More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Shandrick

Michael Shandrick

Posted: October 27, 2009 01:09 PM

Save My Job, Save My City

What's Your Reaction?

At the intersection of Platte and Nevada stands the statue of General William J. Palmer, the town's founder. Palmer sits on his horse two blocks away from the Colorado Springs city hall. Last Thursday evening the main room was crowded and the corridors and meeting room were filled to the brim with some 500 people who are concerned about saving their jobs and the city Palmer founded.

The City Council will now decide who will stay and who won't, including the police and fire employees, who comprise two-thirds of the city's budget in the general fund, some 1,200 personnel. Another 600 civic employees could be impacted by job losses by Thanksgiving Day as the city tries to trim salaries in an effort to fund their operations for 2010.

At the meeting were city engineers, code enforcement people, sitting next to police and fire fighters, bus drivers, educators, park workers, maintenance people, historians, educators and civic volunteers. Everyone is expected to take a big hit as the bean counters sharpen their pencils.

Obvious by their absence at the meeting was the business community. Perhaps these people were scared away by all the talk of a "tea party" spurred on by the local newspaper and the talk radio station. In any event, no business person came before the dais to say anything in support of the local city government.

"They chose to remain on the sidelines," said council member Jan Martin, author of 2C, a ballot measure that would stem some of the job losses by raising a mill levy on property taxes.

What bothers Martin is that she is unable to get the message out to a larger base that 2C is a well thought out measure begun two years ago. But she faces severe opposition by a well financed anti-2C campaign. Interestingly, her opponents are supported by the two major news outlets, KVOR, a talk radio show that features Limbaugh, Hannity and Beck, and the ultra-conservative Gazette Telegraph, which lately has been targeting public employees as the chief culprits in the crisis.

"What bothers me is how do we get a voice when the media is focused on right-wing principles."

She is referring to a Gazette Telegraph front-page bold headline that demonized the profligate workers for the city. The paper then published an article penned by break-away councilman Tom Gallagher who delivered a manifesto on fiscal cleansing just days before the hearing.

"If people want to hear both sides of the 2C issue, where do they go?" Martin asked.

Yet, for all the local coverage there is no discovery of malfeasance or corruption in the Colorado Springs city government. In fact, the city had commissioned a year-long non-partisan peer audit among 24 top economic specialists. They delivered a report that said the city was relying on an unsustainable strategy of trying to link a balanced budget to sales tax revenues during a recession. This was something no other city has done by design. The worst that can be said about the city council's operations was that it had not factored in any wriggle room in which it could finance itself in hard times.

Chuck Murphy, a general contractor and developer in town the past 50 years sees the current fiscal crisis as a problem rooted in the fact that many citizens are from someplace else. These new people have theirs and they don't want to share it. Nor are they interested in the city's past or its accomplishments. All they want is low taxes.

"That we are in this situation is a sad commentary. A majority of the people who will vote in the next election won't understand how we got in this mess or how dire the circumstances are. They'll just want to fix the situation by getting rid of the current council."

Murphy, a supporter of 2C and Martin, whom he describes as a "fearless woman", points out that there is a non-partisan way to work through the crisis, but not at the expense of losing the connection to the past.

"When General Palmer founded this city the first thing he did was buy 10,000 trees to plant in order to create a beautiful garden-like place where hard-working people could appreciate the natural splendor of the region. That speaks volumes about this city."

 

Follow Michael Shandrick on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TTigerX2

At the intersection of Platte and Nevada stands the statue of General William J. Palmer, the town's founder. Palmer sits on his horse two blocks away from the Colorado Springs city hall. Last Thursday...
At the intersection of Platte and Nevada stands the statue of General William J. Palmer, the town's founder. Palmer sits on his horse two blocks away from the Colorado Springs city hall. Last Thursday...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:49 PM on 11/23/2009
Add on to the pile this fact: the USOC fairly held the City of Colorado Springs hostage in its demands to fork over $53 million or else. The USOC, which pays the insurmountable sum of $1 per year for the lease of its Olympic Training Center, threatened to move if the city didn't meet its demands. The deal was approved just as we were heading into a national recession. If anyone wanted to take a closer look at our city budget shortfall, look no further than the USOC deal... a shady one at that. The justification was that the USOC generates about $4 million in revenue per year... a laughable notion as the USOC hosts zero events in the city. Mind you, this was pointed out to those who jumped on the band wagon to meet the USOC's demands. They were warned that such an expenditure would cost city employees their jobs and would be harmful to the city's essential services. Now here we are with the first round of layoffs looming and budget cuts planned for ALL essential services. So it shall be because city residents refused to approve a massive tax hike which would have doubled property taxes at a time when residents are strapped as it is. But rest assured that the USOC will have a new headquarters wherein to hold its board meetings and "millionaire athletes" will be afforded new digs on the USOC campus. As long as they're happy!
03:52 AM on 11/30/2009
Actually the USOC does bring in $4 million in tax revenue every year, whether or not that fact supports your ideology. To say otherwise is just plain dishonest, and shows that you haven't actually sourced your info. Regardless of that, the USOC deal is being paid for by city issued bonds... Let me repeat: BONDS. Not one dollar is coming out of city tax revenues. Had the USOC deal never been put together, it would have zero impact on our current fiscal crisis. As such, it still has had NO impact on the current crisis. City Council did not sacrifice city jobs for the USOC deal.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:43 AM on 01/11/2010
And where exactly is that $4 million coming from? You're full of it. Now let's say for argument's sake that this were "true" ... do you trade $4 million in percieved revenue gain for $53 million in output? Not unless somebody somewhere is cashing in on the deal and it isn't the taxpayers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:26 AM on 01/11/2010
Truly. I'd like to know: how do we arrive at the touted $4 million revenue from the USOC? Please explain as I'd so love to hear it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:23 PM on 11/23/2009
One last thing... I'm all for paying higher taxes when our elected officials utilize revenue to make improvements in city services. However, since the reign of Mayor Lionel Rivera, Colorado Springs has seen its public services shrink, even in better times, in spite of previous voter-approved tax hikes. It just so happens that Colorado Springs residents are fed up with Rivera and the City Council who continously mismanage city resources no matter how many times we elect to give them more room to maneuver. Blaming our problems on reduced sales tax revenue accounts for only a part of the problem. The rest lies with those who misuse public funds for private gain. Our latest vote to plug the money pit was a public indictment of our elected officials, not an act of selfishness. Perhaps in the next election, residents will remember how they've been treated by the Republican regime currently at the helm of our city government.
04:23 AM on 11/30/2009
You may profess to being all for paying higher taxes, but it's unfortunately obvious you haven't done the one thing necessary to make sound policy decisions. You haven't actually taken the time to educate yourself on the Colorado Springs budget mechanisms. I don't blame you. Becoming an expert in Colorado Springs fiscal policy first requires studying TABOR for a month or more. At least 3-4 hours a day. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the Tax Policy Center, the W.P Carey Business school through the Arizona Board of Regents as well as Fred Crowley, Iris J. Lav, Therese McGuire and Kim Rueben have all written extensively on the subject. The reading is rather dry, but very pertinent.

