at CBS too much credit. I think their reptilian brains just said, "God good, gay bad."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamie461
10:28 PM on 02/08/2010
I think you are giving the guys at Man Crunch too much credit. Look, I've been in the advertising business a looooong time. The Man Crunch guys have pulled off a truly brilliant marketing scheme. They NEVER had the $3 million to pay for that spot. And the spot itself was very low-budget, and actually not very well done. They sent it to CBS, knowing that they didn't have the credit available to pay for the spot. CBS rejected it for business reasons, and Man Crunch was able to turn that into a TON of free publicity. That free publicity translated into much higher web site traffic. This has all worked out exactly as Man Crunch planned it. They only paid for the cost of producing that cheap spot, and in return they got millions of $$$ worth of publicity without ever having to pay for it.

Look below the surface, folks. Things are not always QUITE what they seem.
04:18 PM on 02/03/2010
How about if people contact CBS and let them know that you won't watch any of their multi-million dollar ads as long as they intend to air this ad, attacking women's rights. Stangely enough, the tenor of the ad seems to be that Mrs.Tebow made her CHOICE, but now wishes to urge that other women not have that CHOICE! Perhaps, they will get it if all of their other company's ads are devalued. I plan on contacting CBS and also plan on trying to convince the other 25 people at the Super Bowl Party to do the same.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CBreeze27
Jedi Mind Master
07:39 AM on 02/04/2010
I've been saying...boycotting the superbowl isn't going to happen. It's too much of a big day. However, boycotting CBS during SWEEPS WEEK will hit them in the pocketbook because sweeps rating determines how much they can charge for ads going forward! Boycott CBS during SWEEPS when it comes up!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabaretchatnoir
Student
04:31 AM on 02/08/2010
Just posted on my facebook.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guitanguran
02:12 PM on 02/03/2010
How about the 2.5 mil from the taxpayer to advertise the census?
04:06 PM on 02/03/2010
How about if people contact CBS and let them know that you won't watch any of their multi-million dollar ads as long as they intend to air this ad, attacking women's rights. Stangely enough, the tenor of the ad seems to be that Mrs.Tebow made her CHOICE, but now wishes to urge that other women not have that CHOICE! Perhaps, they will get it if all of their other company's ads are devalued. I plan on contacting CBS and also plan on trying to convince the other 25 people at the Super Bowl Party to do the same.
05:47 PM on 02/02/2010
AGAIN
CBS and Focus on the Family should donate the ad money to Haiti?
09:06 PM on 02/02/2010
How about Planned Parenthood?
05:46 PM on 02/02/2010
Mancrunch verses the Fokus on family-
CBS is another media hog-only in it for the $$$$$$
If it works for them`-its all good
03:18 PM on 02/02/2010
I think a question raised by CBS's decision is if our airwaves are indeed free. Do the broadcasters in fact own the airwaves and the content the public sees? While newer media, e.g. Youtube and the Internet, do contribute to different views the public sees, a few large corporations are the ones that truly control the widest spread content available. While people can argue about the "right" and the "left" and their views, I think it is important to question CBS's practices and their change of long-enforced ones. Is it truly all about the money? If it is, why was the other ad for a gay dating site not accepted? And for those who are commenting about how Christians do not care about individual's rights, it is important to note that the ad rejected in 2004 was from a Christian organization. I do not think this will make people turn off their television and affect CBS's ratings, but hopefully it will bring forth the issue of who controls the media and their motivations for the content they provide, whether in the form of programming or commercials.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CBreeze27
Jedi Mind Master
08:01 AM on 02/04/2010
First, CBS Collaborated with FOF: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/03/tim-tebow-ad-cbs-focus-on_n_447384.html

Second, as from the story above, the organization United Church of Christ feels slighted also and distriminated against: "[w]hile CBS is reportedly saying that a bad economy now necessitates changes in its policy on so-called advocacy ads, this decision only underscores the arbitrary way the networks approach these decisions and the result is a woeful lack of religious diversity in our nation's media," says the Rev. J. Bennett Guess, the UCC's director of communications. "Because of its own economic circumstances, CBS is affording time to one religious organization while having suppressed another. This sounds as if the broadcasters think they own the airwaves when, in theory at least, they do not"