I'm sorry, I'm not really such a snarky bitch, but I've been studying TABOR and the Colorado Springs fiscal crisis (for 3-4 hours a day for the last 2 and a half months) and find myself frustrated with the lack of understanding by much of the public. TABOR is a direct democracy fiscal policy: ultimately this means that when the budget goes haywire, it is the VOTERS fault. It really is. :( I'm a voter in Colorado Springs, and it sucks to be implicated in such a trainwreck, but there it is... We the voters can't blame our elected officials, when we've stripped them of the lion's share of economic decision making power.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:48 AM on 01/11/2010
Yes, I'm fully aware of Tabor... however, citizens have voted in the past to increase taxes only to find those revenues being mispent. I do and will continue to blame our elected officlials for mismanging our resources... no matter what idiotic budget mechanisms they employ.

The Golden Goose is no longer capable of laying golden eggs. Get it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:16 AM on 01/11/2010
I haven't done one thing necessary to make sound policy decisions? Nobody asked and I never thought I'd be allowed anywhere near the decision-making process. Let me at it. Hand over that budget and I'd be happy to oblige.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Michael Shandrick
01:16 PM on 10/28/2009
The recent fiscal crisis in Colorado Springs is really not about taxes. This is a mythology dug up by the same flat-earthers who believe that all government is bad.

The issue is about finding new ways of financing services in an economy that will be with us another 20 years or more. It is also about creating a value for those services people are willing to pay. The founders of the city knew this. We should learn by their example.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:12 AM on 01/11/2010
You assume that people are "unwilling" to pay. The majority are unable to pay when they can barely afford their rent. How is this so difficult to fathom? As for flat-earthers... well... you assume you're speaking to tea party patriots when in fact you're hearing from fed up liberals who by the way are also losing there jobs and the roof over their heads. You can ask them yourself... just check out the tent city blooming along Fountain Creek.
05:23 AM on 10/28/2009
If you can explain how increasing taxes will help lower unemployment in the Springs, I would be most interested to hear why. However, it sounds like your just lashing out a citizenry that doesn't want a tax increase because it affects your job, which is understandable, but you're not going to convince many people that way.
09:59 AM on 10/28/2009
The taxes or mil levy increase in 2C would bring the city only up to the point of sustaining the budget, not increasing any more spending. We are not talking about increasing the police force, which is already understaffed for a city of this size. We are not talking about increasing the already cut fire department, or adding bus routes for the beleaguered transit system. This increase would still make Colorado Springs the cheapest city, in terms of property tax rates, in the state. Pueblo does better and has managed to protect parks, history and art in the city. What was mentioned in the city council meeting was that city workers have gone without raises for many years. There have already been layoffs in city services and what is left of the staff has had to work twice as hard to provide any city service to cover for the layoffs. General Palmer, Spencer Penrose and many other wealthy people in Colorado Springs' past actually donated money to the city! What we are losing in Colorado Springs is not only jobs, but our past, our parks, our history and our community.
11:02 AM on 10/28/2009
First off, holding up Pueblo as a model that we should strive to emulate is just funny. I'll take the Springs. (Higher unemployment, more poverty, etc.)

Second, public transportation in the Springs is beleaguered because the population is too dispersed to effectively cover it all using the bus system.

"What was mentioned in the city council meeting was that city workers have gone without raises for many years. "

You mean they are living like the rest of us?

"General Palmer, Spencer Penrose and many other wealthy people in Colorado Springs' past actually donated money to the city! "

If people want to donate money to the city or local charities & organizations, more power to them. However, their donations were voluntary; tax increases would be voluntary for the 50 + X% of the population that votes for them, and involuntary for the rest. in addition, I highly doubt that the city will place an initiative on the ballot for a tax decrease; taxes are normally incrementally ratcheted and rarely ratcheted down.