The bright side for ManCrunch since being rejected for a PAID advertisement from CBS has gone viral on youtube for FREE. It seems CBS gave them more exposure by being closed-minded: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MQWFiIrBLA
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Renee Libby
02:04 PM on 02/02/2010
It's all about the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
photo
Decorina
Hypocrisy means your karma ran over your dogma
12:30 PM on 02/02/2010
FOTF needs to focus on their own d.a.m.n. family and leave mine out of it.
06:05 PM on 02/01/2010
A woman who is proud of her choice NOT to have an abortion?! I mean, it's an outrage. And you say the fetus that she didn't terminate actually went on to do great things in football? Completely inappropriate for the Super Bowl!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
lisakaz2
Da ministero dell'interno di Snark.
07:26 PM on 02/01/2010
It's isn't related to the SB. And it might not entirely be true.
11:51 PM on 02/01/2010
Since when did liberal women give a damn about Superbowl advertisements? The only reason that abortion rights groups are losing their collective minds over this ad is simple, it humanizes abortion and puts a face (Tim Tebow) on what would have been an aborted fetus. This ad is as effective as the ad that highlighted President Obama's single Mother's decision, not to abort him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Renee Libby
02:19 PM on 02/02/2010
So only liberal women are pro choice? Interesting.
05:46 PM on 02/01/2010
If you oppose this ad, then wait until it airs...leave the room...go to your computer and send money to your favorite pro-choice group. It would be wonderful if Focus on the Family paid millions for an ad that generated money for deserving women's groups. Money which, let's face it, they likely wouldn't have gotten otherwise.
05:46 PM on 02/01/2010
Regardless of what CBS decides is their position in defending their choice to introduce politically charged, divisive ads during the Super Bowl, the NFL should seriously consider refusing to give the network contract to any network that runs controversial political ads during the Super Bowl.

Why? Because all week all the political controversy is dominating all media coverage of the NFL's biggest most profitable game. Due to this, the NFL has lost control of the marketing focus of it's most important 2 weeks of hype, sales, sponsorships, & merchandising of the year. And people are saying they'll boycott CBS/The Game over it. Who knows if people really will skip the game over it, but the NFL doesn't need that headache. CBS's decision is negatively affecting the NFL's business.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guitanguran
07:31 PM on 02/01/2010
"Who knows if people really will skip the game over it..."
02:17 PM on 02/05/2010
Yes! People WILL skip the game over it.
05:11 PM on 02/01/2010
GOOD MORNING!!! MY FELLOW HOMO SAPIENS WHICH MEANS THE SPECIES WHO IS WISE.
Has anyone in Americaland noticed how those Robber Baron Stooges like to brag publicly about being Christian???!!!
Looking at these Christian Robber Baron Stooges voting records in the U.S. Congress is a real eye opener since these Christians always vote to fund insane wars and weapons that slaughter and maim a million human beings, they also vote to support war criminals like Bush who also claims to worship the Christian god that Bush said was his guide and we all know that Bush was responsible for the slaughter and maiming of a million Iraqis and who also committed war crimes.
These Christians have also opposed and voted against health care for all the America people for generations even though today 123 Americans die every day from lack of health care and the only conclusion one can come to is that these Christians worship the god of the dark side, the god of war, hate, fear, death, deceit, destruction, greed and may that god be cast into a flaming pit and his disciples spend eternity gnawing on teddy bears!!!
11:58 PM on 02/01/2010
Tell that to all of the faith based groups that are caring for the people in Haiti. If it was not for the kindness and compassion of Christian charitable organizations the have nots would have a lot less. Unfortunately, atheists such as you, generally do nothing more than ridicule the faitful and spend your lives hating.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Renee Libby
02:24 PM on 02/02/2010
I commend all the faith based groups doing good works in Haiti. However, there are many atheists who also contribute to charity - and without the carrot of eternal reward. I admire them as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CBreeze27
Jedi Mind Master
08:47 AM on 02/04/2010
You think only faith-based organizations are capable of charity and compassion? How sad and closed-minded of you. You accuse athiests of hating, yet your comment is filled with distain and contempt. The difference is, the so-called religious feel the need to pronounce every good deed they do saying look how wonderful I am! While the athiests quietly do deeds without the need to tell the whole world. We do it because it ir right, it is just, it is compassionate, not because a God or religion tells us we have to. It's funny, the most religious people I know are the ones preaching to others how they NEED to live their lives, they criticize them and look down on them. Most are racists (not all), most are hypocrites (not all), and they don't practice what they preach. Be careful of whom you accuse of ridiculing and hating...the finger might come back at your own group.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haval2
what to say?
05:05 PM on 02/01/2010
The religious right is nauseating and should have no place in sports. Why should something fun like the super bowl have to have political overtones. they are oppressive people always forcing their will and ways on people, many of whom don't want to be like them in the least.
12:35 PM on 02/02/2010
Why should kids have to watch men make out on TV when they try to watch the Superbowl?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Domenica Iacovone
10:19 PM on 02/02/2010
The same reason Miller light has bikini clad women wrestling in the mud?
02:08 PM on 02/05/2010
Agreed!!!!!!!!